Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy

[P@triot]

The right wing is full of fallacy, like usual. Mogadishu had no taxes and very few regulations, for over a decade; how many fortune five hundred firms, relocated there.

Mogadishu is a vintage left-wing nation where armed dictators try to control the masses through force. Just like you want here in the U.S.

 

[danielpalos]

Why not use laissez-fair, with our war on terror.

Because the United States federal government is responsible for National Security. They are not, however, responsible for the free market.

Why do you need this explained to you every single day?

No, it isn't. WE have a Second Amendment. The general government is there for the common defense, and to wage war if necessary.

 

[danielpalos]

Warfare requires, command economics.

Repeating lie does not make it true - despite what the communists have trained you to believe. We've engaged in wars throughout our history and never engaged in your precious and idiotic "command economy". Warfare only requires a properly funded and well prepared military. Both of which are exponentially more easily achieved with a true free market which generates the innovation and wealth (which results in higher tax revenues for the government).

This is why nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.
Warfare requires command economics not, laissez-fair. Only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

The right wing is full of fallacy, like usual. Mogadishu had no taxes and very few regulations, for over a decade; how many fortune five hundred firms, relocated there.

Mogadishu is a vintage left-wing nation where armed dictators try to control the masses through force. Just like you want here in the U.S.

the right wing is for, no government. any more projections, right winger?

 

[P@triot]

Because the United States federal government is responsible for National Security.

No, it isn't. WE have a Second Amendment.

Yes folks.... danielpalos really did just say that.

The first enumerated power of Article I, Section 8 tasks the federal government with defense.

 

[P@triot]

Warfare requires, command economics.

Repeating lie does not make it true - despite what the communists have trained you to believe. We've engaged in wars throughout our history and never engaged in your precious and idiotic "command economy". Warfare only requires a properly funded and well prepared military. Both of which are exponentially more easily achieved with a true free market which generates the innovation and wealth (which results in higher tax revenues for the government).

This is why nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.
Warfare requires command economics not, laissez-fair. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Repeating lie does not make it true - despite what the communists have trained you to believe. We've engaged in wars throughout our history and never engaged in your precious and idiotic "command economy". Warfare only requires a properly funded and well prepared military. Both of which are exponentially more easily achieved with a true free market which generates the innovation and wealth (which results in higher tax revenues for the government).

This is why everyone keeps advocating to ignore you Daniel. You're just a troll...

 

[P@triot]

The right wing is full of fallacy, like usual. Mogadishu had no taxes and very few regulations, for over a decade; how many fortune five hundred firms, relocated there.

Mogadishu is a vintage left-wing nation where armed dictators try to control the masses through force. Just like you want here in the U.S.

the right wing is for, no government. any more projections, right winger?

The right-wing is for constitutional government (except for Sovereign Citizens and anarchist - both of which are rejected by both sides of the aisle and thus have zero representation in government). Mogadishu is a nation oppressed by armed dictators - just like you desire here in the U.S.

 

[danielpalos]

Because the United States federal government is responsible for National Security.

No, it isn't. WE have a Second Amendment.

Yes folks.... danielpalos really did just say that.

The first enumerated power of Article I, Section 8 tasks the federal government with defense.

It says, the common defense, not, national security. We have a Second Amendment, for that.

 

[danielpalos]

Warfare requires, command economics.

Repeating lie does not make it true - despite what the communists have trained you to believe. We've engaged in wars throughout our history and never engaged in your precious and idiotic "command economy". Warfare only requires a properly funded and well prepared military. Both of which are exponentially more easily achieved with a true free market which generates the innovation and wealth (which results in higher tax revenues for the government).

This is why nobody should take the right wing seriously about economics or the law.
Warfare requires command economics not, laissez-fair. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Repeating lie does not make it true - despite what the communists have trained you to believe. We've engaged in wars throughout our history and never engaged in your precious and idiotic "command economy". Warfare only requires a properly funded and well prepared military. Both of which are exponentially more easily achieved with a true free market which generates the innovation and wealth (which results in higher tax revenues for the government).

