Nothing has chased more Christians away from this religion then the evangelicals

[jbander]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

Well first off...... if someone can chase you away from your religion, then you never were part of that religion to begin with.

So honestly I think they are doing a service to Christians then. It's like the Westboro people. Nothing the westboro people do, is going to drive me away from G-d in Heaven.

If you know the Lord, the way that I do, how can you leave because of fruity people at Westboro?

The only people who would leave over that, are people who never believed to begin with. And if they never believed to begin with, then all we did was lose fakes. That's a plus in my book. Fewer people faking being Christian is wonderful.

The church is in no way the religion, I believe Jesus made that quite clear.

 

[jbander]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

Well first off...... if someone can chase you away from your religion, then you never were part of that religion to begin with.

So honestly I think they are doing a service to Christians then. It's like the Westboro people. Nothing the westboro people do, is going to drive me away from G-d in Heaven.

If you know the Lord, the way that I do, how can you leave because of fruity people at Westboro?

The only people who would leave over that, are people who never believed to begin with. And if they never believed to begin with, then all we did was lose fakes. That's a plus in my book. Fewer people faking being Christian is wonderful.

Oh I left out a little fact , your remark is insane and rabid

 

[jbander]

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I have no doubt that you "don't understand" as you are obviously blind and do not have ears to hear the truth when presented before you. Like your post claiming Jesus never said anything about homosexuals. That is as bogus as it gets. The whole word both New Testament and the Old Testament are the Word that was with God from the beginning that was spoken into the world for the world could be saved. Jesus means that the spirit of Jehovah's Salvation with us. Not with demons many carry with 'Pride' and not to save the carnal humans but to save the living soul created with the blow of breath that came from that which was made Holy from the beginning.

Nutso , do you really think that Jesus would support your pile of shit leader?

Their orange messiah has pushed out Jesus.

They pick the pumpkin man over Reason and Jesus's word.

 

[jbander]

They be a ugly group of humanity

Do you disagree with certain doctrines of the evangelical movement?

or

Does it have more to do with the behaviors of the evangelical Christian's? If that is the case, can their behavior be independent of their doctrine?

Good Question, they as a group got this countries biggest threat elected, a cruel evil dangerous man. A threat to this country with a fake opinion on Abortion . He cares for nothing except himself. This group still follows him like a group of Zombies. , I have always wondered how the antichrist would or could get his army to fight against God and his angels . Now I know. He will say and do exactly what their Chosen leader said and did to get elected. His army will be made up of Evangelicals and other hate groups. He is them, they own him. their behavior is their doctrine.

You didn't even acknowledge my question. You went all political nut job on me.

News Flash: The election has been over for 2 years 10 months 1 week and 5 days. Stop whining. Whining should be limited to 5 days max for ultra babies. For normal humans 10 minutes is sufficient. Whining for 2 years 10 months 1 week and five days requires medical treatment. You have a mental illness.

Good grief , I'LL make it simple , scum bag is this countries biggest threat his product is hatred and he has sold it to the weak in this country. The man is dangerous and in my opinion this countries biggest enemy. Tell me I shouldn't hate the enemy of my country. I'm waiting.

 

[RodISHI]

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I have no doubt that you "don't understand" as you are obviously blind and do not have ears to hear the truth when presented before you. Like your post claiming Jesus never said anything about homosexuals. That is as bogus as it gets. The whole word both New Testament and the Old Testament are the Word that was with God from the beginning that was spoken into the world for the world could be saved. Jesus means that the spirit of Jehovah's Salvation with us. Not with demons many carry with 'Pride' and not to save the carnal humans but to save the living soul created with the blow of breath that came from that which was made Holy from the beginning.

Nutso , do you really think that Jesus would support your pile of shit leader?

You sure do try to make wild accusations. God leads me. I have no clue what leads you but it sure seems like one hell of a nasty spirit.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

One of the

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

One of the many similarities between the Democratic Party and the Nazi Party is their religious bigotry.
They Nazis were/are obsessed with hating the Jews.
The Democrats are obsessed with hating the Evangelicals.
The Dems are going down a very dark road.
The Democrats hate Christians but they have a special kind of fanatical hatred for the Evangelicals.
The Liberals want an amoral society, so their version of Christianity is amoral.
The Left's adoration of the Islamist proves that they are not principled, it's just straight-up hatred for the Evangelicals.
It is kind of what the Democratic Party's coalition of hate has been built around.

Yeah, you’re worried that the left wants an amoral society. What do you do? Elect the most amoral President ever.

