Obama, the worst President ever!

[IcebergSlim]

Obama is the worst President ever...an empty chair

Yet when Republicans asked....Wouldn't you rather have a Republican President?
The American public replied....Hell NO!

That's probably true.

But then again, they seem to be hypnotized with, on the one hand, a woman on the verge of being indicted, and on the other, a reality TV star.

SO. . . . that's not really saying much.

It is saying plenty; that criminals control the Dhimmicratics Party, no real shock there, and that GOP rank and file loath their party establishment enough to trust and prefer a Reality TV star with a checkered liberal past to represent them instead.

The whole nation was subverted by internationalists a century ago. When ever a politician has the audacity to put American interests before the interests of international business or the visions of the globalists the get pushed out.

Naturally the regional governments suffer.

And the little folks get called traitors when they want to cling to the Bill of Rights. . . .

This bubbling bouillabaisse of paranoia is missing something....

Perhaps a dash of "rootless, cosmopolitan Jew".....

 

[IcebergSlim]

Been hearing a lot of that since Pretzeldunce Innocent Bystander left the Ship of State on the rocks and burning....apparently their role in fiscal policy has been completely neutered...

A president's role in fiscal policy has been neutered since, essentially the creation of the FED in 1913. They do have an important role in choosing the chair, and the district heads, but that is under advice and consent from not only the Fed itself, but from congress. So, essentially, it's largely ceremonially.

Unless some maverick wanted to go in there and shake things up.

Someone like a Ron Paul or a Rand Paul.


Or a. . . . . . . Trump?


Unlike Donald Trump's Campaign, His Take On The Federal Reserve Is Sort Of Serious

For the love of G*d, make it stop...

Hyperbolic claims on behalf of Ricardian Equivalence notwithstanding, Presidents exercise a degree of control over fiscal policy........the Fed exercises none....

The budget process begins with a request from the WH.....

"While the world breathlessly awaits the outcome of this week’s FOMC meeting—will the Federal Reserve raise interest rates or won’t it?—one thing is clear regardless: the Fed is driving the U.S. into a 2nd depression in order to carry out its one and only remit now that America’s ability to produce real jobs has been reduced to ash, namely, propping up criminal banks with multi-trillion-dollar giveaways.

What’s so disturbing about the fatal path that the Fed has been on for 7 years is that it's one the Fed went down before, when—by its own admission—it extended and deepened the Great Depression in the late 1930s with a foolhardy policy that jacked up total reserves and destroyed bank lending. In the words of Janet Yellen, "[t]he economy plunged back into depression." (6/23/09 tr. at p. 175)

That's curious, because exactly the same dynamic is at work now, as total reserves have skyrocketed since 2008 in perfect dollar-for-dollar tandem with a plunge in lending. The effect on the birth- and death rates of new and existing businesses, respectively, has been catastrophic.

And what has propelled total reserve balances into the stratosphere? Why, it's the Fed's fateful decision to pay banks interest for holding money with the Fed--money provided by none other than the Fed itself when it printed $1.73 trillion and handed it to the bustout banks in exchange for worthless mortgage-backed securities. The Fed pulled nearly exactly the same stunt in 1936-37 when it suddenly required banks to maintain higher reserves at the Fed. In both cases, the Fed's diversion of monies away from the economy proved disastrous. It remains to be seen whether the Fed will need another world war to cover up its ruinous acts.

BestEvidence’s newest film, “They Come from Planet Klepto,” undertakes an intensive examination of the transcript and exhibits from the Fed’s June 2009 FOMC meeting held during the first few critical months of the most ambitious monetary experiment of all time, which the Fed falsely swore was temporary in nature.

As it turns out, the Federal Reserve never intended to unwind the radical balance sheet expansion it began 7 years ago at all, as one of the central purposes of the Fed programs—aside from enabling broke banks to erect an illusion of solvency big enough to justify bonuses—was to cover up the very Wall Street crimes that caused the meltdown of 2008 in the first place.

“Planet Klepto" distinguishes itself from many other worthy efforts along the same lines in its granular treatment of untrammeled criminality driving Federal Reserve policy by lavishing attention on the Fed’s own words, charts, documents, projections, speeches, papers, spreadsheets and data.

Viewers are urged to consider the implications of the Federal Reserve’s proven willingness to prop up, at all costs, the criminal banks controlling it. If criminal giveaways aren’t out of bounds, what’s to stop takeaways when the next meltdown hits?

Source materials:

Bank deposits: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/...

