Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy

[Faun]

Barack Obama stepped into an economy that was doing just fine...

You're done. That is thee most batshit insane post I've ever seen here. Bar none.

You have to be crazy to think negative 8 percent GDP and a million plus people becoming unemployed in the month Bush left office as, "an economy that was doing just fine."

 

[Faun]

Everywhere liberals get these insane minimum wages shoved through, we see insane unemployment. Businesses move or shut down. Nothing but poverty is left in the wake of liberal policy. What a damn shame...

Minimum wage hikes put pressure on businesses to 're-engineer labor force,' a restaurateur says - LA Times
Some restaurants face pressure to trim menus and staffs under California's wage hike

you know, my friend, that's an interesting hypothesis.

and yet pretty much every time a republican is president we end up in a recession.

corporations are making record profits. they aren't paying workers commensurate with inflation while they are rewarding their upper echelon execs and offshoring their income and workers. and that has nothing to do with the difference between $8 an hour and $15 an hour. how do we know this? wherever wages are higher, e.g., Australia, the economy, including businesses, do better.

why? because if the middle class is destroyed, as it has been by rightwing policies, then they don't have money to buy goods.

you don't see a problem with that?

Why? Because the last two Republican presidents we've had (George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush) implemented liberal policy across the board. Let's take a quick peak at history:

The economy completely and totally collapses under Jimmy Carter and his liberal policy. Ronald Reagan steps in, implements true conservative policy, and not only does the economy rebound, it flourishes. We ride the Reagan economic tidal wave until the early 2000's, when Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act finally collapses the housing market.

Barack Obama has had 8 years and 100% of the policies he demanded (he got Obamacare, he got the banking regulations, the credit card regulations, the stimulus packages, etc.) - all of which he insisted would solve the economic crisis. What do we have to show for it? Well, we have nearly double the national debt from when he took over. We have more people on food stamps than when he took over. We have more people who have completely dropped out of the workforce than when he took over. And we're seeing higher costs than when he took over (healthcare costs, energy costs, gas, etc.).

So...be honest with me dear friend....are these absurd communist Cuban left-wing policies working? Set aside your ideology for a moment, look at the facts and the data, and tell me that these are actually working. Come on.

By the way, do you really believe that Barack Obama (an admitted Marxist) wakes up every day and cares about you? He attended Columbia while Cloward & Piven (two Columbian professors) were preaching their strategy on how to collapse the U.S. by overloading the social programs, blaming capitalism, and then replacing it with communism. And incidentally, Barack Obama and his cronies (Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, etc.) need people on the government plantation. That's why the middle class is shrining. They realize that if the middle class disappears, and they can grow the lower class dependent on government for even their most basic needs, then it is likely those people will vote Democrat and Obama and his cronies get to stay in power. Why would you support people hungry for power and determined to get you into poverty to ensure their power? That is insane. I've posted this many times and it is indisputably true...

"They Republicans are for the rich. Democrats are for the poor. If they need more voters, the they have to make more of who they are for". And make not mistake about it - Barack Obama has done a brilliant job of collapsing the economy and creating more poor Democrat voters. The numbers don't lie.

Bush43 drove up debt but cutting taxes while increasing spending to fund his war of choice. That is no more "Liberal policy" than there have been 96 million people drop out of the labor force since Obama's been president.

You have a defective brain.

I'll grant you that cutting taxes is not a liberal policy (well, sadly, not anymore...the golden boy of the party JFK gave quite a speech about how cutting taxes was the only way to help a dying economy but unfortunately you and your fellow liberals in this day and age have become far too radicalized to admit and accept that). But spending way beyond one's means is inherently left-wing. 90% of what GWB did was left-wing, and had he ran for office with a tiny little "D" behind his name, he would be considered a GOD by you people.

After all, Obama has almost exclusively followed what GWB did - only expanded on it (Wall Street bailouts like Bush, Patriot Act like Bush, Guantanamo Bay like Bush). Oops! Those darn facts again!

You're wasting your Internet bandwidth posting here. You're done. You're as deranged as they come.

 

[edthecynic]

Bwahahaha! That's why Jimmy Carter collapsed the U.S. economy and by the time Ronald Reagan left 8 years later, it was booming. Conversely, Barack Obama stepped into an economy that was doing just fine (unemployment was somewhere around 6.5% if I remember correctly on the day he was sworn in), and then he promptly went out and collapsed everything. It ballooned to over 10% on his watch (and in actuality, it was more like 16%) despite the fact that he guaranteed the American people if they dropped over a trillion dollars in stimulus, unemployment wouldn't even hit 8%.

