Wow, you point out the Zionist Entity is indeed an apartheid state, and they get very upset.
Round Robin.
Can you show an example of such "apartheid"?
Sure. Gaza and the West Bank are "Occuppied Territories". The people there have no represenation in the Knesset, they require special visas to move about the country, there are walls keeping them in, and their prime territory has been seized for "Settlements.">
Apartheid.
Which has nothing to do with your fake apartheid accusation. Once again, it’s the Muslims and Arabs that are practicing racial, religious and ethnic apartheid. Unlike Israel.
Muslims are the majority in the Middle East. Yet in various ME countries, you have Christians, Druze, Zoroasterians, Yazidi, Mandians, etc.
Of course there is no rational basis for calling Israel an apartheid state. Israel, as you well know, is a liberal democracy in which all citizens have the same rights.
Bullshit, as above, if you are Arab in an "Occupied Territory", you don't have equal rights.
There is a very strange disconnect in the ideology of those like @JoeB131 in that they demand an independent State of Palestine ("end the occupation") and at the same time demand Israeli sovereignty ("make everyone from river to sea an Israeli citizen with equal rights"). Like, do they not understand that these are mutually exclusive? It CAN'T be both an occupation and apartheid. Mutually exclusive.
This isn't logical at all. It can be both an occupation and apartheid, because Zionist law rules, and Arabs are second class citizens.
Actually, they are third-class citizens. The second class are the Christians, Sephardim, Mizhari, and Muslims within the 1967 borders.
The first-class citizens are the Ashkenazim colonizers, of course.
The parallels with South Africa are clear. The Boers were on top, with the people of mixed race and Asians in the middle, and blacks on the bottom.