Nuclear rights of Iranian nation.

[Zavulon]

These arent the moves that the "Hermit Kingdom" is into. They arent interested in getting themselves blown up just so they can hand off a nuke to Iran. There is no upside for them. The Hermit Kingdom keeps to themselves.

Better Korea isn't Hermit Kingdom anymore. They are deeply cooperative with Russia and Iran. They even participated in Russian military operation with their infantry.

 

[Godboy]

Better Korea isn't Hermit Kingdom anymore. They are deeply cooperative with Russia and Iran. They even participated in Russian military operation with their infantry.

The soldiers that they gave to Russia, werent going to cause a war with the United States. Secretly handing a nuke to Iran would doom their nation. We would instantly have the perfect excuse to nuke them and there would be no backlash from the world over it.

 

[Zavulon]

The soldiers that they gave to Russia, werent going to cause a war with the United States. Secretly handing a nuke to Iran would doom their nation. We would instantly have the perfect excuse to nuke them and there would be no backlash from the world over it.

The United States don't need "excuses" to attack anyone (conventionally or with WMD). They need only opportunity to attack somebody with profit and without retaliation. North Korea have good deterrence on the USA and can be quite provocative. If the USA nuke DPRK, DPRK nuke the USA back and destroy, say, five big cities.
So, if there is a choice between swallowing nuclearisation of a previously non-nuclear country (as it was with India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea) and fighting and even winning a limited nuclear war - latter is usually lesser acceptable, especially if even a limited nuclear war means that many more previously non-nuclear countries became nuclear in few years.

And, of course, American illegal and unprovoked aggression against Better Korea will face Russia and Chinese response.

 

[Godboy]

The United States don't need "excuses" to attack anyone (conventionally or with WMD). They need only opportunity to attack somebody with profit and without retaliation. North Korea have good deterrence on the USA and can be quite provocative. If the USA nuke DPRK, DPRK nuke the USA back and destroy, say, five big cities.
So, if there is a choice between swallowing nuclearisation of a previously non-nuclear country (as it was with India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea) and fighting and even winning a limited nuclear war - latter is usually lesser acceptable, especially if even a limited nuclear war means that many more previously non-nuclear countries became nuclear in few years.

And, of course, American illegal and unprovoked aggression against Better Korea will face Russia and Chinese response.

North Korea isnt giving Iran a nuke. No one is going to do that. You need to give up on this childish pipe dream.

 

[Zavulon]

North Korea isnt giving Iran a nuke.

Who told you this? North Koreans?

No one is going to do that.

Why not?

You need to give up on this childish pipe dream.

It seems that it's just your wishful-thinking.

 

[Godboy]

Who told you this? North Koreans?

Why not?

It seems that it's just your wishful-thinking.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Let me know when it happens. Until then youre just a looney dipshit with absurd claims.