Let the Whistle Blowing Begin....

[SSDD]

I would imagine that this is only the beginning of a torrent of evidence that is quickly percolating to the surface with regard to the sham climate science has become. Climate gate gave us a peek behind the curtain...It probably won't be long before the whole damned curtain gets torn down and we all get to see the depth of the scam that has been perpetrated on us.

So go ahead all you first class seat holders on the AGW crazy train....lets see you, once again, attempt to defend the indefensible.

A look behind the curtain at NOAA’s climate data center.


I read with great irony recently that scientists are “frantically copying U.S. Climate data, fearing it might vanish under Trump” (e.g., Washington Post 13 December 2016). As a climate scientist formerly responsible for NOAA’s climate archive, the most critical issue in archival of climate data is actually scientists who are unwilling to formally archive and document their data. I spent the last decade cajoling climate scientists to archive their data and fully document the datasets. I established a climate data records program that was awarded a U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 2014 for visionary work in the acquisition, production, and preservation of climate data records (CDRs), which accurately describe the Earth’s changing environment.

Climate scientists versus climate data




BOMBSHELL – NOAA whistleblower says Karl et al. “pausebuster” paper was hyped, broke procedures

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

BOMBSHELL – NOAA whistleblower says Karl et al. “pausebuster” paper was hyped, broke procedures

NOAA Whistleblower reveals ‘Pausebuster’ scandal

David Rose in the Mail on Sunday reports that John J Bateshas revealed a host of questionable practices committed by NOAA scientists as they rushed through the ‘Pausebuster’ paper.


The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.
A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015

NOAA Whistleblower reveals ‘Pausebuster’ scandal

First NOAA Whistleblower


Heat’s On At NOAA As “High Level Whistle Blower” Exposes Data Fraud, “Scientific Integrity Breaches”!

“Irrefutable evidence”

The latest revelation, according to Online Mail, comes from “impeccable” NOAA scientist Dr. John Bates, who has shown “irrefutable evidence” that an NOAA paper showing accelerating global warming was rushed to be published just before the Paris Conference in 2015, and was “based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data“. The paper became to be known as the “Pausebuster” and was central in spurring the 2015 Paris Treaty.

Central African data made up entirely

On another matter, the NOAA has just come under massive fire as climate science skeptic Tony Heller presented at his realclimatescience blog strong evidence that the government agency manipulated December 2016 data in order to make it “red hot” in Central Africa, “with record heat“. However, the problem is that there are no measurement stations whatsoever located in the vast region, and so the NOAA simply made up and filled in the hot data.

Heller notes that full-surface temperature measurement by satellites in fact show that “the NOAA’s record hot regions in Africa were actually close to normal“.

- See more at: NoTricksZone: "Not here to worship what is known, but to question it" – Jacob Bronowski. "Fake and vulgar" climate news from Germany in English – by Pierre L. Gosselin

 

[Old Rocks]

Wind and solar are both the cheapest form of energy available now. Grid scale batteries are being manufactured and sold as we post. The cryosphere continues to melt, and you continue to be an idiot.

 

[SSDD]

Wind and solar are both the cheapest form of energy available now. Grid scale batteries are being manufactured and sold as we post. The cryosphere continues to melt, and you continue to be an idiot.

Speaking of idiots....looking at this gold standard reconstruction made from ice cores taken above the Arctic Circle, what do you suppose the cryosphere has looked like for the bulk of the past 10K years when compared to today?...and the same warm spikes are evident in ice cores taken in the Antarctic as well. Think you can answer...or will you just dodge like you always have?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Wind and solar are both the cheapest form of energy available now. Grid scale batteries are being manufactured and sold as we post. The cryosphere continues to melt, and you continue to be an idiot.

You have been shown not only a liar but your pseudoscience a fraud.. Then you tell another lie about wind and solar being so cheap (while forgetting to include the costs of fossil fuel plants that must run and the 32 cents per kwh that are give to them to offset the high cost of operations and breakdowns).. Your intent to deceive is sickening.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

I would imagine that this is only the beginning of a torrent of evidence that is quickly percolating to the surface with regard to the sham climate science has become. Climate gate gave us a peek behind the curtain...It probably won't be long before the whole damned curtain gets torn down and we all get to see the depth of the scam that has been perpetrated on us.

So go ahead all you first class seat holders on the AGW crazy train....lets see you, once again, attempt to defend the indefensible.

A look behind the curtain at NOAA’s climate data center.


I read with great irony recently that scientists are “frantically copying U.S. Climate data, fearing it might vanish under Trump” (e.g., Washington Post 13 December 2016). As a climate scientist formerly responsible for NOAA’s climate archive, the most critical issue in archival of climate data is actually scientists who are unwilling to formally archive and document their data. I spent the last decade cajoling climate scientists to archive their data and fully document the datasets. I established a climate data records program that was awarded a U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 2014 for visionary work in the acquisition, production, and preservation of climate data records (CDRs), which accurately describe the Earth’s changing environment.