Bank loans: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/...

Bernanke speech (text): http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/1...
Bernanke speech (video): http://www.c-span.org/video/?284139-1...

Excess reserves: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/...

June 2009 FOMC transcript: http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetar...

June 2009 FOMC presentation materials: http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetar...

Total reserve balances: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/...

Fed “Oceans of Cash” paper: http://www.clevelandfed.org/en/Newsro...

Mortgage-backed securities held by the Fed: https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2...

Merrill Lynch’s MBS sales, July 2008: http://www.economonitor.com/analysts/...

Bailout (2012): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1928331/?... (N.B.: I wrote and produced this film before learning how to turn on a camera. -JET)

Business birth and death rates: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/rese...

Aldrich Plan cartoon: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06...

Ford Theatre Reunion’s Godzilla cover: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMt4Oe...

Judging by that bit of filibuster, I'm guessing that you listen to a lot of wingnut talk radio...

Incidentally, "wingnut" radio agrees with your position, they think the president and congress have more to do with "jobs" than the FED. They don't understand that the Fed and the world banking manipulations, currency wars and the currency bubble have more to do with stopping job growth than government does.


Grow up.

Sure.....

"They" are failing......we've established a record for consecutive months of job growth, with the numbers of the past 24 months the best since the late 90s.....

Or are BLS and ADP divisions of One World Inc?

 

[MisterBeale]

Obama is the worst President ever...an empty chair

Yet when Republicans asked....Wouldn't you rather have a Republican President?
The American public replied....Hell NO!

That's probably true.

But then again, they seem to be hypnotized with, on the one hand, a woman on the verge of being indicted, and on the other, a reality TV star.

SO. . . . that's not really saying much.

It is saying plenty; that criminals control the Dhimmicratics Party, no real shock there, and that GOP rank and file loath their party establishment enough to trust and prefer a Reality TV star with a checkered liberal past to represent them instead.

The whole nation was subverted by internationalists a century ago. When ever a politician has the audacity to put American interests before the interests of international business or the visions of the globalists the get pushed out.

Naturally the regional governments suffer.

And the little folks get called traitors when they want to cling to the Bill of Rights. . . .

This bubbling bouillabaisse of paranoia is missing something....

Perhaps a dash of "rootless, cosmopolitan Jew".....

I'd say you're right, but it isn't paranoia, it is the natural progression of power, capital, bureaucracy and government.

It was the true cause of the Civil War. Local governments and State governments wanted to hold on to their power, Federalists and Centralists wanted more power and control.

Eventually, power WILL BE more centralized or civilization will decline.

It is just going to be a matter of how power is shared, or if we live in a world where things are autocratic.


As it stands, folks have no say, none. They don't have any say about how global corporations operate, nor do they have any say over how the global government is arranged.

If they did, there would probably be less agitation at the G8, G# summits, those climate summits, world economic forums, etc.


The people of the world now feel like they are being excluded by the rulers, and, let's face it, it is the one issue that the progressives and the libertarians agree on.


The global elites are building the world of tomorrow as a feudal state, with no input from the people they are lording over.

 

[IcebergSlim]

For the love of G*d, make it stop...

Hyperbolic claims on behalf of Ricardian Equivalence notwithstanding, Presidents exercise a degree of control over fiscal policy........the Fed exercises none....

The budget process begins with a request from the WH.....

"While the world breathlessly awaits the outcome of this week’s FOMC meeting—will the Federal Reserve raise interest rates or won’t it?—one thing is clear regardless: the Fed is driving the U.S. into a 2nd depression in order to carry out its one and only remit now that America’s ability to produce real jobs has been reduced to ash, namely, propping up criminal banks with multi-trillion-dollar giveaways.

What’s so disturbing about the fatal path that the Fed has been on for 7 years is that it's one the Fed went down before, when—by its own admission—it extended and deepened the Great Depression in the late 1930s with a foolhardy policy that jacked up total reserves and destroyed bank lending. In the words of Janet Yellen, "[t]he economy plunged back into depression." (6/23/09 tr. at p. 175)

That's curious, because exactly the same dynamic is at work now, as total reserves have skyrocketed since 2008 in perfect dollar-for-dollar tandem with a plunge in lending. The effect on the birth- and death rates of new and existing businesses, respectively, has been catastrophic.

