“Not only has Dawkins ruined science. He’s ruined atheism too.”

[Fort Fun Indiana]

God exists because we exist, and we didn't create ourselves.

We didn't need to create ourselves. Evolution created us.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

I wonder why evoliton-denying goobers are relegated to embarrassing themselves with copypasta jobs on anonymous message boards, instead of publishing research papers?

Haha...no i don't.

 

[DudleySmith]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

I wonder why evoliton-denying goobers are relegated to embarrassing themselves with copypasta jobs on anonymous message boards, instead of publishing research papers?

Haha...no i don't.

Says some deviant. lol like you have any idea about the subject.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

I wonder why evoliton-denying goobers are relegated to embarrassing themselves with copypasta jobs on anonymous message boards, instead of publishing research papers?

Haha...no i don't.

Says some deviant. lol like you have any idea about the subject.

Oops, unforced error. I am in line with the global scientific community and the most well-supported scientific theory in history. You are sitting in the corner with the alien abductees and the spoonbenders.

That makes you the deviant.

 

[abu afak]

Dudley WHIFFS Again after his FRAUDULENT OP was busted.
"Engineered Evolution"... aka ID - LOFL
"Dawkins ruined Science" !! WTF - LOFL

ZERO.
`

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

Ah, yet another person Dawkins has probable embarrassed.

 

[DudleySmith]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

Ah, yet another person Dawkins has probable embarrassed.

lol Dawkins lost every debate he was ever in, and his assertion that a little pedophilia is okay is well documented. Like most faggots you're just mad because most people know you're mentally ill deviants, and fake science hasn't been able to cover that fact up.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

lol Dawkins lost every debate he was ever in

I see you are a desperate charlatan like the article author. Numbers of Dawkins debates you have watched = 0

 

[Dusty]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

The only thing that Dawkins ruined was his reputation

 

[DudleySmith]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

The only thing that Dawkins ruined was his reputation

He ruined more than that; he ruined his credibility and sanity. I used to be a regular at his forum over at infidels.org; he became deranged and essentially turned the place into a cult centered on himself, no disagreements allowed.

 

[Dusty]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

The only thing that Dawkins ruined was his reputation

He ruined more than that; he ruined his credibility and sanity. I used to be a regular at his forum over at infidels.org; he became deranged and essentially turned the place into a cult centered on himself, no disagreements allowed.

Literally everyone who spends their life either preaching God or atheism is a nutbag and a schizzo. I watched a religious channel for about 2 minutes today and the guy babbling about Jesus and Deuteronomy is not connected to the world, he only speaks in bible passages and this is just not normal. Dawkins saw this behavior and let it get to him, the fact is that Dawkins knows that DNA did not write itself and will go to a sad death just like Sagan did.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

The only thing that Dawkins ruined was his reputation

Yet his foundation is doing better than ever. It seems to me he only ruined his reputation with people that are too sensitive to handle the things he says.

 

[Dusty]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

The only thing that Dawkins ruined was his reputation

Yet his foundation is doing better than ever. It seems to me he only ruined his reputation with people that are too sensitive to handle the things he says.

Well it is true that there are plenty of delusional people that believe that DNA wrote itself in a pond one day and that also believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing. You know the ignorant think that they are educated type

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

The only thing that Dawkins ruined was his reputation

Yet his foundation is doing better than ever. It seems to me he only ruined his reputation with people that are too sensitive to handle the things he says.

Well it is true that there are plenty of delusional people that believe that DNA wrote itself in a pond one day and that also believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing. You know the ignorant think that they are educated type

I.E., educated scientists. How ironic that they are being called uneducated by a person who clearly knows less than nothing about any of this.

 

[Dadoalex]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

Why not look over the threads at all those where Believers are attacking Atheists for NOT BELIEVING

Remember these gems?
"Without God how do you keep from raping women?" Forgetting, of course, that little Virgen Mary thing.
"Be good for goodness sake" and the outrage it caused among the Believers?

Maybe, just maybe, the perceived attitude is a response to Believer attitudes AND having to explain the same factual information 3 or 5 hundred times.

Myself? Don't know.
"God" doesn't matter.
Whatever one supposes "God" to be has no REAL impact on the REAL world.
No impact, doesn't matter.
If, in fact, "God" does exist then, "God,"

So, if "God" doesn't matter, does "God" exist?
In greek mythology the fall of the Pantheon was attributed to the Gods' failure to care for their followers, people.
This caused people to stop believing.
As fewer believed, the Gods lost their power to command which caused even fewer to believe.
My best guess is MAYBE.
But God's not something worth worshipping.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

Why not look over the threads at all those where Believers are attacking Atheists for NOT BELIEVING

Remember these gems?
"Without God how do you keep from raping women?" Forgetting, of course, that little Virgen Mary thing.
"Be good for goodness sake" and the outrage it caused among the Believers?

Maybe, just maybe, the perceived attitude is a response to Believer attitudes AND having to explain the same factual information 3 or 5 hundred times.

