Obama's job growth were part-time jobs...partially due to Obamacare!

[flack]

That's about right. He failed, thank God, at instituting his socialist agenda. You must not realize how huge that is. Once he lost the House there was no way except through executive order to get his agenda through. My father, a life long major democrat, called him a f++king commie. I need say no more.

At least you are honest about tanking the economy for basically no reason.

Obama is/was not really all that far left, he talked a lot about it to get the far left to vote for him, but he really was just another corporate puppet.

You go right on believing that.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That's about right. He failed, thank God, at instituting his socialist agenda. You must not realize how huge that is. Once he lost the House there was no way except through executive order to get his agenda through. My father, a life long major democrat, called him a f++king commie. I need say no more.

At least you are honest about tanking the economy for basically no reason.

Obama is/was not really all that far left, he talked a lot about it to get the far left to vote for him, but he really was just another corporate puppet.

You go right on believing that.

I believe it because it is what all the evidence points to. I go where the evidence leads me

 

[flack]

That's about right. He failed, thank God, at instituting his socialist agenda. You must not realize how huge that is. Once he lost the House there was no way except through executive order to get his agenda through. My father, a life long major democrat, called him a f++king commie. I need say no more.

At least you are honest about tanking the economy for basically no reason.

Obama is/was not really all that far left, he talked a lot about it to get the far left to vote for him, but he really was just another corporate puppet.

You go right on believing that.

I believe it because it is what all the evidence points to. I go where the evidence leads me

Then you are reading it wrong.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That's about right. He failed, thank God, at instituting his socialist agenda. You must not realize how huge that is. Once he lost the House there was no way except through executive order to get his agenda through. My father, a life long major democrat, called him a f++king commie. I need say no more.

At least you are honest about tanking the economy for basically no reason.

Obama is/was not really all that far left, he talked a lot about it to get the far left to vote for him, but he really was just another corporate puppet.

You go right on believing that.

I believe it because it is what all the evidence points to. I go where the evidence leads me

Then you are reading it wrong.

This from the guy that admits to helping crash the economy based upon whom they thought might win the election!

You are a fun one, that is for sure.

 

[flack]

That's about right. He failed, thank God, at instituting his socialist agenda. You must not realize how huge that is. Once he lost the House there was no way except through executive order to get his agenda through. My father, a life long major democrat, called him a f++king commie. I need say no more.

At least you are honest about tanking the economy for basically no reason.

Obama is/was not really all that far left, he talked a lot about it to get the far left to vote for him, but he really was just another corporate puppet.

You go right on believing that.

I believe it because it is what all the evidence points to. I go where the evidence leads me

Then you are reading it wrong.

This from the guy that admits to helping crash the economy based upon whom they thought might win the election!

You are a fun one, that is for sure.

Look I live in Hampton Roads Virginia. The largest Naval port in the world. His plans to slash the military was enough to send this place into a panic. They were right. He hurt the military immensely. There were shipyards that had no military vessel for months. A lot of them turned to container and cruise ships to stay afloat. Some didn't make it and were bought by bigger firms. We have all the services here. Army, Navy, Coast Guard, Air Force, Marines, and Merchant Marines. A few others I won't mention. This area was practically destroyed by Obama.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Look I live in Hampton Roads Virginia. The largest Naval port in the world. His plans to slash the military was enough to send this place into a panic. They were right. He hurt the military immensely. There were shipyards that had no military vessel for months. A lot of them turned to container and cruise ships to stay afloat. Some didn't make it and were bought by bigger firms. We have all the services here. Army, Navy, Coast Guard, Air Force, Marines, and Merchant Marines. A few others I won't mention. This area was practically destroyed by Obama.

Obama spent more on the military than did Bush II, so it seems you again are a bit off.

Most of the cuts to the military were forced by the Budget Control Act of 2011 aka sequestration. This bill was passed in the House 269–161. 174 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted for it and the Senate 74–26. Those cuts were made deeper in 2013 with a vote of 332-94 in the House and 64-36 in the Senate.

To blame Obama alone is to ignore the part even the GOP played in this...but that is what partisans do.

 

[flack]

Look I live in Hampton Roads Virginia. The largest Naval port in the world. His plans to slash the military was enough to send this place into a panic. They were right. He hurt the military immensely. There were shipyards that had no military vessel for months. A lot of them turned to container and cruise ships to stay afloat. Some didn't make it and were bought by bigger firms. We have all the services here. Army, Navy, Coast Guard, Air Force, Marines, and Merchant Marines. A few others I won't mention. This area was practically destroyed by Obama.