And what has propelled total reserve balances into the stratosphere? Why, it's the Fed's fateful decision to pay banks interest for holding money with the Fed--money provided by none other than the Fed itself when it printed $1.73 trillion and handed it to the bustout banks in exchange for worthless mortgage-backed securities. The Fed pulled nearly exactly the same stunt in 1936-37 when it suddenly required banks to maintain higher reserves at the Fed. In both cases, the Fed's diversion of monies away from the economy proved disastrous. It remains to be seen whether the Fed will need another world war to cover up its ruinous acts.

BestEvidence’s newest film, “They Come from Planet Klepto,” undertakes an intensive examination of the transcript and exhibits from the Fed’s June 2009 FOMC meeting held during the first few critical months of the most ambitious monetary experiment of all time, which the Fed falsely swore was temporary in nature.

As it turns out, the Federal Reserve never intended to unwind the radical balance sheet expansion it began 7 years ago at all, as one of the central purposes of the Fed programs—aside from enabling broke banks to erect an illusion of solvency big enough to justify bonuses—was to cover up the very Wall Street crimes that caused the meltdown of 2008 in the first place.

“Planet Klepto" distinguishes itself from many other worthy efforts along the same lines in its granular treatment of untrammeled criminality driving Federal Reserve policy by lavishing attention on the Fed’s own words, charts, documents, projections, speeches, papers, spreadsheets and data.

Viewers are urged to consider the implications of the Federal Reserve’s proven willingness to prop up, at all costs, the criminal banks controlling it. If criminal giveaways aren’t out of bounds, what’s to stop takeaways when the next meltdown hits?

Source materials:

Bank deposits: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/...

Bank loans: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/...

Bernanke speech (text): http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/1...
Bernanke speech (video): http://www.c-span.org/video/?284139-1...

Excess reserves: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/...

June 2009 FOMC transcript: http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetar...

June 2009 FOMC presentation materials: http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetar...

Total reserve balances: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/...

Fed “Oceans of Cash” paper: http://www.clevelandfed.org/en/Newsro...

Mortgage-backed securities held by the Fed: https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2...

Merrill Lynch’s MBS sales, July 2008: http://www.economonitor.com/analysts/...

Bailout (2012): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1928331/?... (N.B.: I wrote and produced this film before learning how to turn on a camera. -JET)

Business birth and death rates: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/rese...

Aldrich Plan cartoon: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06...

Ford Theatre Reunion’s Godzilla cover: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMt4Oe...

Judging by that bit of filibuster, I'm guessing that you listen to a lot of wingnut talk radio...

Why don't you go back to the Badland's sock thread where you belong?

Occasionally, I like to bring a bit of light to the dark slums of USMB......complacent ignorance is the playground of the Devil....

Au contraire you vile little sock


Dark slums of USMB? Let's not forget, 95% of your posts are in THE BADLANDS.


The very fact that you dismiss the previously post fact's as nothing more than a "filibuster" with out due consideration, quite evidently means that it is you that are spreading partisan fear mongering with nothing helpful to the community.

The information I posted you will not find either on talk radio or on CFR controlled media. It is the truth about what is going on behind the scenes. It is a patriot's warning.


Why do you think the "Audit the Fed" Bill failed?


IT failed for the very reason that if the information above were known to the general public, the global economy would melt down tomorrow.

This ISN'T a partisan issue sir. I think you know that, you are just scared shitless. It is your job to spread disinfo. I wouldn't be at all surprised if you are an Obbabble minion.

The level of discussion at the Badlands is a bit more elevated.....sure we have our native morons, but we've managed to keep them in varying degrees of heliocentric orbit...

The Fed IS audited, and its balance sheet is public and available online...

I am disinclined to wade through the pap you regurgitated because life is much too short to indulge people who consider themselves "true patriots"...... The world is a chaotic place in which a large and disparate number of interests compete.....urban migration is not the result of a conspiracy...

 

[IcebergSlim]

Obama is the worst President ever...an empty chair

Yet when Republicans asked....Wouldn't you rather have a Republican President?
The American public replied....Hell NO!

That's probably true.

But then again, they seem to be hypnotized with, on the one hand, a woman on the verge of being indicted, and on the other, a reality TV star.

SO. . . . that's not really saying much.

It is saying plenty; that criminals control the Dhimmicratics Party, no real shock there, and that GOP rank and file loath their party establishment enough to trust and prefer a Reality TV star with a checkered liberal past to represent them instead.

The whole nation was subverted by internationalists a century ago. When ever a politician has the audacity to put American interests before the interests of international business or the visions of the globalists the get pushed out.

