NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary

[ScienceRocks]

NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary

NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary Clinton


By Daily News Bin |

September 8, 2015

After months of negative stories about 2016 frontrunner Hillary Clinton which were almost bizarrely inaccurate and had to be repeatedly retracted, the New York Times has finally taken definitive action within its organizational structure to put a stop to the strange editorial agenda. Carolyn Ryan is now officially out as Washington Bureau Chief, and while the newspaper isn’t referring to it as a firing, the move was made after less than two years on the job.

The NY Times had been pushing various strange and false storylines regarding Hillary Clinton and her campaign. An article depicting doom and gloom for Clinton based on her standard-issue use of private email as Secretary of State was deemed so factually inaccurate that even after a comprehensive retraction was published, so much additional false information was found within the story that an unprecedented second retraction had to be issued. The article was deemed to be such a work of fiction that even the Times’ own Public Editor criticized the hatchet job.

This was followed by several additional negative New York Times pieces about Clinton of questionable validity, including a headline last week which falsely claimed that Clinton had criticized democratic rival Bernie Sanders during her MSNBC interview. ....................

Media Matters says that while Ryan is being removed from the Washington Bureau Chief job, she’s being allowed to remain as a “political editor.” This may be a fair compromise, as while the fictional articles about Hillary Clinton did happen on Ryan’s watch, she herself was not the author of those articles. .............................

HAHAHA!!!! GO clinton!!! Go! Infrastructure, science, r&d and education for all!

 

[gtopa1]

get well quick; like Scalia!!!

Greg

 

[tinydancer]

Pillows. All we need are pillows.



I am so glad I live in the middle of nowhere. With weapons.

Criticize the bitch you are freaking toast.

 

[tinydancer]

NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary

NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary Clinton


By Daily News Bin |

September 8, 2015

After months of negative stories about 2016 frontrunner Hillary Clinton which were almost bizarrely inaccurate and had to be repeatedly retracted, the New York Times has finally taken definitive action within its organizational structure to put a stop to the strange editorial agenda. Carolyn Ryan is now officially out as Washington Bureau Chief, and while the newspaper isn’t referring to it as a firing, the move was made after less than two years on the job.

The NY Times had been pushing various strange and false storylines regarding Hillary Clinton and her campaign. An article depicting doom and gloom for Clinton based on her standard-issue use of private email as Secretary of State was deemed so factually inaccurate that even after a comprehensive retraction was published, so much additional false information was found within the story that an unprecedented second retraction had to be issued. The article was deemed to be such a work of fiction that even the Times’ own Public Editor criticized the hatchet job.

This was followed by several additional negative New York Times pieces about Clinton of questionable validity, including a headline last week which falsely claimed that Clinton had criticized democratic rival Bernie Sanders during her MSNBC interview. ....................

Media Matters says that while Ryan is being removed from the Washington Bureau Chief job, she’s being allowed to remain as a “political editor.” This may be a fair compromise, as while the fictional articles about Hillary Clinton did happen on Ryan’s watch, she herself was not the author of those articles. .............................

HAHAHA!!!! GO clinton!!! Go! Infrastructure, science, r&d and education for all!

You are balls to the walls fucking insane Matthew. Go Clinton!

 

[Camp]

get well quick; like Scalia!!!

Greg

See why Trumperbots are called deplorable?

 

[gtopa1]

get well quick; like Scalia!!!

Greg

See why Trumperbots are called deplorable?

See how liberals went into raptures when Scalia died!!! lol

Oh: and I am not a Republican. I am a Constitutional Monarchist. You rebellious colonials you!!!



Greg

 

[Camp]

get well quick; like Scalia!!!

Greg

See why Trumperbots are called deplorable?

See how liberals went into raptures when Scalia died!!! lol

Oh: and I am not a Republican. I am a Constitutional Monarchist. You rebellious colonials you!!!



Greg

Wishing death on someone over politics is deplorable.

 

[tinydancer]

get well quick; like Scalia!!!

Greg

See why Trumperbots are called deplorable?

To question why a Supreme Court Justice was found with a pillow over his face as he died color me whacked out....

okey dokey

 

[S.J.]

Matthew likes the idea of punishing people for exercising their first amendment rights (if they criticize a liberal).