Obama spent more on the military than did Bush II, so it seems you again are a bit off.

Most of the cuts to the military were forced by the Budget Control Act of 2011 aka sequestration. This bill was passed in the House 269–161. 174 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted for it and the Senate 74–26. Those cuts were made deeper in 2013 with a vote of 332-94 in the House and 64-36 in the Senate.

To blame Obama alone is to ignore the part even the GOP played in this...but that is what partisans do.

Here I will just let you read it for yourself.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...tifact-sheet-our-guide-to-military-spending-/

 

[flack]

Look I live in Hampton Roads Virginia. The largest Naval port in the world. His plans to slash the military was enough to send this place into a panic. They were right. He hurt the military immensely. There were shipyards that had no military vessel for months. A lot of them turned to container and cruise ships to stay afloat. Some didn't make it and were bought by bigger firms. We have all the services here. Army, Navy, Coast Guard, Air Force, Marines, and Merchant Marines. A few others I won't mention. This area was practically destroyed by Obama.

Obama spent more on the military than did Bush II, so it seems you again are a bit off.

Most of the cuts to the military were forced by the Budget Control Act of 2011 aka sequestration. This bill was passed in the House 269–161. 174 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted for it and the Senate 74–26. Those cuts were made deeper in 2013 with a vote of 332-94 in the House and 64-36 in the Senate.

To blame Obama alone is to ignore the part even the GOP played in this...but that is what partisans do.

But you see sequestration was never suppose to happen.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Look I live in Hampton Roads Virginia. The largest Naval port in the world. His plans to slash the military was enough to send this place into a panic. They were right. He hurt the military immensely. There were shipyards that had no military vessel for months. A lot of them turned to container and cruise ships to stay afloat. Some didn't make it and were bought by bigger firms. We have all the services here. Army, Navy, Coast Guard, Air Force, Marines, and Merchant Marines. A few others I won't mention. This area was practically destroyed by Obama.

Obama spent more on the military than did Bush II, so it seems you again are a bit off.

Most of the cuts to the military were forced by the Budget Control Act of 2011 aka sequestration. This bill was passed in the House 269–161. 174 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted for it and the Senate 74–26. Those cuts were made deeper in 2013 with a vote of 332-94 in the House and 64-36 in the Senate.

To blame Obama alone is to ignore the part even the GOP played in this...but that is what partisans do.

Here I will just let you read it for yourself.

PolitiFact Sheet: Military spending under Obama and Congress

Thank you for supporting my point...that was very nice of you...from your link

There are two main reasons for the spending drop. The first is the Obama administration’s decision to start removing U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. The second has to do with a process known as sequestration.

...

The bipartisan nature of the sequestration provision means that both parties merit a share of the blame, experts say.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Look I live in Hampton Roads Virginia. The largest Naval port in the world. His plans to slash the military was enough to send this place into a panic. They were right. He hurt the military immensely. There were shipyards that had no military vessel for months. A lot of them turned to container and cruise ships to stay afloat. Some didn't make it and were bought by bigger firms. We have all the services here. Army, Navy, Coast Guard, Air Force, Marines, and Merchant Marines. A few others I won't mention. This area was practically destroyed by Obama.

Obama spent more on the military than did Bush II, so it seems you again are a bit off.

Most of the cuts to the military were forced by the Budget Control Act of 2011 aka sequestration. This bill was passed in the House 269–161. 174 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted for it and the Senate 74–26. Those cuts were made deeper in 2013 with a vote of 332-94 in the House and 64-36 in the Senate.

To blame Obama alone is to ignore the part even the GOP played in this...but that is what partisans do.

But you see sequestration was never suppose to happen.

But it did because the people in Congress could not make any agreements. I know that the very idea of sequestration was supposed to scare the two sides into action..but as most of us knew would happen...that did not happen...thus sequestration happened...and to blame it on Obama alone is just a partisan knee jerk reaction

 

[healthmyths]

Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

How many times are you worthless lying scum POS right-wingers going to mindlessly parrot this LIE?????
As you well know PT jobs for economic reasons went DOWN after the passage of the PPACA!!!!!

And how many times do honest people like ME who put the links and substantiation have to contend with people like YOU that state your own personal, subjective and total ignorant comments? PLEASE provide PROOF as I did to back up my statements. WHERE is your PROOF!!!

