Nothing has chased more Christians away from this religion then the evangelicals

[jbander]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

 

[jbander]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

So, are you a Christian?

So are you a right wing ass hole?

 

[Lysistrata]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

 

[BS Filter]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

So, are you a Christian?

So are you a right wing ass hole?

Thanks, I pretty much figured you weren't. Like most on the left, you just spew ignorant hatred about everything you know absolutely nothing about. Dismissed.

 

[Polishprince]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

 

[BS Filter]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

 

[Lysistrata]

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

 

[Lysistrata]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with the LGBT business.

 

[Polishprince]

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I'm not being "disparaging" by calling someone a pimp or a hoe or a homo at all. This is what they are, and they traditionally were in their own habitat. Most of this kind of activity is no longer on the streets nowadays and is more "on line".

But these folks just aren't normative. A neighbor of mine in the alley I used to live in was a pimp daddy. Its part of life.

I certainly don't hate someone for this kind of activity, but don't tell me the Godfather is typical or is going to pretend to be devout like "Mayor Pete".

 

[Polishprince]

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with the LGBT business.

The people of Sodom named their town after sodomy, they were clearly big fans of the practice.

Of course it had everything to do with it.

Almighty God agreed to spare Sodom if there 5 normative folks could be found there. So he sent down a couple of his holy angels to check out the situation on the ground. They were staying with God's friend, Lot. The Gay Community of Sodom immediately went over to Lot's domicile in an attempt to recruit the angels into the gay lifestyle.

 

[Lysistrata]

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I'm not being "disparaging" by calling someone a pimp or a hoe or a homo at all. This is what they are, and they traditionally were in their own habitat. Most of this kind of activity is no longer on the streets nowadays and is more "on line".

But these folks just aren't normative. A neighbor of mine in the alley I used to live in was a pimp daddy. Its part of life.

I certainly don't hate someone for this kind of activity, but don't tell me the Godfather is typical or is going to pretend to be devout like "Mayor Pete".

Why do you think that "Mayor Pete" is pretending to be devout? Maybe he actually IS devout. Is frankie graham "devout" or just pretending to be? Where do you live that people are having sex in the street? I don't give a flying as to what you define with this funny word "normative." This term seems to arise from some funny right-wing stuff. Who invented it? Rush?

 

[BS Filter]

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with the LGBT business.

Oh, here we go. You're gonna tell us God destroyed the cities because the residents were "impolite", huh.

 

[Polishprince]

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with the LGBT business.

Oh, here we go. You're gonna tell us God destroyed the cities because the residents were "impolite", huh.

There is nothing less polite than f'ing a normative guy in the a-- so they do have point I guess.

 

[BS Filter]

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with the LGBT business.

Oh, here we go. You're gonna tell us God destroyed the cities because the residents were "impolite", huh.

There is nothing less polite than f'ing a normative guy in the a-- so they do have point I guess.

The queers have a false narrative that they use to explain the destruction of the cities. It's not biblical and pure propaganda.

 

[22lcidw]

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

Back alleys in tougher areas have plenty of whores and chikcenheads. Many of them are having drug issues also.

 

[RodISHI]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

You are portraying hatred and ugliness here bud.

I simply state the facts when it comes to the Bible.

Keep your sex in the red light district where it all belongs. The other option is do like normal people, get a room and for darn sure leave other peoples children alone. Public places and spaces are not public brothels.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The proper grammar is "THAN," not "then."

Correct

I would have restructured the sentence to link a verb with the topical intertwining of the adjectives utilized.

 

[Lysistrata]

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with the LGBT business.

Oh, here we go. You're gonna tell us God destroyed the cities because the residents were "impolite", huh.

Do you actually interpret the bible as being infallible and inerrant?

Nobody is having sex in the middle of the street, bubba.

 

[Lysistrata]

What is all of this weirdness about "red light districts" and people having sex in the street or in alleys? I know that some evangelicals are on this trip that heterosexuals have their sex in cars after closing time, given their "keep your knees together" stuff on USMB. I get it that this is how evangelicals have sex. They are not normal.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I am currently rethinking the whole concept of Christianity and my identity as a Christian. The evangelicals have so prostituted the teachings and sacredness of this faith that I am considering walking away from it altogether. There are other options available.

Hysteria, aren't you rethinking your whole humanity thing? You fit better with swine... Allahu Akbar