Obama will raise taxes on the middle class in 100 days

[AmericanFirst]

refusing to get healthcare and paying a fine has nothing to do with class, any person, poor to rich that doesn't get it pays the fine.

Also because of the aca, those that currently have healthcare are getting a check back.

Not only has obama not raised taxes on the middle class, he's got a check in the mail for them as well. Thanks obama!

socialism!!! Idiot!!!

Don't forget Marxist!!! Communist!! Nazi!! Muslim!! Kenyan!! while you're at it

OK, thanks for reminding me what an idiot obamaturd is.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Because of W's "give everything to the rich" tax plan, it took the biggest surplus in US history and turned it into the biggest deficit. You would have to be mentally ill to support the GOP and their proven failed policies.

"trickle down" Has NEVER even once worked.

more jobs were created under Bush than Obama....

How dumb are you? W had a net job creation of negative 646,000.

Not to mention 2/3'd of all the jobs created in the past 52 years have been under democratic presidents.

you believe all the liberal lies....?

In Cleveland, President Barack Obama claimed he created more private-sector jobs in the past 27 months than President George W. Bush created “during the entire seven years before this crisis.” But that’s like comparing apples and mangoes. The president is absolving himself of responsibility for the savage recession he inherited, while assigning to Bush responsibility for the recession that began within weeks of his taking office in 2001.

The fact is, the economy has gained just about the same number of private-sector jobs (Obama’s preferred measure) in the 27 months since the most recent job slump hit bottom as it did in the 27 months following the bottom of the first Bush slump. And looking at total jobs — the broader and more customary measure — Bush’s post-slump job creation record was significantly better than Obama’s.

FactCheck.org : Obama’s Economic Sleight of Hand

 

[AmericanFirst]

I'm talking about the payroll taxes that the GOP wanted to raise on the middle class and Obama told the GOP trash to go to hell.

So am I. Obamaturd wanted to let the Bush tax cuts to expire.

How dumb are you? The payroll taxes had nothing to do with the bush tax cuts for the rich.

Smarter then your sorry ass. I am far from rich and got a tax cut. The lie from the left that the tax cuts were for the rich is well, a fat lie.

 

[Black_Label]

more jobs were created under Bush than Obama....

How dumb are you? W had a net job creation of negative 646,000.

Not to mention 2/3'd of all the jobs created in the past 52 years have been under democratic presidents.

you believe all the liberal lies....?

In Cleveland, President Barack Obama claimed he created more private-sector jobs in the past 27 months than President George W. Bush created “during the entire seven years before this crisis.” But that’s like comparing apples and mangoes. The president is absolving himself of responsibility for the savage recession he inherited, while assigning to Bush responsibility for the recession that began within weeks of his taking office in 2001.

The fact is, the economy has gained just about the same number of private-sector jobs (Obama’s preferred measure) in the 27 months since the most recent job slump hit bottom as it did in the 27 months following the bottom of the first Bush slump. And looking at total jobs — the broader and more customary measure — Bush’s post-slump job creation record was significantly better than Obama’s.

FactCheck.org : Obama’s Economic Sleight of Hand

Try learning some facts so you stop coming across as a brainwashed right wing idiot

Republicans

Richard Nixon: Increase of 7.1 million jobs
Gerald Ford: Increase of 1.3 million jobs
Ronald Reagan: Increase of 14.7 million jobs
George H.W. Bush: Increase of 1.5 million jobs
George W. Bush: Decline of 646,000 jobs

Total: Increase of 23.9 million jobs under Republican presidents

Democrats

John F. Kennedy: Increase of 2.7 million jobs
Lyndon B. Johnson: Increase of 9.5 million jobs
Jimmy Carter: Increase of 9.0 million jobs
Bill Clinton: Increase of 20.8 million jobs
Barack Obama: Increase of 332,000 jobs

Total: Increase of 42.3 million jobs.

PolitiFact | Bill Clinton says Democratic presidents top Republican presidents in job creation

 

[ScreamingEagle]

How dumb are you? W had a net job creation of negative 646,000.

