A lawsuit is a legal argument. They’re not testimony.
How are all of you so synced up in your stupidity? It’s like you’re all riding the same idiot train straight off a cliff.
A lawsuit is based on SWORN TESTIMONY!
DURRRRRR
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lawsuit is a legal argument. They’re not testimony.
How are all of you so synced up in your stupidity? It’s like you’re all riding the same idiot train straight off a cliff.
Who settles the lawsuit? I believe that would be a COURT. Testimonies in court are under oath. Lying under oath is perjury. Glad I could clear that up for you.A lawsuit is a legal argument. They’re not testimony.
How are all of you so synced up in your stupidity? It’s like you’re all riding the same idiot train straight off a cliff.
Did you forget who is suing who?A lawsuit is based on SWORN TESTIMONY!
DURRRRRR
What testimony are you morons talking about?Who settles the lawsuit? I believe that would be a COURT. Testimonies in court are under oath. Lying under oath is perjury. Glad I could clear that up for you.
Did you forget who is suing who?
They’re based on legal arguments. Not testimony.The defense files Motions, THAT ARE ALSO BASED ON SWORN TESTIMONY!
They’re based on legal arguments. Not testimony.
What sworn testimony are you referring to? You don’t know. It doesn’t exist.
I’m not.You are wrong, and a moron.
I’m not.
Tell me what sworn testimony Trump used in his lawsuit to get a special master.
There was none.
If that’s true, then we should arrest and prosecute Trump’s lawyers. Right?What is funny is you don't even understand that lawyers are ALWAYS under oath.
That is one of those funny things about having an esq. at the end of your name.
You first had to swear an oath to GET the title!
Moron.
If that’s true, then we should arrest and prosecute Trump’s lawyers. Right?
You said their lawsuit has to be based on testimony, right? So if their lawsuit failed then the testimony MUST be perjury.If you can find where they have perjured themselves, absolutely. But then, the dems would have to arrest all of their people immediately because we CAN prove they lied.
BUT they are political class, so are protected.
You said their lawsuit has to be based on testimony, right? So if their lawsuit failed then the testimony MUST be perjury.
You still won’ say what testimony was perjury for Maddow, which is pretty weird if you think you know what you’re talking about.
That’s not what I said at all. Now you’re lying, which is pretty pathetic.You are the one who said Madcow just has to lie to win her case.
Dummy.
Lol.This is what we need in Western journalism .....people being held accountable for their lives.
NBC Must Face Suit by Devin Nunes Alleging Maddow Smeared Him
Former congressman and Donald Trump ally Devin Nunes cleared an early hurdle in a lawsuit accusing MSNBC host Rachel Maddow of smearing him on her show.www.bloomberg.com