Facts. They are a *****, eh Faun?

Reagan took office Jan 1981, the Reagan Recession began at the end of 1982, so Carter had nothing to do with the Reagan Recession, which at the time was the worst since the Great Republican Depression.

UE was 7.8% and skyrocketing when Bush left, or if we are using the "more like" rate 14.2%. The stimulus was $787 billion, NOT over a trillion, 1/3 of which was tax cuts, and the skyrocketing Bush unemployment was already over 8% by the time the stimulus was signed, and nearly 16% on the "more like" scale.

 

[P@triot]

Barack Obama stepped into an economy that was doing just fine...

You're done. That is thee most batshit insane post I've ever seen here. Bar none.

You have to be crazy to think negative 8 percent GDP and a million plus people becoming unemployed in the month Bush left office as, "an economy that was doing just fine."

Dude...unemployment was something like 6.5%. Gas was something like $1.35 the day Obama was sworn into office.

You really hate facts more than anyone here, uh?

 

[P@triot]

Bwahahaha! That's why Jimmy Carter collapsed the U.S. economy and by the time Ronald Reagan left 8 years later, it was booming. Conversely, Barack Obama stepped into an economy that was doing just fine (unemployment was somewhere around 6.5% if I remember correctly on the day he was sworn in), and then he promptly went out and collapsed everything. It ballooned to over 10% on his watch (and in actuality, it was more like 16%) despite the fact that he guaranteed the American people if they dropped over a trillion dollars in stimulus, unemployment wouldn't even hit 8%.

Facts. They are a *****, eh Faun?

Reagan took office Jan 1981, the Reagan Recession began at the end of 1982, so Carter had nothing to do with the Reagan Recession, which at the time was the worst since the Great Republican Depression.

UE was 7.8% and skyrocketing when Bush left, or if we are using the "more like" rate 14.2%. The stimulus was $787 billion, NOT over a trillion, 1/3 of which was tax cuts, and the skyrocketing Bush unemployment was already over 8% by the time the stimulus was signed, and nearly 16% on the "more like" scale.

Um....junior? When Jimmy Carter was in office - there was a major energy crisis. People would wait in line for hours when a gas station finally received a delivery and then some would end up leaving without gas anyway. Interest rates were insane - like 20% or something. The reason Carter was a one pump chump was because the economy was such a train wreck. That's why the American people ousted a sitting president (a very rare occurrence) and turned to Ronald Reagan. And he delivered in a huge way. By the time he left office in 1988, the economy was booming.

Would you like to try again?

 

[Uncensored2008]

President Obamas liberal policies have generated ten million jobs




.

In the same way that pollution of Minnesota lakes spawned ten million trout.

 

[P@triot]

Everywhere liberals get these insane minimum wages shoved through, we see insane unemployment. Businesses move or shut down. Nothing but poverty is left in the wake of liberal policy. What a damn shame...

Minimum wage hikes put pressure on businesses to 're-engineer labor force,' a restaurateur says - LA Times
Some restaurants face pressure to trim menus and staffs under California's wage hike

you know, my friend, that's an interesting hypothesis.

and yet pretty much every time a republican is president we end up in a recession.

corporations are making record profits. they aren't paying workers commensurate with inflation while they are rewarding their upper echelon execs and offshoring their income and workers. and that has nothing to do with the difference between $8 an hour and $15 an hour. how do we know this? wherever wages are higher, e.g., Australia, the economy, including businesses, do better.

why? because if the middle class is destroyed, as it has been by rightwing policies, then they don't have money to buy goods.

you don't see a problem with that?

Why? Because the last two Republican presidents we've had (George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush) implemented liberal policy across the board. Let's take a quick peak at history:

The economy completely and totally collapses under Jimmy Carter and his liberal policy. Ronald Reagan steps in, implements true conservative policy, and not only does the economy rebound, it flourishes. We ride the Reagan economic tidal wave until the early 2000's, when Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act finally collapses the housing market.

Barack Obama has had 8 years and 100% of the policies he demanded (he got Obamacare, he got the banking regulations, the credit card regulations, the stimulus packages, etc.) - all of which he insisted would solve the economic crisis. What do we have to show for it? Well, we have nearly double the national debt from when he took over. We have more people on food stamps than when he took over. We have more people who have completely dropped out of the workforce than when he took over. And we're seeing higher costs than when he took over (healthcare costs, energy costs, gas, etc.).

So...be honest with me dear friend....are these absurd communist Cuban left-wing policies working? Set aside your ideology for a moment, look at the facts and the data, and tell me that these are actually working. Come on.

By the way, do you really believe that Barack Obama (an admitted Marxist) wakes up every day and cares about you? He attended Columbia while Cloward & Piven (two Columbian professors) were preaching their strategy on how to collapse the U.S. by overloading the social programs, blaming capitalism, and then replacing it with communism. And incidentally, Barack Obama and his cronies (Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, etc.) need people on the government plantation. That's why the middle class is shrining. They realize that if the middle class disappears, and they can grow the lower class dependent on government for even their most basic needs, then it is likely those people will vote Democrat and Obama and his cronies get to stay in power. Why would you support people hungry for power and determined to get you into poverty to ensure their power? That is insane. I've posted this many times and it is indisputably true...

"They Republicans are for the rich. Democrats are for the poor. If they need more voters, the they have to make more of who they are for". And make not mistake about it - Barack Obama has done a brilliant job of collapsing the economy and creating more poor Democrat voters. The numbers don't lie.

Bush43 drove up debt but cutting taxes while increasing spending to fund his war of choice. That is no more "Liberal policy" than there have been 96 million people drop out of the labor force since Obama's been president.

You have a defective brain.

I'll grant you that cutting taxes is not a liberal policy (well, sadly, not anymore...the golden boy of the party JFK gave quite a speech about how cutting taxes was the only way to help a dying economy but unfortunately you and your fellow liberals in this day and age have become far too radicalized to admit and accept that). But spending way beyond one's means is inherently left-wing. 90% of what GWB did was left-wing, and had he ran for office with a tiny little "D" behind his name, he would be considered a GOD by you people.

After all, Obama has almost exclusively followed what GWB did - only expanded on it (Wall Street bailouts like Bush, Patriot Act like Bush, Guantanamo Bay like Bush). Oops! Those darn facts again!

You're wasting your Internet bandwidth posting here. You're done. You're as deranged as they come.

Well you're the one everyone is laughing at right now - not me. I've hit you with fact after fact and now you've got that deer-in-headlights look on your face and are turning to insults like a small child in your frustration with reality. You can't deny anything I've said (and haven't even tried really) and the best your fellow liberal could response with is "statistics are like lies"

 

[Faun]

Barack Obama stepped into an economy that was doing just fine...

You're done. That is thee most batshit insane post I've ever seen here. Bar none.

You have to be crazy to think negative 8 percent GDP and a million plus people becoming unemployed in the month Bush left office as, "an economy that was doing just fine."

Dude...unemployment was something like 6.5%. Gas was something like $1.35 the day Obama was sworn into office.

You really hate facts more than anyone here, uh?

Yeah, suuure.... those are "facts" like your other "fact" that 96 million people dropped out of the labor force since Obama became president.

In other words ... you're ******* crazy.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

President Obamas liberal policies have generated ten million jobs

President Obama's policy created record unemployment. Over 30 million jobs were lost under him.

President Obamas liberal policies have generated ten million jobs

The facts say otherwise.... 30 million jobs lost under Obama in his first couple of years. 92 million have dropped out of the work force all together under his reign of terror. The few jobs that have been created were result of conservative policy under conservative governors and state legislatures in places like Wisconsin, Ohio, Texas, and North Dakota. It's why the American people overwhelmingly turned their states and local municipalities over to conservatives in 2010.

Record 92,898,000 Americans Not In The Workforce - Breitbart

The number has more to do with corporate policy than presidential policy...

Oh really? Tell that to those workers who would gladly accept a 40 hour paycheck with the ability to contribute to their own health care plan, rather than earning under 30 hours every week and paying your own benefits under the new Obamacare mandate. Economy and household income looked a lot stronger and more confident before the nation was dealt the poor hand of an ACA. There's a result of presidential policy the liberal democrats can't walk away from.

 

[P@triot]

President Obamas liberal policies have generated ten million jobs

President Obama's policy created record unemployment. Over 30 million jobs were lost under him.

President Obamas liberal policies have generated ten million jobs

The facts say otherwise.... 30 million jobs lost under Obama in his first couple of years. 92 million have dropped out of the work force all together under his reign of terror. The few jobs that have been created were result of conservative policy under conservative governors and state legislatures in places like Wisconsin, Ohio, Texas, and North Dakota. It's why the American people overwhelmingly turned their states and local municipalities over to conservatives in 2010.

Record 92,898,000 Americans Not In The Workforce - Breitbart

The number has more to do with corporate policy than presidential policy...

Oh really? Tell that to those workers who would gladly accept a 40 hour paycheck with the ability to contribute to their own health care plan, rather than earning under 30 hours every week and paying your own benefits under the new Obamacare mandate. Economy and household income looked a lot stronger and more confident before the nation was dealt the poor hand of an ACA. There's a result of presidential policy the liberal democrats can't walk away from.

Shhhh! You can't talk reason and facts with liberals SoBG! Don't you know better than that by now? The age old adage still applies:

"If you want to anger a conservative - lie to them. If you want to anger a liberal - tell them the truth".

 

[Faun]

you know, my friend, that's an interesting hypothesis.

and yet pretty much every time a republican is president we end up in a recession.

corporations are making record profits. they aren't paying workers commensurate with inflation while they are rewarding their upper echelon execs and offshoring their income and workers. and that has nothing to do with the difference between $8 an hour and $15 an hour. how do we know this? wherever wages are higher, e.g., Australia, the economy, including businesses, do better.

why? because if the middle class is destroyed, as it has been by rightwing policies, then they don't have money to buy goods.

you don't see a problem with that?

Why? Because the last two Republican presidents we've had (George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush) implemented liberal policy across the board. Let's take a quick peak at history:

The economy completely and totally collapses under Jimmy Carter and his liberal policy. Ronald Reagan steps in, implements true conservative policy, and not only does the economy rebound, it flourishes. We ride the Reagan economic tidal wave until the early 2000's, when Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act finally collapses the housing market.

Barack Obama has had 8 years and 100% of the policies he demanded (he got Obamacare, he got the banking regulations, the credit card regulations, the stimulus packages, etc.) - all of which he insisted would solve the economic crisis. What do we have to show for it? Well, we have nearly double the national debt from when he took over. We have more people on food stamps than when he took over. We have more people who have completely dropped out of the workforce than when he took over. And we're seeing higher costs than when he took over (healthcare costs, energy costs, gas, etc.).

So...be honest with me dear friend....are these absurd communist Cuban left-wing policies working? Set aside your ideology for a moment, look at the facts and the data, and tell me that these are actually working. Come on.

By the way, do you really believe that Barack Obama (an admitted Marxist) wakes up every day and cares about you? He attended Columbia while Cloward & Piven (two Columbian professors) were preaching their strategy on how to collapse the U.S. by overloading the social programs, blaming capitalism, and then replacing it with communism. And incidentally, Barack Obama and his cronies (Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, etc.) need people on the government plantation. That's why the middle class is shrining. They realize that if the middle class disappears, and they can grow the lower class dependent on government for even their most basic needs, then it is likely those people will vote Democrat and Obama and his cronies get to stay in power. Why would you support people hungry for power and determined to get you into poverty to ensure their power? That is insane. I've posted this many times and it is indisputably true...

"They Republicans are for the rich. Democrats are for the poor. If they need more voters, the they have to make more of who they are for". And make not mistake about it - Barack Obama has done a brilliant job of collapsing the economy and creating more poor Democrat voters. The numbers don't lie.

Bush43 drove up debt but cutting taxes while increasing spending to fund his war of choice. That is no more "Liberal policy" than there have been 96 million people drop out of the labor force since Obama's been president.

You have a defective brain.

I'll grant you that cutting taxes is not a liberal policy (well, sadly, not anymore...the golden boy of the party JFK gave quite a speech about how cutting taxes was the only way to help a dying economy but unfortunately you and your fellow liberals in this day and age have become far too radicalized to admit and accept that). But spending way beyond one's means is inherently left-wing. 90% of what GWB did was left-wing, and had he ran for office with a tiny little "D" behind his name, he would be considered a GOD by you people.

After all, Obama has almost exclusively followed what GWB did - only expanded on it (Wall Street bailouts like Bush, Patriot Act like Bush, Guantanamo Bay like Bush). Oops! Those darn facts again!

You're wasting your Internet bandwidth posting here. You're done. You're as deranged as they come.

