Now...About That 'White Privilege'....

[alang1216]

Nobody gives a fuck what a bunch of liberooidal hack "historians" say about anything.

I'm sure they feel the same about you so everyone should be happy.

 

[alang1216]

View attachment 617210

Can you honestly (sic) say that if George Wallace, Bull Conner, or Jeff Davis were alive today they would be Democrats?

 

[LOIE]

Are you saying Lincoln did not give an 1858 speech in pro-slavery Southern Illinois where he insisted that he opposed “bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the black and white races”? Since that is a historical fact I'm not the liar here.

Did Lincoln fight to end slavery or did he fight to maintain the union?

I believe there's plenty of historical evidence that Lincoln did what he he did to save the union. While he may have opposed slavery as an individual, he could also have objected to the social and political equality of blacks and whites, fearing it would not be a good thing for the country. Perhaps he thought, like many, that although slaves should be freed, they should continue to "know their place" and not expect total equality.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Still, the Irish were -- at one time -- among the poorest immigrants we ever got and the slowest to assimilate. It took 120 years

Not quite true. There is one group that has never assimilated AS A GROUP

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Can you honestly (sic) say that if George Wallace, Bull Conner, or Jeff Davis were alive today they would be Democrats?

No, they would not. The Demonazi Party has changed, but not in ways you imagine

 

[alang1216]

No, they would not. The Demonazi Party has changed, but not in ways you imagine

You mean not in ways you approve of. The Democrats have evolved just like I imagine.

 

[22lcidw]

Are you saying Lincoln did not give an 1858 speech in pro-slavery Southern Illinois where he insisted that he opposed “bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the black and white races”? Since that is a historical fact I'm not the liar here.

Did Lincoln fight to end slavery or did he fight to maintain the union?

Outside globalists at the time wanted to divide our nation. And used slavery as a wedge to do just that. There was a lot of criticisms on slavery and it may have been eliminated within a decade if there was no civil war. The real financial power of the world is located in London. The Western Hemisphere was ripe for global interests. And a fiat currency was the prescription needed to make inroads in what would be the richest part of it. They failed. Until 1913. If you worked as a custodian before 1913 you earned what you worked for. After 1913, there was a middleman with the fiat currency. It eventually caused certain groups of employees to be overcompensated and destroyed industries here as they have been sent overseas. Progs will say the unions were good. They were. Until they got to greedy and held the nation to hostage and then it became the norm.

 

[alang1216]

Outside globalists at the time wanted to divide our nation. And used slavery as a wedge to do just that. There was a lot of criticisms on slavery and it may have been eliminated within a decade if there was no civil war. The real financial power of the world is located in London. The Western Hemisphere was ripe for global interests. And a fiat currency was the prescription needed to make inroads in what would be the richest part of it. They failed. Until 1913. If you worked as a custodian before 1913 you earned what you worked for. After 1913, there was a middleman with the fiat currency. It eventually caused certain groups of employees to be overcompensated and destroyed industries here as they have been sent overseas. Progs will say the unions were good. They were. Until they got to greedy and held the nation to hostage and then it became the norm.

I never know how to reply when people see a grand conspiracy in actions that were in response to real problems.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Not quite true. There is one group that has never assimilated AS A GROUP

Well.....then, there is this:


Democrat activist

Linda Sarsour to Muslim Americans: Our Priority Is Not To Assimilate; It Is To Our People And Allah​

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, they would not. The Demonazi Party has changed, but not in ways you imagine

But.....if only two choices, yep.....they've be Democrats.

 

[Soupnazi630]

How many of those races had 4 million in slavery?

All of them including blacks

 

[alang1216]

Well.....then, there is this:


Democrat activist

Linda Sarsour to Muslim Americans: Our Priority Is Not To Assimilate; It Is To Our People And Allah​

I suspect many groups would agree. Hasidic Jews and Amish come to mind. You judge them the same way?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I suspect many groups would agree. Hasidic Jews and Amish come to mind. You judge them the same way?

