NY Post Story on Hunter Biden quickly unraveling.

[colfax_m]

so what your saying is I'm right and you cant debunk it so youre going to resort to personal attacks,,,

I’m saying I’m not going to argue with you about the basic meanings of words. It’s a complete waste of time.

 

[LaDairis]

This is where you need some critical thinking skills.

Democrat "critical thinking skills" =

 

[colfax_m]

Show where it was debunked? And again I don't trust the media. So to you the optics aren't bad? Agree to disagree. To me the optics are awful and especially because with two weeks left he is hiding in his basement. This is where you need some critical thinking skills.

Of course the optics are bad. But bad optics isn’t criminal and right now Trump is screaming about putting Joe Biden in jail which is a disgusting way for any candidate to act but it’s just par for the course here.

You don’t trust the media, except when you do after you told me over and over again about the NY Post being a legitimate newspaper.

There’s no point in me showing you anything if you’re just going to brush it off because you don’t believe it without any critical thinking involved. Total waste of time.

 

[Gary Lee]

I told you this Hunter Biden story was garbage.

“The New York Post’s front-page article about Hunter Biden on Wednesday was written mostly by a staff reporter who refused to put his name on it, two Post employees said.

Bruce Golding, a reporter at the Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid since 2007, did not allow his byline to be used because he had concerns over the article’s credibility, the two Post employees said, speaking on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation.

Coming late in a heated presidential campaign, the article suggested that Joseph R. Biden Jr. had used his position to enrich his son Hunter when he was vice president. The Post based the story on photos and documents the paper said it had taken from the hard drive of a laptop purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden.

Many Post staff members questioned whether the paper had done enough to verify the authenticity of the hard drive’s contents, said five people with knowledge of the tabloid’s inner workings. Staff members also had concerns about the reliability of its sources and its timing, the people said”.

New York Post Published Hunter Biden Report Amid Newsroom Doubts

Some reporters withheld their bylines and questioned the credibility of an article that made the tabloid’s front page on Wednesday.

www.nytimes.com

*************

Let me put this in plain English for Trumpist simpletons: The Reporter did not want to have his name used in the by-line because he knew this story about Hunter Biden was a lie.

Only friggin idiots would consider Steve Bannon, a man now being prosecuted for fraud, and Rudy Guiliani, a known Russian useful idiot, credible sources.

Try passing on those insults on to someone face to face. You don't know what's their real agenda was or even if or if not they believed the story.

 

[justinacolmena]

I told you this Hunter Biden story was garbage.

“The New York Post’s front-page article about Hunter Biden on Wednesday was written mostly by a staff reporter who refused to put his name on it, two Post employees said.

Hookers and lawyers, where does all this child pornography come from anyways?

So Johnlaw is hunting down newspaper reporters and FBI agents with an exclusively Democrat crew of private investigators — and that crew is playing "the usual" life-ruining pranks and dirty tricks of the Five Families on suspects and targeted individuals.

Nor do immediate family members of a major party Presidential candidate count as "targeted individuals" except for rare cases such as Rosemary Kennedy.

We're outsiders, rejected, outcasts, too poor to play those games, tired of being roughed up and shaken down by dirty cops all day and all night, progressively deprived of property and liberty — and in the end we die.

 

[bripat9643]

Show where it was debunked? And again I don't trust the media. So to you the optics aren't bad? Agree to disagree. To me the optics are awful and especially because with two weeks left he is hiding in his basement. This is where you need some critical thinking skills.

Of course the optics are bad. But bad optics isn’t criminal and right now Trump is screaming about putting Joe Biden in jail which is a disgusting way for any candidate to act but it’s just par for the course here.

You don’t trust the media, except when you do after you told me over and over again about the NY Post being a legitimate newspaper.

There’s no point in me showing you anything if you’re just going to brush it off because you don’t believe it without any critical thinking involved. Total waste of time.

Biden is a criminal. Jail is where he belongs.

 

[LaDairis]

Jail is where he belongs.

 

[bripat9643]

He did meet them, shit for brains. The executives thanked Joe for meeting with them.

No. For starters, the executive thanked Hunter for giving him the opportunity to meet Joe Biden, which may have never happened at all since the language is vague enough to leave open the possibility that it was merely an offer, not an even that actually happened. Further, if all it was was a handshake and an introduction, is that really a problem?

if it didnt happen then all joe has to do is say it didnt happen,,
but instead of doing that he went into hiding,,,

But then he would have to start answering more questions.

 

[Faun]

Unraveliing? US Treasury documents confirm Hunter received $3.5 mil from the wife of the mayor of Moscow...Hunter has been laundering Russian money.

Well that's not true. The Senate report states Rosemont Seneca Thornton received the $3.5 million.