Climate scientists versus climate data




BOMBSHELL – NOAA whistleblower says Karl et al. “pausebuster” paper was hyped, broke procedures

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

BOMBSHELL – NOAA whistleblower says Karl et al. “pausebuster” paper was hyped, broke procedures

NOAA Whistleblower reveals ‘Pausebuster’ scandal

David Rose in the Mail on Sunday reports that John J Bateshas revealed a host of questionable practices committed by NOAA scientists as they rushed through the ‘Pausebuster’ paper.


The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.
A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015

NOAA Whistleblower reveals ‘Pausebuster’ scandal

First NOAA Whistleblower


Heat’s On At NOAA As “High Level Whistle Blower” Exposes Data Fraud, “Scientific Integrity Breaches”!

“Irrefutable evidence”

The latest revelation, according to Online Mail, comes from “impeccable” NOAA scientist Dr. John Bates, who has shown “irrefutable evidence” that an NOAA paper showing accelerating global warming was rushed to be published just before the Paris Conference in 2015, and was “based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data“. The paper became to be known as the “Pausebuster” and was central in spurring the 2015 Paris Treaty.

Central African data made up entirely

On another matter, the NOAA has just come under massive fire as climate science skeptic Tony Heller presented at his realclimatescience blog strong evidence that the government agency manipulated December 2016 data in order to make it “red hot” in Central Africa, “with record heat“. However, the problem is that there are no measurement stations whatsoever located in the vast region, and so the NOAA simply made up and filled in the hot data.

Heller notes that full-surface temperature measurement by satellites in fact show that “the NOAA’s record hot regions in Africa were actually close to normal“.

- See more at: NoTricksZone: "Not here to worship what is known, but to question it" – Jacob Bronowski. "Fake and vulgar" climate news from Germany in English – by Pierre L. Gosselin

They weren't duped.

If the conclusion of any so-called research concludes that more centralized and concentrated power over the proles is called for, "world leaders" will be getting in line with the the funding to provide it.

This is the very nature of the authoritarian mindset.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

You have been shown not only a liar but your pseudoscience a fraud.. Then you tell another lie about wind and solar being so cheap (while forgetting to include the costs of fossil fuel plants that must run and the 32 cents per kwh that are give to them to offset the high cost of operations and breakdowns).. Your intent to deceive is sickening.

I bet he doesn't count the environmental costs of production and installation, either. Enviromoonbats are like that.

 

[Billy_Bob]

I would imagine that this is only the beginning of a torrent of evidence that is quickly percolating to the surface with regard to the sham climate science has become. Climate gate gave us a peek behind the curtain...It probably won't be long before the whole damned curtain gets torn down and we all get to see the depth of the scam that has been perpetrated on us.

So go ahead all you first class seat holders on the AGW crazy train....lets see you, once again, attempt to defend the indefensible.

A look behind the curtain at NOAA’s climate data center.


I read with great irony recently that scientists are “frantically copying U.S. Climate data, fearing it might vanish under Trump” (e.g., Washington Post 13 December 2016). As a climate scientist formerly responsible for NOAA’s climate archive, the most critical issue in archival of climate data is actually scientists who are unwilling to formally archive and document their data. I spent the last decade cajoling climate scientists to archive their data and fully document the datasets. I established a climate data records program that was awarded a U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 2014 for visionary work in the acquisition, production, and preservation of climate data records (CDRs), which accurately describe the Earth’s changing environment.

Climate scientists versus climate data




BOMBSHELL – NOAA whistleblower says Karl et al. “pausebuster” paper was hyped, broke procedures

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

BOMBSHELL – NOAA whistleblower says Karl et al. “pausebuster” paper was hyped, broke procedures

NOAA Whistleblower reveals ‘Pausebuster’ scandal

David Rose in the Mail on Sunday reports that John J Bateshas revealed a host of questionable practices committed by NOAA scientists as they rushed through the ‘Pausebuster’ paper.


The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.
A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015

NOAA Whistleblower reveals ‘Pausebuster’ scandal

First NOAA Whistleblower


Heat’s On At NOAA As “High Level Whistle Blower” Exposes Data Fraud, “Scientific Integrity Breaches”!

“Irrefutable evidence”

The latest revelation, according to Online Mail, comes from “impeccable” NOAA scientist Dr. John Bates, who has shown “irrefutable evidence” that an NOAA paper showing accelerating global warming was rushed to be published just before the Paris Conference in 2015, and was “based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data“. The paper became to be known as the “Pausebuster” and was central in spurring the 2015 Paris Treaty.

Central African data made up entirely

On another matter, the NOAA has just come under massive fire as climate science skeptic Tony Heller presented at his realclimatescience blog strong evidence that the government agency manipulated December 2016 data in order to make it “red hot” in Central Africa, “with record heat“. However, the problem is that there are no measurement stations whatsoever located in the vast region, and so the NOAA simply made up and filled in the hot data.

Heller notes that full-surface temperature measurement by satellites in fact show that “the NOAA’s record hot regions in Africa were actually close to normal“.

- See more at: NoTricksZone: "Not here to worship what is known, but to question it" – Jacob Bronowski. "Fake and vulgar" climate news from Germany in English – by Pierre L. Gosselin

Anyone with a mind could see Karl Et Al was cooked pseudoscience. Now those who helped cook the books are telling all and its damning.. This next week Trump is going to give the agency a broom sweep.. I will bet the rats will flee that sinking ship in droves and it appears many are trying like hell to keep their jobs by exposing the deceptions.

