Nuclear rights of Iranian nation.

These arent the moves that the "Hermit Kingdom" is into. They arent interested in getting themselves blown up just so they can hand off a nuke to Iran. There is no upside for them. The Hermit Kingdom keeps to themselves.
Better Korea isn't Hermit Kingdom anymore. They are deeply cooperative with Russia and Iran. They even participated in Russian military operation with their infantry.
 
Better Korea isn't Hermit Kingdom anymore. They are deeply cooperative with Russia and Iran. They even participated in Russian military operation with their infantry.
The soldiers that they gave to Russia, werent going to cause a war with the United States. Secretly handing a nuke to Iran would doom their nation. We would instantly have the perfect excuse to nuke them and there would be no backlash from the world over it.
 
The soldiers that they gave to Russia, werent going to cause a war with the United States. Secretly handing a nuke to Iran would doom their nation. We would instantly have the perfect excuse to nuke them and there would be no backlash from the world over it.
The United States don't need "excuses" to attack anyone (conventionally or with WMD). They need only opportunity to attack somebody with profit and without retaliation. North Korea have good deterrence on the USA and can be quite provocative. If the USA nuke DPRK, DPRK nuke the USA back and destroy, say, five big cities.
So, if there is a choice between swallowing nuclearisation of a previously non-nuclear country (as it was with India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea) and fighting and even winning a limited nuclear war - latter is usually lesser acceptable, especially if even a limited nuclear war means that many more previously non-nuclear countries became nuclear in few years.

And, of course, American illegal and unprovoked aggression against Better Korea will face Russia and Chinese response.
 
Last edited:
The United States don't need "excuses" to attack anyone (conventionally or with WMD). They need only opportunity to attack somebody with profit and without retaliation. North Korea have good deterrence on the USA and can be quite provocative. If the USA nuke DPRK, DPRK nuke the USA back and destroy, say, five big cities.
So, if there is a choice between swallowing nuclearisation of a previously non-nuclear country (as it was with India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea) and fighting and even winning a limited nuclear war - latter is usually lesser acceptable, especially if even a limited nuclear war means that many more previously non-nuclear countries became nuclear in few years.

And, of course, American illegal and unprovoked aggression against Better Korea will face Russia and Chinese response.
North Korea isnt giving Iran a nuke. No one is going to do that. You need to give up on this childish pipe dream.
 
As if it was Iran, who stirred up the stewpot of hell in the Middle East, in the first place.
As if it hasn’t been Iran that was threatening the U.S. and Israel from day one about 47 years ago, and followed through in that threat, many times.

FOOK OFF.
 
Very simple… we nuke them first.

The instant they have a bomb, Israel glows green. The instant they have a second one, some partvofctgecUS glows green. Therefore we cannot allow them to achieve a nuclear weapon under any circumstance. Even if it means wiping out the entire country



"we" = ISRAEL not US

Treasonous mother Fer
 
As if it hasn’t been Iran that was threatening the U.S. and Israel from day one about 47 years ago, and followed through in that threat, many times.

FOOK OFF.


Same ol treasonous lies from the same liars who lied us into Iraq a quarter century ago.
 
As if it hasn’t been Iran that was threatening the U.S. and Israel from day one about 47 years ago, and followed through in that threat, many times.

FOOK OFF.
As if they don't have right defend their land, their people and their territory. You came in Middle East, not they came in America.
 
And what price are you ready to pay for this destruction? One American city? Two cities? One hundred cities? How determined you are? Given that you can't sacrifice even few hundred thousands of soldiers in ground operation, you are not determined at all.
Im prepared to sacrifice as many Russians as necessary should they get in our way Ivan.
 
As if they don't have right defend their land, their people and their territory. You came in Middle East, not they came in America.
By slaughtering their own people??

Sounds like Stalin
 
Im prepared to sacrifice as many Russians as necessary should they get in our way Ivan.
No doubt about it. You don't value other people lives, especially Russian ones. But what about Americans? Do you care about them, or in your service you don't value them either?
 
No doubt about it. You don't value other people lives, especially Russian ones. But what about Americans? Do you care about them, or in your service you don't value them either?
You misunderstand troll. Im for dealing with Mullahs who have killed Americans and Russians if you are dumb enough to get in our way.
 
15th post
Where is this slaughter of protestors in America Ivan?

Get new material troll
I don't tell about "slaughter of protestors". I mean Americans prefer to kill each other before the situation came to the level of "organised protests". How many criminals were shoot down by cops, and how many lawful citizens were killed by criminals?
 
I'm not joking. Nuclear weapons are not just tools for mass-murder. First of all, nuclear weapons are tools of deterrence, and demand responsibility. This sort of level-up would change the whole game. There would be no need in playing proxy-games with certain "terroristic" groups, but need in ability to play nuclear-detereence game, meaning, changing of financial streams from Islamic Revolutionary Guard to the Army or Fleet. And, therefore, there was strong opposition to such games among high-ranked politicians. And, of course, non-nuclear Iran was risking non-nuclear bombing campaign and nuclear Iran would risking nuclear exchange.
So, yes, significant part of Iranians thought that it's more safe to don't have nukes, than have them. Now, many of them have changed their mind, but even now, decision of withdrawing from Non Prolifiration Treaty is not made yet.
It's not about loving and kind. It's about deterrence. America can deter nuclear Russia and America would be able to deter nuclear Iran even easier.
Iran brought the military retaliations on themselves by admitting they were enriching plutonium, thus breaking promises made to Obama in exchange for billions of American tax dollars. Iran has been breathing threatening and slaughter against Israel and the US for decades and have been backing up those threats by supplying proxies all over the world with weapons to kill those who do not support the Muslim views of the Ayatollah.
 
As if they don't have right defend their land, their people and their territory. You came in Middle East, not they came in America.
When did the U.S. invade Iran in the last fifty years, you fookin moron? On the first day of the 1979 revolution the mullahs declared their intention to destroy the U.S. aka the big satan and Israel, the little satan. Those declarations have followed through with actions, many of them.

These Mullah animals don’t care about Iran, its people, its resources, or its borders. Their only objective is to spread their version of radical Islam all over the Middle East and the rest of the world. That’s why Arab countries and the Iranian people are asking the U.S. and Israel to finish the job of changing this evil regime.

The problem with the world today is there are to many retarded terrorist loving idiots like you saying stupid ignorant Shiite.
 
Last edited:
When did the U.S. invade Iran in the last fifty years, you fookin moron?
Ordinary Iranians saw Shah regime as American occupation administration, and they had all reasons to think it. Shah was stealing their money and giving them to America. And when Mullahs said that America is a Big Satan it was because they were following ordinary people's understanding. And, of course, many Americans did understand that they were doing Satan's job.



On the first day of the 1979 revolution the mullahs declared their intention to destroy the U.S. aka the big satan and Israel, the little satan. Those declarations have followed through with actions, many of them.

As if they didn't have reasons to do that. Say nothing about many groups in Russia, who want to destroy the USA.
These Mullah animals don’t care about Iran, its people, its resources, or its borders. Their only objective is to spread their version of radical Islam all over the Middle East and the rest of the world.
It is simply not true. Houthis in Yemen has different version of Shii Islam, and Hezbollah are Sunni. Say nothing about Russian Orthodox Church, North Korean Atheists and Chinese Pagans.

That’s why Arab countries and the Iranian people are asking the U.S. and Israel to finish the job of changing this evil regime.
Are they? I doubt it.

The problem with the world today is there are to many retarded terrorist loving idiots like you saying stupid ignorant Shiite.
I do prefer Iranian terrorist over American terrorists because former don't try to kill me.
 
Back
Top Bottom