'Not a single Gazan saved a hostage': World leaders react to slain hostages' release. [100% guilty Arab fakestinians]

[ShahdagMountains]

The hatred of Jews, from time immemorial to the outlandish way it has resurfaced globally today, is truly breathtaking. What on earth could this infinitesimal population of Jews, and their tiny ancestral homeland, Israel, have possibly done to inspire such universally unflinching contempt?

Many of the original justifications for why Jews are to be despised above all others —why hating them is so justly deserved—have been debunked by the absurdity of those blood libels and the upsurge of a (relatively) enlightened public.

No, Jews did not kill Christ; and no, they don’t murder Christian children to improve the taste of Passover matzoh. As for having horns and tails, no one has ever seen a Jew with such anatomical features.

More stubbornly historical tropes require Olympian suspensions of disbelief. You don’t need to be a savant to recognize that levers that “control the world” are not being pulled by Jews. Would Israelis and the Diaspora be this perpetually miserable if they were in possession of such powers?

The Denial Disease

Antisemitism in this new digital age where information is readily available, but all too often falsified, is a disease largely about denial.

jewishjournal.com

 

[ShahdagMountains]

For the past several weeks, critics have fumed at The New York Timesover a misleading photo of an 18-month-old boy in Gaza on its front page. It turns out that Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq, who was a symbol for a story about widespread hunger in Gaza, wasn’t simply suffering from malnutrition. He had pre-existing health issues “affecting his brain and his muscle development,” according to an updated version of the story. But that detail didn’t find its way into print.

When the so-called paper of record updated its story with an editors notefour days later, it also quietly deleted the mother’s claim that her son was “born a healthy child.” There was still no mention of the boy’s brother, who appears healthy in the background of another photo that appeared online.

This incident wasn’t just a one-off.

An investigation by The Free Press reveals that at least a dozen other viral images of starvation in Gaza also lacked important context: The subjects of those photos have significant health problems. Those appeared all over social media, in the reports of leading international aid organizations, and on some of the most prestigious news outlets in the United States, including CNN, NPR, and the Times—without disclosing the complicated medical histories that help explain their stark appearances.

It’s not that there isn’t hunger in Gaza. There is. The World Health Organization reported 63 deaths from malnutrition last month alone, including 25 children. Some of them might have been sick or worse even if there was no war. In 2022, about 50 Gazans under the age of 20 died from malnutrition, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

They Became Symbols for Gazan Starvation. But All 12 Suffer from Other Health Problems.

A Free Press investigation found that the viral photos lacked important context: The subjects have cystic fibrosis, rickets, or other serious ailments.

www.thefp.com

 

[JoeB131]

The hatred of Jews, from time immemorial to the outlandish way it has resurfaced globally today, is truly breathtaking. What on earth could this infinitesimal population of Jews, and their tiny ancestral homeland, Israel, have possibly done to inspire such universally unflinching contempt?

You mean other than their ongoing genocide of the people who moved into their ancestral homeland after they abandoned it?

Many of the original justifications for why Jews are to be despised above all others —why hating them is so justly deserved—have been debunked by the absurdity of those blood libels and the upsurge of a (relatively) enlightened public.

No, Jews did not kill Christ;

Well, if you read the Bible, they most certainly did. Pontius Pilate didn't want to kill Jesus. He went out of his way to try to spare Jesus, but the angry JEWISH mob wasn't having it. He even offered them a choice between killing Jesus and a murderer named Barabas. They chose to spare Barabas.

Now, I don't believe Jesus actually existed, but if you want a beef with Christianity, it's kind of baked into the founding documents. Vatican II was just a spin job. "OH, it was Satan who killed Jesus, not the Jewish Mob who demanded his death!!!"

and no, they don’t murder Christian children to improve the taste of Passover matzoh. As for having horns and tails, no one has ever seen a Jew with such anatomical features.

More stubbornly historical tropes require Olympian suspensions of disbelief. You don’t need to be a savant to recognize that levers that “control the world” are not being pulled by Jews. Would Israelis and the Diaspora be this perpetually miserable if they were in possession of such powers?

Well, let's look at the complaints with Jews by Christians.

