watchingfromafar
Gold Member
- Aug 6, 2017
- 5,445
- 1,311
- 140
A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.
Care to guess why-?
-
Care to guess why-?
-
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gravity or lack thereof?A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.
Care to guess why-?
-
Gravity and energy are two different forces.Gravity or lack thereof?
Semantics -- "rereleases" -- it never released any before.A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.
Care to guess why-?
-
A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.
Care to guess why-?
-
Energy is energy whether in the vacuum of space or on Earth. That is how a rocket or space shuttle can move/maneuver in space.A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.
Care to guess why-?
-
Then, how did the Big...Bang?Because space is a vacuum, a lack of atoms means a lack of a substance to "carry" the energy.
Good point. Must have been The Aether, huh?Then, how did the Big...Bang?
Ok -Energy is energy whether in the vacuum of space or on Earth.
Please elaborate.Aliens have a suppressor field surrounding us. Lol, of course it releases energy.
Damn good questionThen, how did the Big...Bang?
Because no one saw it. If a tree falls in the Forrest....A nuclear explosion, detonated in outer space rereleases “zero” energy.
Care to guess why-?
-
One may obtain different results from another..From the Google gods:
What would happen if there was a nuclear explosion in space?
Their source link.If a nuke exploded in space, gamma rays and X-rays would be emitted and would expand to light up the sky. On the surface of the planet, auroras of light would be seen for thousands of miles within minutes of the blast. The explosion would also create a magnetic field, which could disrupt electronic communication. Jul 8, 2022
While matter and energy are equivalent in certain respects, "matter" today still implies mass which implies "particles" (possibly "atoms" or the "subatomic" variety) at the very least. This (atomism) is the fundamental error modern physics continues to embrace wholeheartedly while pretending like crazy to be oh so open minded and comprehensive. They can't bring themselves to choose between a wave or a particle, so they demand some things be both simultaneously and at the same time too. Energy is neither. It's always field-like more than anything. They don't understand that light's energy source need go nowhere. Need "propagate" itself nowhere. Only its energy need travel from A to B. The Sun can stay put. Your speakers can stay put. X-ray machines can stay put. Only the medium need worry about moving or "propagating" energy anywhere. So it does. Move all of it. Obviously. Certainly nothing else does.In my view, energy is the measurement of matter in a state of motion or so it seems to me.
I wouldn't say the ramifications of a nuclear explosion is much less destructive in space. The US tested its first nuclear warhead in 1958. I would guess that it reached space as defined back then and today. There wouldn't be any blast to do physical damage, but there would be fallout to worry about. This led to banning nuclear weapons testing in space in the 60s, but nuclear space testing continued until the 80s. It means the fallout could directly affect us as well as poison our foods to the point of causing our deaths.From the Google gods:
What would happen if there was a nuclear explosion in space?
The explosion of a nuclear bomb in space releases precisely the same amount of energy as it would release into the atmosphere. But this energy will not be converted into kinetic energy and heat since the air is not there to do this. That is what makes space nuclear explosion much less destructive.