Immigrants And Politics

[Hector12]

Answer the question, you buffoon:

If the party tells you to vote Stalinist......

......you'll do it, won't you!!!!!!!!

PoliticalChic,

It is not too late for you to seek help, but you need to realize that you are the problem, and not those you insult without provocation.

 

[PoliticalChic]

PoliticalChic,

It is not too late for you to seek help, but you need to realize that you are the problem, and not those you insult without provocation.

You justified slaughter to get cheap products.

I will continue to reveal what you are.


“….Communism enabled the Soviet Union to industrialize rapidly enough to produce the weapons that enabled the Soviet Union to defeat the Nazi invasion. The vast majority of German casualties were on the Russian front.

Communism enabled Communist China to produce the best consumer goods at the lowest prices. “

62% of 18-29 Year Olds Have a Favorable View of Socialism post #264



You are accepting 65 million human beings slaughtered.

 

[pal]

1. Democracy
2. Communism
3. Fascism

Origin immigrant politics.

 

[mikegriffith1]

3. November 4th, 1856, the man generally recognized as the worst president in our history, James Buchanan, won the office...and precipitated the Civil War.

I think Buchanan has gotten a bad rap. I don't think he was as bad a president as most historians claim he was. He has been condemned mostly because he (correctly) argued that under the Constitution the federal government did not have the right to use force against states that voted to leave the Union, and that the Union was not intended to be held together by coercion. He has also been condemned because he (correctly) placed much of the blame for secession on the Radical Republicans and the abolitionists.

I think Buchanan's biggest mistake, in terms of precipitating the Civil War, was not evacuating the federal garrisons in the seceded states, especially the garrison on Fort Sumter.

I am not convinced that war was unavoidable. The majority of Americans favored a peaceful compromise on the issue of slavery in the territories. As far as we can tell, a sizable majority of Americans favored the Crittenden Compromise, which would have, among other things, essentially moved the Canadian border to the northern border of the Southern states, would have set up a de facto system of compensated emancipation, and would have prevented the expansion of slavery north of the Missouri Compromise line.

To be clear, Southern Fire-Eaters shared much of the blame for the secession crisis and the Civil War, and the seven Southern states that seceded first had no valid grounds for refusing to honor the 1860 presidential election results.

 

[Unkotare]

Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1868)

Texas v. White: States do not have the right to unilaterally secede from the United States, so the Confederate states during the Civil War always remained part of the nation.

supreme.justia.com

 

[citygator]

 

[mikegriffith1]

Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1868)

Texas v. White: States do not have the right to unilaterally secede from the United States, so the Confederate states during the Civil War always remained part of the nation.

supreme.justia.com

I think Texas v. White is a vacuous, invalid decision that ignores the numerous statements of the founding fathers and others from the founding era on the nature of the Union.

 

[Unkotare]

I think Texas v. White is a vacuous, invalid decision that ignores the numerous statements of the founding fathers and others from the founding era on the nature of the Union.

Well, I guess that's why you're a Supreme Court Justice.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Well, I guess that's why you're a Supreme Court Justice.

Look who was on the Supreme Court for Texas v. White. Remember that the decision was given in 1868. If ever there were a packed court, this was it. Five of the eight justices were Republicans who had been put on the court since 1862 by a Republican-dominated Senate.

Many of the arguments about the founding and nature of the Union and the sovereignty of states in Texas v. White are demonstrably wrong.

Texas v. White was not actually about secession. It was about whether Texas had the right to sue over the reclamation of bonds sold during the Civil War, but the judges used the decision to rule that secession was unconstitutional.

 

[Unkotare]

Look who was on the Supreme Court for Texas v. White. …

Was it you?

 

[mikegriffith1]

Was it you?

You might want to read my article Proof that the Union Was Supposed to Be Voluntary. It's barely six pages long.

 

[Unkotare]

You might want to read my article Proof that the Union Was Supposed to Be Voluntary. It's barely six pages long.

Or I might not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I think Buchanan has gotten a bad rap. I don't think he was as bad a president as most historians claim he was. He has been condemned mostly because he (correctly) argued that under the Constitution the federal government did not have the right to use force against states that voted to leave the Union, and that the Union was not intended to be held together by coercion. He has also been condemned because he (correctly) placed much of the blame for secession on the Radical Republicans and the abolitionists.

I think Buchanan's biggest mistake, in terms of precipitating the Civil War, was not evacuating the federal garrisons in the seceded states, especially the garrison on Fort Sumter.

I am not convinced that war was unavoidable. The majority of Americans favored a peaceful compromise on the issue of slavery in the territories. As far as we can tell, a sizable majority of Americans favored the Crittenden Compromise, which would have, among other things, essentially moved the Canadian border to the northern border of the Southern states, would have set up a de facto system of compensated emancipation, and would have prevented the expansion of slavery north of the Missouri Compromise line.

To be clear, Southern Fire-Eaters shared much of the blame for the secession crisis and the Civil War, and the seven Southern states that seceded first had no valid grounds for refusing to honor the 1860 presidential election results.

You are wrong, and need to research his deal with Taney