That they were responsible for the revolutions in Russia and Germany that brought so much misery into Europe after WWI. that was a valid complaint.

They collaborated with the Islamic Occupiers of Spain until the Christians finally won.

They were the tax collectors for the Tsar in Russia.

Because Christians were not allowed to loan money at an interest rate (usury), Jews became the money lenders, and resented for it.

So those are the historical complaints. Some are valid, while others are not.

The bigger problem today is a lot of Americans look at AIPAC, look how when Zionist Lobby yells "Jump", politicians from both parties say, "HOW HIGH?"

You've made us an accomplice to your evil, and some of us just don't like it. We don't like that America keeps getting dragged into wars in the Middle East. (Has been going on since I was a young lad in the US Army. I 'm an old man now, and it's still going on!)

For the past several weeks, critics have fumed at The New York Timesover a misleading photo of an 18-month-old boy in Gaza on its front page. It turns out that Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq, who was a symbol for a story about widespread hunger in Gaza, wasn’t simply suffering from malnutrition. He had pre-existing health issues “affecting his brain and his muscle development,” according to an updated version of the story. But that detail didn’t find its way into print.

Because it's not terribly relevant. This boy had a pre-existing condition. A condition made worse by the fact the Zionists have bombed all the health care clinics and cut off the food supply.

So, yes, in a famine, the weakest always die first. No big surprise there.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

You mean other than their ongoing genocide of the people who moved into their ancestral homeland after they abandoned it?




Well, if you read the Bible, they most certainly did. Pontius Pilate didn't want to kill Jesus. He went out of his way to try to spare Jesus, but the angry JEWISH mob wasn't having it. He even offered them a choice between killing Jesus and a murderer named Barabas. They chose to spare Barabas.

Now, I don't believe Jesus actually existed, but if you want a beef with Christianity, it's kind of baked into the founding documents. Vatican II was just a spin job. "OH, it was Satan who killed Jesus, not the Jewish Mob who demanded his death!!!"

Well, let's look at the complaints with Jews by Christians.

That they were responsible for the revolutions in Russia and Germany that brought so much misery into Europe after WWI. that was a valid complaint.

They collaborated with the Islamic Occupiers of Spain until the Christians finally won.

They were the tax collectors for the Tsar in Russia.

Because Christians were not allowed to loan money at an interest rate (usury), Jews became the money lenders, and resented for it.

So those are the historical complaints. Some are valid, while others are not.

The bigger problem today is a lot of Americans look at AIPAC, look how when Zionist Lobby yells "Jump", politicians from both parties say, "HOW HIGH?"

You've made us an accomplice to your evil, and some of us just don't like it. We don't like that America keeps getting dragged into wars in the Middle East. (Has been going on since I was a young lad in the US Army. I 'm an old man now, and it's still going on!)




Because it's not terribly relevant. This boy had a pre-existing condition. A condition made worse by the fact the Zionists have bombed all the health care clinics and cut off the food supply.

So, yes, in a famine, the weakest always die first. No big surprise there.

Well done!

 

[EMH]

There was no 107 attack.

There never were any "hostages."

The "hostage movie" was just cover for the total extermination of Gaza, the plan all along.

 

[Roudy]

There was no 107 attack.

There never were any "hostages."

The "hostage movie" was just cover for the total extermination of Gaza, the plan all along.

Do today’s‌ asylums provide “computer time” for lunatics like you to go online and explore? If so that explains everything with comments such as “there were never any hostages”, “there was no 10/7 attack” or ”the hostage movie was a fake”.

It’s one thing to say these crazy things, it’s another to actually believe them. You have to be a special kind of crazy. which appears to be your case. It also means you are beyond help,

 

[Roudy]

You mean other than their ongoing genocide of the people who moved into their ancestral homeland after they abandoned it?




Well, if you read the Bible, they most certainly did. Pontius Pilate didn't want to kill Jesus. He went out of his way to try to spare Jesus, but the angry JEWISH mob wasn't having it. He even offered them a choice between killing Jesus and a murderer named Barabas. They chose to spare Barabas.

Now, I don't believe Jesus actually existed, but if you want a beef with Christianity, it's kind of baked into the founding documents. Vatican II was just a spin job. "OH, it was Satan who killed Jesus, not the Jewish Mob who demanded his death!!!"




