Little-Acorn
Gold Member
In fact, nearly every report purporting to make Trump look bad on any subject, comes from hard-left newspapers, and most have only anonymous sources. So there's nobody investigators can put on the stand and question about what they saw and heard.
How convenient.
BTW, how are the Democrats doing in finding the people in Russia who hacked our election? Any sources we can question? Any descriptions of which people they influenced, so we can question them?
Well, what do you know. No names. No specific actions found, no evidence at all.
Seems to be an emerging pattern in all these "blockbuster" reports from Democrat sources.
BTW, Comey had a chance to testify before Congress. Why didn't he mention any such request from Trump to shut down any investigation? Didn't even bring up the memo this "report" now points to as their chief (and only) source.
And why don't any of the screeching, outraged Democrats display any curiosity about these questions?
How convenient.
BTW, how are the Democrats doing in finding the people in Russia who hacked our election? Any sources we can question? Any descriptions of which people they influenced, so we can question them?
Well, what do you know. No names. No specific actions found, no evidence at all.
Seems to be an emerging pattern in all these "blockbuster" reports from Democrat sources.
BTW, Comey had a chance to testify before Congress. Why didn't he mention any such request from Trump to shut down any investigation? Didn't even bring up the memo this "report" now points to as their chief (and only) source.
And why don't any of the screeching, outraged Democrats display any curiosity about these questions?
Last edited: