NOAA/NASA temperature data ALL FAKE!!!

[SSDD]

He wasn't lying....the gray areas are areas of missing data...perhaps there are thermometers there...but missing data is missing data and it is still filled in...ie...made up. Generally, less than 20% of the globe is actually included in the global temperature average...the rest is just filled in using various spurious methods.

 

[Billy_Bob]

He wasn't lying....the gray areas are areas of missing data...perhaps there are thermometers there...but missing data is missing data and it is still filled in...ie...made up. Generally, less than 20% of the globe is actually included in the global temperature average...the rest is just filled in using various spurious methods.

Correct!

This is how Karl Et Al obtained its spurious warming. It is now wholly exposed by those who were tasked with the deception. The locomotive is now fully off the tracks and now the deception is being exposed.

 

[Billy_Bob]

In-filling of data to create the illusion of warming..

Or deniers lying about no data stations in Central Africa!

From the OP's link

Actual data stations in Africa:

An awful lot of data station red dots in the grey no data stations areas of the denier's phony map of data stations.

You haven't studied Karl Et Al at all have you? They threw out land based data and inserted infilling.. This is precisely the deception that is being exposed today by the people who are blowing the whistle.

 

[edthecynic]

He wasn't lying....the gray areas are areas of missing data...perhaps there are thermometers there...but missing data is missing data and it is still filled in...ie...made up. Generally, less than 20% of the globe is actually included in the global temperature average...the rest is just filled in using various spurious methods.

Please prove your bullshit!

 

[edthecynic]

You haven studied Karl Et Al at all have you? They threw out land based data and inserted infilling.. This is precisely the deception that is being exposed today by the people who are blowing the whistle.

Actually, no, that was not Bates' objection, but it is no surprise that is you will lie about no data from Central Africa, you will lie about Bates' objections.

Bates' objection was that the Karl study was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process, which Bates devised.

 

[Old Rocks]

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

 

[SSDD]

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

So let me ask again rocks....I have asked repeatedly for you to point out a single thing in that link...or any of the links it provides that you would call observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence supporting the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...and to date, you haven't come up with a single thing...you haven't even tried...you must know what a weak pile of shit it is and just hope that by sending people off to it they may find something there that fools them as thoroughly as it has fooled you.

 

[skookerasbil]

Nah......what hoax?

Check the link.........imaginary data.
https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data-is-fake-data/
You alarmist bozo's are such a bunch of suckers!!!

Actually the SUCKERS are those stupid enough to swallow the lies on your link!
A perfect example of how everything that comes from the deniers is a lie is your link's blink map.

If you pay attention the two blinks are of two different things. One is a map of land temperature ANOMALIES and the other is temperature PERCENTILES!!!!!!!!!

Here is the actual ANOMALY map:

lol.......ones a "land only" and one is a "land and ocean". You fucking dummy!!

The PERCENTILE map your liars used in place of the anomaly map WAS land & ocean

lol......whatever you say s0n!!

In 2017, anything that doesn't conform with the established narrative for progressives is automatically labeled fake, their idea's so convincingly rejected, its the only play when you've been checkmated 4 billion times!!

Rigging the climate change data for the graphs = ghey.

 

[edthecynic]

Nah......what hoax?

Check the link.........imaginary data.
https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data-is-fake-data/
You alarmist bozo's are such a bunch of suckers!!!

Actually the SUCKERS are those stupid enough to swallow the lies on your link!
A perfect example of how everything that comes from the deniers is a lie is your link's blink map.

If you pay attention the two blinks are of two different things. One is a map of land temperature ANOMALIES and the other is temperature PERCENTILES!!!!!!!!!

Here is the actual ANOMALY map:

lol.......ones a "land only" and one is a "land and ocean". You fucking dummy!!

The PERCENTILE map your liars used in place of the anomaly map WAS land & ocean

lol......whatever you say s0n!!

In 2017, anything that doesn't conform with the established narrative for progressives is automatically labeled fake, their idea's so convincingly rejected, its the only play when you've been checkmated 4 billion times!!

Rigging the climate change data for the graphs = ghey.

Well then that makes you the board's 3 dollar bill!

 

[jc456]

Damn, you're smoking some good shit!



Anyone that is rational wouldn't think that the only real data set on this planet is a fraud.

AND YET?

 

[skookerasbil]

Nah......what hoax?

Check the link.........imaginary data.
https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data-is-fake-data/
You alarmist bozo's are such a bunch of suckers!!!

Actually the SUCKERS are those stupid enough to swallow the lies on your link!
A perfect example of how everything that comes from the deniers is a lie is your link's blink map.

If you pay attention the two blinks are of two different things. One is a map of land temperature ANOMALIES and the other is temperature PERCENTILES!!!!!!!!!

Here is the actual ANOMALY map:

lol.......ones a "land only" and one is a "land and ocean". You fucking dummy!!

The PERCENTILE map your liars used in place of the anomaly map WAS land & ocean

lol......whatever you say s0n!!

In 2017, anything that doesn't conform with the established narrative for progressives is automatically labeled fake, their idea's so convincingly rejected, its the only play when you've been checkmated 4 billion times!!

Rigging the climate change data for the graphs = ghey.

Well then that makes you the board's 3 dollar bill!

Taking bows and dominating in here s0n..........skeptics dominate this forum. But good try with the attempt to muddy the waters with semantics spin with the graphs on page 1 of this thread. You phonies just hope nobody actually takes a good look. Trying to fake a data fake is ghey. You dickheads did it for 15 months on Trump.......how did that work out for ya???

 

[skookerasbil]

From today in Zero hedge........read by millions daily............

ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data

Dr John Bates' disclosures about the manipulation of data behind the so-called 'Pausebuster' paper is the biggest scientific scandal since 'Climategate' in 2009 when, as Britain's Daily Mail reported, thousands of leaked emails revealed scientists were trying to block access to data, and using a 'trick' to conceal embarrassing flaws in their claims about global warming.

Britain's Mail on Sunday today revealed astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

The whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.




http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-05/


Evidently, the whistle blower is highly regarded!!

More AGW k00k losing..............

 

[edthecynic]

From today in Zero hedge........read by millions daily............

ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data

Dr John Bates' disclosures about the manipulation of data behind the so-called 'Pausebuster' paper is the biggest scientific scandal since 'Climategate' in 2009 when, as Britain's Daily Mail reported, thousands of leaked emails revealed scientists were trying to block access to data, and using a 'trick' to conceal embarrassing flaws in their claims about global warming.

Britain's Mail on Sunday today revealed astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

The whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.




http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-05/


Evidently, the whistle blower is highly regarded!!

More AGW k00k losing..............

Zerohedge is fake news with zero credibility.
If you notice the only word in quotes from Bates is "unverified" all the other words are made up by the fake news writers.

 

[skookerasbil]

From today in Zero hedge........read by millions daily............

ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data

Dr John Bates' disclosures about the manipulation of data behind the so-called 'Pausebuster' paper is the biggest scientific scandal since 'Climategate' in 2009 when, as Britain's Daily Mail reported, thousands of leaked emails revealed scientists were trying to block access to data, and using a 'trick' to conceal embarrassing flaws in their claims about global warming.

Britain's Mail on Sunday today revealed astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

The whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.




http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-05/


Evidently, the whistle blower is highly regarded!!

More AGW k00k losing..............

Zerohedge is fake news with zero credibility.
If you notice the only word in quotes from Bates is "unverified" all the other words are made up by the fake news writers.

Actually, it is the only place you can get real journalism in 2017.......MSNBC, FOX, CNN, NBC et. al...........all fake and state controlled s0n. And whats great is, it took awhile but Americans who vote finally get it. Places like Breitbart and Zerohedge get more popular by the day.......the others......not so much @www.fakenewsisghey.com!

 

[edthecynic]

From today in Zero hedge........read by millions daily............

ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data

Dr John Bates' disclosures about the manipulation of data behind the so-called 'Pausebuster' paper is the biggest scientific scandal since 'Climategate' in 2009 when, as Britain's Daily Mail reported, thousands of leaked emails revealed scientists were trying to block access to data, and using a 'trick' to conceal embarrassing flaws in their claims about global warming.

Britain's Mail on Sunday today revealed astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

The whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.




http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-05/


Evidently, the whistle blower is highly regarded!!

More AGW k00k losing..............

Zerohedge is fake news with zero credibility.
If you notice the only word in quotes from Bates is "unverified" all the other words are made up by the fake news writers.

Actually, it is the only place you can get real journalism in 2017.......MSNBC, FOX, CNN, NBC et. al...........all fake and state controlled s0n. And whats great is, it took awhile but Americans who vote finally get it. Places like Breitbart and Zerohedge get more popular by the day.......the others......not so much @www.fakenewsisghey.com!

More "alternative-facts!"

 

[flacaltenn]

Nah......what hoax?

Check the link.........imaginary data.


https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data-is-fake-data/


You alarmist bozo's are such a bunch of suckers!!!

This revelation goes together with today's story in the Daily Mail about the NOAA whistle-blower. Looks like you MISSED that one Skooks. You're slipping. I'm beating you to it..

 

[flacaltenn]

From today in Zero hedge........read by millions daily............

ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data

Dr John Bates' disclosures about the manipulation of data behind the so-called 'Pausebuster' paper is the biggest scientific scandal since 'Climategate' in 2009 when, as Britain's Daily Mail reported, thousands of leaked emails revealed scientists were trying to block access to data, and using a 'trick' to conceal embarrassing flaws in their claims about global warming.

Britain's Mail on Sunday today revealed astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

The whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.




http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-05/


Evidently, the whistle blower is highly regarded!!

More AGW k00k losing..............

Zerohedge is fake news with zero credibility.
If you notice the only word in quotes from Bates is "unverified" all the other words are made up by the fake news writers.

Definitely not fake anything.. US media will soon be FORCED to bust their silence and report this. Because it's ENTIRELY credible. The jig is up --- the AGW fraud train is at the station..

From the Daily Mail..

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.



Read more: World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Junk science -- paid for by you BECAUSE "we know what's good for you"..

 

[flacaltenn]

In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data – the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) – of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation… in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’.

Dr Bates was one of two Principal Scientists at NCEI, based in Asheville, North Carolina.

A blatant attempt to intensify paper's impact
Official delegations from America, Britain and the EU were strongly influenced by the flawed NOAA study as they hammered out the Paris Agreement – and committed advanced nations to sweeping reductions in their use of fossil fuel and to spending £80 billion every year on new, climate-related aid projects.



Read more: World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[flacaltenn]

Nah......what hoax?

Check the link.........imaginary data.


https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data-is-fake-data/


You alarmist bozo's are such a bunch of suckers!!!

This revelation goes together with today's story in the Daily Mail about the NOAA whistle-blower. Looks like you MISSED that one Skooks. You're slipping. I'm beating you to it..

OK Skooks -- You didn't miss it.. But it should have been it's own topic.

 

[flacaltenn]

Both datasets were flawed. This newspaper has learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming. The revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend.

Read more: World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Pretty much what the reaction to the Karl paper propaganda was stating. Skeptics are USEFUL in science. Especially "UNSETTLED science". Like sticking a thermometer up the planet's ass and taking a simple temperature reading every day..