Rust_Cohle
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
Im asserting he told a lie on a meme much like Katrina Wong and NY found a way to lock up more political opponentsAre you asserting he "broke" a made up law?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im asserting he told a lie on a meme much like Katrina Wong and NY found a way to lock up more political opponentsAre you asserting he "broke" a made up law?
So it's (D)ifferent for the LA shitlib comedian huh
What a load of shitIt's different if someone intended to interfere with the rights of others. You have to establish criminal intent.
If Mackey had just posted a stupid meme with something humorous like Send your ballot to Hillary4Prison@democratcum.com I think they could argue it was just a poor attempt at humor.
Mackey and his co-conspirators clearly built a following of 58,000 users (not to mention others who aren't followers but who can still see his posts). They then used that online community to deceive potentially thousands of voters with fraudulent messaging. There's solid evidence pointing to that conclusion.
What a load of shit
The only reason he was "bothered" is because the Libtard filth in New York is hell bent on destroying any American that is opposed to this country being a Socialist shithole.It's different if someone intended to interfere with the rights of others. You have to establish criminal intent.
If Mackey had just posted a stupid meme with something humorous like Send your ballot to Hillary4Prison @ Democrat-scum.com hahahaha then that would be one thing. I think he never would have been bothered.
Mackey and his co-conspirators clearly built a following of 58,000 users (not to mention others who aren't followers but who can still see his posts). They then used that online community to deceive potentially thousands of voters with fraudulent messaging. There's solid evidence pointing to that conclusion.
The only reason he was "bothered" is because the Libtard filth in New York is hell bent on destroying any American that is opposed to this country being a Socialist shithole.
Anyone rational person would say soYeah, well, the jury didn't think so.
Like I said, there's the appellate process. Maybe an appellate court judge throws out the conviction.
Truth!Interesting opinion.
Dark days are ahead with laws like these and the restrict actTruth!
Crooked Hillary got away with a lot worst being a major league influencer and spreading disinformation.
There is no justice here. Just Leftest hate.
Anyone rational person would say so
Both did the same joke.
One got charged cause he was a straight white male and the female Asian democrat couldn't possibly "oppress" anyone in shitlib land so there's your real answer
You don't have a first amendment right to defraud people or to interfere with their liberties, which is what has been alleged in this case, and for the moment, that allegation stands as a criminal conviction. The case will be appealed, so we'll see if the conviction stands.
Why wasn't Hillary Clinton indicted? I thought it was easy for grand juries to do that.
Meh voting isnt even a constitutional right. Its a state right that can be taken away in hours.Yeah, you suck where it comes to protecting rights.
Yet here you are LOLNo one cares who you think should be voting.
Your worthless comment doesn’t address the other poster.
Meh voting isnt even a constitutional right. Its a state right that can be taken away in hours.
Meh voting isnt even a constitutional right. Its a state right that can be taken away in hours.