I didn't vote for Obama

 

[Polishprince]

Muslims are liberals.
They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I'm not being "disparaging" by calling someone a pimp or a hoe or a homo at all. This is what they are, and they traditionally were in their own habitat. Most of this kind of activity is no longer on the streets nowadays and is more "on line".

But these folks just aren't normative. A neighbor of mine in the alley I used to live in was a pimp daddy. Its part of life.

I certainly don't hate someone for this kind of activity, but don't tell me the Godfather is typical or is going to pretend to be devout like "Mayor Pete".

I'm pretty sure many people can read into your brash words about gays. The first time you did it , it was a Freudian slip but now that you came out to yourself you are now hiding from the truth. I've seen many people like you.

The only thing I've criticized about homos is the fact that they are trying to force acceptance of their new institution of Gay Marriage up the caboose of the general public.

If someone chooses the gay orientation, that's certainly their privilege. But the whole question is whether people should be forced to celebrate it.

Who is being forced to celebrate anything? Go home and mope.

People are being forced to bake cakes to celebrate homosexual marriages, or face financial ruin.

 

[RodISHI]

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I'm not being "disparaging" by calling someone a pimp or a hoe or a homo at all. This is what they are, and they traditionally were in their own habitat. Most of this kind of activity is no longer on the streets nowadays and is more "on line".

But these folks just aren't normative. A neighbor of mine in the alley I used to live in was a pimp daddy. Its part of life.

I certainly don't hate someone for this kind of activity, but don't tell me the Godfather is typical or is going to pretend to be devout like "Mayor Pete".

I'm pretty sure many people can read into your brash words about gays. The first time you did it , it was a Freudian slip but now that you came out to yourself you are now hiding from the truth. I've seen many people like you.

The only thing I've criticized about homos is the fact that they are trying to force acceptance of their new institution of Gay Marriage up the caboose of the general public.

If someone chooses the gay orientation, that's certainly their privilege. But the whole question is whether people should be forced to celebrate it.

Who is being forced to celebrate anything? Go home and mope.

People are being forced to bake cakes to celebrate homosexual marriages, or face financial ruin.

Dumb asses with demons trying to conflate Faith with Politics and then they think they will really have some sort of impact by spouting off garbage.

 

[bodecea]

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

Radical Muslims are very very very con-servative.

 

[Polishprince]

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

Radical Muslims are very very very con-servative.

The ones I've seen, from Omar and Tlaib to the Minister Louis Farrakhan, are actually very, very, very liberal.

 

[flacaltenn]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

Well we know that by electing scum bag you pick evil, so we know there is a market for it, so your hateful evangelical ministers fill that market and sell it. Aren't you getting a little sick of you pampas Bible thumping weird evangelical ministers that don't live the words they are catching you with. It funny.

Since when is Trump --- a bible thumping evangelical?? I think you're confusing the religion forum with the politics forum...

 

[Lysistrata]

The people of Sodom named their town after sodomy, they were clearly big fans of the practice.

Of course it had everything to do with it.

Almighty God agreed to spare Sodom if there 5 normative folks could be found there. So he sent down a couple of his holy angels to check out the situation on the ground. They were staying with God's friend, Lot. The Gay Community of Sodom immediately went over to Lot's domicile in an attempt to recruit the angels into the gay lifestyle.

Not even close,First it was 10 people not five. All the people from many quarters came to the house and wanted to have sex with the angels who were , what sex? was it sex or gay sex . all the people from all quarters is that men and women. And lets get this straight So if we are to believe this story , then we have to some how get around the fact that Lot offered his two virgin daughters to be gang raped by the crowd. So is this a story or a fable. Do you pratice the laws of Leviticus cause if you don't and you don't then all the story's in the old testament are under scrutiny, When your children argued with you did you take them to the gate and have the people kill them for you or were you man enough to kill them yourselves, So is that a true story or a fable . You clowns are a gas, mealy minded self righteous obnoxious, I'm better then you people.

I'm saying this is a Lysistrata sock.

Who's with me

Says a lover of frankie graham.

I don't love Franklin Graham. But you do have a very bad sock and are absolutely OBSESSED with the sex lives of evangelicals. That's.....strange, dear.

The thought about Sex and the evangelicals conjures up a fantastically funny image of Sexual comedy.

I agree with you. It has comic potential: Fifty Shades of Grey as a comedy. Some unzipped patriarchal guy ordering his wife around. But I'm not sure that I really want to go there.

 

[rightwinger]

God would rather have a beer with an atheist than an evangelical

 

[Lysistrata]

Says a lover of frankie graham.

