NRA: Hillary Was Right, You Can't Trust Obama With Your Guns

WillowTree

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2008
84,532
16,093
2,180
WASHINGTON -- The National Rifle Association is turning to Hillary Rodham Clinton to bolster its criticism of Barack Obama's positions on gun issues.

The NRA's Political Victory Fund planned a national newspaper ad Thursday reviving a Clinton mailing that accused Obama of waffling on gun issues. Clinton's campaign sent the mailing when the New York senator was challenging Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination. It accuses Obama of changing his statements on gun issues to try to fit the audience he was addressing.

"Hillary was right: You can't trust Obama with your guns," says the NRA political action committee's ad, scheduled to run in USA Today. The PAC has spent at least $2.3 million on anti-Obama efforts, including more than $100,000 on the new USA Today ad.




NRA: Hillary Was Right, You Can't Trust Obama With Your Guns - FOXNews.com Elections
 
Total bullshit.


Obama will let me keep my guns.:clap2:


Come on. Let's get something about putting Korans in all the Motels.:lol:
 
You know, I seem to remember the NRA saying something quite similar about Bill Clinton. Gosh, don't we all still have guns?

Let's see here, what else does the NRA do? They support your right to have AK-47 machine guns in your home. They do not support any kind of regulation whatsoever on gun control, nor background checks. In fact, if it were up to the NRA, a madman who just escaped from prison could buy an entire arsenal of guns, because well you know, you have the right to bare arms and all.

I think the forefathers meant that you don't have to wear long sleeve shirts and you can wear short sleeved shirts. Bare arms. Get it? HA!
 
oh no he won't.

you sound like a 5 year old :lol:

here ya go

[youtube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eB4ew09eoeQ&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eB4ew09eoeQ&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]
 
He'll take our guns. He'll take our bibles. He'll put our babies in Madrasas's.

And, Lordy, Lordy, Lordy, he'll even take our white women.

Oh, he knew a terrorist also.:cuckoo:
 
WASHINGTON -- The National Rifle Association is turning to Hillary Rodham Clinton to bolster its criticism of Barack Obama's positions on gun issues.

The NRA's Political Victory Fund planned a national newspaper ad Thursday reviving a Clinton mailing that accused Obama of waffling on gun issues. Clinton's campaign sent the mailing when the New York senator was challenging Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination. It accuses Obama of changing his statements on gun issues to try to fit the audience he was addressing.

"Hillary was right: You can't trust Obama with your guns," says the NRA political action committee's ad, scheduled to run in USA Today. The PAC has spent at least $2.3 million on anti-Obama efforts, including more than $100,000 on the new USA Today ad.




NRA: Hillary Was Right, You Can't Trust Obama With Your Guns - FOXNews.com Elections

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPBHtjZmSpw]YouTube - Bowling for Columbine[/ame]

:eusa_whistle:

1871: NRA is created and the same year this happens: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1871

Jeez, that wouldn't have any connection would it? :eusa_whistle:
 
Last edited:
You know, I seem to remember the NRA saying something quite similar about Bill Clinton. Gosh, don't we all still have guns?

Let's see here, what else does the NRA do? They support your right to have AK-47 machine guns in your home. They do not support any kind of regulation whatsoever on gun control, nor background checks. In fact, if it were up to the NRA, a madman who just escaped from prison could buy an entire arsenal of guns, because well you know, you have the right to bare arms and all.

I think the forefathers meant that you don't have to wear long sleeve shirts and you can wear short sleeved shirts. Bare arms. Get it? HA!

AK-47 are not machine guns you dumb fuck. And you can NOT own a fully automatic weapon with out a Federal License and it is illegal in at least 13 States. Fully automatic weapons are controlled completely if they are legal. This INCLUDES any materials that are directly involved in converting a weapon to full auto.

The Federal Government requires you get a Federal license which is something like 700 dollars per weapon. That you license said weapon with serial number with local authorities and the federal Government, that you maintain a current location address for where the weapon or weapons are stored, if you plan to take them across State lines you must first inform the Federal Government and ensure any State you plan to take them they are legal in.

So much for that bullshit lie.
 
AK-47 are not machine guns you dumb fuck. And you can NOT own a fully automatic weapon with out a Federal License and it is illegal in at least 13 States. Fully automatic weapons are controlled completely if they are legal. This INCLUDES any materials that are directly involved in converting a weapon to full auto.

The Federal Government requires you get a Federal license which is something like 700 dollars per weapon. That you license said weapon with serial number with local authorities and the federal Government, that you maintain a current location address for where the weapon or weapons are stored, if you plan to take them across State lines you must first inform the Federal Government and ensure any State you plan to take them they are legal in.

So much for that bullshit lie.

If all those fully automatic weapons are controlled completely if legal then how are all these gangs and drug lords getting all these wonderful guns to kill innocents with? :eusa_whistle:
 
If all those fully automatic weapons are controlled completely if legal then how are all these gangs and drug lords getting all these wonderful guns to kill innocents with? :eusa_whistle:

Ohh so taking weapons from LAW ABIDING citizens that obey the laws is gonna prevent criminals from having guns?

Hate to break it to ya but most criminals do NOT have fully automatic weapons. But where do they get them? Smugglers from Mexico and through our Ports. Illegal gunsmiths make the sears and illegally convert weapons, They steal them from Police and the National Guard and EVEN the active duty military.

One must have a special Federal arms sales license with special storage facilities to even sell fully automatic weapons. Most of them are in fact not stored at a local dealer anyway, cause there is such a small demand for them. They are kept at the manufacturers or some large retail facility with special security and are ordered through dealers with the proper licenses by people with the proper licenses.
 
Ohh so taking weapons from LAW ABIDING citizens that obey the laws is gonna prevent criminals from having guns?

Hate to break it to ya but most criminals do NOT have fully automatic weapons. But where do they get them? Smugglers from Mexico and through our Ports. Illegal gunsmiths make the sears and illegally convert weapons, They steal them from Police and the National Guard and EVEN the active duty military.

One must have a special Federal arms sales license with special storage facilities to even sell fully automatic weapons. Most of them are in fact not stored at a local dealer anyway, cause there is such a small demand for them. They are kept at the manufacturers or some large retail facility with special security and are ordered through dealers with the proper licenses by people with the proper licenses.

Most criminals might not have fully automatic weapons but they can get them.

They "steal" them, how do they steal them? Walk into a police station and go "Hey! Can I borrow your guns, I'll give them right back?"

Besides, people can buy all the guns they want at Gun Shows. How do you think the kids at Columbine got their guns? :eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top