Almost any and everything can be reduced or explained by mathematics.
Soooooo......how about it?
Well, for instance try this: What are the odds that all life evolved from a single asexual cell? The odds would be 1 in 10 to the 2,680 power. Virtually impossible.
Not given millions of years it wouldn't. Single cells can split many times in the course of a day. All that DNA mutation and adaptation over millions of years? Not mathematically impossible at all in fact it would be highly unlikely that it didn't evolve.
But I don't really want to argue evolution vs creation, that's been done to death here. I assume you are a Christian, let me ask you this from my OP, why can't evolution be the way God chose to create life?
Because there is no 'god' as perceived by theists; religion and 'god' are creations of man, separate and apart from the science that is evolution.
How would you know? You hold that the primary axioms/tautologies of human cognition and secondary propositions (i.e., conceivable, albeit, inexplicable potentialities of human imagination) are equivalent . . . to the effect that we should proceed from absurdities in logic and science when, of course, we do no such thing. We proceed from articles of justified true belief/knowledge (JTB/K). In other words, you stupidly hold that informal logical fallacies apply to the axioms/tautologies of human cognition. Recall?
But, of course, you don't really believe that. You're just not nearly as bright as you think you are, and your ignorance regarding the conventional standards of science and logic (organic/classical logic and the various analytic forms of logic) is appalling.
You actually hold that all of the primary axioms/tautologies of JTB/K are valid except those regarding the problems of existence and origin, especially the theological axioms. When they arise, you suddenly and arbitrarily allege that they are . . . informal logical fallacies! That's weird because these imperatives are held to be valid, logically necessary premises in all forms of logic in academia, and the
reductio ad absurdum of the irreducible mind and of the infinite regression of origin are held to be the standing imperatives of absolute objectivity in logic and science. They are of the very same nature as that of
2 + 2 = 4!
Shut up! You're an ignoramus who has yet to explain how anyone can logically rule out what cannot be logically ruled out, especially in the face of the scientific fact of the theological axioms of human psychology
: (1) it is not only impossible to logically rule out God's existence, but impossible to logically think/say, on the very face of it, that
God the Creator does not exist;
(2) organic logic necessarily holds that God is the very essence and the ground of the universal laws of thought.