Well you're the one everyone is laughing at right now - not me. I've hit you with fact after fact and now you've got that deer-in-headlights look on your face and are turning to insults like a small child in your frustration with reality. You can't deny anything I've said (and haven't even tried really) and the best your fellow liberal could response with is "statistics are like lies"

96 million people have not dropped out of the labor force since Obama became president. Gas was not something like $1.35 a gallon when Obama became president. The unemployment rate was not 6.5% when Obama became president. The economy was not "fine" when Obama became president. So who knows whom you think is laughing at me for not accepting your made up "facts."

You're clearly too insane to comprehend how insane you are.

 

[edthecynic]

Dude...unemployment was something like 6.5%. Gas was something like $1.35 the day Obama was sworn into office.

You really hate facts more than anyone here, uh?

I already nailed you on those same lies, so what do you do as a worthless lying scum POS CON$ervoFascist, you just parrot the same lies over again.

The U-3 was 7.8% and skyrocketing and the U-6 was 14.2% and skyrocketing when Bush left.

 

[P@triot]

Barack Obama stepped into an economy that was doing just fine...

You're done. That is thee most batshit insane post I've ever seen here. Bar none.

You have to be crazy to think negative 8 percent GDP and a million plus people becoming unemployed in the month Bush left office as, "an economy that was doing just fine."

Dude...unemployment was something like 6.5%. Gas was something like $1.35 the day Obama was sworn into office.

You really hate facts more than anyone here, uh?

Yeah, suuure.... those are "facts" like your other "fact" that 96 million people dropped out of the labor force since Obama became president.

In other words ... you're ******* crazy.

Yeah....that pretty much sums you up my friend. An insane man-clown out of your mind with anger and threatening to kill anyone who tells the truth.

"If you want to anger a conservative - lie to them. If you want to anger a liberal - tell them the truth".

 

[Faun]

Dude...unemployment was something like 6.5%. Gas was something like $1.35 the day Obama was sworn into office.

You really hate facts more than anyone here, uh?

I already nailed you on those same lies, so what do you do as a worthless lying scum POS CON$ervoFascist, you just parrot the same lies over again.

The U-3 was 7.8% and skyrocketing and the U-6 was 14.2% and skyrocketing when Bush left.

That putz is just another rightwingnut raving lunatic. He unwittingly admitted that when he described the economy Bush handed to Obama as "just fine."

 

[P@triot]

Dude...unemployment was something like 6.5%. Gas was something like $1.35 the day Obama was sworn into office.

You really hate facts more than anyone here, uh?

I already nailed you on those same lies, so what do you do as a worthless lying scum POS CON$ervoFascist, you just parrot the same lies over again.

The U-3 was 7.8% and skyrocketing and the U-6 was 14.2% and skyrocketing when Bush left.

Oops....

 

[edthecynic]

Bwahahaha! That's why Jimmy Carter collapsed the U.S. economy and by the time Ronald Reagan left 8 years later, it was booming. Conversely, Barack Obama stepped into an economy that was doing just fine (unemployment was somewhere around 6.5% if I remember correctly on the day he was sworn in), and then he promptly went out and collapsed everything. It ballooned to over 10% on his watch (and in actuality, it was more like 16%) despite the fact that he guaranteed the American people if they dropped over a trillion dollars in stimulus, unemployment wouldn't even hit 8%.

Facts. They are a *****, eh Faun?

Reagan took office Jan 1981, the Reagan Recession began at the end of 1982, so Carter had nothing to do with the Reagan Recession, which at the time was the worst since the Great Republican Depression.

UE was 7.8% and skyrocketing when Bush left, or if we are using the "more like" rate 14.2%. The stimulus was $787 billion, NOT over a trillion, 1/3 of which was tax cuts, and the skyrocketing Bush unemployment was already over 8% by the time the stimulus was signed, and nearly 16% on the "more like" scale.

Um....junior? When Jimmy Carter was in office - there was a major energy crisis. People would wait in line for hours when a gas station finally received a delivery and then some would end up leaving without gas anyway. Interest rates were insane - like 20% or something. The reason Carter was a one pump chump was because the economy was such a train wreck. That's why the American people ousted a sitting president (a very rare occurrence) and turned to Ronald Reagan. And he delivered in a huge way. By the time he left office in 1988, the economy was booming.

Would you like to try again?

When Carter left office there was no recession, Reagan's policies created one of the worst since the Great Republican Depression. The economy recovered in spite of Reagan, not because of St Ronnie!!!

