Now There is Evidence the FBI Planned the January 6 Operation and Planted Documents

[Lastamender]

I did a thread on this in February when this information came out. Now there is court testimony proving it is true. This document authored by a FBI operative and used as evidence to put Tarrio on jail for 22 years.

it was discovered that the Government itself was the author of the mysterious “1776 Returns” document.


The 1776 Returns document is the title of a 9-page paper that outlined strategic plans for the takeover of US government buildings on January 6, 2021.


It was confirmed in court that the FBI was behind the document and and FBI operative was the author of the document.
According to the Motion by attorney Roger Roots:


“It appears that the government itself is the author of the most incriminating and damning document in this case, which was mysteriously sent at government request to Proud Boy leader Enrique Tarrio immediately prior to January 6 in order to frame or implicate Tarrio in a government- created scheme to storm buildings around the Capitol. As such, Exhibit 528-1 and the government’s efforts to frame or smear defendants with it, constitutes outrageous government conduct. This is either entrapment or outrageous government conduct, or both. Equally improper, it is a Brady violation because the Department of Justice must surely have known these revelations before putting Special Agent Dubrowski on the stand on February 9 to introduce this evidence.”

Now There is Evidence the FBI Planned the January 6 Operation and Planted Documents Days Earlier That Were Later Used Against Innocent Americans | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In February of this year, The Gateway Pundit’s Cara Castronuovo wrote about a shocking development in the US government’s case against the Proud Boys.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[okfine]

I did a thread on this in February when this information came out. Now there is court testimony proving it is true. This document authored by a FBI operative and used as evidence to put Tarrio on jail for 22 years.

it was discovered that the Government itself was the author of the mysterious “1776 Returns” document.


The 1776 Returns document is the title of a 9-page paper that outlined strategic plans for the takeover of US government buildings on January 6, 2021.


It was confirmed in court that the FBI was behind the document and and FBI operative was the author of the document.
According to the Motion by attorney Roger Roots:


“It appears that the government itself is the author of the most incriminating and damning document in this case, which was mysteriously sent at government request to Proud Boy leader Enrique Tarrio immediately prior to January 6 in order to frame or implicate Tarrio in a government- created scheme to storm buildings around the Capitol. As such, Exhibit 528-1 and the government’s efforts to frame or smear defendants with it, constitutes outrageous government conduct. This is either entrapment or outrageous government conduct, or both. Equally improper, it is a Brady violation because the Department of Justice must surely have known these revelations before putting Special Agent Dubrowski on the stand on February 9 to introduce this evidence.”

Now There is Evidence the FBI Planned the January 6 Operation and Planted Documents Days Earlier That Were Later Used Against Innocent Americans | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In February of this year, The Gateway Pundit’s Cara Castronuovo wrote about a shocking development in the US government’s case against the Proud Boys.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Rotating your crazy stories again?

 

[Lastamender]

Rotating your crazy stories again?

It was said in court and it was told to the J6 committee. It happened.

 

[okfine]

It was said in court and it was told to the J6 committee. It happened.

Is this about Big Lie one or two?

 

[Lastamender]

Gateway pundit. That might be the most batshit crazy of all the batshit crazy sourses.

Not at all. The NYT and the WP are far less credible. They reported on the Russian hoax like it was true for years and we know now it was all a lie.

 

[Donald H]

The full power of the state is being brought down on Trump's neck and this sort of kneejerk protesting isn't going to work.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Not at all. The NYT and the WP are far less credible. They reported on the Russian hoax like it was true for years and we know now it was all a lie.

[The Russians DID interfere in the 2016 as proven by a BIPARTISAN Senate Committee.]



Now, prove the Gateway Pundit allegations. What is the evidence? And NO, it was not shown during the 1/6 investigations.

 

[Lastamender]

[The Russians DID interfere in the 2016 as proven by a BIPARTISAN Senate Committee.]



Now, prove the Gateway Pundit allegations. What is the evidence? And NO, it was not shown during the 1/6 investigations.

