No Such People Live Today, Ya Git

[Billy_Kinetta]

What is the major malfunction here?

Julian Castro defends reparations push, says people who were state-sanctioned property deserve compensation

 

[Taz]

What is the major malfunction here?

Julian Castro defends reparations push, says people who were state-sanctioned property deserve compensation

All those people are dead.

 

[TNHarley]

Im a jew. Im owed reparations from almost every civilization on earth.
Im ok with reparations

 

[Taz]

Im a jew. Im owed reparations from almost every civilization on earth.
Im ok with reparations

Come and repair my fence and I'll give you some shekels.

 

[martybegan]

Im a jew. Im owed reparations from almost every civilization on earth.
Im ok with reparations

Come and repair my fence and I'll give you some shekels.

Don't you know anything about Jews?

He will hire some mexicans to do the work, and bill with a 2.1 multiplier.

 

[Auld Phart]

What is the major malfunction here?

Julian Castro defends reparations push, says people who were state-sanctioned property deserve compensation

All those people are dead.

exactly

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

What about unjust enrichment, the proceeds of which have been passed down from generation to generation?

In contract law, unjust enrichment occurs when one person is enriched at the expense of another in circumstances that the law sees as unjust.[1] Where an individual is unjustly enriched, the law imposes an obligation upon the recipient to make restitution, subject to defences such as change of position. Liability for an unjust (or unjustified) enrichment arises irrespective of wrongdoing on the part of the recipient. The concept of unjust enrichment can be traced to Roman law and the maxim that "no one should be benefited at another's expense": nemo locupletari potest aliena iactura or nemo locupletari debet cum aliena iactura.
Unjust enrichment - Wikipedia

​

 

[MizMolly]

What about unjust enrichment, the proceeds of which have been passed down from generation to generation?

In contract law, unjust enrichment occurs when one person is enriched at the expense of another in circumstances that the law sees as unjust.[1] Where an individual is unjustly enriched, the law imposes an obligation upon the recipient to make restitution, subject to defences such as change of position. Liability for an unjust (or unjustified) enrichment arises irrespective of wrongdoing on the part of the recipient. The concept of unjust enrichment can be traced to Roman law and the maxim that "no one should be benefited at another's expense": nemo locupletari potest aliena iactura or nemo locupletari debet cum aliena iactura.
Unjust enrichment - Wikipedia

​

Not everyone had riches passed down.There were also slaves all over the world at one time or another, it was acceptable and legal. It wasn't right, but that's what it was. Egyptians had slaves, are they held accountable? Same for all other countries.

 

[TNHarley]

What about unjust enrichment, the proceeds of which have been passed down from generation to generation?

In contract law, unjust enrichment occurs when one person is enriched at the expense of another in circumstances that the law sees as unjust.[1] Where an individual is unjustly enriched, the law imposes an obligation upon the recipient to make restitution, subject to defences such as change of position. Liability for an unjust (or unjustified) enrichment arises irrespective of wrongdoing on the part of the recipient. The concept of unjust enrichment can be traced to Roman law and the maxim that "no one should be benefited at another's expense": nemo locupletari potest aliena iactura or nemo locupletari debet cum aliena iactura.
Unjust enrichment - Wikipedia

​

Lol sometimes i just think you are a troll

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Lol sometimes i just think you are a troll

Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premise

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Not everyone had riches passed down.There were also slaves all over the world at one time or another, it was acceptable and legal. It wasn't right, but that's what it was. Egyptians had slaves, are they held accountable? Same for all other countries.

Where does it say EVERYONE? And bringing up others who have committed human rights violations doesn't absolve the ones committed by those in the United States. Most people know "but Timmy did it too" is not a valid argument or excuse for their own wrong or in this case immoral and unlawful behavior by the time they're 5.

 

[TNHarley]

Lol sometimes i just think you are a troll

Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premise

Your argument lacks any thinking. To use that argument for reparations, that would include millions of other people.
Do you want to pay reparations to whites?

 

[MizMolly]

Not everyone had riches passed down.There were also slaves all over the world at one time or another, it was acceptable and legal. It wasn't right, but that's what it was. Egyptians had slaves, are they held accountable? Same for all other countries.

Where does it say EVERYONE? And bringing up others who have committed human rights violations doesn't absolve the ones committed by those in the United States. Most people know "but Timmy did it too" is not a valid argument or excuse for their own wrong or in this case immoral and unlawful behavior by the time they're 5.

I didnt make excuses. I pointed out the reality, and it was not right and America and/or whites were not the only pepetrators

 

[Godboy]

Lol sometimes i just think you are a troll

Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premise

The fact that it hasnt happened yet tells us everything we need to know about its "legal premise".

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Your argument lacks any thinking. To use that argument for reparations, that would include millions of other people.
Do you want to pay reparations to whites?

Says the man (allegedly) who doesn't know the difference between a legal theory and an argument.

 

[TNHarley]

Your argument lacks any thinking. To use that argument for reparations, that would include millions of other people.
Do you want to pay reparations to whites?

Says the man (allegedly) who doesn't know the difference between a legal theory and an argument.

Your argument is a legal theory, genius.
Doesnt mean its settled.

 

[ptbw forever]

Lol sometimes i just think you are a troll

Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premise

We have done more than dispute it.

 

[fncceo]

Don't you know anything about Jews?

Only his boss, his landlord, and his court-appointed attorney.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Lol sometimes i just think you are a troll

Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premise

We have done more than dispute it.

Someone brought a court case against the U.S. government for reparations for human rights violations against people of African descent and lost? What's the case number and send me a link to the decision(s).

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Your argument lacks any thinking. To use that argument for reparations, that would include millions of other people.
Do you want to pay reparations to whites?

Says the man (allegedly) who doesn't know the difference between a legal theory and an argument.

Your argument is a legal theory, genius.
Doesnt mean its settled.

I haven't made an argument, that you don't know that is beyond pathetic.