Nuclear explosion

[Brick Gold]

Heres an article with pictures about Starfish Prime, near-space nuclear detonation.

9 July 1962, 09:00:09 UTC, T + 13:41 - This Day in Aviation

9 July 1962: At 09:00:09 UTC, the United States detonated a thermonuclear warhead over the Pacific Ocean. This was part of the Operation Dominic-Fishbowl test series at Johnston Island, and was designated Starfish Prime. At 08:46:28 UTC, a Douglas Thor DSV2E orbital launch vehicle, serial number...

www.thisdayinaviation.com

 

[Here and there]

A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.

Care to guess why-?
-

Don’t know but if u were travelling the speed of light in your car then turning in the lights, what would happen?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Don’t know but if u were travelling the speed of light in your car then turning in the lights, what would happen?

The mainstream physics 'splaination:

What would happen if the car traveled exactly at the speed of light in vacuum and turned on its headlights? Objects that don't have exactly zero mass can never travel exactly the speed of light in vacuum. On the other hand, objects with exactly zero mass always travel at exactly the speed of light in vacuum and cannot travel at any other speed. Getting any object with mass at exactly the speed of light requires an infinite amount of energy and is therefore impossible. The closer the car gets to traveling at speed c relative to the ground, the slower its time progresses relative to the ground, so the more its light would seem frozen in the headlamps.

A few practical notes need to be made. In real life, a car driving on the earth's surface could never come anywhere close to the speed of light.

Now ask yourself, Self, where else might a car be driving "in real life"? Anyways, presume the above paragraph correct,.. mathematically. Yes, things do tend to be relative to one's perspective. However, when one simply presumes the Aether rather than forcing space and time to contort through the hoops described further in that link, the result is exactly the same. So go figure. Absurd or simple? Your choice.

 

[toobfreak]

A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.
Care to guess why-?

No need to guess. It is because no work is accomplished.

 

[Here and there]

The mainstream physics 'splaination:

Now ask yourself, Self, where else might a car be driving "in real life"? Anyways, presume the above paragraph correct,.. mathematically. Yes, things do tend to be relative to one's perspective. However, when one simply presumes the Aether rather than forcing space and time to contort through the hoops described further in that link, the result is exactly the same. So go figure. Absurd or simple? Your choice.

You went to enormous lengths to display how pedantic you are. Do you have any humour or some kind of expert.

 

[Grumblenuts]

You went to enormous lengths to display how pedantic you are. Do you have any humour or some kind of expert.

Did I now? And do you? You're welcome, asswipe.

 

[Here and there]

Grumblenuts

Did I now? And do you? You're welcome,

You’ve got a high opinion of yourself. Been a narcissist long?

I have nothing to thank you for.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Grumblenuts

You’ve got a high opinion of yourself. Been a narcissist long?

I have nothing to thank you for.

 

[Here and there]

Grow up. Is that the best you’ve got?

 

[para bellum]

A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.

Care to guess why-?
-

Because it released it's energy when it exploded. There is nothing to "rerelease". The atoms have split. The energy that was binding the nucleus has been released.

 

[BackAgain]

The sun is a nuclear furnace and releases tons of energy.

 

[Stryder50]

Please elaborate.
In my view, energy is the measurement of matter in a state of motion or so it seems to me.
How about you -

Light is not matter.
Nor are radio waves.
Both are examples of energy.

Duh!

 

[watchingfromafar]

Light is not matter.

Sun photons pass through the glass and hit the flat plane causing it to turn.
Only a form of mass could cause this reaction which proves light rays are a form of mass.

DUH
-

 

[watchingfromafar]

Don’t know but if u were travelling the speed of light in your car then turning in the lights, what would happen?

The light would leave the car at a speed of 299,792,458 metres per second

The speed of the car is irrelevant.
-

 

[Grumblenuts]

Sun photons pass through the glass and hit the flat plane causing it to turn.
Only a form of mass could cause this reaction which proves light rays are a form of mass.
View attachment 710921
DUH
-

Nice picture and tshotshke. Available in its original glass or now plastic. Either way.. CHEAP!

Far as proving light rays possess mass? Nope. Incoming energy striking one side of a vane leaves the other side relatively cool. The warmer sides are then drawn toward the cooler areas but can never quite catch up. Again, cool toy, Einstein!

 

[watchingfromafar]

The warmer sides are then drawn toward the cooler areas but can never quite catch up. Again, cool toy, Einstein!

The glass container is in a vacuum
Next
-

 

[Here and there]

The light would leave the car at a speed of 299,792,458 metres per second

The speed of the car is irrelevant.
-

So that light would over take the speed of light. Got it.

 

[Grumblenuts]

So that light would over take the speed of light. Got it.

How do you know?

 

[Grumblenuts]

The glass container is in a vacuum
Next
-

If true, what difference do you imagine that makes?

Sun photons pass through the glass and hit the flat plane

Now picture a large black slab of marble strategically placed to capture sunlight streaming in through a window during the day so as to return thermal energy to the house all night. Indeed, having no air to circulate the heat eliminates one of the three well recognized means of thermal transfer (convection). Eliminating direct contact eliminates another (conduction, if we ignore the floor). Which means have you somehow entirely neglected, Einstein?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Extra credit:
Again, you say:

Sun photons pass through the glass and hit the flat plane

Does this glass cause them to change direction at all? To slow down a bit? And, when they emerge from this glass, do they not change direction again and speed back up to c prior to hitting this flat plane? If so, what powers this incredible feat of acceleration? Btw, same question applies whether you credit these "photons" with having mass or none. Whether under vacuum or none as well.