Naturally the regional governments suffer.

And the little folks get called traitors when they want to cling to the Bill of Rights. . . .

This bubbling bouillabaisse of paranoia is missing something....

Perhaps a dash of "rootless, cosmopolitan Jew".....

I'd say you're right, but it isn't paranoia, it is the natural progression of power, capital, bureaucracy and government.

It was the true cause of the Civil War. Local governments and State governments wanted to hold on to their power, Federalists and Centralists wanted more power and control.

Eventually, power WILL BE more centralized or civilization will decline.

It is just going to be a matter of how power is shared, or if we live in a world where things are autocratic.


As it stands, folks have no say, none. They don't have any say about how global corporations operate, nor do they have any say over how the global government is arranged.

If they did, there would probably be less agitation at the G8, G# summits, those climate summits, world economic forums, etc.


The people of the world now feel like they are being excluded by the rulers, and, let's face it, it is the one issue that the progressives and the libertarians agree on.


The global elites are building the world of tomorrow as a feudal state, with no input from the people they are lording over.

So what happened between the Old Feudal and the New Feudal which occasioned the loss of control of the hereditary elites?

 

[I amso IR]

Until and unless obama starts throwing innocent, loyal Americans into concentration camps, he'll still take a back seat to that fucking low-life fdr.

That may be so and I will not argue the point. However, the poll concerned Presidents since WWll. That would be from "Nuke them back to the stone age" Harry S Truman to present. Honestly, every President in this era has screwed up one way or the other. George H.W. Bush had the "read my lips" remark as well as "The New World Order" disaster which has led to todays socialist seeking Americans. As with so many other members, yourself included, it is fun watching folks fall all over themselves defending Obama and company. Best regards, I amso IR P.S. Obama is the biggest failure since 1776, in my opinion, bar none.

 

[Unkotare]

Until and unless obama starts throwing innocent, loyal Americans into concentration camps, he'll still take a back seat to that fucking low-life fdr.

That may be so and I will not argue the point. However, the poll concerned Presidents since WWll. That would be from "Nuke them back to the stone age" Harry S Truman to present. Honestly, every President in this era has screwed up one way or the other. George H.W. Bush had the "read my lips" remark as well as "The New World Order" disaster which has led to todays socialist seeking Americans. As with so many other members, yourself included, it is fun watching folks fall all over themselves defending Obama and company. Best regards, I amso IR P.S. Obama is the biggest failure since 1776, in my opinion, bar none.

"Yourself included"?

????

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Obama is definitely the worst in my lifetime. Carter used to be. Carter responded poorly to tough circumstances but Obama has actually created bad circumstances.

Describe what you see...

A deflection.
Median income is down, prices are up. Net; consumer economic contraction. Average American household lost over $10k annually for obama's first six years.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Obama is definitely the worst in my lifetime. Carter used to be. Carter responded poorly to tough circumstances but Obama has actually created bad circumstances.

Give it a year and you will be claiming Hillary is the worst in your lifetime

Let's hope that won't need to be a consideration. The White House would have to be called the Big House.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

To which poll are you referring?


While you are sorting that out, bite down on this noise

238 presidential scholars: Bush worst president of modern era, fifth worst in US history

238 liberals. Enough said. Obama is the worst president.

Yeah......skuulin is like a virus......

but then there's this...

President Bush will leave office as one of the most unpopular departing presidents in history, according to a new CBS News/New York Times poll showing Mr. Bush's final approval rating at 22 percent.

Seventy-three percent say they disapprove of the way Mr. Bush has handled his job as president over the last eight years.

Mr. Bush's final approval rating is the lowest final rating for an outgoing president since Gallup began asking about presidential approval more than 70 years ago.

Bush's Final Approval Rating: 22 Percent

Remarkably, if you add the poll numbers for the outgoing Honorable VP Esquire Shooter, the two of them STILL fall short of Obama's lowest....

Bush still better than obuthole.

What fires up your morning wood is not at issue....

If you are too stupid I will explain it where your two year old simple mind can understand; obuthole is obama whom Bush is still better than, and spent less money with a war on two fronts. Stupid libtards.

 

[Brain357]

Where is this ruin? Are repubs so soft they think this is ruin? Stop crying we are ok.

The ruin is in the making by you and your fellow Marxists, twat face.

So there isn't any.

 

[I amso IR]

Until and unless obama starts throwing innocent, loyal Americans into concentration camps, he'll still take a back seat to that fucking low-life fdr.

