You tried to rationalize it down to him not actually being the IG during the time of the crimes. But he was directly working with the people in the department he established relationships with while still IG. This is a classic example of plausible deniability. Just accept it- a high ranking person in the Obama admin was clearly corrupt and that SHOULD elicit feelings of skepticism about his administration in general and get you questioning and digging for more, the same way the left applies that to trump. So hopefully this helps get the critical thought flowing. I won’t hold my breath though.
I wasn't trying to rationalize his crime--your posts were suggesting it happened on Obama's watch, which it didn't. Just trying to make that clear.
Stealing the government's software program and a bunch of employees' data files is a huge no no and I'm glad he got caught. Obama made a poor choice with that fella.
You’re still missing the point.
Simple question: does this make you want to dig further and see if there’s a possibility of more corruption in Obama’s choices for his admin?
I'm not sure why I would focus on Obama's admin choices at this point. Seems it would be more sensible to worry about the CURRENT administration.
Of course, if the DOJ is investigating something from back then, like they were the Edwards case, they should have at it.