You have NO proof of anything only OPINIONS by biased hacks! And you know it. There is no data that supports your lies, the actual data shows that PT jobs for economic reasons, and the PPACA would be such an economic reason as your lying sources claim, DECREASED since the law was passed. And the data is easy to find, so there is no excuse for your sources lies, since the BLS specifically tracks PT jobs for economic reasons every month and reports it every month!!!!!

When the PPACA passed in March 2010 there were 9,126,000 working PT for economic reasons, when Obama left office it was down to 5,664,000. It is now 4,111,000
Here is the link to the BLS data:
Table A-8. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status
Scroll down to PERSONS AT WORK PART TIME,
select Part time for economic reasons seasonally adjusted and then scroll down further and click on "retrieve data."

The ONLY source of your data is BLS.
I have 3 distinct studies as multiple sources:

Marcus Dillender Carolyn Heinrich Susan Houseman Upjohn Institute Vanderbilt University Upjohn Institute
Using monthly CPS data, we estimate that the ACA resulted in an increase in low-hours, involuntary part-time employment of a half-million to a million workers in retail, accommodations, and food services, the sectors in which employers are most likely to reduce hours if they choose to circumvent the mandate, and also the sectors in which low-wage workers are most likely to be affected.
Additionally, employers may choose to outsource certain tasks to firms with fewer than 50 full-time employees. Ironically, the employer mandate could reduce the quality of jobs for low- and middle-skilled workers by increasing the share of low-hours part-time, temporary, and contract employment—categories that often are associated with relatively low compensation and job instability.

https://my.vanderbilt.edu/carolynhe...ffects-ACA-on-Part-time-employment-6-9-16.pdf

According to a new U.S. Chamber of Commerce July survey, nearly three-fourth of small businesses say the ACA makes it harder to hire workers and 61 percent do not plan to take on additional hires next year.
According to The New York Times Economix blogger Annie Lowrey, “The Affordable Care Act gives employers an incentive to hire part-time workers rather than full-time workers, as they might be compelled to offer health coverage to the latter, but not the former. That’s why a number of big employers have started offering more temporary or part-time positions.” Reuters reported on June 13 that Wal-Mart has already implemented a strategy of hiring more temporary workers

Major Newspapers link Obamacare to Increase in Part-time and Temp Jobs; Networks Ignore

A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.
The study shows that the jobs were temporary, contract positions, or part-time "gig" jobs in a variety of fields.
shows that the proportion of workers throughout the U.S., during the Obama era, who were working in these kinds of temporary jobs, increased from 10.7% of the population to 15.8%.

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

 

[healthmyths]

I did, twice. You know a lot of that was because people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans. If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed.

"I did, twice."

Ah, so you're part of the problem.

The rest of your post reflects your rightardism...

"people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans."

That's utter dementia. Many people were forced to stop investing as lenders went bankrupt and credit markets locked up. That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running.

"If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed."

That's also rightarded hallucination as GDP flipped back to positive growth in 2009 and job growth began its unprecedented 107 consecutive month streak in 2010, a full year before Republicans took control of the House.

But I see you're a very obedient and loyal rightard, blaming Democrats for Republican failures and crediting Republicans for Democrat successes. I have no doubt the herd is very proud and appreciative of your efforts.

You wrote.."That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running."

Evidently you never saw these quotes from Barney Frank.

"When warned about Fannie Mae in (House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) criticized the President [Bush] warning saying: "these two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac --are not facing any kind of financial crisis....The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies,
the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." (New York Times, 9/11/03)
But NOW what does Barney say???
Barney Frank Comes Home to the Facts By Larry Kudlow August 21, 2010
For years, Frank was a staunch supporter of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant government housing agencies that played such an enormous role in the financial meltdown that thrust the economy into the Great Recession.
But in a recent CNBC interview, Frank told me that he was ready to say goodbye to Fannie and Freddie.
"I hope by next year we'll have abolished Fannie and Freddie," he said. Remarkable. And he went on to say that "it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it." He then added,
"I had been too sanguine about Fannie and Freddie."
Barney Frank admits truth about Fannie

So what was a major contributor to the housing bubble that Barney blamed Fannie/Freddie for???

"it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.

