Nurses tell of "aborted" babies being born alive.

[RDD_1210]

I really can't wait to do to these baby murderers and their advocates what they have done to babies for 40 years now...abort them in the most painful way possible...it will make what happened to William Wallace look tame.Oh and I am pro life when it comes to innocent life but you scum have blood on your hands and are MORE than deserving of ANY punishment you get.

No, you're pro-birth and anti-woman. Let's be honest.

I am honest. You are the one denying science and preaching murder of babies,takes a real tough guy to murder someone who can't defend themselves.

Define "baby".

Let the back peddling begin tough guy.

 

[RDD_1210]

So a baby in the womb doesn't have a beating heart? Dude you lose your argument right there. At 6 weeks a babies heart has formed and is beating. AKA ITS ALIVE. Same thing happens to that baby as would happen to me if you shot me in the heart or punctured it with a scalpel it would kill us both.

It's a fetus at 6 weeks. A non-viable fetus that can't sustain itself. Calling it a baby doesn't change anything..it's still just a non-viable fetus.

Its a human being. It has a beating heart. Stopping its heart is murder. Oh in that case ANYONE that needs life support is a non viable fetus as well...they can't live without that life support.We should just kill them.

LOL, another one that doesn't understand that words have meanings. Once you learn the actual definitions for the words you use, you'd stop making your ridiculous arguments. A fetus is a fetus, not a human being.

If a fetus is a human being, why don't we count them in the census?

If a fetus is a human being, why do people say we have 2 children and one on the way instead of we have 3 children?

If a fetus is a human being, why don't we have a funeral when there is a miscarriage?

 

[Erand7899]

LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?This baby is alive!?: the heartbreaking story of Baby Hope
LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?That?s not a baby. That?s an abortion!?: clinic workers describe babies born alive

LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?This is so hard. Oh, God, it?s so hard!?: nurses tell of aborted babies born alive

We had one saline [type of abortion] born alive. I raced to the nursery with it and put it in an incubator. I called the pediatrician to come right down, and he refused. He said, “That’s not a baby. That’s an abortion. (1)

How can that not bring tears to your eyes?

It's also sad that so-called "pro lifers" don't give a shit about the well being of kids once they're born. Pro-lifers should be called "Pro-birthers" because they only care about a child being born, not it's actual life.

What evidence do you have, beyond your own ignorant assumption, that so-called "pro lifers" don't give a shit about the well being of kids once they're born? Do they abandon their children? Do they kill their children? Do they not provide housing and food for their children?

I suspect that your bitterness is caused by the fact that pro-lifers are not crazy about paying for the well-being of your children.

 

[RDD_1210]

LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?This baby is alive!?: the heartbreaking story of Baby Hope
LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?That?s not a baby. That?s an abortion!?: clinic workers describe babies born alive

LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?This is so hard. Oh, God, it?s so hard!?: nurses tell of aborted babies born alive

We had one saline [type of abortion] born alive. I raced to the nursery with it and put it in an incubator. I called the pediatrician to come right down, and he refused. He said, “That’s not a baby. That’s an abortion. (1)

How can that not bring tears to your eyes?

It's also sad that so-called "pro lifers" don't give a shit about the well being of kids once they're born. Pro-lifers should be called "Pro-birthers" because they only care about a child being born, not it's actual life.

What evidence do you have, beyond your own ignorant assumption, that so-called "pro lifers" don't give a shit about the well being of kids once they're born? Do they abandon their children? Do they kill their children? Do they not provide housing and food for their children?

I suspect that your bitterness is caused by the fact that pro-lifers are not crazy about paying for the well-being of your children.

"Their" children...no they care for them. That's not the issue. It's when they tell others they can't have to have an abortion that their hypocrisy comes out. The evidence is in the lack of support for those babies once their born.

 

[driveby]

The ones in need do, but what do you care? They were born, your concern ends.

I already debunked that lie, numbnuts. Feel free to repeat it as often as you'd like though.......

Nope, you sure didn't. You actually reinforced how true it is. Thanks turnip!

I sure did, post 127. It's not my job to splain it to your ignorant ass......

 

[RDD_1210]

I already debunked that lie, numbnuts. Feel free to repeat it as often as you'd like though.......

Nope, you sure didn't. You actually reinforced how true it is. Thanks turnip!

I sure did, post 127. It's not my job to splain it to your ignorant ass......

Let me check again.....

Nope you definitely didn't.

Try again nutter.

 

[Clementine]

LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?This baby is alive!?: the heartbreaking story of Baby Hope
LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?That?s not a baby. That?s an abortion!?: clinic workers describe babies born alive

LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?This is so hard. Oh, God, it?s so hard!?: nurses tell of aborted babies born alive

We had one saline [type of abortion] born alive. I raced to the nursery with it and put it in an incubator. I called the pediatrician to come right down, and he refused. He said, “That’s not a baby. That’s an abortion. (1)

How can that not bring tears to your eyes?