Did the interference change the outcome? Apparently not, or Killary would have been president. Non-story.

 

[BackAgain]

Rotating your crazy stories again?

That ^ sounds like you can’t rebut his reference to court filings and associated documentary evidence.

Typical fume: all noise all the time, but no substance.

 

[Magnus]

I did a thread on this in February when this information came out. Now there is court testimony proving it is true. This document authored by a FBI operative and used as evidence to put Tarrio on jail for 22 years.

it was discovered that the Government itself was the author of the mysterious “1776 Returns” document.


The 1776 Returns document is the title of a 9-page paper that outlined strategic plans for the takeover of US government buildings on January 6, 2021.


It was confirmed in court that the FBI was behind the document and and FBI operative was the author of the document.
According to the Motion by attorney Roger Roots:


“It appears that the government itself is the author of the most incriminating and damning document in this case, which was mysteriously sent at government request to Proud Boy leader Enrique Tarrio immediately prior to January 6 in order to frame or implicate Tarrio in a government- created scheme to storm buildings around the Capitol. As such, Exhibit 528-1 and the government’s efforts to frame or smear defendants with it, constitutes outrageous government conduct. This is either entrapment or outrageous government conduct, or both. Equally improper, it is a Brady violation because the Department of Justice must surely have known these revelations before putting Special Agent Dubrowski on the stand on February 9 to introduce this evidence.”

Now There is Evidence the FBI Planned the January 6 Operation and Planted Documents Days Earlier That Were Later Used Against Innocent Americans | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In February of this year, The Gateway Pundit’s Cara Castronuovo wrote about a shocking development in the US government’s case against the Proud Boys.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Which court was this presented in, sport?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Did the interference change the outcome? Apparently not, or Killary would have been president. Non-story.

There was interference and the release of 30,000 emails by Russia at the request of Donald Trump.

Whether Russia succeeded or not is not the issue, but that for the first time they were front and center in interfering in a US election.

 

[Magnus]

I did a thread on this in February when this information came out. Now there is court testimony proving it is true. This document authored by a FBI operative and used as evidence to put Tarrio on jail for 22 years.

it was discovered that the Government itself was the author of the mysterious “1776 Returns” document.


The 1776 Returns document is the title of a 9-page paper that outlined strategic plans for the takeover of US government buildings on January 6, 2021.


It was confirmed in court that the FBI was behind the document and and FBI operative was the author of the document.
According to the Motion by attorney Roger Roots:


“It appears that the government itself is the author of the most incriminating and damning document in this case, which was mysteriously sent at government request to Proud Boy leader Enrique Tarrio immediately prior to January 6 in order to frame or implicate Tarrio in a government- created scheme to storm buildings around the Capitol. As such, Exhibit 528-1 and the government’s efforts to frame or smear defendants with it, constitutes outrageous government conduct. This is either entrapment or outrageous government conduct, or both. Equally improper, it is a Brady violation because the Department of Justice must surely have known these revelations before putting Special Agent Dubrowski on the stand on February 9 to introduce this evidence.”

Now There is Evidence the FBI Planned the January 6 Operation and Planted Documents Days Earlier That Were Later Used Against Innocent Americans | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In February of this year, The Gateway Pundit’s Cara Castronuovo wrote about a shocking development in the US government’s case against the Proud Boys.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

That sentence threw me. When you say "Now there is court testimony..." you mean back in Feb? The trial where Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in prison which is the longest handed to a January 6 offender as of this date?

Man, you retards are so cute. Dumb, but cute.

But, coming to your following line, "it now appears the government itself blah blah..." Tarrio's girlfriend actually said no such thing. What she did say was...

An obscure cryptocurrency advocate from Florida may be the original source of an incendiary document at the heart of the seditious conspiracy charges against members of the Proud Boys.

Samuel Armes told the Jan. 6 select committee in a newly disclosed interview that he didn’t draft the document, titled “1776 returns,” itself — and had no role in aspects that laid out an operational strategy to occupy federal buildings on Jan. 6, 2021, to disrupt the transfer of presidential power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden.