We need catalogue all the different sorts of lies you Democrats tell.

Which group, of the three, is rife with terrorists?


I know you don't care because you vote to guarantee nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism.

Disgusting anti-humanity slime you Democrats are.

 

[alang1216]

We need catalogue all the different sorts of lies you Democrats tell.

Which group, of the three, is rife with terrorists?


I know you don't care because you vote to guarantee nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism.

Disgusting anti-humanity slime you Democrats are.

What percentage constitutes a "rife"? If you're worried about terrorism, it is the alt-right you should condemn.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What percentage constitutes a "rife"? If you're worried about terrorism, it is the alt-right you should condemn.

I am always amused at how easy it is to get you to post exactly what I want you to.

You being as dumb as you are, I suppose I shouldn't pat myself on the back so much.


40% of Indonesians approve of violence in defense of Islam.
http://www.thejakartapost.com/detailweekly.asp?fileid=20060728.@03 https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2014/10/06/violence-in-defense-of-islam-statistics/



Pew Global: 68% of Palestinian Muslims say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified.
43% of Nigerian Muslims say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified.
38% of Lebanese Muslims say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified.
15% of Egyptian Muslims say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified.
13% of Indonesian Muslims say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified.
12% of Jordanian Muslims say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified.
7% of Muslim Israelis say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified.

Muslim Opinion Polls

Challenging the myth of a 'tiny minority of extremists'

www.thereligionofpeace.com

*much more here:

Muslim Opinion Polls

Challenging the myth of a 'tiny minority of extremists'

www.thereligionofpeace.com

Islam is a peaceful religion because most Muslims live peacefully and that only a "tiny minority of extremists" practice violence? That's like saying that White supremacy must be perfectly fine since only a tiny minority of racists ever hurt anyone. Neither does it explain why religious violence is largely endemic to Islam, despite the tremendous persecution of religious minorities in Muslim countries.

In truth, even a tiny minority of "1%" of Muslims worldwide translates to 15 million believers - which is hardly an insignificant number. However, the "minority" of Muslims who approve of terrorists, their goals, or their means of achieving them is much greater than this. In fact, it isn't even a true minority in some cases, depending on how goals and targets are defined. Muslim Opinion Polls



How ya' like dat, booooooooyyyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeee????????????

 

[PoliticalChic]

I suspect many groups would agree. Hasidic Jews and Amish come to mind. You judge them the same way?

Now....why do you vote to guarantee nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism.


What is your hatred of Jews, of Israel, based on????

 

[Jets]

Are you saying Lincoln did not give an 1858 speech in pro-slavery Southern Illinois where he insisted that he opposed “bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the black and white races”? Since that is a historical fact I'm not the liar here.

Did Lincoln fight to end slavery or did he fight to maintain the union?

Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.

Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.

I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.

Abraham Lincoln's Letter to Horace Greeley

www.abrahamlincolnonline.org

Lincoln was a pragmatic politician.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What percentage constitutes a "rife"? If you're worried about terrorism, it is the alt-right you should condemn.

"...it is the alt-right you should condemn."


There is no such.

It is a term of art (you'd best look that up, dunce) designed for the dumbest of Democrat voters. Nor is there any Far Right, if that is what you are getting at.

They don't exist other than as a lie and a shield for the most violent of voters, Biden voters, who perpetrated over 12 THOUSAND riots, arsons, and anarcho-terrorist acts leading up to the stolen election.

Your support for violence and the violent is duly noted.

 

[bodecea]

Slavery was a part of the human condition for millennia...It was hardly unique to Murica.

Now take your nihilistic self-loathing elsewhere, kook.

Chattel slavery?

 

[PoliticalChic]

What percentage constitutes a "rife"? If you're worried about terrorism, it is the alt-right you should condemn.

Looks like I put a cork in your pie hole, huh?


Wasn't that fun?