Myself? Don't know.
"God" doesn't matter.
Whatever one supposes "God" to be has no REAL impact on the REAL world.
No impact, doesn't matter.
If, in fact, "God" does exist then, "God,"
View attachment 489631
So, if "God" doesn't matter, does "God" exist?
In greek mythology the fall of the Pantheon was attributed to the Gods' failure to care for their followers, people.
This caused people to stop believing.
As fewer believed, the Gods lost their power to command which caused even fewer to believe.
My best guess is MAYBE.
But God's not something worth worshipping.

Like Hitchens said when asked, "Why? Why don't you just ignore them and leave religion alone?"

Hitchens: "Because they won't let me."

 

[Dusty]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

The only thing that Dawkins ruined was his reputation

Yet his foundation is doing better than ever. It seems to me he only ruined his reputation with people that are too sensitive to handle the things he says.

Well it is true that there are plenty of delusional people that believe that DNA wrote itself in a pond one day and that also believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing. You know the ignorant think that they are educated type

I.E., educated scientists. How ironic that they are being called uneducated by a person who clearly knows less than nothing about any of this.

LOL uneducated clowns that actually believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing and that you are not real but a computer simulation.

Yawn

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

The only thing that Dawkins ruined was his reputation

Yet his foundation is doing better than ever. It seems to me he only ruined his reputation with people that are too sensitive to handle the things he says.

Well it is true that there are plenty of delusional people that believe that DNA wrote itself in a pond one day and that also believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing. You know the ignorant think that they are educated type

I.E., educated scientists. How ironic that they are being called uneducated by a person who clearly knows less than nothing about any of this.

LOL uneducated clowns that actually believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing and that you are not real but a computer simulation.

Yawn

Again, pretty ironic to be called uneducated by such an ignorant moron on his newest sock account. I doubt a scientist would be moved.

 

[LittleNipper]

God exists because we exist, and we didn't create ourselves.

We didn't need to create ourselves. Evolution created us.

Ah! But evolution doesn't create, it progresses.

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

Why not look over the threads at all those where Believers are attacking Atheists for NOT BELIEVING

Remember these gems?
"Without God how do you keep from raping women?" Forgetting, of course, that little Virgen Mary thing.
"Be good for goodness sake" and the outrage it caused among the Believers?

Maybe, just maybe, the perceived attitude is a response to Believer attitudes AND having to explain the same factual information 3 or 5 hundred times.

Myself? Don't know.
"God" doesn't matter.
Whatever one supposes "God" to be has no REAL impact on the REAL world.
No impact, doesn't matter.
If, in fact, "God" does exist then, "God,"
View attachment 489631
So, if "God" doesn't matter, does "God" exist?
In greek mythology the fall of the Pantheon was attributed to the Gods' failure to care for their followers, people.
This caused people to stop believing.
As fewer believed, the Gods lost their power to command which caused even fewer to believe.
My best guess is MAYBE.
But God's not something worth worshipping.

GOD most certainly is worth far more than plain worship.

 

[LittleNipper]

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

Why not look over the threads at all those where Believers are attacking Atheists for NOT BELIEVING

Remember these gems?
"Without God how do you keep from raping women?" Forgetting, of course, that little Virgen Mary thing.
"Be good for goodness sake" and the outrage it caused among the Believers?

Maybe, just maybe, the perceived attitude is a response to Believer attitudes AND having to explain the same factual information 3 or 5 hundred times.

Myself? Don't know.
"God" doesn't matter.
Whatever one supposes "God" to be has no REAL impact on the REAL world.
No impact, doesn't matter.
If, in fact, "God" does exist then, "God,"
View attachment 489631
So, if "God" doesn't matter, does "God" exist?
In greek mythology the fall of the Pantheon was attributed to the Gods' failure to care for their followers, people.
This caused people to stop believing.
As fewer believed, the Gods lost their power to command which caused even fewer to believe.
My best guess is MAYBE.
But God's not something worth worshipping.

Like Hitchens said when asked, "Why? Why don't you just ignore them and leave religion alone?"

Hitchens: "Because they won't let me."

One moment, please...

Not only has Dawkins ruined science, he’s ruined atheism too.


20 years ago, an atheist was an intellectual with whom one could have a reasonable dialogue.


Today, most people experience atheists as bellicose angry males who commonly suffer from depression, who post anonymous tirades all over the internet so they can share their misery with everyone else.


We have the New Atheists to thank for this. And their four horsemen. Dawkins – Dennett – Harris – Hitchens.


Wanna have an intelligent discussion about atheism? Read Voltaire, Nietzche or Bertrand Russell.


Agree or disagree, they will force you to think.


Wanna have a pointless shouting match with a bunch of mannerless name-callers who make up just-so stories about warm ponds and lucky lightning strikes and think they’re doing science? Sit down with guys who read Krauss, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris. Walk into a roomful of Dawkins fans.


They will force you to emote.


So, dear atheist, why are you sitting here defending any of these proselytizers?

Dawkins was molested by a homosexual as a child, so naturally he's screwed up.

I wonder why evoliton-denying goobers are relegated to embarrassing themselves with copypasta jobs on anonymous message boards, instead of publishing research papers?

Haha...no i don't.

Says some deviant. lol like you have any idea about the subject.

Oops, unforced error. I am in line with the global scientific community and the most well-supported scientific theory in history. You are sitting in the corner with the alien abductees and the spoonbenders.

That makes you the deviant.

There is no safety in numbers, unless you're running from lions...