 

[Faun]

Barack Obama stepped into an economy that was doing just fine...

You're done. That is thee most batshit insane post I've ever seen here. Bar none.

You have to be crazy to think negative 8 percent GDP and a million plus people becoming unemployed in the month Bush left office as, "an economy that was doing just fine."

Dude...unemployment was something like 6.5%. Gas was something like $1.35 the day Obama was sworn into office.

You really hate facts more than anyone here, uh?

Yeah, suuure.... those are "facts" like your other "fact" that 96 million people dropped out of the labor force since Obama became president.

In other words ... you're ******* crazy.

Yeah....that pretty much sums you up my friend. An insane man-clown out of your mind with anger and threatening to kill anyone who tells the truth.

"If you want to anger a conservative - lie to them. If you want to anger a liberal - tell them the truth".

Now your insanity leads you to the delusion I've threatened anyone.

Where will your insanity lead you to next?

 

[P@triot]

Why? Because the last two Republican presidents we've had (George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush) implemented liberal policy across the board. Let's take a quick peak at history:

The economy completely and totally collapses under Jimmy Carter and his liberal policy. Ronald Reagan steps in, implements true conservative policy, and not only does the economy rebound, it flourishes. We ride the Reagan economic tidal wave until the early 2000's, when Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act finally collapses the housing market.

Barack Obama has had 8 years and 100% of the policies he demanded (he got Obamacare, he got the banking regulations, the credit card regulations, the stimulus packages, etc.) - all of which he insisted would solve the economic crisis. What do we have to show for it? Well, we have nearly double the national debt from when he took over. We have more people on food stamps than when he took over. We have more people who have completely dropped out of the workforce than when he took over. And we're seeing higher costs than when he took over (healthcare costs, energy costs, gas, etc.).

So...be honest with me dear friend....are these absurd communist Cuban left-wing policies working? Set aside your ideology for a moment, look at the facts and the data, and tell me that these are actually working. Come on.

By the way, do you really believe that Barack Obama (an admitted Marxist) wakes up every day and cares about you? He attended Columbia while Cloward & Piven (two Columbian professors) were preaching their strategy on how to collapse the U.S. by overloading the social programs, blaming capitalism, and then replacing it with communism. And incidentally, Barack Obama and his cronies (Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, etc.) need people on the government plantation. That's why the middle class is shrining. They realize that if the middle class disappears, and they can grow the lower class dependent on government for even their most basic needs, then it is likely those people will vote Democrat and Obama and his cronies get to stay in power. Why would you support people hungry for power and determined to get you into poverty to ensure their power? That is insane. I've posted this many times and it is indisputably true...

"They Republicans are for the rich. Democrats are for the poor. If they need more voters, the they have to make more of who they are for". And make not mistake about it - Barack Obama has done a brilliant job of collapsing the economy and creating more poor Democrat voters. The numbers don't lie.

Bush43 drove up debt but cutting taxes while increasing spending to fund his war of choice. That is no more "Liberal policy" than there have been 96 million people drop out of the labor force since Obama's been president.

You have a defective brain.

I'll grant you that cutting taxes is not a liberal policy (well, sadly, not anymore...the golden boy of the party JFK gave quite a speech about how cutting taxes was the only way to help a dying economy but unfortunately you and your fellow liberals in this day and age have become far too radicalized to admit and accept that). But spending way beyond one's means is inherently left-wing. 90% of what GWB did was left-wing, and had he ran for office with a tiny little "D" behind his name, he would be considered a GOD by you people.

After all, Obama has almost exclusively followed what GWB did - only expanded on it (Wall Street bailouts like Bush, Patriot Act like Bush, Guantanamo Bay like Bush). Oops! Those darn facts again!

You're wasting your Internet bandwidth posting here. You're done. You're as deranged as they come.

Well you're the one everyone is laughing at right now - not me. I've hit you with fact after fact and now you've got that deer-in-headlights look on your face and are turning to insults like a small child in your frustration with reality. You can't deny anything I've said (and haven't even tried really) and the best your fellow liberal could response with is "statistics are like lies"

96 million people have not dropped out of the labor force since Obama became president. Gas was not something like $1.35 a gallon when Obama became president. The unemployment rate was not 6.5% when Obama became president. The economy was not "fine" when Obama became president. So who knows whom you think is laughing at me for not accepting your made up "facts."

