Obama crushed what little hope

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oh, and your Obama admitted the Russians did not hack the election.....so.....

He did?

Where? When?

His news conference today.....it was stunning to hear him admit that......

You guys are really kind of dense.

No one said the election was hacked.

And, the statement doesn't change the claim: that the Russians were behind the hacking of the DNC and the release of information to wikileaks.

No one can say to what extent, if any, it affected the election's outcome.

If the info released was true I dont see the problem.
If hillary hadnt been crooked in the first place there would have been no damaging information to begin with.

 

[Lastamender]

Oh, and your Obama admitted the Russians did not hack the election.....so.....

He did?

Where? When?

His news conference today.....it was stunning to hear him admit that......

You guys are really kind of dense.

No one said the election was hacked.

And, the statement doesn't change the claim: that the Russians were behind the hacking of the DNC and the release of information to wikileaks.

No one can say to what extent, if any, it affected the election's outcome.

If the info released was true I dont see the problem.
If hillary hadnt been crooked in the first place there would have been no damaging information to begin with.

It could be considered karma. Obama told half truths or plain lied for 8 years. Hillary has been corrupt from the early seventies. Time for a cosmic change?

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

bbb

His news conference today.....it was stunning to hear him admit that......

You guys are really kind of dense.

No one said the election was hacked.

And, the statement doesn't change the claim: that the Russians were behind the hacking of the DNC and the release of information to wikileaks.

No one can say to what extent, if any, it affected the election's outcome.

Wiki refutes the claim. They say it was given to them by a DNC insider.

If the Russians got them, what did they do with them? Barry claims to have known about the hacking, yet did nothing about it until after Hellary lost. NOW it's a big deal...LOL

And they should be believed over the combined opinions of all our intelligence agencies...why?
WikiLeaks tweet shows Assange will lie to further his cause
http://gizmodo.com/julian-assange-lied-about-a-wikileaks-data-dump-on-nati-1785091653

You're focused on the date of the hacking. It wasn't such a big deal at the time. It becomes a big deal when it's released in dribbles, during a critical point at the election. Two different things.

Please link the intelligence agency releases that support your position. They don't exist. The only info released is "unnamed sources". The rest is carefully worded spin. Remember the "Benghazi was the result of a video" misinformation campaign? It came directly from the WH and involved the DOJ plus UN Ambassador. DO YOU believe them?

If it wasn't a big deal to them when it happened, then why is it one now???

I've already - several times - linked to statements from US intelligence agencies. They all state that Russia was behind the hacks.

Comparing it to Benghazi is disingenius. The Benghazi was fast moving and chaotic and it's not surprising that people might have initially blamed it on the wrong things. This is not. They been investigating it for some time.

It proves that the Obama Administration will lie when put under political pressure from events beyond their control...or they are GROSSLY incompetent in garnering intel and or the interpretation of it. They based that particular conclusion on the CIA as well.

Please provide a link to your sources. I haven't seen anything other than our governments hack each other.

 

[Coyote]

bbb

You guys are really kind of dense.

No one said the election was hacked.

And, the statement doesn't change the claim: that the Russians were behind the hacking of the DNC and the release of information to wikileaks.

No one can say to what extent, if any, it affected the election's outcome.

Wiki refutes the claim. They say it was given to them by a DNC insider.

If the Russians got them, what did they do with them? Barry claims to have known about the hacking, yet did nothing about it until after Hellary lost. NOW it's a big deal...LOL

And they should be believed over the combined opinions of all our intelligence agencies...why?
WikiLeaks tweet shows Assange will lie to further his cause
http://gizmodo.com/julian-assange-lied-about-a-wikileaks-data-dump-on-nati-1785091653

You're focused on the date of the hacking. It wasn't such a big deal at the time. It becomes a big deal when it's released in dribbles, during a critical point at the election. Two different things.

Please link the intelligence agency releases that support your position. They don't exist. The only info released is "unnamed sources". The rest is carefully worded spin. Remember the "Benghazi was the result of a video" misinformation campaign? It came directly from the WH and involved the DOJ plus UN Ambassador. DO YOU believe them?

If it wasn't a big deal to them when it happened, then why is it one now???

I've already - several times - linked to statements from US intelligence agencies. They all state that Russia was behind the hacks.

Comparing it to Benghazi is disingenius. The Benghazi was fast moving and chaotic and it's not surprising that people might have initially blamed it on the wrong things. This is not. They been investigating it for some time.