Well, let's look at the complaints with Jews by Christians.

That they were responsible for the revolutions in Russia and Germany that brought so much misery into Europe after WWI. that was a valid complaint.

They collaborated with the Islamic Occupiers of Spain until the Christians finally won.

They were the tax collectors for the Tsar in Russia.

Because Christians were not allowed to loan money at an interest rate (usury), Jews became the money lenders, and resented for it.

So those are the historical complaints. Some are valid, while others are not.

The bigger problem today is a lot of Americans look at AIPAC, look how when Zionist Lobby yells "Jump", politicians from both parties say, "HOW HIGH?"

You've made us an accomplice to your evil, and some of us just don't like it. We don't like that America keeps getting dragged into wars in the Middle East. (Has been going on since I was a young lad in the US Army. I 'm an old man now, and it's still going on!)




Because it's not terribly relevant. This boy had a pre-existing condition. A condition made worse by the fact the Zionists have bombed all the health care clinics and cut off the food supply.

So, yes, in a famine, the weakest always die first. No big surprise there.

Ha ha ha, you are funny. I read the Bible it doesn’t mention a Palestine or Palestinian people. Same with the Koran. Both books do indeed mention mention Israel and Jerusalem many times and also say that it is the homeland of the Jews.

The Roman’s would not be “listening” to the Jews as they were occupied rebels trying to repel Romans invasion.

Jesus was a Jew and one of hundreds of thousands of people that were crucified by the Romans for variety of reasons, including claiming to be the son of god, which is what Jesus did according to the Bible. Only the emperor can make that claim.

 

[Failzero]

Do today’s‌ asylums provide “computer time” for lunatics like you to go online and explore? If so that explains everything with comments such as “there were never any hostages”, “there was no 10/7 attack” or ”the hostage movie was a fake”.

It’s one thing to say these crazy things, it’s another to actually believe them. You have to be a special kind of crazy. which appears to be your case. It also means you are beyond help,

Revisionist History run amok

 

[EMH]

Do today’s‌ asylums provide “computer time” for lunatics like you to go online and explore? If so that explains everything with comments such as “there were never any hostages”, “there was no 10/7 attack” or ”the hostage movie was a fake”.

It’s one thing to say these crazy things, it’s another to actually believe them. You have to be a special kind of crazy. which appears to be your case. It also means you are beyond help,

Trump to Tucker Carlson = many people tell me 107 did not happen

108 RAV:
interviews church leader in Nazareth = WE HAD A QUIET NIGHT

Charlie Kirk on 108

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/10/17/charlie_kirk_did_someone_in_israel_tell_army_to_stand_down_during_attack_thats_a_legitimate_non-conspiracy_question.html

CHARLIE KIRK: I've been to Israel many times, the whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe.

I've been to that Gaza border. You cannot go ten feet without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. The whole country is surveilled. Let me just go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often and most Americans don't know this. In the last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war, it's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration, he said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets, that's all gone. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead.

I'm not willing to go so far to say Netanyahu knew, or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand-down order? Was there a stand-down order?

Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel is the size of New Jersey, when I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it was 45 minutes. For six hours, they're live streaming the killing of Jews. Did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate non-conpiracy question.


Early November CBS this Morning shows entire Tel Aviv skyline and highway system 100% undamaged



107 was a complete bullshit hate hoax, and only treasonously stupid people believe it.

 

[JoeB131]

Ha ha ha, you are funny. I read the Bible it doesn’t mention a Palestine or Palestinian people. Same with the Koran. Both books do indeed mention mention Israel and Jerusalem many times and also say that it is the homeland of the Jews.

The Roman’s would not be “listening” to the Jews as they were occupied rebels trying to repel Romans invasion.

Um, the Bible talks quite a lot about the "Philistines". "Palestine" is just a Latinization of "Philistine", which is what the Romans called the province after they got sick of the Jews and their nonsense. (The last straw was when they staged yet another revolt in 117 AD when Trajan was trying to conquer Parthia!)

Again, I am going by the Bible's account. Pilate let the mob decide who was getting crucified that day.