I don't love Franklin Graham. But you do have a very bad sock and are absolutely OBSESSED with the sex lives of evangelicals. That's.....strange, dear.

Other way around. The evangelicals seem to be obsessed with everyone else's sex life. They are constantly saying things like "abstinence," "keep your knees together," "taking it up the caboose," "birth control is bad," "birth control doesn't work," "if a woman can swallow a tiny camera, we can check out her reproductive organs," "gay Teletubbies," "American heterosexuals are not in relationships and only have sex in the back seats of cars after closing time," and they outright lie about issues regarding women, sex, birth control, the human gestational process, and abortion (which apparently has something to do with a tendency toward breast cancer and apparently is more dangerous than a colonoscopy).

Nobody gives a damn about how you evangelicals have sex. That's your personal business. Do anything that you want, with whomever you want, even frankie or pigpence, or your husband and sex master. Enjoy BDSM if you want to. Just stay the hell out of everyone else's personal business and relationships. You people are so sexually obsessed that it is ridiculous.

Take a look at this bitch Huber:
Trump’s Abstinence Queen Has a Tarnished Ree

She's a bit obsessive. Try explaining it.

Hysteria fantasizes about my sex life and then calls ME sex obsessed.

Oh, Hysteria. Where to begin.

Why would I waste time on your sex life? When did I ever fantasize about your sex life? Service your master any way he wishes. I don't care. As you could see, if you could read, I was summing up the evangelical obsession with other people's sex lives. Bet you didn't read the piece on this scumbag Huber. She bilked the taxpayers out of millions. Now, she gets $277 million for "abstinence only education"? She is playing with the lives of hundreds of thousands of students in this country.

Why is abstinence a bad thing?

It's not a bad thing if it is the free choice of a person who is well informed as to his or her choices. What I object to is not apprising people of the variety of choices available; the deliberate denial of essential information.

This link is to Planned Parenthood's advice on abstinence:

What are the Benefits of Sexual Abstinence and Outercourse?

I can't make your choices for you. If you do not wish to have sex, don't have it.

 

[BS Filter]

God would rather have a beer with an atheist than an evangelical

Yeah, you don't even believe in God.

 

[BS Filter]

I don't love Franklin Graham. But you do have a very bad sock and are absolutely OBSESSED with the sex lives of evangelicals. That's.....strange, dear.

Other way around. The evangelicals seem to be obsessed with everyone else's sex life. They are constantly saying things like "abstinence," "keep your knees together," "taking it up the caboose," "birth control is bad," "birth control doesn't work," "if a woman can swallow a tiny camera, we can check out her reproductive organs," "gay Teletubbies," "American heterosexuals are not in relationships and only have sex in the back seats of cars after closing time," and they outright lie about issues regarding women, sex, birth control, the human gestational process, and abortion (which apparently has something to do with a tendency toward breast cancer and apparently is more dangerous than a colonoscopy).

Nobody gives a damn about how you evangelicals have sex. That's your personal business. Do anything that you want, with whomever you want, even frankie or pigpence, or your husband and sex master. Enjoy BDSM if you want to. Just stay the hell out of everyone else's personal business and relationships. You people are so sexually obsessed that it is ridiculous.

Take a look at this bitch Huber:
Trump’s Abstinence Queen Has a Tarnished Ree

She's a bit obsessive. Try explaining it.

Hysteria fantasizes about my sex life and then calls ME sex obsessed.

Oh, Hysteria. Where to begin.

Why would I waste time on your sex life? When did I ever fantasize about your sex life? Service your master any way he wishes. I don't care. As you could see, if you could read, I was summing up the evangelical obsession with other people's sex lives. Bet you didn't read the piece on this scumbag Huber. She bilked the taxpayers out of millions. Now, she gets $277 million for "abstinence only education"? She is playing with the lives of hundreds of thousands of students in this country.

Why is abstinence a bad thing?

It's not a bad thing if it is the free choice of a person who is well informed as to his or her choices. What I object to is not apprising people of the variety of choices available; the deliberate denial of essential information.

This link is to Planned Parenthood's advice on abstinence:

What are the Benefits of Sexual Abstinence and Outercourse?

I can't make your choices for you. If you do not wish to have sex, don't have it.

Planned Parenthood is the devil's workshop. Leave sex education to the parents and their church. The rest of you heathen can go to hell.

 

[flacaltenn]

Another repetitious political brawl posing as a religious issue.. Not much about evangelicals in the replies....
Closed...