 

[SmokeALib]

NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary

NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary Clinton


By Daily News Bin |

September 8, 2015

After months of negative stories about 2016 frontrunner Hillary Clinton which were almost bizarrely inaccurate and had to be repeatedly retracted, the New York Times has finally taken definitive action within its organizational structure to put a stop to the strange editorial agenda. Carolyn Ryan is now officially out as Washington Bureau Chief, and while the newspaper isn’t referring to it as a firing, the move was made after less than two years on the job.

The NY Times had been pushing various strange and false storylines regarding Hillary Clinton and her campaign. An article depicting doom and gloom for Clinton based on her standard-issue use of private email as Secretary of State was deemed so factually inaccurate that even after a comprehensive retraction was published, so much additional false information was found within the story that an unprecedented second retraction had to be issued. The article was deemed to be such a work of fiction that even the Times’ own Public Editor criticized the hatchet job.

This was followed by several additional negative New York Times pieces about Clinton of questionable validity, including a headline last week which falsely claimed that Clinton had criticized democratic rival Bernie Sanders during her MSNBC interview. ....................

Media Matters says that while Ryan is being removed from the Washington Bureau Chief job, she’s being allowed to remain as a “political editor.” This may be a fair compromise, as while the fictional articles about Hillary Clinton did happen on Ryan’s watch, she herself was not the author of those articles. .............................

HAHAHA!!!! GO clinton!!! Go! Infrastructure, science, r&d and education for all!

You're a fool.

 

[Bleipriester]

NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary

NY Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over inaccurate criticisms of Hillary Clinton


By Daily News Bin |

September 8, 2015

After months of negative stories about 2016 frontrunner Hillary Clinton which were almost bizarrely inaccurate and had to be repeatedly retracted, the New York Times has finally taken definitive action within its organizational structure to put a stop to the strange editorial agenda. Carolyn Ryan is now officially out as Washington Bureau Chief, and while the newspaper isn’t referring to it as a firing, the move was made after less than two years on the job.

The NY Times had been pushing various strange and false storylines regarding Hillary Clinton and her campaign. An article depicting doom and gloom for Clinton based on her standard-issue use of private email as Secretary of State was deemed so factually inaccurate that even after a comprehensive retraction was published, so much additional false information was found within the story that an unprecedented second retraction had to be issued. The article was deemed to be such a work of fiction that even the Times’ own Public Editor criticized the hatchet job.

This was followed by several additional negative New York Times pieces about Clinton of questionable validity, including a headline last week which falsely claimed that Clinton had criticized democratic rival Bernie Sanders during her MSNBC interview. ....................

Media Matters says that while Ryan is being removed from the Washington Bureau Chief job, she’s being allowed to remain as a “political editor.” This may be a fair compromise, as while the fictional articles about Hillary Clinton did happen on Ryan’s watch, she herself was not the author of those articles. .............................

HAHAHA!!!! GO clinton!!! Go! Infrastructure, science, r&d and education for all!

Disgusting. Who criticizes Clinton must go. "Free press", ludicrous. The regime that spends US tax money on terrorists while Infrastructure, science, r&d and education are going downhill will hopefully replaced by Trump.

 

[Camp]

get well quick; like Scalia!!!

Greg

See why Trumperbots are called deplorable?

To question why a Supreme Court Justice was found with a pillow over his face as he died color me whacked out....

okey dokey

What does that have to do with wishing someone would die?

 

[SmokeALib]

New York Times fires Washington Bureau Chief over accurate criticisms of Hillary.

Fixed.

 

[gtopa1]

get well quick; like Scalia!!!

Greg

See why Trumperbots are called deplorable?

See how liberals went into raptures when Scalia died!!! lol

Oh: and I am not a Republican. I am a Constitutional Monarchist. You rebellious colonials you!!!



Greg

Wishing death on someone over politics is deplorable.

You are quite correct. It would pass your notice the celbrations by lefty pricless ones at the death of Thatcher and Reagan; the wishing of death on Cheney and Dubyah; play your violin elsewhere.

Oh: and Scalia recovered several times from serious illness. I would never wish death on anyone really; I'm not a liberal.

Greg

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

get well quick; like Scalia!!!

Greg

See why Trumperbots are called deplorable?

See how liberals went into raptures when Scalia died!!! lol

Oh: and I am not a Republican. I am a Constitutional Monarchist. You rebellious colonials you!!!



Greg

Wishing death on someone over politics is deplorable.

It's not when those politics threaten the existence of your country.
I hope she along with Barry die in a fiery plane crash...for the good of my country.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Matthew likes the idea of punishing people for exercising their first amendment rights (if they criticize a liberal).

Matt is a Fascist like the rest of the "Progressives"