1995
in the Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 1994 suit against redlining. Most significant of all,
ACORN was the driving force behind a 1995 regulatory revision pushed through by the Clinton Administration that greatly expanded the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) and laid the groundwork for the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac borne financial crisis we now confront.
Barack Obama was the attorney representing ACORN in this effort.
With this new authority, ACORN used its subsidiary, ACORN Housing, to promote subprime loans more aggressively.
Barack H. Obama, Esq.’s Role in the Financial Crisis – Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fe

A VERY Major factor in the housing crisis was the simple fact Obama, et.al. sued Citibank in 1994. This opened the door to what Barney Frank
stated "it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
Now grossly uninformed people say "yah, but that wasn't the major cause!!"... And I agree!
But it WAS a cause!
FACT:
How Obama Bankrupted Black Homeowners
How Obama Bankrupted Black Homeowners | Investor's Business Daily

In 2003 Frank was a POWERLESS member of the MINORITY Party, the GOP ran everything, the HOUSE, the SENATE and the presidency.

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010.

Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did![/QUOTE]

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?

 

[AntonToo]

94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

OP is pure counterfactual bullshit.

Just about ALL of the 14 million net jobs created 2010-2016 were full time.

 

[edthecynic]

Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

How many times are you worthless lying scum POS right-wingers going to mindlessly parrot this LIE?????
As you well know PT jobs for economic reasons went DOWN after the passage of the PPACA!!!!!

And how many times do honest people like ME who put the links and substantiation have to contend with people like YOU that state your own personal, subjective and total ignorant comments? PLEASE provide PROOF as I did to back up my statements. WHERE is your PROOF!!!

You have NO proof of anything only OPINIONS by biased hacks! And you know it. There is no data that supports your lies, the actual data shows that PT jobs for economic reasons, and the PPACA would be such an economic reason as your lying sources claim, DECREASED since the law was passed. And the data is easy to find, so there is no excuse for your sources lies, since the BLS specifically tracks PT jobs for economic reasons every month and reports it every month!!!!!

When the PPACA passed in March 2010 there were 9,126,000 working PT for economic reasons, when Obama left office it was down to 5,664,000. It is now 4,111,000
Here is the link to the BLS data:
Table A-8. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status
Scroll down to PERSONS AT WORK PART TIME,
select Part time for economic reasons seasonally adjusted and then scroll down further and click on "retrieve data."

The ONLY source of your data is BLS.
I have 3 distinct studies as multiple sources:

Marcus Dillender Carolyn Heinrich Susan Houseman Upjohn Institute Vanderbilt University Upjohn Institute
Using monthly CPS data, we estimate that the ACA resulted in an increase in low-hours, involuntary part-time employment of a half-million to a million workers in retail, accommodations, and food services, the sectors in which employers are most likely to reduce hours if they choose to circumvent the mandate, and also the sectors in which low-wage workers are most likely to be affected.
Additionally, employers may choose to outsource certain tasks to firms with fewer than 50 full-time employees. Ironically, the employer mandate could reduce the quality of jobs for low- and middle-skilled workers by increasing the share of low-hours part-time, temporary, and contract employment—categories that often are associated with relatively low compensation and job instability.

https://my.vanderbilt.edu/carolynhe...ffects-ACA-on-Part-time-employment-6-9-16.pdf

According to a new U.S. Chamber of Commerce July survey, nearly three-fourth of small businesses say the ACA makes it harder to hire workers and 61 percent do not plan to take on additional hires next year.
According to The New York Times Economix blogger Annie Lowrey, “The Affordable Care Act gives employers an incentive to hire part-time workers rather than full-time workers, as they might be compelled to offer health coverage to the latter, but not the former. That’s why a number of big employers have started offering more temporary or part-time positions.” Reuters reported on June 13 that Wal-Mart has already implemented a strategy of hiring more temporary workers

Major Newspapers link Obamacare to Increase in Part-time and Temp Jobs; Networks Ignore

A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.
The study shows that the jobs were temporary, contract positions, or part-time "gig" jobs in a variety of fields.
shows that the proportion of workers throughout the U.S., during the Obama era, who were working in these kinds of temporary jobs, increased from 10.7% of the population to 15.8%.

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

3 "studies" proven FALSE by real data from the BLS. The RAND "study" was so obviously worthless, you liars keep trying to pass it off as coming from Harvard and Princeton when it actually was done by the RAND think tank, an extreme far Right radical group!!!!!

 

[edthecynic]

"I did, twice."