Not to mention 2/3'd of all the jobs created in the past 52 years have been under democratic presidents.

you believe all the liberal lies....?

In Cleveland, President Barack Obama claimed he created more private-sector jobs in the past 27 months than President George W. Bush created “during the entire seven years before this crisis.” But that’s like comparing apples and mangoes. The president is absolving himself of responsibility for the savage recession he inherited, while assigning to Bush responsibility for the recession that began within weeks of his taking office in 2001.

The fact is, the economy has gained just about the same number of private-sector jobs (Obama’s preferred measure) in the 27 months since the most recent job slump hit bottom as it did in the 27 months following the bottom of the first Bush slump. And looking at total jobs — the broader and more customary measure — Bush’s post-slump job creation record was significantly better than Obama’s.

FactCheck.org : Obama’s Economic Sleight of Hand

Try learning some facts so you stop coming across as a brainwashed right wing idiot

Republicans

Richard Nixon: Increase of 7.1 million jobs
Gerald Ford: Increase of 1.3 million jobs
Ronald Reagan: Increase of 14.7 million jobs
George H.W. Bush: Increase of 1.5 million jobs
George W. Bush: Decline of 646,000 jobs

Total: Increase of 23.9 million jobs under Republican presidents

Democrats

John F. Kennedy: Increase of 2.7 million jobs
Lyndon B. Johnson: Increase of 9.5 million jobs
Jimmy Carter: Increase of 9.0 million jobs
Bill Clinton: Increase of 20.8 million jobs
Barack Obama: Increase of 332,000 jobs

Total: Increase of 42.3 million jobs.

PolitiFact | Bill Clinton says Democratic presidents top Republican presidents in job creation

stats like that can be interpreted anyway you like....Slick Willie of course took all the superficial credit he could......

for example if you consider $10/hr jobs created under Obama to be equal to $20/hr jobs created under Bush go right ahead....(not to mention all the "saved" jobs he claimed...)

how do you explain the fact that families incomes are down about $4,000 since Obama took office....?

obviously Obama's policies are not improving anything....

PolitiFact | Romney ad faults Obama for falling incomes

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Will you be paying more then than you are now??

That is irelevant. The misleading thread title is.

It's relevant will you be paying more in taxes in 2013 than you are now. A simple yes I will or no I will not will suffice

 

[uscitizen]

Obama will raise taxes on the middle class in 100 days *

Republicans believe that the middle class makes between $250,000-$500,000 per year.

True story.

is $25,000 - $50,000 considered "middle class".......?

if so....be prepared for TAX HIKES in 100 days......courtesy of OBAMA....

According to Romney the middle class starts at about 250K.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How dumb are you? W had a net job creation of negative 646,000.

Not to mention 2/3'd of all the jobs created in the past 52 years have been under democratic presidents.

you believe all the liberal lies....?

In Cleveland, President Barack Obama claimed he created more private-sector jobs in the past 27 months than President George W. Bush created “during the entire seven years before this crisis.” But that’s like comparing apples and mangoes. The president is absolving himself of responsibility for the savage recession he inherited, while assigning to Bush responsibility for the recession that began within weeks of his taking office in 2001.

The fact is, the economy has gained just about the same number of private-sector jobs (Obama’s preferred measure) in the 27 months since the most recent job slump hit bottom as it did in the 27 months following the bottom of the first Bush slump. And looking at total jobs — the broader and more customary measure — Bush’s post-slump job creation record was significantly better than Obama’s.

FactCheck.org : Obama’s Economic Sleight of Hand

Try learning some facts so you stop coming across as a brainwashed right wing idiot

Republicans

Richard Nixon: Increase of 7.1 million jobs
Gerald Ford: Increase of 1.3 million jobs
Ronald Reagan: Increase of 14.7 million jobs
George H.W. Bush: Increase of 1.5 million jobs
George W. Bush: Decline of 646,000 jobs

Total: Increase of 23.9 million jobs under Republican presidents

Democrats

John F. Kennedy: Increase of 2.7 million jobs
Lyndon B. Johnson: Increase of 9.5 million jobs
Jimmy Carter: Increase of 9.0 million jobs
Bill Clinton: Increase of 20.8 million jobs
Barack Obama: Increase of 332,000 jobs

Total: Increase of 42.3 million jobs.

