We won't get him out by making his case high profile. The only way we can do him any good is some quiet bargaining and arm twisting.
Agreed. And that means the President only gets involved if there is no other way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We won't get him out by making his case high profile. The only way we can do him any good is some quiet bargaining and arm twisting.
Hogwash. The only people who criticize him that way have an agenda against him. They criticize his every breath.
What do you expect from the Pakistainsi, roses?
Now we know why you call yourself "Blind" Boo. Very fitting
We should have flew this guy out of the country as soon as Bin Laden was killed.
Damn straight. It could have been arranged and should have been.
This will make it much harder for informants to trusts us now.
Just plain despicable. I don't give a shit who is in the White House...this is unforgivable.
Well...what do you know...I can't even find a story about this on CNN/MSNBC.
This is a HUUGE story - no headlines.
We won't get him out by making his case high profile. The only way we can do him any good is some quiet bargaining and arm twisting.
Agreed. And that means the President only gets involved if there is no other way.
Secretary of State Clinton was pretty irate over it
Yeah she looks real 'irate.' Every recent photo i've seen of her, she's drinkin & partying it up. And she's becoming a big ole fat ass too. Must be nice.
We won't get him out by making his case high profile. The only way we can do him any good is some quiet bargaining and arm twisting.
Pakistan is our enemy but we are only friendly with them since they provide a southern supply route into Afghanistan.
We need to get more supplies through the NDN, so we can cut our ties with the scumbag Pakistanis.
Also, we need to align ourselves with India against Pakistan for the long term.
Only problem is Pakistan has some serious long range missiles.
We won't get him out by making his case high profile. The only way we can do him any good is some quiet bargaining and arm twisting.
Dead wrong again.
Hogwash. The only people who criticize him that way have an agenda against him. They criticize his every breath.
What do you expect from the Pakistainsi, roses?
Now we know why you call yourself "Blind" Boo. Very fitting
Wow, you're the first to come up with that one..........
Actually playing fetch with my nearly blind dog reminded me of the American voters in that she was easily distracted, but her nose would sniff out her toy where ever I threw it.
So what is your agenda?
Now we know why you call yourself "Blind" Boo. Very fitting
Wow, you're the first to come up with that one..........
Actually playing fetch with my nearly blind dog reminded me of the American voters in that she was easily distracted, but her nose would sniff out her toy where ever I threw it.
So what is your agenda?
You think someone has to have an agenda to think this is wrong??
Go on USPO forum...I had the same username there as here...go ahead and search through my old posts about Bush and the Iraq war...there are plenty of them.
This has nothing to do which damn party the current President belongs to - this is suicide foreign policy to out your informant. Just plain immoral and bad form.
Wow, you're the first to come up with that one..........
Actually playing fetch with my nearly blind dog reminded me of the American voters in that she was easily distracted, but her nose would sniff out her toy where ever I threw it.
So what is your agenda?
You think someone has to have an agenda to think this is wrong??
Go on USPO forum...I had the same username there as here...go ahead and search through my old posts about Bush and the Iraq war...there are plenty of them.
This has nothing to do which damn party the current President belongs to - this is suicide foreign policy to out your informant. Just plain immoral and bad form.
Nope. People who criticize the president by saying he is taking too much credit for the OBL operation have an agenda against the man. I just assumed by your one liner you actually read the post.......my bad.
I don't see any real evidence that the Obama Administration outed this man. The NY Times article says he admitted his involvment to Pakistani officals in the weeks after the raid. Panetta was said to have used his name last December but he was already under arrest by then.
WHY is it "treason" against our good ally pal buddy friend Pok-ee-stahn for the doctor to provide intel that helped us splatter bin Laden's brains on the wall?
WHY is it "treason" against our good ally pal buddy friend Pok-ee-stahn for the doctor to provide intel that helped us splatter bin Laden's brains on the wall?
WHY is it "treason" against our good ally pal buddy friend Pok-ee-stahn for the doctor to provide intel that helped us splatter bin Laden's brains on the wall?
I still say he should have gotten a better lawyer and placed blame one Obama since Obama took credit for it.
WHY is it "treason" against our good ally pal buddy friend Pok-ee-stahn for the doctor to provide intel that helped us splatter bin Laden's brains on the wall?
Because Usama Bin Laden was a guest of the Pakistani government and for the Doctor to turn him in was treason.
Yeah you're correct no doubt...The comment was made tongue-in-cheek...knowing full well their system isn't anywhere near ours...WHY is it "treason" against our good ally pal buddy friend Pok-ee-stahn for the doctor to provide intel that helped us splatter bin Laden's brains on the wall?
I still say he should have gotten a better lawyer and placed blame one Obama since Obama took credit for it.
That won't work in the Pakistani courts, your guilt is already decided before your trial anyways in those countries.