Nobel Committee Regrets Giving Obama The Peace Prize Now..."the prize was a mistake.."

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Jul 21, 2009
130,699
66,872
2,645
Headmaster's Office, Hogwarts
Looks like they suffer from an extreme case of regret taking into consideration that Obama has caused so much death and destruction in the Middle-East.



Nobeltimeline-Obama-articleLarge-1000x640.jpg


Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize - BBC News

What an amazing feat Barack Obama pulled in winning a Nobel Piece Prize a mere nine months into his presidency, “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” What are some examples of those efforts? Not being George W. Bush — and that’s about the extent of it.

There was widespread consensus the prize was politically motivated, and even Obama said he was shocked by it and didn’t consider himself worthy of the reward (but accepted it anyway). Since then, Obama’s set the record as the only Nobel Peace Prize laureate to have bombed another, when U.S./NATO planes bombed a hospital operated by Doctors Without Borders in October of last year.

Needless to say, after actually having a record by which to judge Obama, many in the Nobel committee are regretting awarding him the prize. As The Blaze reported: Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama in 2009 was an experiment to encourage the newly elected Democrat to follow through on his lofty promises, according to at least one former member of the Nobel committee. But apparently, that was a failed experiment.

http://www.allenbwest.com/mlee/first-democrats-lose-election-now
A regretful Geir Lundestad, onetime secretary of the Nobel committee, told the Associated Press that he hoped the award would strengthen Obama. But it didn’t, according to the group, despite the White House’s belief that the president “lived up to the standard that he has set for himself” regarding the prize.

Instead of being an encouraging sign, the award was met with palpable indignation, particularly among conservatives who believed Obama should have done something rather than spoken something to receive the lofty prize.

“No Nobel Peace Prize ever elicited more attention than the 2009 prize to Barack Obama,” Lundestad, who is working on his memoir, reportedly wrote in the forthcoming book. “Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake. In that sense, the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for.”


OUCH: Nobel Prize committee ADMITS the unthinkable about Obama... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com
 
Obama used the Nobel Peace Prize to clean his anus after taking in multiple gay lovers.
 
Yeah, I read about this when it first hit the news last year. No surprise really. They gave it to him based on hope and what might be. With some luck they will have learned a lesson...
 
Yeah, I read about this when it first hit the news last year. No surprise really. They gave it to him based on hope and what might be. With some luck they will have learned a lesson...
They gave him the award because Obama paid them $100 million......and because he wasn't GWB.
 
cut it out JERKS----it was a vote of CONFIDENCE------the Syrian thing is
not his fault
 
Don't worry, they'll get it back In about 5 years...

(They just need to check pawnshops in his area)
 
Looks like they suffer from an extreme case of regret taking into consideration that Obama has caused so much death and destruction in the Middle-East.



Nobeltimeline-Obama-articleLarge-1000x640.jpg


Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize - BBC News

What an amazing feat Barack Obama pulled in winning a Nobel Piece Prize a mere nine months into his presidency, “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” What are some examples of those efforts? Not being George W. Bush — and that’s about the extent of it.

There was widespread consensus the prize was politically motivated, and even Obama said he was shocked by it and didn’t consider himself worthy of the reward (but accepted it anyway). Since then, Obama’s set the record as the only Nobel Peace Prize laureate to have bombed another, when U.S./NATO planes bombed a hospital operated by Doctors Without Borders in October of last year.

Needless to say, after actually having a record by which to judge Obama, many in the Nobel committee are regretting awarding him the prize. As The Blaze reported: Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama in 2009 was an experiment to encourage the newly elected Democrat to follow through on his lofty promises, according to at least one former member of the Nobel committee. But apparently, that was a failed experiment.

A regretful Geir Lundestad, onetime secretary of the Nobel committee, told the Associated Press that he hoped the award would strengthen Obama. But it didn’t, according to the group, despite the White House’s belief that the president “lived up to the standard that he has set for himself” regarding the prize.

Instead of being an encouraging sign, the award was met with palpable indignation, particularly among conservatives who believed Obama should have done something rather than spoken something to receive the lofty prize.

“No Nobel Peace Prize ever elicited more attention than the 2009 prize to Barack Obama,” Lundestad, who is working on his memoir, reportedly wrote in the forthcoming book. “Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake. In that sense, the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for.”


OUCH: Nobel Prize committee ADMITS the unthinkable about Obama... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com
From your own, the original AP link without West's heavy editorializing:

Geir Lundestad told the AP news agency that the committee hoped the award would strengthen Mr Obama.
Instead, the decision was met with
criticism in the US. Many argued he had not had any impact worthy of the award...
"Even many of Obama's supporters believed that the prize was a mistake," he says. "In that sense the committee didn't achieve what it had hoped for".

