O'Donnell Added to CREW's Most Crooked Politician List

[Synthaholic]

Christine O'Donnell Counters Accusers

too bad synthy didn't read this before he made himself look like a bigger ******* idiot than he has usually done here

Are you referring to a specific post of mine, or just drooling again?

 

[Synthaholic]

Can you show me where a job is a requirement to run for elected office?

Whatever happened to 'Executive Experience'?

last election said it didnt matter

So now Righties believe that?

 

[DiveCon]

Whatever happened to 'Executive Experience'?

last election said it didnt matter

So now Righties believe that?

if it didnt matter to you in the last election, why does it bother you NOW?
and besides
this ISNT an executive position shes running for
so that is yet another FAIL you own

 

[Claudette]

Well O'Donnell seems to be a righty, righty and Coombs seems to be a lefty, lefty.

Will be interesting to see which one the Del voters will go for.

I can hardly wait. LOL

 

[Avorysuds]

I love how wrapped up in Republican Primaries all you Left wing assholes are. Clearly the Tea Party and the anti Democrat Mood has you people scared shitless

I'm not left wing and I support some of the tea party candidates, like Rand Paul and Marco Rubio.

I can wrap my brain around Marco, but not Rand Paul. What do you like about him, if you don't mind?

I am pointing out that Delaware Republicans nominated an ethically challenged Senate candidate all based on pure ideology and the conservatives here are defending it, while at the same time assailing the people of New York City for reelecting Charlie Rangel in his primary. It's hypocrisy.

You are right, it is hypocrisy. But I'm also concerned that Rangel is being convicted before his trial has even started. I admit that it looks like some laws were broken, along with some House rules. But when you think about it, it's pretty penny-ante crap: rent control apartments and vacation rentals. Not exactly Cunningham/Abramoff territory. I see these as slip-ups, and not necessarily of his doing. We'll see.

I think that if you have been as powerful as Rangel, in the Washington environment since 1970, and this is all they got, it speaks well of his honesty.

You realize that Marco is on that uber factual CREW list right? All you have to do is click on the blue link and read... or you can scroll down. http://www.citizensforethics.org/crookedcandidates2010

 

[Zander]

Well O'Donnell seems to be a righty, righty and Coombs seems to be a lefty, lefty.

Will be interesting to see which one the Del voters will go for.

I can hardly wait. LOL

Don't forget Coons is a PUPPY KILLER!!!

 

[Synthaholic]

last election said it didnt matter

So now Righties believe that?

if it didnt matter to you in the last election, why does it bother you NOW?
and besides
this ISNT an executive position shes running for
so that is yet another FAIL you own

I was hoping you would show some honesty. Oh well.

 

[Claudette]

Well O'Donnell seems to be a righty, righty and Coombs seems to be a lefty, lefty.

Will be interesting to see which one the Del voters will go for.

I can hardly wait. LOL

Don't forget Coons is a PUPPY KILLER!!!

He's also a self avowed Marxist.

Wonder ow the Del voters will like him??? LOL

 

[DiveCon]

So now Righties believe that?

if it didnt matter to you in the last election, why does it bother you NOW?
and besides
this ISNT an executive position shes running for
so that is yet another FAIL you own

I was hoping you would show some honesty. Oh well.

it would be nice to see honesty from YOU

how the **** is what i said dishonest?
the senate isnt an executive position
so it wouldnt be the case for THIS election
now, if she were running for POTUS with her experience, you would have a point

 

[Kat]

if it didnt matter to you in the last election, why does it bother you NOW?
and besides
this ISNT an executive position shes running for
so that is yet another FAIL you own

I was hoping you would show some honesty. Oh well.

it would be nice to see honesty from YOU

how the **** is what i said dishonest?
the senate isnt an executive position
so it wouldnt be the case for THIS election
now, if she were running for POTUS with her experience, you would have a point

Dive, don't be concerned. You are one of the most honest people I know. Many times, whether I liked it or not, you told me the truth.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Bringing in congressional n00bs just means you'll have a bunch of clowns who don't have enough experience to navigate the lobbyist-infest waters of Capitol Hill. It will be interesting to see how many of the TP-approved candidates--if they get into office first--will actually walk the walk of fiscal conservatism.

Funny how now there's a bunch of people hoping that Washington will change, the same people who go on about how Democrats are gullible for hoping that Obama could change Washington.

