How can you make such a broad statement without a single example? Besides, there are no "regulations" that a conservative will agree with. Look at what they have done to OSHA and the EPA and Wall Street.
It just a broad as your original statement saying liberals were responsible for our pristine abe beautiful country. One shouldnt use more significant figures than provided by the original data. You didnt provide any examples either.
I consider myself conservative, and I agree with alot of OSHA and EPA regs. What I do not agree with is how the organziations have been perverted from thier original goals to basically lawsuit generating plants, with the rules no longer written by engineers and scientists to protect things, but instead by lawyers and burecrats to create lawsuits and endless regulations that do nothing but add paperwork.
Still no example.
Besides, right wingers have no respect for "engineers and scientists" if the right wingers on the USMB are any indication, and they are.
Scientists: Bush Distorts Science
The Union of Concerned Scientists, an independent organization, also issued a 37-page report, "Scientific Integrity in Policymaking," detailing the accusations. The statement and the report both accuse the Bush administration of distorting and suppressing findings that contradict administration policies, stacking panels with like-minded and underqualified scientists with ties to industry, and eliminating some advisory committees altogether.
Culture: Scientists and Bush administration at odds - US News and World Report
Bush administration accused of doctoring scientists' reports | Environment | The Guardian
===========================
How many USMB members have said similar statements to: Education is just a piece of paper, scientists sit back and collect government money for doing nothing, people that are over educated have no common sense, liberals have taken over science and that's why there are no more inventions and discoveries, and on and on. The "anti science" comments are endless.
And still, right wingers insist more than 6% of scientists are Republican. I'm sure it's less.