Your title is a serious misquote. The words actually say the prize didn't have the desired effect because of Americans' reaction to it. It had nothing to do with anything Obama did or didn't do.
 
I think most people knew because of the atmosphere around the world at that time regarding Obama, that this award was nothing more than piling on the bandwagon.
The Nobel people really damaged their credibility, and forever their awards will always be looked upon very suspiciously.
 
Looks like they suffer from an extreme case of regret taking into consideration that Obama has caused so much death and destruction in the Middle-East.



Nobeltimeline-Obama-articleLarge-1000x640.jpg


Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize - BBC News

What an amazing feat Barack Obama pulled in winning a Nobel Piece Prize a mere nine months into his presidency, “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” What are some examples of those efforts? Not being George W. Bush — and that’s about the extent of it.

There was widespread consensus the prize was politically motivated, and even Obama said he was shocked by it and didn’t consider himself worthy of the reward (but accepted it anyway). Since then, Obama’s set the record as the only Nobel Peace Prize laureate to have bombed another, when U.S./NATO planes bombed a hospital operated by Doctors Without Borders in October of last year.

Needless to say, after actually having a record by which to judge Obama, many in the Nobel committee are regretting awarding him the prize. As The Blaze reported: Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama in 2009 was an experiment to encourage the newly elected Democrat to follow through on his lofty promises, according to at least one former member of the Nobel committee. But apparently, that was a failed experiment.

A regretful Geir Lundestad, onetime secretary of the Nobel committee, told the Associated Press that he hoped the award would strengthen Obama. But it didn’t, according to the group, despite the White House’s belief that the president “lived up to the standard that he has set for himself” regarding the prize.

Instead of being an encouraging sign, the award was met with palpable indignation, particularly among conservatives who believed Obama should have done something rather than spoken something to receive the lofty prize.

“No Nobel Peace Prize ever elicited more attention than the 2009 prize to Barack Obama,” Lundestad, who is working on his memoir, reportedly wrote in the forthcoming book. “Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake. In that sense, the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for.”


OUCH: Nobel Prize committee ADMITS the unthinkable about Obama... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com


Sadly the light bulb came on a bit late
 
Looks like they suffer from an extreme case of regret taking into consideration that Obama has caused so much death and destruction in the Middle-East.



Nobeltimeline-Obama-articleLarge-1000x640.jpg


Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize - BBC News

What an amazing feat Barack Obama pulled in winning a Nobel Piece Prize a mere nine months into his presidency, “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” What are some examples of those efforts? Not being George W. Bush — and that’s about the extent of it.

There was widespread consensus the prize was politically motivated, and even Obama said he was shocked by it and didn’t consider himself worthy of the reward (but accepted it anyway). Since then, Obama’s set the record as the only Nobel Peace Prize laureate to have bombed another, when U.S./NATO planes bombed a hospital operated by Doctors Without Borders in October of last year.

Needless to say, after actually having a record by which to judge Obama, many in the Nobel committee are regretting awarding him the prize. As The Blaze reported: Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama in 2009 was an experiment to encourage the newly elected Democrat to follow through on his lofty promises, according to at least one former member of the Nobel committee. But apparently, that was a failed experiment.

A regretful Geir Lundestad, onetime secretary of the Nobel committee, told the Associated Press that he hoped the award would strengthen Obama. But it didn’t, according to the group, despite the White House’s belief that the president “lived up to the standard that he has set for himself” regarding the prize.

Instead of being an encouraging sign, the award was met with palpable indignation, particularly among conservatives who believed Obama should have done something rather than spoken something to receive the lofty prize.

“No Nobel Peace Prize ever elicited more attention than the 2009 prize to Barack Obama,” Lundestad, who is working on his memoir, reportedly wrote in the forthcoming book. “Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake. In that sense, the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for.”


OUCH: Nobel Prize committee ADMITS the unthinkable about Obama... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com
From your own, the original AP link without West's heavy editorializing:

Geir Lundestad told the AP news agency that the committee hoped the award would strengthen Mr Obama.
Instead, the decision was met with
criticism in the US. Many argued he had not had any impact worthy of the award...
"Even many of Obama's supporters believed that the prize was a mistake," he says. "In that sense the committee didn't achieve what it had hoped for".

Your title is a serious misquote. The words actually say the prize didn't have the desired effect because of Americans' reaction to it. It had nothing to do with anything Obama did or didn't do.
A misquote only if you cherry-pick the article.
 
Looks like they suffer from an extreme case of regret taking into consideration that Obama has caused so much death and destruction in the Middle-East.



Nobeltimeline-Obama-articleLarge-1000x640.jpg


Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize - BBC News

What an amazing feat Barack Obama pulled in winning a Nobel Piece Prize a mere nine months into his presidency, “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” What are some examples of those efforts? Not being George W. Bush — and that’s about the extent of it.