Jesus was a Jew and one of hundreds of thousands of people that were crucified by the Romans for variety of reasons, including claiming to be the son of god, which is what Jesus did according to the Bible. Only the emperor can make that claim.

Except the Romans didn't care. (Not that the Emperor claimed to be the "Son of God". In fact, Tiberius, who was Emperor at that time, was one of the Emperors who didn't get deified after death.)

In fact, Pilate tried to fob Jesus off on Herod Antipas, who was King of Galilee. (At that time, still a Roman client state.)

 

[Roudy]

Um, the Bible talks quite a lot about the "Philistines". "Palestine" is just a Latinization of "Philistine", which is what the Romans called the province after they got sick of the Jews and their nonsense. (The last straw was when they staged yet another revolt in 117 AD when Trajan was trying to conquer Parthia!)

Again, I am going by the Bible's account. Pilate let the mob decide who was getting crucified that day.


Except the Romans didn't care. (Not that the Emperor claimed to be the "Son of God". In fact, Tiberius, who was Emperor at that time, was one of the Emperors who didn't get deified after death.)

In fact, Pilate tried to fob Jesus off on Herod Antipas, who was King of Galilee. (At that time, still a Roman client state.)

Philistines have nothing to do with “Palestinians” ya dipshit. They were a sea faring people that were defeated and are extinct. That’s exactly why it is not mentioned in the Bible or the Koran, it simply did not exist. All three holy books refer to Israel and Jerusalem as the ETERNAL land of of the Jews, look it up. Both Jesus and his disciples were Jews that lived in Israel. Jesus was a Jew that wanted to his his people and God’s promised land from the Roman occupation.

Palestinians are Arab squatters, mostly from Egypt and Jordan that started calling themselves Palestinians circa 1970’s. You’re just another ignorant antisemitic pro Palestinian moron that is jumping from one bullshit theory to another like a chicken with its head cut off.

By the time Israel is done, it will have annexed the so called “West Bank” (another recently invented name) and completely occupied Gaza, after turning it into the rubble. That’s what happens when you behave like subhuman savage animals on Oct. 7.

The Palestinians in Gaza will have moved back to where they came from, to Egypt, Jordan and Egypt. Many already have, there is nothing left to stay for. Hams has been defeated what left is a few coward animals hiding hostages and dead bodies behind their own women and children. They think that’s going to save them, it won’t.

 

[Roudy]

Philistines have nothing to do with “Palestinians” ya dipshit. They were a sea faring people that were defeated and are extinct. That’s exactly why it is not mentioned in the Bible or the Koran, it simply did not exist. All three holy books refer to Israel and Jerusalem as the ETERNAL land of of the Jews, look it up. Both Jesus and his disciples were Jews that lived in Israel. Jesus was a Jew that wanted to his his people and God’s promised land from the Roman occupation.

Palestinians are Arab squatters, mostly from Egypt and Jordan that started calling themselves Palestinians circa 1970’s. You’re just another ignorant antisemitic pro Palestinian moron that is jumping from one bullshit theory to another like a chicken with its head cut off.

By the time Israel is done, it will have annexed the so called “West Bank” (another recently invented name) and completely occupied Gaza, after turning it into the rubble. That’s what happens when you behave like subhuman savage animals on Oct. 7.