You're clearly too insane to comprehend how insane you are.

Oops...

 

[edthecynic]

Dude...unemployment was something like 6.5%. Gas was something like $1.35 the day Obama was sworn into office.

You really hate facts more than anyone here, uh?

I already nailed you on those same lies, so what do you do as a worthless lying scum POS CON$ervoFascist, you just parrot the same lies over again.

The U-3 was 7.8% and skyrocketing and the U-6 was 14.2% and skyrocketing when Bush left.

Oops....
View attachment 71388

How many years outdated is that chart?

 

[P@triot]

Why? Because the last two Republican presidents we've had (George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush) implemented liberal policy across the board. Let's take a quick peak at history:

The economy completely and totally collapses under Jimmy Carter and his liberal policy. Ronald Reagan steps in, implements true conservative policy, and not only does the economy rebound, it flourishes. We ride the Reagan economic tidal wave until the early 2000's, when Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act finally collapses the housing market.

Barack Obama has had 8 years and 100% of the policies he demanded (he got Obamacare, he got the banking regulations, the credit card regulations, the stimulus packages, etc.) - all of which he insisted would solve the economic crisis. What do we have to show for it? Well, we have nearly double the national debt from when he took over. We have more people on food stamps than when he took over. We have more people who have completely dropped out of the workforce than when he took over. And we're seeing higher costs than when he took over (healthcare costs, energy costs, gas, etc.).

So...be honest with me dear friend....are these absurd communist Cuban left-wing policies working? Set aside your ideology for a moment, look at the facts and the data, and tell me that these are actually working. Come on.

By the way, do you really believe that Barack Obama (an admitted Marxist) wakes up every day and cares about you? He attended Columbia while Cloward & Piven (two Columbian professors) were preaching their strategy on how to collapse the U.S. by overloading the social programs, blaming capitalism, and then replacing it with communism. And incidentally, Barack Obama and his cronies (Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, etc.) need people on the government plantation. That's why the middle class is shrining. They realize that if the middle class disappears, and they can grow the lower class dependent on government for even their most basic needs, then it is likely those people will vote Democrat and Obama and his cronies get to stay in power. Why would you support people hungry for power and determined to get you into poverty to ensure their power? That is insane. I've posted this many times and it is indisputably true...

"They Republicans are for the rich. Democrats are for the poor. If they need more voters, the they have to make more of who they are for". And make not mistake about it - Barack Obama has done a brilliant job of collapsing the economy and creating more poor Democrat voters. The numbers don't lie.

Bush43 drove up debt but cutting taxes while increasing spending to fund his war of choice. That is no more "Liberal policy" than there have been 96 million people drop out of the labor force since Obama's been president.

You have a defective brain.

I'll grant you that cutting taxes is not a liberal policy (well, sadly, not anymore...the golden boy of the party JFK gave quite a speech about how cutting taxes was the only way to help a dying economy but unfortunately you and your fellow liberals in this day and age have become far too radicalized to admit and accept that). But spending way beyond one's means is inherently left-wing. 90% of what GWB did was left-wing, and had he ran for office with a tiny little "D" behind his name, he would be considered a GOD by you people.

After all, Obama has almost exclusively followed what GWB did - only expanded on it (Wall Street bailouts like Bush, Patriot Act like Bush, Guantanamo Bay like Bush). Oops! Those darn facts again!

You're wasting your Internet bandwidth posting here. You're done. You're as deranged as they come.

Well you're the one everyone is laughing at right now - not me. I've hit you with fact after fact and now you've got that deer-in-headlights look on your face and are turning to insults like a small child in your frustration with reality. You can't deny anything I've said (and haven't even tried really) and the best your fellow liberal could response with is "statistics are like lies"

96 million people have not dropped out of the labor force since Obama became president. Gas was not something like $1.35 a gallon when Obama became president. The unemployment rate was not 6.5% when Obama became president. The economy was not "fine" when Obama became president. So who knows whom you think is laughing at me for not accepting your made up "facts."

You're clearly too insane to comprehend how insane you are.

Um....junior? I posted the link to the Bureau of Labor statistics run by the Obama government you adore proving 96 million people have dropped out of the workforce under the Obama reign of terror. The fact that you can't deal with facts shows you need some serious help. But either way - you look like a fool freaking out about the indisputable facts and posting tons of GIF's in a sad attempt to distract from my proving you wrong over and over.