There was widespread consensus the prize was politically motivated, and even Obama said he was shocked by it and didn’t consider himself worthy of the reward (but accepted it anyway). Since then, Obama’s set the record as the only Nobel Peace Prize laureate to have bombed another, when U.S./NATO planes bombed a hospital operated by Doctors Without Borders in October of last year.

Needless to say, after actually having a record by which to judge Obama, many in the Nobel committee are regretting awarding him the prize. As The Blaze reported: Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama in 2009 was an experiment to encourage the newly elected Democrat to follow through on his lofty promises, according to at least one former member of the Nobel committee. But apparently, that was a failed experiment.

A regretful Geir Lundestad, onetime secretary of the Nobel committee, told the Associated Press that he hoped the award would strengthen Obama. But it didn’t, according to the group, despite the White House’s belief that the president “lived up to the standard that he has set for himself” regarding the prize.

Instead of being an encouraging sign, the award was met with palpable indignation, particularly among conservatives who believed Obama should have done something rather than spoken something to receive the lofty prize.

“No Nobel Peace Prize ever elicited more attention than the 2009 prize to Barack Obama,” Lundestad, who is working on his memoir, reportedly wrote in the forthcoming book. “Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake. In that sense, the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for.”


OUCH: Nobel Prize committee ADMITS the unthinkable about Obama... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com


Once time has passed and the left wing moron historians have died and gone wherever they think they go........history will not be kind to barry........and it won't take as long as the truth about FDR....
 
Yeah, I read about this when it first hit the news last year. No surprise really. They gave it to him based on hope and what might be. With some luck they will have learned a lesson...


They are left wing dimwits....they haven't learned anything....
 
Looks like they suffer from an extreme case of regret taking into consideration that Obama has caused so much death and destruction in the Middle-East.



Nobeltimeline-Obama-articleLarge-1000x640.jpg


Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize - BBC News

What an amazing feat Barack Obama pulled in winning a Nobel Piece Prize a mere nine months into his presidency, “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” What are some examples of those efforts? Not being George W. Bush — and that’s about the extent of it.

There was widespread consensus the prize was politically motivated, and even Obama said he was shocked by it and didn’t consider himself worthy of the reward (but accepted it anyway). Since then, Obama’s set the record as the only Nobel Peace Prize laureate to have bombed another, when U.S./NATO planes bombed a hospital operated by Doctors Without Borders in October of last year.

Needless to say, after actually having a record by which to judge Obama, many in the Nobel committee are regretting awarding him the prize. As The Blaze reported: Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama in 2009 was an experiment to encourage the newly elected Democrat to follow through on his lofty promises, according to at least one former member of the Nobel committee. But apparently, that was a failed experiment.

A regretful Geir Lundestad, onetime secretary of the Nobel committee, told the Associated Press that he hoped the award would strengthen Obama. But it didn’t, according to the group, despite the White House’s belief that the president “lived up to the standard that he has set for himself” regarding the prize.

Instead of being an encouraging sign, the award was met with palpable indignation, particularly among conservatives who believed Obama should have done something rather than spoken something to receive the lofty prize.

“No Nobel Peace Prize ever elicited more attention than the 2009 prize to Barack Obama,” Lundestad, who is working on his memoir, reportedly wrote in the forthcoming book. “Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake. In that sense, the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for.”


OUCH: Nobel Prize committee ADMITS the unthinkable about Obama... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com
From your own, the original AP link without West's heavy editorializing:

Geir Lundestad told the AP news agency that the committee hoped the award would strengthen Mr Obama.
Instead, the decision was met with
criticism in the US. Many argued he had not had any impact worthy of the award...
"Even many of Obama's supporters believed that the prize was a mistake," he says. "In that sense the committee didn't achieve what it had hoped for".

Your title is a serious misquote. The words actually say the prize didn't have the desired effect because of Americans' reaction to it. It had nothing to do with anything Obama did or didn't do.
A misquote only if you cherry-pick the article.
I read your link and bolded just to assist you with the close reading required to make out what the article meant. What the secretary said did NOT say what your OP/title said. At all.
This is one of your scurvier scummier efforts.
 
I think most people knew because of the atmosphere around the world at that time regarding Obama, that this award was nothing more than piling on the bandwagon.
The Nobel people really damaged their credibility, and forever their awards will always be looked upon very suspiciously.


No....they haven't had credibility since they gave it to one of the worlds leading terrorists....

Yasser Arafat - Wikipedia

In 1994 Arafat received the Nobel Peace Prize,

Now that was a joke.....
 
How stupid are these left wing dim wits....he is allowing iran, the biggest sponsor of terrorism around the world to get nuclear weapons......the guy is a true dumb fuck....
 

Forum List

Back
Top