It's also sad that so-called "pro lifers" don't give a shit about the well being of kids once they're born. Pro-lifers should be called "Pro-birthers" because they only care about a child being born, not it's actual life.

Is that how you justify murder? Blame somebody else for not taking YOUR responsibility?

You got it. You see, the tax payers are looked upon as deep pockets who have more than they deserve. People making stupid choices and relying on government are precious dependents and they deserve a chunk of what you earn because they can't get a job because they didn't finish school or are otherwise unemployable. Don't suggest that they elevate themselves by making changes because that mean. If they keep having children, your "responsibility" for their children increases. How you feel about it, or whatever your religious beliefs are, don't matter at all because nanny government says it's your responsibility.

Pro-lifers haven't stopped abortions, so the argument about raising people's children because of views is moot. The reason sluts, like Fluke, are still bitching is because they really want the rest of us to pay for the abortions. It's not enough that they are legal. We are being told that if we don't pay for them or insist that women think before they act, we will be responsible for raising their child. The mothers of unplanned pregnancies bear no responsibility. She isn't expected to get a job and pay for her own abortion because it's wrong to tell people they should work. We are supposed to keep working and pay.

And we're supposed to keep our mouths shut and not complain because nanny government has spoken. Now, go to your room and think about what you've done, you mouthy child you! Keep it up and nanny will send the IRS or the NSA after you.

There have been a number of babies that survived the abortion procedure because the idiot mother waited a long time to abort and the 'bun in the oven' was nearly done. Of course, the late-term abortion procedure is much harder on the woman than actually delivering the baby normally or through C-section. The birth is stopped midway so the doctor can jab a sharp instrument into the babies skull and kill it before it's completely out of the womb. If it does survive that, no medical aid is allowed. And, apparently, they assume that the moving, crying baby cannot feel pain. Late-term abortions are something out of a horror movie. Cases of doing it because the mother's life is in danger is really not much of an argument since the procedure would increase the danger to the mother. And to the women who carry babies to the point where they could be saved after aborting are the most cruel people in the world. The left doesn't like talking about this subject because it would promote awareness about development of the fetus and might turn people's stomachs. It's hard to call it an inhuman mass of nothing when it's kicking it's legs and crying. It's supposed to be a nothing little procedure and they don't even think a doctor is necessary for one. When you see stories like this, it rubs them the wrong way because, aside from being incredibly disturbing, it doesn't help their rhetoric about abortions hold up.

Libs claim to be pro-science, but such is not the case when it comes to the medical field.

And they are 'pro-abortion' or 'pro-population control', but not really pro-choice. I think we learned that the last few years with all the government control over our lives and shoving Obamacare down our throats.

 

[Noomi]

So a baby in the womb doesn't have a beating heart? Dude you lose your argument right there. At 6 weeks a babies heart has formed and is beating. AKA ITS ALIVE. Same thing happens to that baby as would happen to me if you shot me in the heart or punctured it with a scalpel it would kill us both.

Its heart beats at the expense of the human being keeping it alive.

 

[S.J.]

Start a thread about hungry children and see how many of these so-called pro-lifers would happily kick a starving child out of their way rather than vote for food stamps.

Talk about child support and the same jerks will say she should have kept her legs closed.

Orion posts one hate thread after another and then posts this from an anti-abortion site?

Reality is, abortion is here to stay. It needs to be easy to obtain and painless for both the woman and the fetus.

And birth control should be free for all. Period. No questions asked.

Save the shit about socialism. Its time we invested in our own country. That means we stop forcing women to reproduce and instead, invest our resources in the children already born. Educate them, feed them, care for them.

Its really not all that hard to understand.

I see, it's not a person but it can feel pain when it's being shredded? That has to be the dumbest ******* thing you've said yet, and you've said some pretty dumb things.

1. Its a fetus
2. It needs to be painless for both the woman and the fetus.

THAT is my opinion.

You're welcome to whatever ill-informed, uneducated, bigoted, irresponsible, sexist, misogynist claptrap you want to spew.

How can it possibly be painless if you're tearing it's arms and legs off and sticking scissors in it's head, you ******* idiot??? You've just earned the top spot on my "dumbest liberal" list. Un-f-ing-believable!!!

 

[Noomi]

How can it possibly be painless if you're tearing it's arms and legs off and sticking scissors in it's head, you ******* idiot??? You've just earned the top spot on my "dumbest liberal" list. Un-f-ing-believable!!!

Partial birth abortions are illegal, I believe, so no scissors are being stuck in anyone's head.

 

[S.J.]

So you must be a big supporter of Obamacare providing contraception to avoid abortions, right?

What good would that do? You're not responsible enough to use it anyway. But I'll be happy to pay for sterilization.

Typical cop out!

Wanna try making a point, troll? Got something to add to the discussion or are you just sitting on the sidelines taking pot shots?

 

[S.J.]

It's a fetus at 6 weeks. A non-viable fetus that can't sustain itself. Calling it a baby doesn't change anything..it's still just a non-viable fetus.

