Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do Jews today believe Jesus was a fraud who got what he deserved?
A: 100% affirmative
irosie91, you are only going to keep triggering Doc1.
Sadducees and Saduceettes were bad dudes and dudettes.
I PREFER to believe -----that there were no Sadueettes.
Jewish women do not get into that kind of thing.
Sadducees preferred vestal virgins
That's how stupid Jake is. Jewish women were/are not allowed to "teach".
MaryAnne11 has not read the Bible at all, or she had reading comprehension problems.
Her own post says the Jews handed Jesus over to the Romans, not the opposite.
Do you have any idea how stupid you really look Fakey?
I'm sorry but you truly do. Do you honestly think quibbling over semantics makes you look good?
The Romans killed the Savior at the behest of the Jews. There is nothing you can do to change that sweetie.
wrong again----the Romans killed Jesus as one of the tens of thousands they killed because THEY WANTED TO.
Jews of that time knew how to kill people and could have
accomplished that task easily without roman help. Jews never employed crucifixion ------that sort of atrocity is
your thing------it was done in ancient Persia, Greece and
Rome------it is absolutely forbidden by jewish law
Sadducees and Saduceettes were bad dudes and dudettes.
I PREFER to believe -----that there were no Sadueettes.
Jewish women do not get into that kind of thing.
Sadducees preferred vestal virgins
So did Procol Harum.
I am not familiar with HARUM----Haroun is an approximate
equivalent of AARON
Yeah, it does, irosie. Poke him again.
Oh, trigger boy was suggesting that someone had mentioned that Jewish women were teaching. About what I know not.
MaryAnne11 has not read the Bible at all, or she had reading comprehension problems.
Her own post says the Jews handed Jesus over to the Romans, not the opposite.
Do you have any idea how stupid you really look Fakey?
I'm sorry but you truly do. Do you honestly think quibbling over semantics makes you look good?
The Romans killed the Savior at the behest of the Jews. There is nothing you can do to change that sweetie.
wrong again----the Romans killed Jesus as one of the tens of thousands they killed because THEY WANTED TO.
Jews of that time knew how to kill people and could have
accomplished that task easily without roman help. Jews never employed crucifixion ------that sort of atrocity is
your thing------it was done in ancient Persia, Greece and
Rome------it is absolutely forbidden by jewish law
You're dismissed.
As you say it on your back in the dust. You are a tosser, Doc1, and nothing else.You are such a honey bunch, getting your words and thoughts all tied up. I said the Jews did not kill Jesus. I said the first congregations were Jewish Christians. I said the Jews are not responsible for Jesus' death. Anyone who says they were and are, even unto today, is not a Christian. Come unto Jesus, Doc1, He will accept you where you are and guide you. Accept him, Doc1.You're the one who attempted to say the Jews had nothing to do with the death of Christ, not me.
I never get anything tied up Jakey, be careful, I will trap you. NOBODY says the "Jews" killed Jesus. EVERYBODY knows who pounded the nails. Jake you are not a Christian, we both know it. You are not a "Conservative", we both know it. You are however incorrect, the Jews were/are indeed responsible for the Death of Christ. THEY were the ones who agitated Pilate to doit. Huh, an "intelligent" guy like you should know Pilate said he "finds no guilt in this man" and even offered to set him or Barrabas free....the "Jews" chose Barabbas. Keep going, I'll keep burying you
In my EDUCATED opinion----you have to be stupid to BELIEVE that CONSTANTINE story. Who are "DA JOOOOS" in this idiot tale?
Believe whatever you want, I don't really care. I will however choose the Bible's account. Apparently you don't like when I slap Jake around.
Sadducees and Saduceettes were bad dudes and dudettes.
I PREFER to believe -----that there were no Sadueettes.
Jewish women do not get into that kind of thing.
Sadducees preferred vestal virgins
So did Procol Harum.
I am not familiar with HARUM----Haroun is an approximate
equivalent of AARON
You have no sense of humor. It's a Musical Group from the 60's. Once again, you're dismissed.
MaryAnne11 has not read the Bible at all, or she had reading comprehension problems.
Her own post says the Jews handed Jesus over to the Romans, not the opposite.
Do you have any idea how stupid you really look Fakey?
I'm sorry but you truly do. Do you honestly think quibbling over semantics makes you look good?
The Romans killed the Savior at the behest of the Jews. There is nothing you can do to change that sweetie.
wrong again----the Romans killed Jesus as one of the tens of thousands they killed because THEY WANTED TO.
Jews of that time knew how to kill people and could have
accomplished that task easily without roman help. Jews never employed crucifixion ------that sort of atrocity is
your thing------it was done in ancient Persia, Greece and
Rome------it is absolutely forbidden by jewish law
You're dismissed.
be not afraid, doc. Feel free to ask questions---
the times of Jesus and friends were very interesting
HISTORICALLY speaking. A good reference is the writings
of Josephus Flavius
Jewish Senators;
and yet the Evangelicals are the main supporters of Israel and the Jews.