This is why everyone keeps advocating to ignore you Daniel. You're just a troll...

You have nothing but fallacy; it is a self-evident Truth, that a warfare-State economy requires, command economics, not laissez-fair.

 

[danielpalos]

The right wing is full of fallacy, like usual. Mogadishu had no taxes and very few regulations, for over a decade; how many fortune five hundred firms, relocated there.

Mogadishu is a vintage left-wing nation where armed dictators try to control the masses through force. Just like you want here in the U.S.

the right wing is for, no government. any more projections, right winger?

The right-wing is for constitutional government (except for Sovereign Citizens and anarchist - both of which are rejected by both sides of the aisle and thus have zero representation in government). Mogadishu is a nation oppressed by armed dictators - just like you desire here in the U.S.

No, the right wing is definitely not, for Constitutional government. Your, right wing, prefers socialism on a national basis.

 

[P@triot]

It says, the common defense, not, national security.

Snowflake...what do you think national security is - sponsored horse racing? It is defense.

 

[P@triot]

No, the right wing is definitely not, for Constitutional government.

That is the foundation of the entire conservative ideology.

 

[regent]

No, the right wing is definitely not, for Constitutional government.

That is the foundation of the entire conservative ideology.

Then conservatives should thank liberals for bringing Constitutional government to the United States.

 

[P@triot]

No, the right wing is definitely not, for Constitutional government.

That is the foundation of the entire conservative ideology.

Then conservatives should thank liberals for bringing Constitutional government to the United States.

Liberals have spent their lives trying to rip constitutional government from the United States.

 

[P@triot]

Nothing lowers the bar like the left-wing ideology. And how "progressive" of this left-wing institution for firing a professor who was trying to raise education instead of lowering it...

Prof rips altering class to up grades. Then this happens.

 

[danielpalos]

It says, the common defense, not, national security.

Snowflake...what do you think national security is - sponsored horse racing? It is defense.

No, it isn't. We have a Second Amendment for, national security. The general government is responsible for the common defense.

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing lowers the bar like the left-wing ideology. And how "progressive" of this left-wing institution for firing a professor who was trying to raise education instead of lowering it...

Prof rips altering class to up grades. Then this happens.

so what.

Here is a form of republican, "job creation" with a capital gains tax preference:

Mr. Kushner did resign from more than 200 positions in the partnerships and limited liability companies that make up the family-run multibillion-dollar real estate business. But the financial disclosure report shows that Mr. Kushner will remain a beneficiary of most of those same entities.--https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/01/us/politics/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-conflicts-business-empire.html?_r=0

 

[Godboy]

There is no denying the facts (though some will sadly still try)...

Walmart Closes LA Store Over $15 Minimum Wage - Breitbart

It may hurt the pocket book of several billionaires and multi-millionaires, why you can't have that...

If it was about greed (as you claim), then why did they shut down the store entirely? Why not keep the business going and just take less profit instead? Let me answer that for you... THEY WERE LOSING MONEY!

Liberals put a bad policy in place and now this is the result.

 

[Moonglow]

There is no denying the facts (though some will sadly still try)...

Walmart Closes LA Store Over $15 Minimum Wage - Breitbart

It may hurt the pocket book of several billionaires and multi-millionaires, why you can't have that...

If it was about greed (as you claim), then why did they shut down the store entirely? Why not keep the business going and just take less profit instead? Let me answer that for you... THEY WERE LOSING MONEY!

Liberals put a bad policy in place and now this is the result.

Liberals don't make business policy for Wal Mart..

 

[danielpalos]

There is no denying the facts (though some will sadly still try)...

Walmart Closes LA Store Over $15 Minimum Wage - Breitbart

It may hurt the pocket book of several billionaires and multi-millionaires, why you can't have that...

If it was about greed (as you claim), then why did they shut down the store entirely? Why not keep the business going and just take less profit instead? Let me answer that for you... THEY WERE LOSING MONEY!

Liberals put a bad policy in place and now this is the result.

just one more tool to, "get WalMart out of the neighborhood"?