But in a colorful hourlong interview with the committee, Armes said he helped formulate some of the ideas that the document relied on — and that eventually ended up in the hands of Proud Boys national chair Enrique Tarrio, one of five charged with seditious conspiracy.
Armes’ connections, via his crypto advocacy, to figures associated with Jan. 6 don’t end there. He also developed an association with a member of the Oath Keepers now facing obstruction charges. And he co-founded a Florida-based cryptocurrency LLC — Government Blockchain Systems — with former Seminole County tax collector Joel Greenberg, an associate of Trump adviser Roger Stone and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).

Jan. 6 committee interview sheds light on origins of Proud Boys ‘1776 returns’ document

Samuel Armes, a cryptocurrency advocate from Florida, told investigators that he helped formulate some of the ideas the document relied on.

www.politico.com

 

[Lastamender]

That sentence threw me. When you say "Now there is court testimony..." you mean back in Feb? The trial where Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in prison which is the longest handed to a January 6 offender as of this date?

Man, you retards are so cute. Dumb, but cute.

But, coming to your following line, "it now appears the government itself blah blah..." Tarrio's girlfriend actually said no such thing. What she did say was...

An obscure cryptocurrency advocate from Florida may be the original source of an incendiary document at the heart of the seditious conspiracy charges against members of the Proud Boys.

Samuel Armes told the Jan. 6 select committee in a newly disclosed interview that he didn’t draft the document, titled “1776 returns,” itself — and had no role in aspects that laid out an operational strategy to occupy federal buildings on Jan. 6, 2021, to disrupt the transfer of presidential power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden.


But in a colorful hourlong interview with the committee, Armes said he helped formulate some of the ideas that the document relied on — and that eventually ended up in the hands of Proud Boys national chair Enrique Tarrio, one of five charged with seditious conspiracy.
Armes’ connections, via his crypto advocacy, to figures associated with Jan. 6 don’t end there. He also developed an association with a member of the Oath Keepers now facing obstruction charges. And he co-founded a Florida-based cryptocurrency LLC — Government Blockchain Systems — with former Seminole County tax collector Joel Greenberg, an associate of Trump adviser Roger Stone and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).

Jan. 6 committee interview sheds light on origins of Proud Boys ‘1776 returns’ document

Samuel Armes, a cryptocurrency advocate from Florida, told investigators that he helped formulate some of the ideas the document relied on.

www.politico.com

None of that changes the fact that Tarrio had nothing to do with creating the plan. A guy working for the FBI did. It was a set up and a frame. It is more than obvious J6 was a set up. You assholes have denial and that is all you have.

 

[Magnus]

None of that changes the fact that Tarrio had nothing to do with creating the plan. A guy working for the FBI did. It was a set up and a frame. It is more than obvious J6 was a set up. You assholes have denial and that is all you have.

Sorry, retard. It wasn't the FBI. It was his girlfriend's friend. I provided you with the facts presented in court. Prove that was a lie. Go.

 

[Lastamender]

You're pathetic.

Why because the FBI is full of traitors working for traitors? That is what is pathetic, and you too.

 

[Lastamender]

Sorry, retard. It wasn't the FBI. It was his girlfriend's friend. I provided you with the facts presented in court. Prove that was a lie. Go.

It was not Tarrio. He knew nothing about it.

 

[Leo123]

You're pathetic.

Juvenile response. ^^^^

 

[Magnus]

It was not Tarrio. He knew nothing about it.

In other words, you have no proof. You just have denial and that is all you have? Got it. Expected as much. Carry on, retard.

 

[Lastamender]

In other words, you have no proof. You just have denial and that is all you have? Got it. Expected as much. Carry on, retard.

You saw the proof in the article. You can read, right?

 

[Magnus]

You saw the proof in the article. You can read, right?

What proof, retard? There was none. A statement does not make it so.

But, go ahead and point it out. Go.