Nunes' lawsuit against Maddow and MSNBC moves forward

[Marener]

Lying under oath is perjury not a legal strategy.

Youre a moron.

 

[Marener]

No, it isn't. It is perjury, full stop.

Just stop. You have no idea what you’re talking about.

 

[westwall]

Just stop. You have no idea what you’re talking about.

I'm an expert witness, moron. I know perjury when I see it.

 

[Marener]

I'm an expert witness, moron. I know perjury when I see it.

It’s not even sworn testimony you dope.

 

[westwall]

It’s not even sworn testimony you dope.

The Hearing is, you dope.

 

[Marener]

The Hearing is, you dope.

It is for witnesses, dope.

 

[Concerned American]

It is for witnesses, dope.

People who testify in legal hearings or court proceedings are under oath, troll. You are a moron who can't find his own ass with both hands. Run along junior, adults are conversing.

 

[Marener]

People who testify in legal hearings or court proceedings are under oath, troll. You are a moron who can't find his own ass with both hands. Run along junior, adults are conversing.

It’s not testimony, dope. It’s a legal argument.

 

[westwall]

It’s not testimony, dope. It’s a legal argument.

You have no clue.

 

[Marener]

You have no clue.

Really. Go ahead and tell me how a legal argument is testimony given under oath.

Dipshit. You watch too much Perry Mason. This has nothing to do with testimony.

 

[westwall]

Really. Go ahead and tell me how a legal argument is testimony given under oath.

Dipshit. You watch too much Perry Mason. This has nothing to do with testimony.

Tell us how a Court Hearing is NOT done under oath?

 

[Marener]

Tell us how a Court Hearing is NOT done under oath?

Lawyers standing in front of a judge aren’t sworn in me offer their arguments as a matter of their opinion to persuade the judge.

A legal argument isn’t testimony given under oath.

Please, educate yourself on the function of the judiciary before you start running your mouth.

Or at least have a little humility.

 

[westwall]

Lawyers standing in front of a judge aren’t sworn in me offer their arguments as a matter of their opinion to persuade the judge.

A legal argument isn’t testimony given under oath.

Please, educate yourself on the function of the judiciary before you start running your mouth.

Or at least have a little humility.

You are seriously funny. Yes, in a Motion before the Bench, you are correct, the lawyers aren't sworn in. That is true, however, if the lawyer is arguing for a Motion that is ONLY supported by perjured testimony, that is grounds for immediate disbarrement for violation of judicial ethics.


DURRRRRR


And then, after disbarrement, felony charges follow for either subborning perjury, or conspiracy to commit.

Double DURRRRRR

 

[Marener]

You are seriously funny. Yes, in a Motion before the Bench, you are correct, the lawyers aren't sworn in. That is true, however, if the lawyer is arguing for a Motion that is ONLY supported by perjured testimony, that is grounds for immediate disbarrement for violation of judicial ethics.


DURRRRRR

There is no perjured testimony. You invented it.

Lawyers are allowed to make arguments that fail. Lord knows that Nunes does it all the time. His lawyers aren’t immediately disbarred.

 

[westwall]

You are seriously funny. Yes, in a Motion before the Bench, you are correct, the lawyers aren't sworn in. That is true, however, if the lawyer is arguing for a Motion that is ONLY supported by perjured testimony, that is grounds for immediate disbarrement for violation of judicial ethics.


DURRRRRR

And the

There is no perjured testimony. You invented it.

Lawyers are allowed to make arguments that fail. Lord knows that Nunes does it all the time. His lawyers aren’t immediately disbarred.

Lawyers are not allowed to make motions based on perjured testimony you tard.

It is ILLEGAL. A violation of judicial ethics, and grounds for immediate disbarrement as just happened in a case in Oregon.

That lawyer is now looking at being Federally indicted too.

I won't name the case because the charges are imminent.

 

[Marener]

And the


Lawyers are not allowed to make motions based on perjured testimony you tard.

It is ILLEGAL. A violation of judicial ethics, and grounds for immediate disbarrement as just happened in a case in Oregon.

That lawyer is now looking at being Federally indicted too.

I won't name the case because the charges are imminent.

What testimony are you claiming is going to be perjured?

It doesn’t exist, moron.

 

[westwall]

What testimony are you claiming is going to be perjured?

It doesn’t exist, moron.

 

[Marener]

And now everyone gets to see that you’re a moron who is full of shit.

 

[Concerned American]

It’s not testimony, dope. It’s a legal argument.

Read the second word of the OP.

 

[Marener]

Read the second word of the OP.

A lawsuit is a legal argument. They’re not testimony.

How are all of you so synced up in your stupidity? It’s like you’re all riding the same idiot train straight off a cliff.