Obama to Congress: I'll Go It Alone

* * * *

ACA is a done deal, ratified by two national elections, passage of the law, and opined on by SCOTUS.

In sycophant Fakey's pretend universe, that means it cannot possibly ever get repealed. :lmao:

Elections have consequences, folks. We lost.

* * * *

:lol: "We." No, you painfully obvious poseur. The Republicans lost. YOU asshole lolberal far left radical Democratics won. America lost.

Let him issue EOs and let's attack the legality of them, which we may very well lose the issue.

"We." :lol:

WE, that means us, not you and your fellow far left wing radical liberal Democrats, Fakey, could lose if WE challenge Obumbler on issuance of alleged Executive Orders. On the other hand, WE are more likely to win. I know that causes you pain, Fakey.

I'm ok with that.
 
Frustrated Obama's message: I'll go it alone

By Tom Curry, National Affairs Writer, NBC News - January 26, 2014

When he stands before lawmakers Tuesday night for his State of the Union speech, President Barack Obama will have a message for the divided Congress that has largely stymied his agenda for the past three years: Fine, I’ll go it alone.

“I’ve got a pen,” Obama has said in the weeks leading up to the speech, “and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward.”

Many of Obama’s big policy goals have ended up stranded in limbo between the Democratic-controlled Senate trying to advance his agenda and the Republican-led House bent on stopping him.

And, heading into a midterm election year, he faces lame-duck status unless his party can regain control of the House this November.

Frustrated with the Capitol Hill quagmire, the president is increasingly turning toward the power of the presidency to try to solidify his legacy. Obama has pledged to act, saying, “We are not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we’re providing Americans the kind of help that they need.”

"The president sees this as a year of action, to work with Congress where he can and to bypass Congress where necessary," White House press secretary Jay Carney told ABC News Sunday.

...

Executive orders and directives
Based on what Obama and his aides have said in the run-up to the State of the Union, it’s likely that he will seek to test the limits of what he can do through executive orders and directives to federal agencies.

...

But congressional Republicans are on a high state of alert for what they see as Obama intrusions on congressional law-making power.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., warned Sunday that “when the executive branch tries to assume the legislative powers, that that's a form of tyranny.”

...

Frustrated Obama's message: I'll go it alone - NBC Politics

------------------------------

Would you like some Vaseline with that dictatorship?
71_71.gif

Good for him, it's about time. Boehner and McConnell should be hung in effigy for putting themselves and their party over the nations people. I hope they both lose their elections in November.

And when President Cruz does that you'll be the first calling for his impeachment. Hypocrite.

Like Mitt Romney, Cruz, the son of a Castro Cuban revolutionary, will never be President of the United States.
 
"...Would you like some Vaseline with that dictatorship?..."
Good for him, it's about time...
What?

Rule by Decree?

Good?

Please, tell me you're kidding.

People who are ready to accept Rule by Decree are a danger to the Republic.

It is my hope that all men and women of goodwill, who believe in our Republic and its People, and who come from all walks of life, and from any party, will be appalled by such a prospect.

A true 'emergency decree' (executive order) here-and-there is a necessary evil.

But to apply that same principle to far more commonplace and mundane and everyday governance - or to matters that traditionally require the asset of Congress - is unacceptable.

No excuses... no explanations... no juicy rationalizations... no caveats.

No Rule by Decree - period.

The line gets drawn here - cross it, and face Impeachment.

For such a loathsome approach to governance, we may actually see enough Democrats disgusted by the idea, to actually convict, once the House impeaches.

If those Senators love our country and its People, and the Constitution they're sworn to defend, then they will have no choice but to convict, if Rule by Decree is attempted.

Such a method of governance here is unacceptable.

Unacceptable.

:lol:

Ronald Reagan

Total

381
12287 - 12667
I 213 12287 - 12499
II 168 12500 - 12667
George Bush Total 166 12668 - 12833
William J. Clinton

Total
364 12834 - 13197
I 200 12834 - 13033
II 164 13034 - 13197
George W. Bush Total
291
13198 - 13488
I 173 13198 - 13370
II 118 13371 - 13488
Barack Obama

Total
168 13489 - 13656...
I 147 13489 - 13635
II 21
Executive Orders

Obama's STILL on the low end when it comes to Executive Orders. :eusa_whistle:
 
So Obama is going to declare that he is the supreme leader tomorrow?

This should be good.

This President should be impeached. I know having to impeach a president is bad for our country. But how much worse can it get?

He has done nothing to bring us together as Americans. He is great at one thing, and that is, division.
 
Executive orders are limited in what they can do if Obama tries to extend their power beyond what was intended and the people quietly accept it we're one step closer from going to democracy to dictatorship.
 
Frustrated Obama's message: I'll go it alone

By Tom Curry, National Affairs Writer, NBC News - January 26, 2014

When he stands before lawmakers Tuesday night for his State of the Union speech, President Barack Obama will have a message for the divided Congress that has largely stymied his agenda for the past three years: Fine, I’ll go it alone.

“I’ve got a pen,” Obama has said in the weeks leading up to the speech, “and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward.”

Many of Obama’s big policy goals have ended up stranded in limbo between the Democratic-controlled Senate trying to advance his agenda and the Republican-led House bent on stopping him.

And, heading into a midterm election year, he faces lame-duck status unless his party can regain control of the House this November.

Frustrated with the Capitol Hill quagmire, the president is increasingly turning toward the power of the presidency to try to solidify his legacy. Obama has pledged to act, saying, “We are not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we’re providing Americans the kind of help that they need.”

"The president sees this as a year of action, to work with Congress where he can and to bypass Congress where necessary," White House press secretary Jay Carney told ABC News Sunday.

...

Executive orders and directives
Based on what Obama and his aides have said in the run-up to the State of the Union, it’s likely that he will seek to test the limits of what he can do through executive orders and directives to federal agencies.

...

But congressional Republicans are on a high state of alert for what they see as Obama intrusions on congressional law-making power.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., warned Sunday that “when the executive branch tries to assume the legislative powers, that that's a form of tyranny.”

...

Frustrated Obama's message: I'll go it alone - NBC Politics

------------------------------

Would you like some Vaseline with that dictatorship?
71_71.gif

Good for him, it's about time. Boehner and McConnell should be hung in effigy for putting themselves and their party over the nations people. I hope they both lose their elections in November.

Its not surprising that you would agree with rule by decree. You're even excited about this.
 
Congress has shown they are unable/unwilling to do their job. Least productive Congress in History

It is long overdue for the President to start using executive actions
 
Congress has shown they are unable/unwilling to do their job. Least productive Congress in History It is long overdue for the President to start using executive actions
It is not given to the President to usurp the powers of Congress.

Any President who actually ends-up going that far is in trouble.
 
Congress has shown they are unable/unwilling to do their job. Least productive Congress in History

It is long overdue for the President to start using executive actions

Are you at all familiar with our system of government?
 
Congress has shown they are unable/unwilling to do their job. Least productive Congress in History It is long overdue for the President to start using executive actions
It is not given to the President to usurp the powers of Congress.

Any President who actually ends-up going that far is in trouble.

He will act within his powers as President

Of course, if Congress doesn't like it, they are welcome to pass their own laws

They are allowed to do that you know
 

Forum List

Back
Top