Not the worst heat wave on record

Hey guys, we can avert all this by changing our cars and paying more tax to enrich the politicians :rolleyes:

No, if we change our existing cars to run on hydrogen, methane, or some bio fuel, then we produce no more CO2 increase that is only from when we burn fossil fuels.
 
We know the temperatures during Roman times, and we know we are greatly exceeding them.

OIP.uHzMZ-vL-nsAgkCWouniRgHaFj


graph_shows_temperature_carbon_744.png
 
Probably true, but it is hard to know the baseline, so I was trying to be conservative.
That's alright. It's generally considered to be 280 ppm. 420/280 = 1.5
 
There is no evidence except by parroting fudge and fraud that we are in any way warming as a planet.

There is precisely

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANES
NO OCEAN RISE
 
We have increased atmospheric CO2 by over 50%.


And that has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

Sincerely,

Highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite rising Co2
 
CO2 is necessary for life on earth. A very important element indeed.

Sure, it is essential to plant growth, but also holds planetary heat as well.
And that dynamic is what caused the last 12 ice age vs warming cycles.

Small point, but CO2 is a compound, not an element.
 
Total bullshit...

It is beyond any possible doubt.
We have multiple correlating data sources.



R.45208e4a122c50f94c9e56ed465f2cf5


Nor it is unexpected to double the atmospheric CO2 when we burn hundreds of millions of years worth or sequestered fossil carbon, all in just a few decades.
 
It is beyond any possible doubt.
We have multiple correlating data sources.



R.45208e4a122c50f94c9e56ed465f2cf5


Nor it is unexpected to double the atmospheric CO2 when we burn hundreds of millions of years worth or sequestered fossil carbon, all in just a few decades.

Yeah?
There's a lot of climate scientist that say you're full of shit.
 
Less than 1 out of every 100 say anything even approaching that.

Sure thing skippy.
So tell me,if the water is going to rise why do so many leftist buy expensive waterfront properties?
Hell, I'm looking for the same thing right now and I have zero fears of the water rising and taking my retirement property.
 
Never mind the other 11 months.


:laugh:
It didn`t snow here in western Pa. last winter and the temperature rarely got below 32 degrees. As a skier, I thought it sucked. Fortunately the ski areas are in higher altitudes where snowmaking was possible.
 
It is not just hotter than it has ever been, but the polar ice is all melting more than it has in hundreds of thousands of years, mountain glaciers are all melted for the first time, coral is all dying for the first time, etc.
Right! Like the arctic gaining ice?
Mountain glaciers never melted before?
Coral never died before?
WTF are you talking about, man? :lol:
 
You own link said that the some record cold temperatures mean nothing because that it short term weather, not accumulating climate averages.

I see, so "coldest on record" means nothing, but "hottest on record" does.

Got it.


:alcoholic:
 
It didn`t snow here in western Pa. last winter and the temperature rarely got below 32 degrees. As a skier, I thought it sucked. Fortunately the ski areas are in higher altitudes where snowmaking was possible.

You may never see snow again.


:itsok:




:auiqs.jpg:
 
If we're twenty miles north of Minot, North Dakota ... in December ... we expect a -10ºF high temperature for the day ... but it has been +20ºF for five days ... is that a heat wave? ... if we see five days of 120ºF in Atlanta, Georgia ... the headlines will be six inches tall ...

This isn't a comment on the physics ... it's about statistics ... if using all the data says the opposite, then you're lying ...
 
If we're twenty miles north of Minot, North Dakota ... in December ... we expect a -10ºF high temperature for the day ... but it has been +20ºF for five days ... is that a heat wave? ... if we see five days of 120ºF in Atlanta, Georgia ... the headlines will be six inches tall ...

This isn't a comment on the physics ... it's about statistics ... if using all the data says the opposite, then you're lying ...
To whom were you replying here and what data do you believe says the opposite of what?
 
Back
Top Bottom