 

[Billy_Bob]

You have been shown not only a liar but your pseudoscience a fraud.. Then you tell another lie about wind and solar being so cheap (while forgetting to include the costs of fossil fuel plants that must run and the 32 cents per kwh that are give to them to offset the high cost of operations and breakdowns).. Your intent to deceive is sickening.

I bet he doesn't count the environmental costs of production and installation, either. Enviromoonbats are like that.

But they sure as hell will state that the name plate value of potential power generation is what it puts out 24/7/365 even when its shown to be less than 17% by empirical evidence. Deception is all they have.

 

[SSDD]

You stocked up on popcorn?...this is going to get very interesting...very soon.

 

[waltky]

Uncle Ferd an' possum...

... got `em a kazoo band...

... do dat count?

 

[mamooth]

Here's a very detailed takedown of this latest fraud attempt by Rose and SSDD.

Factcheck: Mail on Sunday's 'astonishing evidence' about global temperature rise | Carbon Brief

Won't matter to the deniers. They'll just do that cultist "Fake News!" thing that all cultists all do so well.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Here's a very detailed takedown of this latest fraud attempt by Rose and SSDD.

Factcheck: Mail on Sunday's 'astonishing evidence' about global temperature rise | Carbon Brief

Won't matter to the deniers. They'll just do that cultist "Fake News!" thing that all cultists all do so well.

Bwhaaaaa

Cook and Nuttercellie...

Re-enforcing your lack of credibility... Priceless.. and using a MODEL as proof...

 

[miketx]

I could make a graph like the above using photoshop and it would mean the same thing the above graph means: Absolutely Nothing.

 

[SSDD]

I could make a graph like the above using photoshop and it would mean the same thing the above graph means: Absolutely Nothing.

Easy to see who the real deniers are.

 

[miketx]

I could make a graph like the above using photoshop and it would mean the same thing the above graph means: Absolutely Nothing.

Easy to see who the real deniers are.

Lost in a land reality never knew, aren't you? Anybody with a few skills can make a graph like that. But to you, it's the gospel! LMAO!

 

[Old Rocks]

Global sea surface temperatures from the old NOAA record (ERSSTv3b), the new NOAA record (ERSSTv4), and instrumentally homogenous records from buoys and satellites. See Hausfather et al 2017 for details, as well as comparisons with shorter Argo-based records.

Factcheck: Mail on Sunday's 'astonishing evidence' about global temperature rise | Carbon Brief

LOL It is not just the scientists in our nation that are seeing the increase in warming on land and sea. So you dumb bells have to claim an international conspiracy involving most of the scientists in the world to lie about that warming. And no one squealing on this conspiracy involving millions of scientists. LOL Methinks your little tin hats are on too tight.

 

[mamooth]

Bates doesn't seem to be truthful. He says archiving wasn't done right,yet the archives are right here, in fine shape, since 6/12/2015. Best I can tell, he's in a tizzy because the archiving wasn't done quite quickly enough, or in the particular format he liked. He's "whistleblowing" about ... late paperwork.

Quite a scandal, that is.

Oh, here's a source ripping apart the various claims of Bates.

Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units: On the Mail on Sunday article on Karl et al., 2015

 

[SSDD]

I could make a graph like the above using photoshop and it would mean the same thing the above graph means: Absolutely Nothing.

So you don't think the GISP2 ice cores are real?...Interesting...the level of denial around here has really ramped up.

 

[SSDD]

Bates doesn't seem to be truthful. He says archiving wasn't done right,yet the archives are right here, in fine shape, since 6/12/2015. Best I can tell, he's in a tizzy because the archiving wasn't done quite quickly enough, or in the particular format he liked. He's "whistleblowing" about ... late paperwork.

Quite a scandal, that is.

Oh, here's a source ripping apart the various claims of Bates.

Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units: On the Mail on Sunday article on Karl et al., 2015

Archiving was the least of the complaints hairball...

1. Karl made administrative decisions contrary to data integrity;
2. Karl used 90% rather than 95% standard;
3. The use of non standardized data set implied a greater uncertainty to the data that was not, could not be addressed;
4. Karl made poor data integrity decisions in order to meet a publishing date;
5. Karl made decisions that benefited his publication not the organization;
6. Maximized warming
7.Tried to combine two previously separate sets of records
8.NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up


So other than the entire thing being corrupt..it is fine.

 

[Skull Pilot]

You have been shown not only a liar but your pseudoscience a fraud.. Then you tell another lie about wind and solar being so cheap (while forgetting to include the costs of fossil fuel plants that must run and the 32 cents per kwh that are give to them to offset the high cost of operations and breakdowns).. Your intent to deceive is sickening.

I bet he doesn't count the environmental costs of production and installation, either. Enviromoonbats are like that.

or the verified fact that wind is more than three to 6 times more expensive than calculated costs based on rated output because wind mills on average produce actual power that is 15-30% of rated output