It is from the term "Philistines" that the name "Palestinians" has been taken. Actually, the ancient Philistines and modern Palestinians have something in common: both are invaders from other lands! That is precisely the meaning of their name, that is not an ethnic denomination but an adjective applied to them: Peleshet, from the verb "pelesh", "dividers", "penetrators" or "invaders". The Philistines were a confederation of non-Semitic peoples coming from Crete, the Aegean Islands and Asia Minor, also known as "Sea Peoples". The main tribes were Shekelesh, Shardana, Tsikel or Thekker, Akhaiusha or Ekwesh, Danauna or Denyen, Masa or Meshuesh, Uashesh, Teresh or Tursha, Keshesh or Karkisha, Lukka or Rukka, and Labu. The original homeland of the group that ruled the Philistine federation, namely the "Pelesati", was the island of Crete. When the Minoic civilization collapsed, also the Minoic culture disappeared from Crete, as invaders from Greece took control of the island. These ancient Cretans arrived in Southern Canaan and were known as "Peleshtim" by Hebrews and Canaanites (that became allied to fight the invaders). They also invaded Egypt and were defeated by Pharaoh Ramose III in the 12thcentury b.c.e. The Philistines were organized in city-states, being the most important the Pentapolis: Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath and Ekron, and their territory was close to the Mediterranean coast, a little longer and broader than the present-day "Gaza Strip" - not the whole Judah, they never reached Hevron, Jerusalem or Yericho!
Those Sea Peoples that invaded Egypt were expelled towards other Mediterranean lands and did not evolve into any Arab people, but disappeared as distinguishable groups in Roman times. Those dwelling in Canaan were defeated by King David and reduced to insignificance, the best warriors among them were chosen as David's bodyguard. The remaining Philistines still dwelling in Gaza were subdued by Sargon II of Assyria and after that time, they disappeared definitively from history. They are no longer mentioned since the return of the Jewish exiles from Babylon.
Conclusion: there is not one single person in the world who may be able to prove Philistine lineage, yet, if Palestinians insist, they have to recognize themselves as invaders in Israel, and then they must ask Greece to return them back the Isle of Crete! The Philistines are extinct and claims to alleged links with them are utterly false as they are historically impossible to establish. In any case, claiming a Philistine heritage is idle because it cannot legitimate any land in which they were foreign occupants and not native dwellers. Philistines were not Arabs, and the only feature in common between both peoples is that in Israel they should be regarded as invaders, Philistines from the sea and Arabs from the wilderness. They do not want Jerusalem because it is their city, which is not and never has been, they simply want to take her from the Jews, to whom she has belonged for three thousand years. The Philistines wanted to take from Israelites the Holy Ark of the Covenant, modern so-called Palestinians want to take from them the Holy City of the Covenant.

 

[Roudy]

Trump to Tucker Carlson = many people tell me 107 did not happen

108 RAV:
interviews church leader in Nazareth = WE HAD A QUIET NIGHT

Charlie Kirk on 108

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/10/17/charlie_kirk_did_someone_in_israel_tell_army_to_stand_down_during_attack_thats_a_legitimate_non-conspiracy_question.html

CHARLIE KIRK: I've been to Israel many times, the whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe.

I've been to that Gaza border. You cannot go ten feet without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. The whole country is surveilled. Let me just go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often and most Americans don't know this. In the last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war, it's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration, he said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets, that's all gone. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead.

I'm not willing to go so far to say Netanyahu knew, or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand-down order? Was there a stand-down order?

Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel is the size of New Jersey, when I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it was 45 minutes. For six hours, they're live streaming the killing of Jews. Did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate non-conpiracy question.


Early November CBS this Morning shows entire Tel Aviv skyline and highway system 100% undamaged



107 was a complete bullshit hate hoax, and only treasonously stupid people believe it.

Yes it’s hard to believe the level of savagery and barbarism that Palestinian animals committed on Oct. 7. But nothing is surprising when it comes to the so called Palestinians. What isn’t hard to believe are lunatics like you denying it ever happened. There are zombies out there still denying that the Holocaust happened as well. No difference between the two other that the fact that Oct. 7 has so much more video proof and quotes from their leaders proudly claiming they did “The Flood” and will do it over and over, if given the chance to. You must be a special kind of stupid that is not even willing to take hamas at its own word:

Hamas official vows to repeat Israel attacks ‘again and again’ until it’s destroyed

The brutal statement underscored the prospect of continued violence and misery in the region as Hamas and Israel both vowed to eradicate each the other and denied their right to exist.

nypost.com

Hamas In Their Own Words Since The October 7 Attack

Table Of Contents Introduction Mohammed Deif – Hamas Military Commander Hamas Military Commander Mohammed Deif Announces Launch Of Operation Al-Aqsa Deluge, Calls On Palestinians In West Bank, Jerusalem, And Israel Proper To Attacks With Guns, Knives, Vehicles Ismail Haniya – Hamas Chief Hamas...

www.memri.org

 

[Roudy]

Trump to Tucker Carlson = many people tell me 107 did not happen

108 RAV:
interviews church leader in Nazareth = WE HAD A QUIET NIGHT

Charlie Kirk on 108

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/10/17/charlie_kirk_did_someone_in_israel_tell_army_to_stand_down_during_attack_thats_a_legitimate_non-conspiracy_question.html

CHARLIE KIRK: I've been to Israel many times, the whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe.