Lets see, obama had no experiance and said that he would not hire lobbyists. Newsflash, he lied. You left wing idiots are just scared of her like you are Palin. IDIOTS

 

[Charles_Main]

I was hoping you would show some honesty. Oh well.

it would be nice to see honesty from YOU

how the **** is what i said dishonest?
the senate isnt an executive position
so it wouldnt be the case for THIS election
now, if she were running for POTUS with her experience, you would have a point

Dive, don't be concerned. You are one of the most honest people I know. Many times, whether I liked it or not, you told me the truth.

I was going to read and respond to you post. But I got stuck on your avatar and lost all coherent thought.

 

[Modbert]

Lets see, obama had no experiance and said that he would not hire lobbyists. Newsflash, he lied. You left wing idiots are just scared of her like you are Palin. IDIOTS

LOL wut.

 

[AmericanFirst]

That's an ad hominem response. The issues CREW discusses are very real. Noted conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer came out and assailed both Sarah Palin and Jim DeMint for endorsing O'Donnell with all the ethical issues she has and the conservative Weekly Standard brought all of this out in the open as well before the election.

I gotta disagree with you on this one. CREW is a front for George Soros - period. They have one agenda - elect liberals at any cost. They have zero credibility with fair minded people. All of their so called "criminals" are Republicans, Blue Dog Democrats , and a few obvious crooks like James Trafficant . They are as unbiased as the parents of a two year old who just made her first solid poo poo.........

"I gotta disagree with you on this one. CREW is a front for George Soros - period. They have one agenda - elect liberals at any cost."


is that bad?
b'cuz....electing republicans (conservatives)or tea party candidates at ANY cost is what rupert murdoch, roger ailles, glenn beck, rush limbaugh, all conservative hate radio, ann coulter, fox news, pat robertsons media machine, the ACLJ and TBN, michelle malkin and dozens, nay hundreds, of conservative spinmeisters seem to be all about!

"if we don't elect conservatives we are ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!"

if it is BAD when 1 side does it...

why is it good for the other side?

Because the left is wrong for America and is full of socialist pigs, thats why.

 

[Kat]

it would be nice to see honesty from YOU

how the **** is what i said dishonest?
the senate isnt an executive position
so it wouldnt be the case for THIS election
now, if she were running for POTUS with her experience, you would have a point

Dive, don't be concerned. You are one of the most honest people I know. Many times, whether I liked it or not, you told me the truth.

I was going to read and respond to you post. But I got stuck on your avatar and lost all coherent thought.

 

[Synthaholic]

if it didnt matter to you in the last election, why does it bother you NOW?
and besides
this ISNT an executive position shes running for
so that is yet another FAIL you own

I was hoping you would show some honesty. Oh well.

it would be nice to see honesty from YOU

how the **** is what i said dishonest?
the senate isnt an executive position
so it wouldnt be the case for THIS election
now, if she were running for POTUS with her experience, you would have a point

That's not the argument you made, but should have.

Instead, you claimed that Dems made 'Executive Experience' no longer important since the last election. That's a dishonest and lazy answer.

Here's the sequence:

Whatever happened to 'Executive Experience'?

last election said it didnt matter

So now Righties believe that?

 

[Moon]

So now Righties believe that?

if it didnt matter to you in the last election, why does it bother you NOW?
and besides
this ISNT an executive position shes running for
so that is yet another FAIL you own

I was hoping you would show some honesty. Oh well.

What was dishonest about what Dive said? Being a Senator is not considered a chief executive position, and in 2008 a lot of you on the left kept saying that experience didn't matter. Or was that just for Obama?

 

[DiveCon]

if it didnt matter to you in the last election, why does it bother you NOW?
and besides
this ISNT an executive position shes running for
so that is yet another FAIL you own

I was hoping you would show some honesty. Oh well.

What was dishonest about what Dive said? Being a Senator is not considered a chief executive position, and in 2008 a lot of you on the left kept saying that experience didn't matter. Or was that just for Obama?

it seems to me that synth didn't care about executive experience for an executive position, but now wants to say it matters for a NON-executive position

hypocrisy reigns

 

[Rinata]

LOL, CREW..

another Commie-Progressive organization just like Mediamatters. believe them at your own RISK of not hearing the whole truth folks.

who gives a shit what CREW has to say, anyone?

Well then, what is the truth, oh genius one???

 

[Synthaholic]

I was hoping you would show some honesty. Oh well.

What was dishonest about what Dive said? Being a Senator is not considered a chief executive position, and in 2008 a lot of you on the left kept saying that experience didn't matter. Or was that just for Obama?

it seems to me that synth didn't care about executive experience for an executive position, but now wants to say it matters for a NON-executive position

hypocrisy reigns

No - I STILL don't care about executive experience.

Do you?