That may be so and I will not argue the point. However, the poll concerned Presidents since WWll. That would be from "Nuke them back to the stone age" Harry S Truman to present. Honestly, every President in this era has screwed up one way or the other. George H.W. Bush had the "read my lips" remark as well as "The New World Order" disaster which has led to todays socialist seeking Americans. As with so many other members, yourself included, it is fun watching folks fall all over themselves defending Obama and company. Best regards, I amso IR P.S. Obama is the biggest failure since 1776, in my opinion, bar none.

"Yourself included"?

????

Of course Unk. Would be no fun sitting it out. If it will ease your pain, FDR truly stepped on his dick when he allowed that to take place. However his period in office was not part of the OP as Truman finished out FDR's term. Your feelings are well taken and understood. Again, best regards, I amso IR.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Obama is definitely the worst in my lifetime. Carter used to be. Carter responded poorly to tough circumstances but Obama has actually created bad circumstances.

Describe what you see...

A deflection.
Median income is down, prices are up. Net; consumer economic contraction. Average American household lost over $10k annually for obama's first six years.

This is a bunch of inchoate gibberish......to demonstrate that you aren't just leaking from the lip, why don't you post the stats and the sources?

 

[IcebergSlim]

To which poll are you referring?


While you are sorting that out, bite down on this noise

238 presidential scholars: Bush worst president of modern era, fifth worst in US history

238 liberals. Enough said. Obama is the worst president.

Yeah......skuulin is like a virus......

but then there's this...

President Bush will leave office as one of the most unpopular departing presidents in history, according to a new CBS News/New York Times poll showing Mr. Bush's final approval rating at 22 percent.

Seventy-three percent say they disapprove of the way Mr. Bush has handled his job as president over the last eight years.

Mr. Bush's final approval rating is the lowest final rating for an outgoing president since Gallup began asking about presidential approval more than 70 years ago.

Bush's Final Approval Rating: 22 Percent

Remarkably, if you add the poll numbers for the outgoing Honorable VP Esquire Shooter, the two of them STILL fall short of Obama's lowest....

Bush still better than obuthole.

What fires up your morning wood is not at issue....

If you are too stupid I will explain it where your two year old simple mind can understand; obuthole is obama whom Bush is still better than, and spent less money with a war on two fronts. Stupid libtards.

Have you spent many years huffing starter fluid, dude?

 

[555]

I'm ambivalent about Bill O'Reilly, however last night, or perhaps in the last two nights, he made a really good point about Obama and American voters: that the American people really didn't "know" Obama before voting for him (twice)...that we didn't adequately vet him, that we didn't demand enough forums wherein he could be tested.

Whether O'Reilly has a good point - or not - it's really on us that we enabled Obama to do to us what he has done. Let's endeavor not to repeat such a fucking huge mistake.

 

[IcebergSlim]

I'm ambivalent about Bill O'Reilly, however last night, or perhaps in the last two nights, he made a really good point about Obama and American voters: that the American people really didn't "know" Obama before voting for him (twice)...that we didn't adequately vet him, that we didn't demand enough forums wherein he could be tested.

Whether O'Reilly has a good point - or not - it's really on us that we enabled Obama to do to us what he has done. Let's endeavor not to repeat such a fucking huge mistake.

In the interest of full disclosure, did you cast one or more votes for Obama's predecessor?

 

[regent]

The presidents have been rated by many groups, but the rating that matters most is the historian's rating. The last was rating was by Sienna Research Institute. Siena college does not do the rating but asks the best historians and experts on presidents for their rating. In the last poll 238 historians and presidential experts were asked to submit their ratings. Of course others rate too, such as the Wall Street Journal, or the Chicago Tribune and at times just conservatives or liberals, but the biggie is the historian poll that began in 1948.

 

[American_Jihad]

Barry Salunsky Obongo

...

The President Who Has Done the Most Damage
by Dennis Prager
October 29, 2013




The only question is whether it can ever be undone.

I have been broadcasting for 31 years and writing for longer than that. I do not recall ever saying on radio or in print that a president is doing lasting damage to our country. I did not like the presidencies of Jimmy Carter (the last Democrat I voted for) or Bill Clinton. Nor did I care for the “compassionate conservatism” of George W. Bush. In modern political parlance “compassionate” is a euphemism for ever-expanding government.

But I have never written or broadcast that our country was being seriously damaged by a president. So it is with great sadness that I write that President Barack Obama has done and continues to do major damage to America. The only question is whether this can ever be undone.