Ah, so you're part of the problem.

The rest of your post reflects your rightardism...

"people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans."

That's utter dementia. Many people were forced to stop investing as lenders went bankrupt and credit markets locked up. That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running.

"If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed."

That's also rightarded hallucination as GDP flipped back to positive growth in 2009 and job growth began its unprecedented 107 consecutive month streak in 2010, a full year before Republicans took control of the House.

But I see you're a very obedient and loyal rightard, blaming Democrats for Republican failures and crediting Republicans for Democrat successes. I have no doubt the herd is very proud and appreciative of your efforts.

You wrote.."That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running."

Evidently you never saw these quotes from Barney Frank.

"When warned about Fannie Mae in (House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) criticized the President [Bush] warning saying: "these two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac --are not facing any kind of financial crisis....The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies,
the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." (New York Times, 9/11/03)
But NOW what does Barney say???
Barney Frank Comes Home to the Facts By Larry Kudlow August 21, 2010
For years, Frank was a staunch supporter of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant government housing agencies that played such an enormous role in the financial meltdown that thrust the economy into the Great Recession.
But in a recent CNBC interview, Frank told me that he was ready to say goodbye to Fannie and Freddie.
"I hope by next year we'll have abolished Fannie and Freddie," he said. Remarkable. And he went on to say that "it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it." He then added,
"I had been too sanguine about Fannie and Freddie."
Barney Frank admits truth about Fannie

So what was a major contributor to the housing bubble that Barney blamed Fannie/Freddie for???

"it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.

1995
in the Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 1994 suit against redlining. Most significant of all,
ACORN was the driving force behind a 1995 regulatory revision pushed through by the Clinton Administration that greatly expanded the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) and laid the groundwork for the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac borne financial crisis we now confront.
Barack Obama was the attorney representing ACORN in this effort.
With this new authority, ACORN used its subsidiary, ACORN Housing, to promote subprime loans more aggressively.
Barack H. Obama, Esq.’s Role in the Financial Crisis – Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fe

A VERY Major factor in the housing crisis was the simple fact Obama, et.al. sued Citibank in 1994. This opened the door to what Barney Frank
stated "it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
Now grossly uninformed people say "yah, but that wasn't the major cause!!"... And I agree!
But it WAS a cause!
FACT:
How Obama Bankrupted Black Homeowners
How Obama Bankrupted Black Homeowners | Investor's Business Daily

In 2003 Frank was a POWERLESS member of the MINORITY Party, the GOP ran everything, the HOUSE, the SENATE and the presidency.

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010.

Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?[/QUOTE]
Name one Fanny/Freddy reform bill the GOP passed when they controlled all 3 branches!!!!
You can't because they didn't because the GOP are all talk and no action. It was the Democratic Party who actually passed a reform bill when they took over!!!!!

So go on and prove me wrong and post all the reform bills the GOP passed, if you are so credible because of your dishonest links compared to me!!!!

 

[bendog]

Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time
The decline of conventional full-time work has impacted every demographic. Whether this change is good or bad depends on what kinds of jobs people want. “Workers seeking full-time, steady work have lost,” said Krueger. ”
Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

The relationship between Obamacare and part-time work is because of this requirement of Obamacare:
ObamaCare’s “employer mandate” is a requirement that all businesses with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees (FTE) provide health insurance to at least 95% of their full-time employees and dependents up to age 26, or pay a fee. ObamaCare Employer Mandate

Up to 250,000 positions may have been eliminated by small businesses seeking to avoid Obamacare’s employer mandate, according to estimates in a new working paper distributed by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Altogether between 28,000 and 50,000 businesses appear to have reduced their number of full-time employees from 2014 to 2016 because of the mandate.
Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate

So for example employer health insurance cost the employer on average "Coverage with employer health insurance averaged $409 a month per person."
https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/re.../much-companies-pay-employer-health-insurance

So a small employer with say 49 employees wants to hire the 50th employee.
Monthly cost for health insurance by hiring that 50th employee: 50 times $409 equals $20,450/month
$245,400 per year directly from the bottom line of the business.

This small firm with 50 employees average gross revenue: $3,600,000
How Does Your Revenue Stack Up to Other Small Businesses? | QuickBooks
Net profit average per small firm is about 16%
What’s a Good Profit Margin for a New Business?
So now this small business with a net profit of $575,000 has this profit reduced due to Obamacare :
Net income before Obamacare: $575,000
Health insurance premium: 245,400
Net income after premium $330,276
percent reduction in net: Nearly 60% reduction in income.

