Obama Orders Climate Change Be Considered in Military Planning

[Weatherman2020]

So you think think the earth is only 135 years old, figures you are more stupider then the 6,000 year old earth bible thumpers.

They have all kinds of other measurements going back millenia, ice cores tree rings, etc etc, dupe.

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

I'm STILL not a climatologist. But I'm not duped either.

Well, since you're telling me tree rings equal temperature, that does technically qualify you as duped.

BTW - that would be a Horticulturist who would know the growth habits of that species of tree, not a climatologist.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It is, stupid. Ay caramba.

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

 

[Wyatt earp]

They have all kinds of other measurements going back millenia, ice cores tree rings, etc etc, dupe.

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

I'm STILL not a climatologist. But I'm not duped either.

Well, since you're telling me tree rings equal temperature, that does technically qualify you as duped.

BTW - that would be a Horticulturist who would know the growth habits of that species of tree, not a climatologist.

Where did Mann get his tree specimens from?

 

[francoHFW]

July 2016 was world's hottest month since records began, says Nasa ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Aug 16, 2016 - As the string of hottest months continues, 2016 is 'virtually certain' to be the ... the past 14 months have broken the temperature record for each month, ... Hottest ever June marks 14thmonth of record-breaking temperatures.

Brainwashed functional morons everywhere.....

So you think think the earth is only 135 years old, figures you are more stupider then the 6,000 year old earth bible thumpers.

They have all kinds of other measurements going back millenia, ice cores tree rings, etc etc, dupe.

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

By studying tree rings and other clues in our environment, scientists have learned that there have been times when most of the planet was covered in ice, and there have also been much warmer periods. In general, climate changes prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s can be explained by natural causes, such as changes in solar energy and volcanic eruptions. Recent climate changes, however, cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Instead, human activities are very likely responsible. Tree rings alone cannot tell us whether human activities are responsible, but they do help by revealing patterns that scientists can investigate further.

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/documents/tree-rings.pdf

 

[Weatherman2020]

So you think think the earth is only 135 years old, figures you are more stupider then the 6,000 year old earth bible thumpers.

They have all kinds of other measurements going back millenia, ice cores tree rings, etc etc, dupe.

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

By studying tree rings and other clues in our environment, scientists have learned that there have been times when most of the planet was covered in ice, and there have also been much warmer periods. In general, climate changes prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s can be explained by natural causes, such as changes in solar energy and volcanic eruptions. Recent climate changes, however, cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Instead, human activities are very likely responsible. Tree rings alone cannot tell us whether human activities are responsible, but they do help by revealing patterns that scientists can investigate further.

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/documents/tree-rings.pdf

So does a tree grow faster at 90F with water or 90F with drought?

 

[francoHFW]

It is, stupid. Ay caramba.

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

 

[Wyatt earp]

So you think think the earth is only 135 years old, figures you are more stupider then the 6,000 year old earth bible thumpers.

They have all kinds of other measurements going back millenia, ice cores tree rings, etc etc, dupe.

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

By studying tree rings and other clues in our environment, scientists have learned that there have been times when most of the planet was covered in ice, and there have also been much warmer periods. In general, climate changes prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s can be explained by natural causes, such as changes in solar energy and volcanic eruptions. Recent climate changes, however, cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Instead, human activities are very likely responsible. Tree rings alone cannot tell us whether human activities are responsible, but they do help by revealing patterns that scientists can investigate further.

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/documents/tree-rings.pdf

You win a gold star, you learned today the climate has always changed, now can you figure out the resolutions on those proxys? Can you figure out you can't use them with modern temperature readings to get anything significant in a trend.


By the way man just got his tree specimens from only Siberia .

 

[francoHFW]

They have all kinds of other measurements going back millenia, ice cores tree rings, etc etc, dupe.

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

By studying tree rings and other clues in our environment, scientists have learned that there have been times when most of the planet was covered in ice, and there have also been much warmer periods. In general, climate changes prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s can be explained by natural causes, such as changes in solar energy and volcanic eruptions. Recent climate changes, however, cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Instead, human activities are very likely responsible. Tree rings alone cannot tell us whether human activities are responsible, but they do help by revealing patterns that scientists can investigate further.

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/documents/tree-rings.pdf

So does a tree grow faster at 90F with water or 90F with drought?

Ask a climatologist, dupe. They say it supports MMGW. Ay caramba...

 

[Weatherman2020]

It is, stupid. Ay caramba.

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

Politifact? You may as well quote Gores website.

 

[francoHFW]

They have all kinds of other measurements going back millenia, ice cores tree rings, etc etc, dupe.

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

By studying tree rings and other clues in our environment, scientists have learned that there have been times when most of the planet was covered in ice, and there have also been much warmer periods. In general, climate changes prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s can be explained by natural causes, such as changes in solar energy and volcanic eruptions. Recent climate changes, however, cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Instead, human activities are very likely responsible. Tree rings alone cannot tell us whether human activities are responsible, but they do help by revealing patterns that scientists can investigate further.

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/documents/tree-rings.pdf

You win a gold star, you learned today the climate has always changed, now can you figure out the resolutions on those proxys? Can you figure out you can't use them with modern temperature readings to get anything significant in a trend.


By the way man just got his tree specimens from only Siberia .