It proves that the Obama Administration will lie when put under political pressure from events beyond their control...or they are GROSSLY incompetent in garnering intel and or the interpretation of it. They based that particular conclusion on the CIA as well.

Please provide a link to your sources. I haven't seen anything other than our governments hack each other.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16074860/
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16066695/

 

[Lastamender]

bbb

Wiki refutes the claim. They say it was given to them by a DNC insider.

If the Russians got them, what did they do with them? Barry claims to have known about the hacking, yet did nothing about it until after Hellary lost. NOW it's a big deal...LOL

And they should be believed over the combined opinions of all our intelligence agencies...why?
WikiLeaks tweet shows Assange will lie to further his cause
http://gizmodo.com/julian-assange-lied-about-a-wikileaks-data-dump-on-nati-1785091653

You're focused on the date of the hacking. It wasn't such a big deal at the time. It becomes a big deal when it's released in dribbles, during a critical point at the election. Two different things.

Please link the intelligence agency releases that support your position. They don't exist. The only info released is "unnamed sources". The rest is carefully worded spin. Remember the "Benghazi was the result of a video" misinformation campaign? It came directly from the WH and involved the DOJ plus UN Ambassador. DO YOU believe them?

If it wasn't a big deal to them when it happened, then why is it one now???

I've already - several times - linked to statements from US intelligence agencies. They all state that Russia was behind the hacks.

Comparing it to Benghazi is disingenius. The Benghazi was fast moving and chaotic and it's not surprising that people might have initially blamed it on the wrong things. This is not. They been investigating it for some time.

It proves that the Obama Administration will lie when put under political pressure from events beyond their control...or they are GROSSLY incompetent in garnering intel and or the interpretation of it. They based that particular conclusion on the CIA as well.

Please provide a link to your sources. I haven't seen anything other than our governments hack each other.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16074860/
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16066695/

Islam and Democrats and you.

 

[Coyote]

bbb

And they should be believed over the combined opinions of all our intelligence agencies...why?
WikiLeaks tweet shows Assange will lie to further his cause
http://gizmodo.com/julian-assange-lied-about-a-wikileaks-data-dump-on-nati-1785091653

You're focused on the date of the hacking. It wasn't such a big deal at the time. It becomes a big deal when it's released in dribbles, during a critical point at the election. Two different things.

Please link the intelligence agency releases that support your position. They don't exist. The only info released is "unnamed sources". The rest is carefully worded spin. Remember the "Benghazi was the result of a video" misinformation campaign? It came directly from the WH and involved the DOJ plus UN Ambassador. DO YOU believe them?

If it wasn't a big deal to them when it happened, then why is it one now???

I've already - several times - linked to statements from US intelligence agencies. They all state that Russia was behind the hacks.

Comparing it to Benghazi is disingenius. The Benghazi was fast moving and chaotic and it's not surprising that people might have initially blamed it on the wrong things. This is not. They been investigating it for some time.

It proves that the Obama Administration will lie when put under political pressure from events beyond their control...or they are GROSSLY incompetent in garnering intel and or the interpretation of it. They based that particular conclusion on the CIA as well.

Please provide a link to your sources. I haven't seen anything other than our governments hack each other.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16074860/
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16066695/

Islam and Democrats and you.

That was abrogated.

 

[Lastamender]

bbb

Please link the intelligence agency releases that support your position. They don't exist. The only info released is "unnamed sources". The rest is carefully worded spin. Remember the "Benghazi was the result of a video" misinformation campaign? It came directly from the WH and involved the DOJ plus UN Ambassador. DO YOU believe them?

If it wasn't a big deal to them when it happened, then why is it one now???

I've already - several times - linked to statements from US intelligence agencies. They all state that Russia was behind the hacks.

Comparing it to Benghazi is disingenius. The Benghazi was fast moving and chaotic and it's not surprising that people might have initially blamed it on the wrong things. This is not. They been investigating it for some time.

It proves that the Obama Administration will lie when put under political pressure from events beyond their control...or they are GROSSLY incompetent in garnering intel and or the interpretation of it. They based that particular conclusion on the CIA as well.

Please provide a link to your sources. I haven't seen anything other than our governments hack each other.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16074860/
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16066695/

Islam and Democrats and you.

That was abrogated.

Abrogation replaces some verse with something better. We have done that by replacing Democrats.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The reason people dont care is because the media is in bed with democrats. They will never day anything bad about them unless.they have to unlike republicans where they publish any attack, or accusation against them.