PolitiFact | Bill Clinton says Democratic presidents top Republican presidents in job creation

Barack Obama: Increase of 332,000 jobs

In four years?
Clinton was impeached for lying right?

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Obama will raise taxes on the middle class in 100 days *

Republicans believe that the middle class makes between $250,000-$500,000 per year.

True story.

is $25,000 - $50,000 considered "middle class".......?

if so....be prepared for TAX HIKES in 100 days......courtesy of OBAMA....

According to Romney the middle class starts at about 250K.

wrong.....he said $200,000 - $250,000 or less.....he was just agreeing with the Democrat definition of "middle class"....

Obama is now going to give TAX INCREASES to all those "middle class" folks making $250K or less.....because he didn't get his way about taxing those who make $250k or more....waaah!

so Obama's sticking it to all of YOU in the middle class TOO.........in 100 days...

 

[LilOlLady]

SO??? They can afford to pay a little more also. Not. Because the new middle clase is the now poor. The pre Bush middle class could afford to pay a little more. Even the poor should pay some taxes to help pay down the deficit that was caused by big tax cuts for Romney and his corporate buddies. If the millionaires has been paying their share, the rest of us would not have to have our taxes raised to pay off the deficit they caused.. So thank radical right if our taxes are raised.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

SO??? They can afford to pay a little more also. Not. Because the new middle clase is the now poor. The pre Bush middle class could afford to pay a little more. Even the poor should pay some taxes to help pay down the deficit that was caused by big tax cuts for Romney and his corporate buddies. If the millionaires has been paying their share, the rest of us would not have to have our taxes raised to pay off the deficit they caused.. So thank radical right if our taxes are raised.

If the tax payer must tighten it's belt the government should also tighten it's belt.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

SO??? They can afford to pay a little more also. Not. Because the new middle clase is the now poor. The pre Bush middle class could afford to pay a little more. Even the poor should pay some taxes to help pay down the deficit that was caused by big tax cuts for Romney and his corporate buddies. If the millionaires has been paying their share, the rest of us would not have to have our taxes raised to pay off the deficit they caused.. So thank radical right if our taxes are raised.

if the middle class is now the poor as you say....that makes Obama TWICE as bad......

just think.....Obama is going to raise taxes and take food out of the mouths of babes just so he can stick to his marxist agenda of taxing the rich.....

he's going to raise income tax on the most poor by 50%......how can you SUPPORT that....?

 

[Black_Label]

SO??? They can afford to pay a little more also. Not. Because the new middle clase is the now poor. The pre Bush middle class could afford to pay a little more. Even the poor should pay some taxes to help pay down the deficit that was caused by big tax cuts for Romney and his corporate buddies. If the millionaires has been paying their share, the rest of us would not have to have our taxes raised to pay off the deficit they caused.. So thank radical right if our taxes are raised.

if the middle class is now the poor as you say....that makes Obama TWICE as bad......

just think.....Obama is going to raise taxes and take food out of the mouths of babes just so he can stick to his marxist agenda of taxing the rich.....

he's going to raise income tax on the most poor by 50%......how can you SUPPORT that....?

Holy hell are you stupid.

 

[Erand7899]

Not according to Willard, the middle class is $250,000 a year. Though the tax rates that may be restored to the wildly successful Clinton plan will be courtesy of BUSH and the REPUBLICANS (the ones that signed the bill and for it to expire)

Romney considers the middle class UP TO 250,000......what's wrong with that.....?

Romney also want to LOWER TAXES ON EVERYBODY.......the total opposite of Obiewannataxyou....

if the original tax rates are restored you can count on another recession.....thanks to OBAMA.....

How can going back to Clinton's dynamite tax plan that gave us the biggest surplus in US history cause a recession?

