The word rapture appears nowhere in the Bible. Yet so called fundamentalist Christians have somehow created a fanciful interpretation out of Thessalonians that is the foundation of their belief. Where is the theological justification? Talk about stretching a metaphor.......there is no rapture anywhere in the Bible. Therefore so called Christian fundamentalists have no basis for their beliefs.
True, given the fact there is no 'god' as perceived by theists, where religion and 'god' are creations of man, just as the bible was written by men, not a 'deity,' devoid of authority and documented facts.
The notion of 'rapture' just another Christian myth.
Not exactly a new bold groundbreaking position. Of course it's impossible to argue with the impeccable logic of atheists, as far as their argument goes anyway. On the other hand all their arguments end up as blind alleys based on superficial premise. No doubt you believe your thinking is based on rational conclusions of sound reasoning and indisputable logic. Given the fact that there about a million or so psychological studies that demonstrate how most human decision making is based primarily on emotional responses.......how do you know your own reasoning isn't simply a rationalization of your own emotions? I loved to watch how Christopher Hitchens would craft his arguments, flawless reasoning, compelling logic. The same goes for Richard Dawkins. But have you ever seen how either of these gentleman(scions of atheism) would respond when some part of their premise was questioned? They would almost invariably respond defensively with obvious anger and outrage; an emotional response. If atheists arguments are based on some pure form of deductive reasoning why does a challenge elicit an emotional response?
There's nothing 'groundbreaking' about acknowledging facts and the truth.
The bible was written by men, not a 'deity,' and is devoid of documented facts and authority.
And there is no 'god' as perceived by theists – there is no omnipotent extraterrestrial entity that 'hears' prayers, 'intercedes' on the behalf of humans, and 'issues edicts' of religious doctrine and dogma all must obey, lest transgressors are subject to some sort of postmortem 'punishment.'
For some 'god' might exist as a metaphor – the collective goodness of man and the like; but there's no 'god' as perceived by theists.
The mistake theists make to incorrectly believe that their religion and 'god' are the 'status quo,' the consequence of their arrogance and pride, where those free from faith are the 'aberration,' when in fact the opposite is the case.