NPR sues Trump over executive order cutting federal funding

[LeftofLeft]

Yes, there is no requirement for COngress to fund them in the future.

No requirement but I’m sure Democrats and liberals will restore it without regard to financial justification

 

[SassyIrishLass]

They tried. I admit Biden was told by SCOTUS he couldn't do it, and he said **** you and did it anyway.

I remember that well. Do you?

He does but won't admit it. Loons have selective memory

 

[marvin martian]

They tried. I admit Biden was told by SCOTUS he couldn't do it, and he said **** you and did it anyway.

I remember that well. Do you?

Yup, he sure did, and bragged about it:

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Yup, he sure did, and bragged about it:

View attachment 1116028

/Thread

 

[airplanemechanic]

So lets get this right. The president has a right to SPEND money that hasn't been appropriated, but has no right to SAVE money that has been?

Biden can tell SCOTUS to **** off and liberals are silent. But Trump, oh no, THAT SON OF A ***** HAS TO BOW AT THE ALTER OF SCOTUS.

 

[Zincwarrior]

No requirement but I’m sure Democrats and liberals will restore it without regard to financial justification

MAGA controls both houses.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Biden can tell SCOTUS to **** off and liberals are silent. But Trump, oh no, THAT SON OF A ***** HAS TO BOW AT THE ALTER OF SCOTUS.

Yes you have already said that, then were shown to be legally incorrect, but didn't comment on that.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yes you have already said that, then were shown to be legally incorrect, but didn't comment on that.

And you didn't comment on post 83, either.

Would you be as silent, well we KNOW you wouldn't be as silent, about Trump telling SCOTUS to **** off as Biden telling SCOTUS to **** off.

 

[Marener]

So lets get this right. The president has a right to SPEND money that hasn't been appropriated, but has no right to SAVE money that has been?

Biden can tell SCOTUS to **** off and liberals are silent. But Trump, oh no, THAT SON OF A ***** HAS TO BOW AT THE ALTER OF SCOTUS.

If Congress appropriates money, the executive is obligated to spend it. It’s part of executing the laws.

 

[airplanemechanic]

If Congress appropriates money, the executive is obligated to spend it. It’s part of executing the laws.

And if congress DOESN'T appropriate it and the president wants to spend it without congressional approval?????

 

[Marener]

And if congress DOESN'T appropriate it and the president wants to spend it without congressional approval?????

The president can’t do that.

 

[airplanemechanic]

The president can’t do that.

See post 83.

 

[22lcidw]

This is 2025, NPR/PBS is simply an unnecessary government expenditure.
Let them sink or swim on their own, if Americans want to donate to them, be my guest.

We live in an era with many Prog oligarchy types with deep pockets. You can see them possibly being funded. Whether the names would remain the same I do not know.

 

[Zincwarrior]

And you didn't comment on post 83, either.

Hold on, let me check that one. Er...there isn't a post 83. I see 81 then it skips to 84. What?

Would you be as silent, well we KNOW you wouldn't be as silent, about Trump telling SCOTUS to **** off as Biden telling SCOTUS to **** off.

This is true. I view Trump as a potential existential threat to the continued life of the Republic.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Hold on, let me check that one. Er...there isn't a post 83. I see 81 then it skips to 84. What?


This is true. I view Trump as a potential existential threat to the continued life of the Republic.

Um, no, there is a post 83. How convenient that you claim to not be able to see it.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Um, no, there is a post 83. How convenient that you claim to not be able to see it.

I see it

 

[airplanemechanic]

Hold on, let me check that one. Er...there isn't a post 83. I see 81 then it skips to 84. What?


This is true. I view Trump as a potential existential threat to the continued life of the Republic.

But don't feel Biden was an "existential threat" to the continued life of the Republic.

Your credibility is gone dude, just stop.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Um, no, there is a post 83. How convenient that you claim to not be able to see it.

Please repost it in a quote and I will comment.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Please repost it in a quote and I will comment.

Post in thread 'NPR sues Trump over executive order cutting federal funding'

May 27, 2025

They tried. I admit Biden was told by SCOTUS he couldn't do it, and he said **** you and did it anyway.

I remember that well. Do you?

Yup, he sure did, and bragged about it:

• marvin martian

• 

 

[22lcidw]

MAGA controls both houses.

In theory.