This is equally true domestically and internationally. Domestically, his policies have had a grave impact on the American economy.

He has overseen the weakest recovery from a recession in modern American history.

He has mired the country in unprecedented levels of debt: about $6.5 trillion — that is 6,500 billion — in five years (this after calling his predecessor “unpatriotic” for adding nearly $5 trillion in eight years).

He has fashioned a country in which more Americans now receive government aid — means-tested, let alone non-means-tested — than work full-time.

He has no method of paying for this debt other than printing more money — thereby surreptitiously taxing everyone through inflation, including the poor he claims to be helping, and cheapening the dollar to the point that some countries are talking about another reserve currency — and saddling the next generations with enormous debts.

With his 2,500-page Affordable Care Act he has made it impossible for hundreds of thousands, soon millions, of Americans to keep their individual or employer-sponsored group health insurance; he has stymied American medical innovation with an utterly destructive tax on medical devices; and he has caused hundreds of thousands of workers to lose full-time jobs because of the health-care costs imposed by Obamacare on employers.

His Internal Revenue Service used its unparalleled power to stymie political dissent. No one has been held accountable.

His ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were murdered by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya. No one has been blamed.

The only blame the Obama administration has leveled was on a videomaker in California who had nothing to do with the assault.

In this president’s White House the buck stops nowhere.

…

Read more at: The President Who Has Done the Most Damage, by Dennis Prager, National Review

Lest you remain susceptible...... Prager is an imbecile....

Said the liberal...

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Obama is definitely the worst in my lifetime. Carter used to be. Carter responded poorly to tough circumstances but Obama has actually created bad circumstances.

Describe what you see...

A deflection.
Median income is down, prices are up. Net; consumer economic contraction. Average American household lost over $10k annually for obama's first six years.

This is a bunch of inchoate gibberish......to demonstrate that you aren't just leaking from the lip, why don't you post the stats and the sources?

I have a budget. Consumer goods increased for our average household by over $100/week. $3400 annual increase in gasoline costs @ $2/gallon increase x mileage and mpg. Increased property taxes to offset lost gov income due to slumping sales tax revenues and the total exceeds $10k annually against a reduced net income due to property tax increases.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Barry Salunsky Obongo

...

The President Who Has Done the Most Damage
by Dennis Prager
October 29, 2013




The only question is whether it can ever be undone.

I have been broadcasting for 31 years and writing for longer than that. I do not recall ever saying on radio or in print that a president is doing lasting damage to our country. I did not like the presidencies of Jimmy Carter (the last Democrat I voted for) or Bill Clinton. Nor did I care for the “compassionate conservatism” of George W. Bush. In modern political parlance “compassionate” is a euphemism for ever-expanding government.

But I have never written or broadcast that our country was being seriously damaged by a president. So it is with great sadness that I write that President Barack Obama has done and continues to do major damage to America. The only question is whether this can ever be undone.

This is equally true domestically and internationally. Domestically, his policies have had a grave impact on the American economy.

He has overseen the weakest recovery from a recession in modern American history.

He has mired the country in unprecedented levels of debt: about $6.5 trillion — that is 6,500 billion — in five years (this after calling his predecessor “unpatriotic” for adding nearly $5 trillion in eight years).

He has fashioned a country in which more Americans now receive government aid — means-tested, let alone non-means-tested — than work full-time.

He has no method of paying for this debt other than printing more money — thereby surreptitiously taxing everyone through inflation, including the poor he claims to be helping, and cheapening the dollar to the point that some countries are talking about another reserve currency — and saddling the next generations with enormous debts.

With his 2,500-page Affordable Care Act he has made it impossible for hundreds of thousands, soon millions, of Americans to keep their individual or employer-sponsored group health insurance; he has stymied American medical innovation with an utterly destructive tax on medical devices; and he has caused hundreds of thousands of workers to lose full-time jobs because of the health-care costs imposed by Obamacare on employers.

His Internal Revenue Service used its unparalleled power to stymie political dissent. No one has been held accountable.

His ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were murdered by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya. No one has been blamed.

The only blame the Obama administration has leveled was on a videomaker in California who had nothing to do with the assault.

In this president’s White House the buck stops nowhere.

…

Read more at: The President Who Has Done the Most Damage, by Dennis Prager, National Review

Lest you remain susceptible...... Prager is an imbecile....

Said the liberal...

It's demonstrable.......which is why you are having issues seeing it......