Well, IDB, the point is, me poor ignorant con, that education of the population has always been a key in helping the economy of any country. I was avoiding your issue of private vs public education. Perhaps that discussion belongs elsewhere. But, in terms of economic growth and economic success, perhaps you can name a couple of countries who are doing as you apparently want, i.e., providing education to the majority of their youth via private education. And of course, perhaps you can let us all know why you would attack education at all. Seems to be a con malady. Cons hate education, unless it is being delivered by a private enterprise. Which is another way of saying, me con tool, that you do not value education.
Relative to economic plans, obama's intent as far as getting the unemployment rate under control is well spelled out. You could know it if you want to. Perhaps you would like to suggest what Romney's is. It seems to change daily. So, does he want to decrease taxes by 20%, which would amount to about a $5T decrease in gov. income, or does he not? He has said he did support it when talking to a strictly con audience. Now he disavows it, though he made the statement many, many times over the past two years.
Does he fully support Ryan's s plan, or has he his own. He has said both. So, what is it. And once you can define it, then how do you suggest it will help. Seriously, how do you believe the Romney plan (whatever it is) is going to help reduce unemployment? I would take book gladly on the bet that you have no earthly idea. So, there is the challenge, again. Show me how reducing taxes is going to help. You won't, I expect, because you can not. But then, you probably do not know that you can not. Just find a time when decreasing taxes has helped during a bad economy. But of course, you can not. You simply want to post dogma. Which is a total waste of time.
