So we can write off ABU GRAB to some low-level troop ******* things up.
Explain to me how both incidents ended up in the press?
Explain to me why the Dems celebrated ABU GRAB?
Explain to me why the only announced response to the Kuran burnings was an apology to Karzi and an announcement that troops in US compounds should turn their desks toward the door? Boy that sure help....didn't it?
Well, first, at the time of Abu Grahib, I defended the actions of the Administration and thought that this was a case of unprepared reservists screwing up. And I got into some royal fights with liberals over that, who were absolutely insisting PFC Lindey England was phoning Rummy at night.
But since I don't bend at the Altar of the Mittster, you won't believe that.
But to the point. Destroying the Korans was an oversight by an officer lacking cultural sensitivity. Makes me kind of wonder because there were other incidents like this through the war, and you thought they'd have the training better.
Abu Grahib, on the other hand, was pretty malicious. It was one sadist who convinced others to go along with him because he told them he was a prison guard in civilian life and this is how you control prisoners.
JMHO, btw.