obama's immigration plan, like the plans of Sanctuary cities, is predicated on one unshakable belief. The immigrant is a more valuable person than the citizen.
That seems to be a belief 'dubya' shares with the President.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
obama's immigration plan, like the plans of Sanctuary cities, is predicated on one unshakable belief. The immigrant is a more valuable person than the citizen.
Let's get off the "amnesty" bandwagon and start talking about practical solutions to our illegal immigration problem. First, let's SECURE THE BORDER WITH A REAL FENCE. Then, let's develop a TAMPER PROOF I.D. in order to identify those who are here legally. Then, we can deal with those who are already here:
1. Require registration within a specified time period. Deport those who fail to register.
2. Issue conditional visas to those without criminal records.
3. Require self-support and payment of taxes for 10 years* WITHOUT GOVERNMENT BENEFITS.**
4. Grant permanent visas.
5. Make return to the U.S. after deportation a felony.
*This is the same waiting period as in current law. The only difference is allowing them to stay in the U.S.
**This would result in additional federal income and social security tax revenues with no increase in expenditures.
Any problems with this approach?
You can tunnel under a fence. Haven't you heard about San Diego? You people wanting a fence are just stupid. Haven't you ever climbed a fence and how hard is it to cut through one? What are we going to do put the whole military guarding a fence?
If it's a felony to return to the US, who pays to imprison them? As for 3. why not just use the same time period a legal immigrant would use to become a citizen once they get here?
What do you suggest to get the problem under control?
I take it you aren't trying to blame me because some idiot spent over 15 pages saying the same thing and providing no evidence to support his position.
They were in no mood to think of their Japanese neighbors as Americans.
Dubya, give it up. The politics will require tightening of the boarder in order to get the rest. The pro-immigration reform groups in Congress do not have the votes without having to give in on this issue.
I understand the Republican condition, but I don't understand how it can be done. A fence isn't going to do it, so what else is there? Are we going to change the law and allow the military to guard the border? It's easy to say the border needs to be tightened, but coming up with suggestions that work isn't so easy.
A bounty works for me.
obama is going to push for his immigration until every body of water in the US is like Falcon Lake.
You are describing yourself, ever since you were trounced some time ago. You simply can't handle being told and proven that you are wrong on many issues. Your anti-government stance is silly, your arguments are worse, and your personal self-entitlement is baffling. You won't change, which is the mark of an immature personality. So be it.
I disagree about the need for Japanese Internment during WWII and some kook wants to go psycho about it? War by it's nature taxes civil liberties and sometimes tough decisions have to be made.
I take it you aren't trying to blame me because some idiot spent over 15 pages saying the same thing and providing no evidence to support his position. I've studied the military history of WWII and no one is going to convince me there wasn't a grave security problem on the west coast. It's real easy to look back that we won the war, but that wasn't the reality at the beginning of WWII. The fact is, we were out manned and out gunned at that time.
It's certainly regretable that Japanese Americans were put in internment camps, but it was necessary to secure the west coast to provide major repairs to our ships. I don't fault a President for making such a tough decision.
The decision was partly based on safety. Americans in 1944 weren't the same Americans we have today. There was no altar of multiculturalism, nor was there a communal worship of diversity. Those Japanese Americans were at the non-existent mercy of their American neighbors. They were in no mood to think of their Japanese neighbors as Americans.
I disagree about the need for Japanese Internment during WWII and some kook wants to go psycho about it? War by it's nature taxes civil liberties and sometimes tough decisions have to be made.
I take it you aren't trying to blame me because some idiot spent over 15 pages saying the same thing and providing no evidence to support his position. I've studied the military history of WWII and no one is going to convince me there wasn't a grave security problem on the west coast. It's real easy to look back that we won the war, but that wasn't the reality at the beginning of WWII. The fact is, we were out manned and out gunned at that time.
It's certainly regretable that Japanese Americans were put in internment camps, but it was necessary to secure the west coast to provide major repairs to our ships. I don't fault a President for making such a tough decision.
The decision was partly based on safety. Americans in 1944 weren't the same Americans we have today. There was no altar of multiculturalism, nor was there a communal worship of diversity. Those Japanese Americans were at the non-existent mercy of their American neighbors. They were in no mood to think of their Japanese neighbors as Americans.
And unlike German and Italian immigrants, the Japanese were easy to spot. It was strictly racial and had nothing to do with safety.
You'd be lucky to get the toy home before it breaks into pieces.
You'd be lucky to get the toy home before it breaks into pieces.
Like all of your failed, un-American arguments for defending FDR's concentration camps.
Let's get off the "amnesty" bandwagon and start talking about practical solutions to our illegal immigration problem. First, let's SECURE THE BORDER WITH A REAL FENCE. Then, let's develop a TAMPER PROOF I.D. in order to identify those who are here legally. Then, we can deal with those who are already here:
1. Require registration within a specified time period. Deport those who fail to register.
2. Issue conditional visas to those without criminal records.
3. Require self-support and payment of taxes for 10 years* WITHOUT GOVERNMENT BENEFITS.**
4. Grant permanent visas.
5. Make return to the U.S. after deportation a felony.
*This is the same waiting period as in current law. The only difference is allowing them to stay in the U.S.
**This would result in additional federal income and social security tax revenues with no increase in expenditures.
Any problems with this approach?
Let's get off the "amnesty" bandwagon and start talking about practical solutions to our illegal immigration problem. First, let's SECURE THE BORDER WITH A REAL FENCE. Then, let's develop a TAMPER PROOF I.D. in order to identify those who are here legally. Then, we can deal with those who are already here:
1. Require registration within a specified time period. Deport those who fail to register.
2. Issue conditional visas to those without criminal records.
3. Require self-support and payment of taxes for 10 years* WITHOUT GOVERNMENT BENEFITS.**
4. Grant permanent visas.
5. Make return to the U.S. after deportation a felony.
*This is the same waiting period as in current law. The only difference is allowing them to stay in the U.S.
**This would result in additional federal income and social security tax revenues with no increase in expenditures.
Any problems with this approach?
The Great Wall of China didn't work to keep out the Mongols. A "Great Wall of America" won't keep out the Mexicans.
How would you make a tamper proof ID? Implant RFID tags on everyone at birth? Tatoo SSN's on people's foreheads? Barcodes?
They are coming here for jobs. Strictly enforce employment laws and punish businesses who hire illegals.
Other than that, I don't have a problem with deporting folks who are here illegally or under false pretenses.
There is a bipartisan bill floating around. I think Obama might not like it because it states that those here illegally cannot have access to our welfare system.
Right...we need to kiss their Brown asses and pander to their every whim! And the rest of us? Too fucking bad!
Wtf does it matter what color their asses are?
Some people are more particular of the asses they kiss than you are.
But seriously, RoadVirus is a complete bigot who only sees ethnicity as the issue.
Wtf does it matter what color their asses are?
Some people are more particular of the asses they kiss than you are.
But seriously, RoadVirus is a complete bigot who only sees ethnicity as the issue.
The Dumbos and news hacks are making ethnicity the issue. They've been making it the issue since the day after election night. They go on and on about "Republicans need the Hispanic vote", "Republicans need to reach out to the Hispanic community" etc.
What the hell is wrong with having some compassion for an illegal immigrant? If I was in their shoes, I probably would do the same thing, if the opportunity presented itself. Why can't right-wingers think like that and stop putting all the blame on them and never blaming the people who hire them? The employers broke the law too and since Reagan's days had to fill out forms proving their employees were citizens.
Tighten border security so the flow is a trickle.
Make business and employment law so tight that violators by boss and employee is incredibly painful.
A reasonable road to citizenship.