Its a human being. It has a beating heart. Stopping its heart is murder. Oh in that case ANYONE that needs life support is a non viable fetus as well...they can't live without that life support.We should just kill them.

LOL, another one that doesn't understand that words have meanings. Once you learn the actual definitions for the words you use, you'd stop making your ridiculous arguments. A fetus is a fetus, not a human being.

If a fetus is a human being, why don't we count them in the census?

If a fetus is a human being, why do people say we have 2 children and one on the way instead of we have 3 children?

If a fetus is a human being, why don't we have a funeral when there is a miscarriage?

If it's NOT a human being, why was Scott Peterson charged with double murder when he killed his pregnant wife?

 

[S.J.]

How can it possibly be painless if you're tearing it's arms and legs off and sticking scissors in it's head, you ******* idiot??? You've just earned the top spot on my "dumbest liberal" list. Un-f-ing-believable!!!

Partial birth abortions are illegal, I believe, so no scissors are being stuck in anyone's head.

I suggest you go back and read the OP links.

 

[Noomi]

How can it possibly be painless if you're tearing it's arms and legs off and sticking scissors in it's head, you ******* idiot??? You've just earned the top spot on my "dumbest liberal" list. Un-f-ing-believable!!!

Partial birth abortions are illegal, I believe, so no scissors are being stuck in anyone's head.

I suggest you go back and read the OP links.

Yeah, nah. They are all from anti abortion websites. I am sure the actual doctor who did the abortion would have something else to say.

 

[Papageorgio]

Partial birth abortions are illegal, I believe, so no scissors are being stuck in anyone's head.

I suggest you go back and read the OP links.

Yeah, nah. They are all from anti abortion websites. I am sure the actual doctor who did the abortion would have something else to say.

There have been doctors prosecuted for this, it is more common than you think, but being a cold hearted liberal, you make excuses for these deaths and demean them. Thanks for being a cold hearted...

 

[Noomi]

I suggest you go back and read the OP links.

Yeah, nah. They are all from anti abortion websites. I am sure the actual doctor who did the abortion would have something else to say.

There have been doctors prosecuted for this, it is more common than you think, but being a cold hearted liberal, you make excuses for these deaths and demean them. Thanks for being a cold hearted...

And those doctors who do the wrong thing should be prosecuted. But most do the right thing and follow the law.

 

[chikenwing]

Yeah, nah. They are all from anti abortion websites. I am sure the actual doctor who did the abortion would have something else to say.

There have been doctors prosecuted for this, it is more common than you think, but being a cold hearted liberal, you make excuses for these deaths and demean them. Thanks for being a cold hearted...

And those doctors who do the wrong thing should be prosecuted. But most do the right thing and follow the law.

Doesn't make it less cold and inhuman,but your proud of that. Gassing Jews was legal once also,so was slavery.

 

[chikenwing]

Can't kill something that wasn't alive yet to begin with.

But you can neglect the well being of a helpless baby which is what you are clearly in favor of.

So a baby in the womb doesn't have a beating heart? Dude you lose your argument right there. At 6 weeks a babies heart has formed and is beating. AKA ITS ALIVE. Same thing happens to that baby as would happen to me if you shot me in the heart or punctured it with a scalpel it would kill us both.

It's a fetus at 6 weeks. A non-viable fetus that can't sustain itself. Calling it a baby doesn't change anything..it's still just a non-viable fetus.

So what just because its can't sustain itself,matters not,a 1 year old can't sustain itself.

 

[RDD_1210]

So a baby in the womb doesn't have a beating heart? Dude you lose your argument right there. At 6 weeks a babies heart has formed and is beating. AKA ITS ALIVE. Same thing happens to that baby as would happen to me if you shot me in the heart or punctured it with a scalpel it would kill us both.

It's a fetus at 6 weeks. A non-viable fetus that can't sustain itself. Calling it a baby doesn't change anything..it's still just a non-viable fetus.

So what just because its can't sustain itself,matters not,a 1 year old can't sustain itself.

LOL, really? I have to explain the difference between a 1 year old baby and a 6 week old fetus?

 

[JoeB131]

So a baby in the womb doesn't have a beating heart? Dude you lose your argument right there. At 6 weeks a babies heart has formed and is beating. AKA ITS ALIVE. Same thing happens to that baby as would happen to me if you shot me in the heart or punctured it with a scalpel it would kill us both.

It's a fetus at 6 weeks. A non-viable fetus that can't sustain itself. Calling it a baby doesn't change anything..it's still just a non-viable fetus.

So what just because its can't sustain itself,matters not,a 1 year old can't sustain itself.

a 1 year old CAN live outside of it's mother's body.

Yes, other people will need to feed it, but there's no mandate that a specific person has to whether you want to or not.

I always find it hilarious that all these "libertarian" types become outright Stalinists when it comes to a woman's Lady Parts and what she might do with them.