I've been to that Gaza border. You cannot go ten feet without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. The whole country is surveilled. Let me just go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often and most Americans don't know this. In the last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war, it's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration, he said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets, that's all gone. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead.

I'm not willing to go so far to say Netanyahu knew, or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand-down order? Was there a stand-down order?

Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel is the size of New Jersey, when I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it was 45 minutes. For six hours, they're live streaming the killing of Jews. Did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate non-conpiracy question.


Early November CBS this Morning shows entire Tel Aviv skyline and highway system 100% undamaged



107 was a complete bullshit hate hoax, and only treasonously stupid people believe it.

During the interview, Hamad said: “Israel is a country that has no place on our land,” explaining that it was the job of Hamas to “remove that country.”

Questioned about the October 7 atrocities, Hamad responded:

“We must teach Israel a lesson, and we will do this again and again. The Al-Aqsa Flood is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth, because we have the determination, the resolve, and the capabilities to fight… Nobody should blame us. On October 7, October 10, October one million — everything we do is justified.”

 

[EMH]

Yes it’s hard to believe the level of savagery and barbarism that Palestinian animals committed on Oct. 7. But nothing is surprising when it comes to the so called Palestinians. What isn’t hard to believe are lunatics like you denying it ever happened. There are zombies out there still denying that the Holocaust happened as well. No difference between the two other that the fact that Oct. 7 has so much more video proof and quotes from their leaders proudly claiming they did “The Flood” and will do it over and over, if given the chance to. You must be a special kind of stupid that is not even willing to take hamas at its own word:

Hamas official vows to repeat Israel attacks ‘again and again’ until it’s destroyed

The brutal statement underscored the prospect of continued violence and misery in the region as Hamas and Israel both vowed to eradicate each the other and denied their right to exist.

nypost.com

Hamas In Their Own Words Since The October 7 Attack

Table Of Contents Introduction Mohammed Deif – Hamas Military Commander Hamas Military Commander Mohammed Deif Announces Launch Of Operation Al-Aqsa Deluge, Calls On Palestinians In West Bank, Jerusalem, And Israel Proper To Attacks With Guns, Knives, Vehicles Ismail Haniya – Hamas Chief Hamas...

www.memri.org

Mossad Actors.

Hamas was completely wiped out by January 2024.

The "hostage movie" is 100% about enabling the genocide and land grab, the real objective all along as it was in 67 when Israel lied about being attacked to justify.

Simon Elliot is the director of the Faux News "hostage movie" for treasonous self proclaimed sub human morons

 

[JoeB131]

Philistines have nothing to do with “Palestinians” ya dipshit. They were a sea faring people that were defeated and are extinct. That’s exactly why it is not mentioned in the Bible or the Koran, it simply did not exist. All three holy books refer to Israel and Jerusalem as the ETERNAL land of of the Jews, look it up. Both Jesus and his disciples were Jews that lived in Israel. Jesus was a Jew that wanted to his his people and God’s promised land from the Roman occupation.

Um, that's two Holy Books, not three. And those holy Books mention Flying Horses and talking snakes, so I don't think they can be taken terribly seriously

Actually, there is a lot more evidence the Philistines were the indigenous people of the land, not the Hebrews.

Myth: The name "Palestine" was a Roman invention | Decolonize Palestine

The origins of the name 'Palestine' predate the existence of the Roman empire. This has not stopped Israeli apologists from claiming that this name was invented by the Romans to punish the Jewish people.

decolonizepalestine.com

It was during Classical Antiquity and the Hellenistic period (~500-135 BC) that the name “Palestine” as we know it today took form. The use of the terms Palaistine or Phalastin were widespread in the literature of the period. Philosophers and scientists such as Ptolemy and Aristotle spoke of Palaistine, and Herodotus’ Histories commonly used the name Palestine.