The hell they did, dupe.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

By studying tree rings and other clues in our environment, scientists have learned that there have been times when most of the planet was covered in ice, and there have also been much warmer periods. In general, climate changes prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s can be explained by natural causes, such as changes in solar energy and volcanic eruptions. Recent climate changes, however, cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Instead, human activities are very likely responsible. Tree rings alone cannot tell us whether human activities are responsible, but they do help by revealing patterns that scientists can investigate further.

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/documents/tree-rings.pdf

So does a tree grow faster at 90F with water or 90F with drought?

Ask a climatologist, dupe. They say it supports MMGW. Ay caramba...

Why would a climatologist know if a tree grow faster at 90F with water or 90F with drought?

 

[francoHFW]

It is, stupid. Ay caramba.

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

Politifact? You may as well quote Gores website.

Read it, dupe. They also incorrectly made Obama's lie of the year. Which was was a prediction from years earlier, and HIGHLY debatable. READ IT.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It is, stupid. Ay caramba.

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

What does Fox have anything to do with it dupe?

 

[Weatherman2020]

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

Politifact? You may as well quote Gores website.

Read it, dupe. They also incorrectly made Obama's lie of the year. Which was was a prediction from years earlier, and HIGHLY debatable. READ IT.

You're supplying enough humor, thanks.

 

[francoHFW]

It is, stupid. Ay caramba.

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

What does Fox have anything to do with it dupe?

All the same lying New BS GOP propaganda machine, dupe. Pants on Fire
Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global warming

 

[Weatherman2020]

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

What does Fox have anything to do with it dupe?

All the same lying New BS GOP propaganda machine, dupe. Pants on Fire
Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global warming

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

 

[Wyatt earp]

Tree rings and ice core samples tell you temperature? Since when?

Read something ferchrissake, dupes. lol

tree rings and ice cores support GW - Google Search

Nothing there about tree rings telling you how hot it is.

Which year was the hottest for this tree?
View attachment 90663

By studying tree rings and other clues in our environment, scientists have learned that there have been times when most of the planet was covered in ice, and there have also been much warmer periods. In general, climate changes prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s can be explained by natural causes, such as changes in solar energy and volcanic eruptions. Recent climate changes, however, cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Instead, human activities are very likely responsible. Tree rings alone cannot tell us whether human activities are responsible, but they do help by revealing patterns that scientists can investigate further.

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/documents/tree-rings.pdf

You win a gold star, you learned today the climate has always changed, now can you figure out the resolutions on those proxys? Can you figure out you can't use them with modern temperature readings to get anything significant in a trend.


By the way man just got his tree specimens from only Siberia .

The hell they did, dupe.

Has any piece of scientific research ever been so thoroughly discredited? Tom Wigley’s son’s high school project falsified the hockey stick. The latest Sheep mountain study shows the hockey stick disappears, unless you use Mike’s trick of splicing in the thermometer record, to hide the divergence problem. The Russian scientists who collected the original tree ring samples, tried to warn Mann he was measuring the wrong metric. Yet somehow this nonsensical analysis became a central icon of the climate alarmist movement – and is still widely reproduced by the more scientifically illiterate alarmists.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It isn't even close. Earth had no ice during Jurassic.

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

What does Fox have anything to do with it dupe?

All the same lying New BS GOP propaganda machine, dupe. Pants on Fire
Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global warming

Thier own words fool...


NASA’s top climatologist said that the US had been cooling

Whither U.S. Climate?
By James Hansen, Reto Ruedy, Jay Glascoe and Makiko Sato — August 1999

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought.

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

NOAA and CRU also reported no warming in the US during the century prior to 1989.

February 04, 1989

Last week, scientists from the United States Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that a study of temperature readings for the contiguous 48 states over the last century showed there had been no significant change in average temperature over that period. Dr. (Phil) Jones said in a telephone interview today that his own results for the 48 states agreed with those findings.

New York Times

Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer. The animation below shows how NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend.

 

[francoHFW]

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

Politifact? You may as well quote Gores website.

Read it, dupe. They also incorrectly made Obama's lie of the year. Which was was a prediction from years earlier, and HIGHLY debatable. READ IT.

You're supplying enough humor, thanks.

Hilarious, lazy, don't want the truth dupe.
Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global warming

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

What does Fox have anything to do with it dupe?

All the same lying New BS GOP propaganda machine, dupe. Pants on Fire
Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global warming

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

Pants on fire. Telegraph suqs.

 

[francoHFW]

It's been warming the last 100 years. It's called MMGW, 95% chance according to climatologists...

What after NOAA changed it?

Duped AGAIN and always, dupe. D'OH!

Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global - PolitiFact
www.politifact.com/.../foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-...
PolitiFact.com
Jun 25, 2014 - He provided this animated chart to prove his point (the chart marked "a" is the old ... It accused government scientists of altering the U.S. temperature .... NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000, ...

What does Fox have anything to do with it dupe?

All the same lying New BS GOP propaganda machine, dupe. Pants on Fire
Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global warming

Thier own words fool...


NASA’s top climatologist said that the US had been cooling

Whither U.S. Climate?
By James Hansen, Reto Ruedy, Jay Glascoe and Makiko Sato — August 1999

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought.

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

NOAA and CRU also reported no warming in the US during the century prior to 1989.

February 04, 1989

Last week, scientists from the United States Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that a study of temperature readings for the contiguous 48 states over the last century showed there had been no significant change in average temperature over that period. Dr. (Phil) Jones said in a telephone interview today that his own results for the 48 states agreed with those findings.

New York Times

Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer. The animation below shows how NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend.

1989? lol. Pants on fire. Fox's Doocy: NASA fudged data to make the case for global warming NYT suqs lol.