Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

You will see in short order how wrong you are... Obama is filthy dirty dude... he always has been... even Bill Clinton said he was a street thug and he never hated someone more...

So now you're offeirng us imaginary FUTURE evidence that you don't have, can't establish exists or ever existed, have no idea what it contains or could contain, that you insist will show us that you were right all along.

Somehow.

All while having jack shit to back your claims that Obama committed any crime.

There are a lot of wishing wells in MAGA, aren't there?
 
Last edited:
Obama took a shit on the will of the people why would you defend that?...
Let us address first, your nickname Rambunctious:

rambunctious​


adjective as in boisterous; noisy
You are sure all of the above.

Secondly, let us talk about promises kept.

Obama 47%
Trump 24%

This stat proves that Obama was more faithful to the "will of the people" than Trump.

Last but not least, here is more proof that Obama fulfilled the will of the people

AI Overview

President Barack Obama's "will of the people" during his presidency, from 2009 to 2017, can be understood through the policy priorities of his two terms. While interpreting the "will of the people" is complex and can be debated, key areas of focus that emerged from the 2008 and 2012 elections, as well as prevailing concerns at the time, include:

1. Economic recovery
  • Addressing the Great Recession: Coming into office during a severe economic crisis, Obama's initial priority was to stimulate the economy, save jobs, and stabilize the financial system.
  • Measures such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: According to the National Archives (.gov), this act aimed to stimulate the economy through investments in infrastructure, energy efficiency, education, healthcare, and tax relief.
  • Wall Street Reform: Legislation like the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act aimed to regulate financial institutions and prevent future crises. According to The Obama Foundation, it created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to protect consumers from financial fraud.
2. Healthcare reform
  • Expanding Access to Affordable Healthcare: A central focus was passing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), aiming to ensure access to affordable health insurance for all Americans and regulate the insurance industry. Britannica explains the ACA made the attainment of health insurance mandatory for all citizens and included subsidies for families earning less than $88,000 per year. The Affordable Care Act included provisions like prohibiting coverage denials due to pre-existing conditions and expanding Medicaid.
3. Climate change
  • Addressing Environmental Concerns: Obama's administration emphasized the need to combat climate change through initiatives like the Climate Action Plan, setting standards to reduce carbon pollution from power plants, promoting clean energy, and preparing for the impacts of climate change.
Obstacles faced in accomplishing goals
  • Republican Opposition: Obama faced significant opposition from Republicans in Congress, particularly after the 2010 midterm elections when Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives. This limited his ability to pass further legislative initiatives.
  • Filibuster: The routine use of the filibuster in the Senate by Republicans posed a significant hurdle to passing legislation, requiring a 60-vote majority to overcome.
  • Economic Headwinds: The slow economic recovery and persistent unemployment also presented challenges, fueling public disillusionment and contributing to the difficult political landscape.
In essence, while Obama successfully enacted major reforms in healthcare and financial regulation during his initial term, his subsequent years in office were marked by significant political obstacles and a slower economic recovery, hindering his ability to fulfill all aspects of his agenda.

Having said all of the above and PROVEN that your statement is pure and utter BS, I am 100% sure that you are not "man enough" to admit you're biased and have an incorrect point of view.

InsaneAsylum.webp
 
This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

Trump suck.gif
 
So lets recap. You opened with AI induced fantasies about Obama's execution for his crimes. And told us all about the paper trail he left behind.

But when we ask to actually see the paper trail, or see the evidence he committed treason, or sedition, or a coup, or election rigging....

..........you have nothing, failing completely. And then declare that 'we lost'.

Does that about sum it up?
Still waiting on your Trump/Russia collusion evidence, Simp.

:oops8: :oops8: :oops8: :oops8:
 
you don't mind when your side makes claims without proof shown right away, as a matter of fact you all eat up any half-baked claim against Trump and run with it. The fact is that Obama aided and abetted all the spurious claims against Trump and your side ate it all up like candy.

I'm just shocked that the well of evidence showing that Obama committed any crime is so hopelessly shallow that in barely a day, you've been reduced to whataboutry as the excuse for why you've got jackshit to back up claims of sedition, coups, election rigging and treason.

Not even a day!

If you're going to try and distract people from Epstein, you'll need something way stronger than this weak tea. I've chewed gum that lasted longer.
 
Trump insisted that Gabbard had irrefutable proof of Obama's treason, sedition, a coup and election rigging.

If Gabbard had that irrefutable proof, she would have presented it. She didn't.

So what Obama is facing is a story. Not criminal charges.
Yes, trump likes to talk

Sometimes when he should keep quiet

Obama will be judged on facts not what trump says about it
 
Yes, trump likes to talk

Sometimes when he should keep quiet

Obama will be judged on facts not what trump says about it
And what do the facts say about Obama committing any crime?

Because so far I can't see how y'all could get him on so much as a parking ticket with this pseudo-legal gibberish.

Let alone treasonous conspiracy.
 
And what do the facts say about Obama committing any crime?

Because so far I can't see how y'all could get him on so much as a parking ticket with this pseudo-legal gibberish.

Let alone treasonous conspiracy.
It looks like conspiracy which is a crime
 
It' a rewarmed conspiracy theory. Nothing legit about it.
Oh it's legit alright. There is plent of evidence of it already, we just don't have all of the nuts and bolts yet. When that happens, Americans will see it clearly for the attempted coup that it was.
 
The declassified documents Bondi just released.
Why do you need declassified documents to figure out what Obama told the public? That doesn’t make any sense.

Obama never said Trump colluded.
 
It looks like conspiracy which is a crime

Gabbard said treasonous conspiracy. A conspriacy to commit treason.

Smiling.....c'mon. I mean, c'mon.

You know this just red meat for the MAGA base so they'll stop asking questions about Epstein.
 
Where are those pee pee tapes, Moroner?
They didn’t exist. Just like the “intelligence” of Clinton’s mental state.

Jesus, its like having to talk to a child who needs everything explained.
 
15th post
Oh it's legit alright. There is plent of evidence of it already, we just don't have all of the nuts and bolts yet. When that happens, Americans will see it clearly for the attempted coup that it was.

Then show me! I've gotten so many assurance that the evidence is there, or gonna be there, or is a'comin. But when I ask to actually see the evidence that Obama committed sedition, or a coup, or treason or election rigging....

......I just get more assurances that there is 'plenty of evidence'.

Its like Indiana Jones trying to get an answer on who will be studying the Ark of the Covenant.

"Top. Men."
 
Obama is facing charges not for what he said in public but rather for what we think he did in private
Ha! And what do you think he did in private that you think could lead to charges?
 
Why do you need declassified documents to figure out what Obama told the public? That doesn’t make any sense.

Obama never said Trump colluded.
Thats true

Looking back the Obama junta never directly accused trump but rather smeared him through guilt by association

They investigated and prosecuted many prople around trump and accused them of collusion
 
Last edited:
And no one is surprised that they did that. The only reason you make a big deal out of it is you think you can link TRUMP! to it.
Trump was surprised because he tried to tell the American people it wasn’t Russia. You don’t remember?
 
Back
Top Bottom