There never was a surplus, that was just more smoke and mirrors from your beloved Clinton. Nor, did Clinton have a damn thing to do with the great economy that existed during most of his eight years. That great economy was caused by two booms, the dot com boom and the housing boom. The dot.com boom busted as Clinton left office, and the housing boom began to bust a couple of years later.

The projected surplus was based on rosy economic predictions that had ceased to exist in the last year of the Clinton administration. More smoke and mirrors from your beloved Clinton. Perhaps you forgot that the economy went into recession just three months after Clinton left office.

 

[Erand7899]

The pressure is on the GOP

Will they reach an agreement that allows the middle class to maintain their tax break.....or will they throw them under the bus?

We know the answer don't we?

Of course, you wouldn't expect Democrats to reach an agreement that allows everyone to maintain their tax break.

We know the answer, don't we?

Why is it so hard for some of you to understand that compromise is not one sided. Not getting your way does not create an obligation for the other side to yield.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

SO??? They can afford to pay a little more also. Not. Because the new middle clase is the now poor. The pre Bush middle class could afford to pay a little more. Even the poor should pay some taxes to help pay down the deficit that was caused by big tax cuts for Romney and his corporate buddies. If the millionaires has been paying their share, the rest of us would not have to have our taxes raised to pay off the deficit they caused.. So thank radical right if our taxes are raised.

if the middle class is now the poor as you say....that makes Obama TWICE as bad......

just think.....Obama is going to raise taxes and take food out of the mouths of babes just so he can stick to his marxist agenda of taxing the rich.....

he's going to raise income tax on the most poor by 50%......how can you SUPPORT that....?

Holy hell are you stupid.

is not the lowest tax bracket jumping from 10% to 15% in 100 days.....?

that's a 50% hike....

 

[Erand7899]

Obama has kept his promise. He fought like hell against the GOP trash that wanted to raise taxes on the middle class and won.

No, he compromised. He wanted to let the tax cuts expire. Thank goodness we had a republican controlled house. Lie again, it is too funny.

I'm talking about the payroll taxes that the GOP wanted to raise on the middle class and Obama told the GOP trash to go to hell.

The cut in the payroll tax is cutting into the solvency of social security.

A few years ago, a Republican suggested that people be allowed to keep and invest a portion of the payroll tax, and Democrats went into hysteria. That, they claimed would destroy social security. But, allowing people to keep and spend that portion, somehow is better for social security? What a bunch of goofballs.

 

[RDD_1210]

So remind me again. For those people complaining about the coming tax increase. How do you feel about 47% of the nation "not paying taxes"? Wouldn't a tax increase be exactly what you're looking for in order to make more of that 47% pay something?

 

[ScreamingEagle]

So remind me again. For those people complaining about the coming tax increase. How do you feel about 47% of the nation "not paying taxes"? Wouldn't a tax increase be exactly what you're looking for in order to make more of that 47% pay something?

you mean their "fair share"........? exactly what would you consider a "fair share"......?

 

[Black_Label]

Romney considers the middle class UP TO 250,000......what's wrong with that.....?

Romney also want to LOWER TAXES ON EVERYBODY.......the total opposite of Obiewannataxyou....

if the original tax rates are restored you can count on another recession.....thanks to OBAMA.....

How can going back to Clinton's dynamite tax plan that gave us the biggest surplus in US history cause a recession?

There never was a surplus, that was just more smoke and mirrors from your beloved Clinton. Nor, did Clinton have a damn thing to do with the great economy that existed during most of his eight years. That great economy was caused by two booms, the dot com boom and the housing boom. The dot.com boom busted as Clinton left office, and the housing boom began to bust a couple of years later.

The projected surplus was based on rosy economic predictions that had ceased to exist in the last year of the Clinton administration. More smoke and mirrors from your beloved Clinton. Perhaps you forgot that the economy went into recession just three months after Clinton left office.

Yes, there was the biggest surplus in US history, as well as massive job growth and a booming economy because that's what strong democratic positions do