In these writings, the use of the name Palaistine did not refer solely to the areas ruled by the Philistines at one point or another, but to wider swaths of the region, in some cases even stretching as far as what we would today call Jordan.

Palestinians are Arab squatters, mostly from Egypt and Jordan that started calling themselves Palestinians circa 1970’s. You’re just another ignorant antisemitic pro Palestinian moron that is jumping from one bullshit theory to another like a chicken with its head cut off.

Wait, now, the people who have lived in the region for centuries are "Squatters", but the people who can trace their origins to Europe within one or two generations are indigenous? Is this the logic you are going with.

By the time Israel is done, it will have annexed the so called “West Bank” (another recently invented name) and completely occupied Gaza, after turning it into the rubble. That’s what happens when you behave like subhuman savage animals on Oct. 7.

Actually, I doubt Israel will exist in its current form in 50 years. The world is already turning against the apartheid system. They will either have to go with a two-state solution (with a fair distribution of the land) or a one state solution where ALL Arabs are equal to Jews, which would need to be a much more secular state.

The Palestinians in Gaza will have moved back to where they came from, to Egypt, Jordan and Egypt. Many already have, there is nothing left to stay for. Hams has been defeated what left is a few coward animals hiding hostages and dead bodies behind their own women and children. They think that’s going to save them, it won’t.

Again, Ethnic Cleansing.

Somewhere in Hell, Hitler must be enjoying the irony.

 

[Roudy]

Um, that's two Holy Books, not three. And those holy Books mention Flying Horses and talking snakes, so I don't think they can be taken terribly seriously

Actually, there is a lot more evidence the Philistines were the indigenous people of the land, not the Hebrews.

Myth: The name "Palestine" was a Roman invention | Decolonize Palestine

The origins of the name 'Palestine' predate the existence of the Roman empire. This has not stopped Israeli apologists from claiming that this name was invented by the Romans to punish the Jewish people.

decolonizepalestine.com

It was during Classical Antiquity and the Hellenistic period (~500-135 BC) that the name “Palestine” as we know it today took form. The use of the terms Palaistine or Phalastin were widespread in the literature of the period. Philosophers and scientists such as Ptolemy and Aristotle spoke of Palaistine, and Herodotus’ Histories commonly used the name Palestine.

In these writings, the use of the name Palaistine did not refer solely to the areas ruled by the Philistines at one point or another, but to wider swaths of the region, in some cases even stretching as far as what we would today call Jordan.




Wait, now, the people who have lived in the region for centuries are "Squatters", but the people who can trace their origins to Europe within one or two generations are indigenous? Is this the logic you are going with.



Actually, I doubt Israel will exist in its current form in 50 years. The world is already turning against the apartheid system. They will either have to go with a two-state solution (with a fair distribution of the land) or a one state solution where ALL Arabs are equal to Jews, which would need to be a much more secular state.


Again, Ethnic Cleansing.

Somewhere in Hell, Hitler must be enjoying the irony.

Lived in the region can be Jordan and Egypt dipstick. It’s the Arabs and Muslims that have ethnically cleansed all minorities including Jews and Christians you ignorant fool.

 

[Lisa558]

Lived in the region can be Jordan and Egypt dipstick. It’s the Arabs and Muslims that have ethnically cleansed all minorities including Jews and Christians you ignorant fool.

Yup. Look at how the Muslims and Arabs ethnically cleansed the Jews from 99% of the Middle East:

 

[JoeB131]

Lived in the region can be Jordan and Egypt dipstick. It’s the Arabs and Muslims that have ethnically cleansed all minorities including Jews and Christians you ignorant fool.

It can be Jordan, but it was Palestine.

"A land without a people" was a lie then, and it's a lie now.

Yup. Look at how the Muslims and Arabs ethnically cleansed the Jews from 99% of the Middle East:

Most of them left voluntarily.

Wow, this amazing thing, when you screw people over, they try to screw you over back.

 

[Roudy]

It can be Jordan, but it was Palestine.

"A land without a people" was a lie then, and it's a lie now.



Most of them left voluntarily.

Wow, this amazing thing, when you screw people over, they try to screw you over back.

Ha ha, finally we get to the truth, Jordan, another recently invented word, is actually Palestine.