Until.the media is fair, its not gonna change.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

bbb

Wiki refutes the claim. They say it was given to them by a DNC insider.

If the Russians got them, what did they do with them? Barry claims to have known about the hacking, yet did nothing about it until after Hellary lost. NOW it's a big deal...LOL

And they should be believed over the combined opinions of all our intelligence agencies...why?
WikiLeaks tweet shows Assange will lie to further his cause
http://gizmodo.com/julian-assange-lied-about-a-wikileaks-data-dump-on-nati-1785091653

You're focused on the date of the hacking. It wasn't such a big deal at the time. It becomes a big deal when it's released in dribbles, during a critical point at the election. Two different things.

Please link the intelligence agency releases that support your position. They don't exist. The only info released is "unnamed sources". The rest is carefully worded spin. Remember the "Benghazi was the result of a video" misinformation campaign? It came directly from the WH and involved the DOJ plus UN Ambassador. DO YOU believe them?

If it wasn't a big deal to them when it happened, then why is it one now???

I've already - several times - linked to statements from US intelligence agencies. They all state that Russia was behind the hacks.

Comparing it to Benghazi is disingenius. The Benghazi was fast moving and chaotic and it's not surprising that people might have initially blamed it on the wrong things. This is not. They been investigating it for some time.

It proves that the Obama Administration will lie when put under political pressure from events beyond their control...or they are GROSSLY incompetent in garnering intel and or the interpretation of it. They based that particular conclusion on the CIA as well.

Please provide a link to your sources. I haven't seen anything other than our governments hack each other.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16074860/
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16066695/

Your second link is CNBC and just more of the unnamed sources tripe. If there even are sources, they are criminals that have broken federal security law.

The first link is USA Today and references Politifact. Here's the pertinent part of the article:

But Clinton is correct. On Oct. 7, the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a joint statement on behalf of the U.S. Intelligence Community. The USIC is made up of 16 agencies, in addition to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities."

The important part:

"The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts."

1.) The Clinton campaign isn't even named as being hacked.
2.) Disclosures are consistent - guilt is not even claimed...it looks Russian is all it really says.
3.) "The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations." Nothing specific is said. Just general stuff. Our nations hack each other all the time.

In summary, no proof provided and no specific event or even a specific injured party is named.

This evidence couldn't even get you a search warrant.
.

 

[Coyote]

bbb

And they should be believed over the combined opinions of all our intelligence agencies...why?
WikiLeaks tweet shows Assange will lie to further his cause
http://gizmodo.com/julian-assange-lied-about-a-wikileaks-data-dump-on-nati-1785091653

You're focused on the date of the hacking. It wasn't such a big deal at the time. It becomes a big deal when it's released in dribbles, during a critical point at the election. Two different things.

Please link the intelligence agency releases that support your position. They don't exist. The only info released is "unnamed sources". The rest is carefully worded spin. Remember the "Benghazi was the result of a video" misinformation campaign? It came directly from the WH and involved the DOJ plus UN Ambassador. DO YOU believe them?

If it wasn't a big deal to them when it happened, then why is it one now???

I've already - several times - linked to statements from US intelligence agencies. They all state that Russia was behind the hacks.

Comparing it to Benghazi is disingenius. The Benghazi was fast moving and chaotic and it's not surprising that people might have initially blamed it on the wrong things. This is not. They been investigating it for some time.

It proves that the Obama Administration will lie when put under political pressure from events beyond their control...or they are GROSSLY incompetent in garnering intel and or the interpretation of it. They based that particular conclusion on the CIA as well.

Please provide a link to your sources. I haven't seen anything other than our governments hack each other.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16074860/
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/16066695/

Your second link is CNBC and just more of the unnamed sources tripe. If there even are sources, they are criminals that have broken federal security law.

The first link is USA Today and references Politifact. Here's the pertinent part of the article:

But Clinton is correct. On Oct. 7, the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a joint statement on behalf of the U.S. Intelligence Community. The USIC is made up of 16 agencies, in addition to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities."

The important part:

"The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts."

1.) The Clinton campaign isn't even named as being hacked.
2.) Disclosures are consistent - guilt is not even claimed...it looks Russian is all it really says.
3.) "The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations." Nothing specific is said. Just general stuff. Our nations hack each other all the time.

In summary, no proof provided and no specific event or even a specific injured party is named.

This evidence couldn't even get you a search warrant.
.

Most "evidence" is not made publically available when it comes to intelligence.