Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This guy doesn't even make sense anymore. It is quite obvious that his current healthcare plan is not going to pass, and yet he continues to push it. Any smart president would start cutting back on the obvious parts of the plan that won't pass and push for the ones that will. But no.....he has had too much early success with other legislation with his democratically controlled congress that he is blinded by pride.
You're kidding yourself. Never underestimate the power of sandbagging holdouts, and the pot sweetening that results. Cap and Trade is your first hint.It is quite obvious that his current healthcare plan is not going to pass
EDITORS NOTE: This column is available exclusively through King Features Syndicate. For permission to reprint or excerpt this copyrighted material, please contact: [email protected], or phone 800-708-7311, ext 246.
Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. © 2009 by King Features Syndicate
You're kidding yourself. Never underestimate the power of sandbagging holdouts, and the pot sweetening that results. Cap and Trade is your first hint.It is quite obvious that his current healthcare plan is not going to pass
Obamacare will pass.
Yeah, yeah I know.....You're kidding yourself. Never underestimate the power of sandbagging holdouts, and the pot sweetening that results. Cap and Trade is your first hint.It is quite obvious that his current healthcare plan is not going to pass
Obamacare will pass.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuStsFW4EmQ]YouTube - Kelly's Heroes Oddball - Negative Waves[/ame]
EDITORS NOTE: This column is available exclusively through King Features Syndicate. For permission to reprint or excerpt this copyrighted material, please contact: [email protected], or phone 800-708-7311, ext 246.
Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. © 2009 by King Features Syndicate
I would be more concerned about your plagarism lawsuit from King Features Syndicate
EDITORS NOTE: This column is available exclusively through King Features Syndicate. For permission to reprint or excerpt this copyrighted material, please contact: [email protected], or phone 800-708-7311, ext 246.
Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. © 2009 by King Features Syndicate
I would be more concerned about your plagarism lawsuit from King Features Syndicate
since he did not take credit for the article its not plagerism, he posted the source, go read a book ya dope
I would be more concerned about your plagarism lawsuit from King Features Syndicate
since he did not take credit for the article its not plagerism, he posted the source, go read a book ya dope
"For Permission to reprint"
I've read a book, written two.
since he did not take credit for the article its not plagerism, he posted the source, go read a book ya dope
"For Permission to reprint"
I've read a book, written two.
then you should have known it was not plagerism
"For Permission to reprint"
I've read a book, written two.
then you should have known it was not plagerism
"for permission to reprint"
then you should have known it was not plagerism
"for permission to reprint"
not plagerism
perhaps you should look at the thread before you type.
It's jackasses like you who make this forum not fun to visit and discuss real issues. Do you really think it was plagerism for me to post something that I got off the world-wide net? They can put those signs about not printing up all they want, but once it is published on the net, it becomes public domain. Now, back to the real issuse before my thread was hijacked."For Permission to reprint"
I've read a book, written two.
then you should have known it was not plagerism
"for permission to reprint"
It's jackasses like you who make this forum not fun to visit and discuss real issues. Do you really think it was plagerism for me to post something that I got off the world-wide net? They can put those signs about not printing up all they want, but once it is published on the net, it becomes public domain. Now, back to the real issuse before my thread was hijacked.then you should have known it was not plagerism
"for permission to reprint"
perhaps you should look at the thread before you type.
did he pass off the article as his own work?
perhaps you should look at the thread before you type.
did he pass off the article as his own work?
please reference post #12 in this thread