Seems funny to me. Not ha ha funny, but hypocritical funny.
Sadducees and Saduceettes were bad dudes and dudettes.
I PREFER to believe -----that there were no Sadueettes.
Jewish women do not get into that kind of thing.
Sadducees preferred vestal virgins
So did Procol Harum.
I am not familiar with HARUM----Haroun is an approximate
equivalent of AARON
You have no sense of humor. It's a Musical Group from the 60's. Once again, you're dismissed.
I was very busy in the 60s and 70s ----doc. I should add---
that HAROUN is the Arabic equivalent of the name AARON
MaryAnne11 has not read the Bible at all, or she had reading comprehension problems.
Her own post says the Jews handed Jesus over to the Romans, not the opposite.
Do you have any idea how stupid you really look Fakey?
I'm sorry but you truly do. Do you honestly think quibbling over semantics makes you look good?
The Romans killed the Savior at the behest of the Jews. There is nothing you can do to change that sweetie.
wrong again----the Romans killed Jesus as one of the tens of thousands they killed because THEY WANTED TO.
Jews of that time knew how to kill people and could have
accomplished that task easily without roman help. Jews never employed crucifixion ------that sort of atrocity is
your thing------it was done in ancient Persia, Greece and
Rome------it is absolutely forbidden by jewish law
You're dismissed.
be not afraid, doc. Feel free to ask questions---
the times of Jesus and friends were very interesting
HISTORICALLY speaking. A good reference is the writings
of Josephus Flavius
I have no need to ask you anything honey, my degree is in Comparative Religions and I have been ordained since the 80's.
I PREFER to believe -----that there were no Sadueettes.
Jewish women do not get into that kind of thing.
Sadducees preferred vestal virgins
So did Procol Harum.
I am not familiar with HARUM----Haroun is an approximate
equivalent of AARON
You have no sense of humor. It's a Musical Group from the 60's. Once again, you're dismissed.
I was very busy in the 60s and 70s ----doc. I should add---
that HAROUN is the Arabic equivalent of the name AARON
Don't really care honey, it was levity. Apparently you are not capable of that.
MaryAnne11 has not read the Bible at all, or she had reading comprehension problems.
Her own post says the Jews handed Jesus over to the Romans, not the opposite.
Do you have any idea how stupid you really look Fakey?
I'm sorry but you truly do. Do you honestly think quibbling over semantics makes you look good?
The Romans killed the Savior at the behest of the Jews. There is nothing you can do to change that sweetie.
wrong again----the Romans killed Jesus as one of the tens of thousands they killed because THEY WANTED TO.
Jews of that time knew how to kill people and could have
accomplished that task easily without roman help. Jews never employed crucifixion ------that sort of atrocity is
your thing------it was done in ancient Persia, Greece and
Rome------it is absolutely forbidden by jewish law
You're dismissed.
be not afraid, doc. Feel free to ask questions---
the times of Jesus and friends were very interesting
HISTORICALLY speaking. A good reference is the writings
of Josephus Flavius
I have no need to ask you anything honey, my degree is in Comparative Religions and I have been ordained since the 80's.
Do you have any idea how stupid you really look Fakey?
I'm sorry but you truly do. Do you honestly think quibbling over semantics makes you look good?
The Romans killed the Savior at the behest of the Jews. There is nothing you can do to change that sweetie.
wrong again----the Romans killed Jesus as one of the tens of thousands they killed because THEY WANTED TO.
Jews of that time knew how to kill people and could have
accomplished that task easily without roman help. Jews never employed crucifixion ------that sort of atrocity is
your thing------it was done in ancient Persia, Greece and
Rome------it is absolutely forbidden by jewish law
You're dismissed.
be not afraid, doc. Feel free to ask questions---
the times of Jesus and friends were very interesting
HISTORICALLY speaking. A good reference is the writings
of Josephus Flavius
I have no need to ask you anything honey, my degree is in Comparative Religions and I have been ordained since the 80's.
LOL yes----you remind me of a DIVINITY STUDENT----
from Seton Hall that I knew in my college years -----
He told me that he knew ALL ABOUT JUDAISM----we had
many lively conversations about the NT. Since that time
I came to work with two ex-priests
So did Procol Harum.
I am not familiar with HARUM----Haroun is an approximate
equivalent of AARON
You have no sense of humor. It's a Musical Group from the 60's. Once again, you're dismissed.
I was very busy in the 60s and 70s ----doc. I should add---
that HAROUN is the Arabic equivalent of the name AARON
Don't really care honey, it was levity. Apparently you are not capable of that.
for a theologian you are BLASE' That arabs have
adopted Hebrew names SHOULD be interesting for
a "theologian"