HENCE...the employer says: hmmm well I won't hire one full time but two part-time!!!

OMG! You mean there was actually an economic benefit from putting more people on health care plans and actually paying for their coverage by taxing the people who made money treating them? JFC! Who could ever have predicted such an thing? I am SHOCKED. POSITIVELY SHOCKED

 

[Faun]

LOL

No one gives a shit about where you come from. I had a week where I worked 100 hours, 38 in one day (shift) alone that week. No one gives a shit about that either.

What matters is what the BLS defines as part time and they define part ti.e as less than 35 hours. And their definition has been like that for many decades and has not changed. ACA did not change their definition. Obama's change only affected who was required to be covered by employers for insurance purposes.

And the BLS showed no increase in part time employment following ACA. In fact, it shows a steady decrease for economic reasons. It also shows that exploded under Bush, not Obama.


Did you vote for Bush?

I did, twice. You know a lot of that was because people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans. If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed.

"I did, twice."

Ah, so you're part of the problem.

The rest of your post reflects your rightardism...

"people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans."

That's utter dementia. Many people were forced to stop investing as lenders went bankrupt and credit markets locked up. That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running.

"If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed."

That's also rightarded hallucination as GDP flipped back to positive growth in 2009 and job growth began its unprecedented 107 consecutive month streak in 2010, a full year before Republicans took control of the House.

But I see you're a very obedient and loyal rightard, blaming Democrats for Republican failures and crediting Republicans for Democrat successes. I have no doubt the herd is very proud and appreciative of your efforts.

Obama announced in February 07 so that is wrong.

LOL

That was about a month after lenders started filing bankruptcies...

List of banks acquired or bankrupted during the Great Recession

Don't you ever get tired of being such a rightarded loser?

Read this.

Banking Collapse of 2008: Three weeks that changed the world

That doesn't alter the reality that lenders' problems began in 2006 and began collapsing in early 2007, before Obama declared his entry into the race for president.

 

[Faun]

LOL

No one gives a shit about where you come from. I had a week where I worked 100 hours, 38 in one day (shift) alone that week. No one gives a shit about that either.

What matters is what the BLS defines as part time and they define part ti.e as less than 35 hours. And their definition has been like that for many decades and has not changed. ACA did not change their definition. Obama's change only affected who was required to be covered by employers for insurance purposes.

And the BLS showed no increase in part time employment following ACA. In fact, it shows a steady decrease for economic reasons. It also shows that exploded under Bush, not Obama.


Did you vote for Bush?

I did, twice. You know a lot of that was because people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans. If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed.

"I did, twice."

Ah, so you're part of the problem.

The rest of your post reflects your rightardism...

"people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans."

That's utter dementia. Many people were forced to stop investing as lenders went bankrupt and credit markets locked up. That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running.

"If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed."

That's also rightarded hallucination as GDP flipped back to positive growth in 2009 and job growth began its unprecedented 107 consecutive month streak in 2010, a full year before Republicans took control of the House.

But I see you're a very obedient and loyal rightard, blaming Democrats for Republican failures and crediting Republicans for Democrat successes. I have no doubt the herd is very proud and appreciative of your efforts.

Obama announced in February 07 so that is wrong.

And he was a fringe candidate that most thought was just there to get exposure for maybe the VP slot. Nobody in 2007 thought he would win.

You are full of shit

I'm going to show you something. I want you to pay attention to the signs. He is not running for office. He is just there to give a speech. Now why would they have those signs? Answer that question honestly please.

In the video they keep saying nobody knows who this guy is? Where did all the signs come from then?

Dumbfuck, those signs were handed out to attendees. People didn't just show up with those signs. That's not evidence that folks there knew who Obama was. He wasn't even a Senator yet. Doubtful more than a handful outside of Illinois even knew who he was.

 

[Faun]

"I did, twice."

Ah, so you're part of the problem.

The rest of your post reflects your rightardism...

"people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans."

That's utter dementia. Many people were forced to stop investing as lenders went bankrupt and credit markets locked up. That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running.

"If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed."

That's also rightarded hallucination as GDP flipped back to positive growth in 2009 and job growth began its unprecedented 107 consecutive month streak in 2010, a full year before Republicans took control of the House.