 

[progressive hunter]

so what your saying is I'm right and you cant debunk it so youre going to resort to personal attacks,,,

I’m saying I’m not going to argue with you about the basic meanings of words. It’s a complete waste of time.

after your alternate facts and words thats understandable,,,

like where you said both hunter and joe denied the meeting ever took place,,,

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Show where it was debunked? And again I don't trust the media. So to you the optics aren't bad? Agree to disagree. To me the optics are awful and especially because with two weeks left he is hiding in his basement. This is where you need some critical thinking skills.

Of course the optics are bad. But bad optics isn’t criminal and right now Trump is screaming about putting Joe Biden in jail which is a disgusting way for any candidate to act but it’s just par for the course here.

You don’t trust the media, except when you do after you told me over and over again about the NY Post being a legitimate newspaper.

There’s no point in me showing you anything if you’re just going to brush it off because you don’t believe it without any critical thinking involved. Total waste of time.

Thats political theater as Kamala Harris said when she basically accused Biden of being racially insensitive. Trump accused Cruz's dad of killing JFK, LOL. He is a polarizing tough guy. That is his act that endears him to many and conversely makes him a villain to just as many if not more. NYP is a legitimate newspaper. CNN is a legitimate news station. I just don't trust them. So my opinion decides journalistic legitimacy? I had no idea I had this much power.

Your last sentence is a childish rant. Not sure what you're talking about there. Oh and in terms of media I also don't trust ESPN. I trust my naked eye test.

 

[colfax_m]

Thats political theater as Kamala Harris said when she basically accused Biden of being racially insensitive. Trump accused Cruz's dad of killing JFK, LOL. He is a polarizing tough guy. That is his act that endears him to many and conversely makes him a villain to just as many if not more. NYP is a legitimate newspaper. CNN is a legitimate news station. I just don't trust them. So my opinion decides journalistic legitimacy? I had no idea I had this much power.

Your last sentence is a childish rant. Not sure what you're talking about there. Oh and in terms of media I also don't trust ESPN. I trust my naked eye test.

It’s just so easy for you to brush off Trump’s actions as harmless. As if this theater doesn’t matter. It matters and it’s one of the reasons this country is so screwed up.

You can’t say it’s a legitimate news agency that you don’t trust. That’s self-contradictory.

Why would I spend any time showing you information that you’re going to ignore? That’s not logical. It’s not a childish rant, it’s pretty simple.

 

[progressive hunter]

Thats political theater as Kamala Harris said when she basically accused Biden of being racially insensitive. Trump accused Cruz's dad of killing JFK, LOL. He is a polarizing tough guy. That is his act that endears him to many and conversely makes him a villain to just as many if not more. NYP is a legitimate newspaper. CNN is a legitimate news station. I just don't trust them. So my opinion decides journalistic legitimacy? I had no idea I had this much power.

Your last sentence is a childish rant. Not sure what you're talking about there. Oh and in terms of media I also don't trust ESPN. I trust my naked eye test.

It’s just so easy for you to brush off Trump’s actions as harmless. As if this theater doesn’t matter. It matters and it’s one of the reasons this country is so screwed up.

You can’t say it’s a legitimate news agency that you don’t trust. That’s self-contradictory.

Why would I spend any time showing you information that you’re going to ignore? That’s not logical. It’s not a childish rant, it’s pretty simple.

WOW,,, so thats how you get out of backing up your claims,,,

I gotta try it sometime,,,

 

[Faun]

Dates, players, actions, content of the emails. There are plenty of ways to know if they are authentic.

Take any one of the published emails and lets break it down specifically. Pick one.

Start with this supposed meeting with a Burisma executive. Hunter Biden said there was no meeting. Joe Biden said there was no meeting. At most they had an introduction but no one remembers it because any meeting was so inconsequential.

This is being portrayed as proof of a meeting to discuss bribery and firing Shokin when there’s zero evidence of this.

Guy on the far left is the Burisma Executive. Next topic.

LOL

That guy is a close personal friend of the Biden's who also happens to be the guy who got Hunter the job with Burisma. Not to mention, see if you can prove if Hunter was even working at Burisma yet when that photo was taken....

He was. You can tell by the age. His and Biden's. Hunter admitted he traded on the name.

Oh? How old are they there?

Hunter is 45 I would guess. Joe is 764.

LOL

ShortBus, your guess is wrong. Thanks for trying though.

I am right +/- 1 year

No, you guessed and your guess was wrong. Not only was your guess wrong, you failed miserably to prove your claim that Hunter was already a Burisma employee when that photo was taken.

I said it was a guess. We aren't in a court of law. Gun to my head, I say he was.

And I acknowledged it was a guess. A wrong guess, but a still a guess. Sadly for you, the reason you guessed is because you were actually full of shit when you claimed you can tell by his age that he worked for Burisma on that day. If you knew, you wouldn't have had to guess.

I have common sense. I keep forgetting you're captain literal. Let me rephrase he looks to b 45 years, 7 months, 8 days and 3 hours old (Hunter).

No worries. You lied and got caught. I expected nothing less from you.

Lied? I said it was a guess. Name the lie.

You said Hunter worked for Burisma when that photo was taken.

 

[Cecilie1200]

They were not privately owned they belonged to the Govt and there is a procedure to destroying them. Come on man. Why are you trolling again. Do you believe I am Russian agent like crazy Dana claims?

I know that they were private devices and me stating such is not trolling. How can you possibly say that's trolling?

They weren’t private. They belonged to the US Govt. should I say that in Russian?

CAN you say that in Russian? 'Cause that would be cool.

 

[progressive hunter]

Chinese Gave Penn Biden Center 70 Million

And old Joe gets 775,000 a year as a "professor. I think old Joe has some spainin to do.

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Cecilie1200]

I understand truth hurts. What

You wouldn't know truth if the Fake News MSM handed it to you.

They wouldn't do that.

Nope. Handing out truth would completely defeat Fake News' purpose for existing.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Thats political theater as Kamala Harris said when she basically accused Biden of being racially insensitive. Trump accused Cruz's dad of killing JFK, LOL. He is a polarizing tough guy. That is his act that endears him to many and conversely makes him a villain to just as many if not more. NYP is a legitimate newspaper. CNN is a legitimate news station. I just don't trust them. So my opinion decides journalistic legitimacy? I had no idea I had this much power.

Your last sentence is a childish rant. Not sure what you're talking about there. Oh and in terms of media I also don't trust ESPN. I trust my naked eye test.

It’s just so easy for you to brush off Trump’s actions as harmless. As if this theater doesn’t matter. It matters and it’s one of the reasons this country is so screwed up.

You can’t say it’s a legitimate news agency that you don’t trust. That’s self-contradictory.

Why would I spend any time showing you information that you’re going to ignore? That’s not logical. It’s not a childish rant, it’s pretty simple.

When did I use the word "harmless"? Of course I can say it is legitimate but I don't trust it. Dorsey is the legitimate CEO of Twitter but I don't trust him. Both can be right. What information? I don't ignore facts but I may ignore someone's opinion on facts.

For example we can agree that Tom Brady is #12. What we may disagree on is if he is the GOAT. Facts point to it but I may use different criteria. So to me this Biden scandal is legitimate in that there is something fishy with Hunter. What I don't know is how much Joe knew and if Joe profited from it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Dates, players, actions, content of the emails. There are plenty of ways to know if they are authentic.

Take any one of the published emails and lets break it down specifically. Pick one.

Start with this supposed meeting with a Burisma executive. Hunter Biden said there was no meeting. Joe Biden said there was no meeting. At most they had an introduction but no one remembers it because any meeting was so inconsequential.

This is being portrayed as proof of a meeting to discuss bribery and firing Shokin when there’s zero evidence of this.

Guy on the far left is the Burisma Executive. Next topic.

LOL

That guy is a close personal friend of the Biden's who also happens to be the guy who got Hunter the job with Burisma. Not to mention, see if you can prove if Hunter was even working at Burisma yet when that photo was taken....

He was. You can tell by the age. His and Biden's. Hunter admitted he traded on the name.

Oh? How old are they there?

Hunter is 45 I would guess. Joe is 764.

LOL

ShortBus, your guess is wrong. Thanks for trying though.

I am right +/- 1 year

No, you guessed and your guess was wrong. Not only was your guess wrong, you failed miserably to prove your claim that Hunter was already a Burisma employee when that photo was taken.

I said it was a guess. We aren't in a court of law. Gun to my head, I say he was.

And I acknowledged it was a guess. A wrong guess, but a still a guess. Sadly for you, the reason you guessed is because you were actually full of shit when you claimed you can tell by his age that he worked for Burisma on that day. If you knew, you wouldn't have had to guess.

I have common sense. I keep forgetting you're captain literal. Let me rephrase he looks to b 45 years, 7 months, 8 days and 3 hours old (Hunter).

No worries. You lied and got caught. I expected nothing less from you.

Lied? I said it was a guess. Name the lie.

You said Hunter worked for Burisma when that photo was taken.

It was a guess. Based on his time there, current age and the age he looks in that picture. If I had to bet I'd say yes it was during that time. I do not know for sure.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

They were not privately owned they belonged to the Govt and there is a procedure to destroying them. Come on man. Why are you trolling again. Do you believe I am Russian agent like crazy Dana claims?

I know that they were private devices and me stating such is not trolling. How can you possibly say that's trolling?

They weren’t private. They belonged to the US Govt. should I say that in Russian?

CAN you say that in Russian? 'Cause that would be cool.

I could....I am fluent in Russian. But I cannot write very well.