But I see you're a very obedient and loyal rightard, blaming Democrats for Republican failures and crediting Republicans for Democrat successes. I have no doubt the herd is very proud and appreciative of your efforts.

Obama announced in February 07 so that is wrong.

And he was a fringe candidate that most thought was just there to get exposure for maybe the VP slot. Nobody in 2007 thought he would win.

You are full of shit

I did as well as my boss and all our customers.

Liar

By the way you didn't answer my question. If nobody knew who he was then why all the Obama signs when he wasn't running for office but just there to give a speech? You got played by the machine and you won't admit it. Like with the Greek columns and reverb mike and the halo lighting. You bought a pig in a poke. LMAO!!!!

Hillary was the favorite until February 2008....

... so who the **** scaled back on their businesses in 2007 because of Obama?? You're spouting utter nonsense and it's blatantly obvious.​

 

[Faun]

^^^ great minds...

Where I come from you work 40 plus hours a week. Anybody who thinks they can work less and not improve their life is a liberal. I worked 50 hours a week most of my life and one job I did 65 hours a week.

LOL

No one gives a shit about where you come from. I had a week where I worked 100 hours, 38 in one day (shift) alone that week. No one gives a shit about that either.

What matters is what the BLS defines as part time and they define part ti.e as less than 35 hours. And their definition has been like that for many decades and has not changed. ACA did not change their definition. Obama's change only affected who was required to be covered by employers for insurance purposes.

And the BLS showed no increase in part time employment following ACA. In fact, it shows a steady decrease for economic reasons. It also shows that exploded under Bush, not Obama.


Did you vote for Bush?

I did, twice. You know a lot of that was because people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans. If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed.

"I did, twice."

Ah, so you're part of the problem.

The rest of your post reflects your rightardism...

"people knew Obama was going to get elected and cut the deadwood, stopped investing, and hunkered down to wait out his commie plans."

That's utter dementia. Many people were forced to stop investing as lenders went bankrupt and credit markets locked up. That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running.

"If the republicans hadn't won back the senate in 2010 this country would already been screwed."

That's also rightarded hallucination as GDP flipped back to positive growth in 2009 and job growth began its unprecedented 107 consecutive month streak in 2010, a full year before Republicans took control of the House.

But I see you're a very obedient and loyal rightard, blaming Democrats for Republican failures and crediting Republicans for Democrat successes. I have no doubt the herd is very proud and appreciative of your efforts.

You wrote.."That was in 2007 and started before Obama even announced he was running."

Evidently you never saw these quotes from Barney Frank.

"When warned about Fannie Mae in (House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) criticized the President [Bush] warning saying: "these two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac --are not facing any kind of financial crisis....The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies,
the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." (New York Times, 9/11/03)
But NOW what does Barney say???
Barney Frank Comes Home to the Facts By Larry Kudlow August 21, 2010
For years, Frank was a staunch supporter of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant government housing agencies that played such an enormous role in the financial meltdown that thrust the economy into the Great Recession.
But in a recent CNBC interview, Frank told me that he was ready to say goodbye to Fannie and Freddie.
"I hope by next year we'll have abolished Fannie and Freddie," he said. Remarkable. And he went on to say that "it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it." He then added,
"I had been too sanguine about Fannie and Freddie."
Barney Frank admits truth about Fannie

So what was a major contributor to the housing bubble that Barney blamed Fannie/Freddie for???

"it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.

1995
in the Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 1994 suit against redlining. Most significant of all,
ACORN was the driving force behind a 1995 regulatory revision pushed through by the Clinton Administration that greatly expanded the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) and laid the groundwork for the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac borne financial crisis we now confront.
Barack Obama was the attorney representing ACORN in this effort.
With this new authority, ACORN used its subsidiary, ACORN Housing, to promote subprime loans more aggressively.
Barack H. Obama, Esq.’s Role in the Financial Crisis – Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fe

A VERY Major factor in the housing crisis was the simple fact Obama, et.al. sued Citibank in 1994. This opened the door to what Barney Frank
stated "it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
Now grossly uninformed people say "yah, but that wasn't the major cause!!"... And I agree!
But it WAS a cause!
FACT:
How Obama Bankrupted Black Homeowners
How Obama Bankrupted Black Homeowners | Investor's Business Daily

Ah yes, typical racist claptrap from unnamed rightwingnut editorialists leading up to an election.

Yeah, that's real convincing.