No one is REALLY voting "for" Hillary...

He strikes me as unemployable anywhere. You can't hide that personality for long. Probably on disability/welfare/food stamps.

Wrong as usual...

I would be stunned if he made $50k - $60k per year. He strikes me as a $28k per year kind of guy.

But yet you are the one who is here all day posting, Poodle. Now how is that?
 
You are just another clown who can't comprehend simple facts. I can't count the amount of times I have said and explained what I am on this forum....like the other jackass I put on ignore because they were so fucking dumb you think YOU know better than me about what I am....highly amusing.

Whatever, you goose-stepping twit...
 
if no one is showing up at her rallies, then why would anyone race to go vote for her? i think most dumb voters will be racing to their fridges for hot pockets on november 8
I haven't yet found any local politicians that excite me. . . .

So yeah, there is a frozen burrito with my name on it. :tongue:
 
First and foremost - Jill Stein and the Green Party. Socialism has been a spectacular failure world-wide. It has collapsed every nation that ever implemented it.

So has Capitalism.... in case you were asleep in 2008. And 2001. And 1991. and 1980.

All of those involved capitalism failing epicly and requiring government bailouts.
 
First and foremost - Jill Stein and the Green Party. Socialism has been a spectacular failure world-wide. It has collapsed every nation that ever implemented it.

So has Capitalism.... in case you were asleep in 2008. And 2001. And 1991. and 1980.

All of those involved capitalism failing epicly and requiring government bailouts.
There was no capitalism in 2008, stupid. The "1997 Community Re-Investment Act" (which collapsed the housing market) is not capitalism. Social Security is not capitalism. Sarbanes/Oxley is not capitalism. Taxes on corporations is not capitalism. Medicare is not capitalism. Medicaid is not capitalism. Affirmative Action is not capitalism. All of those (and a lot more) are government controlled regulations interfering with what used to be the free market (until envious little scrubs like you elected power-hungry bigger scrubs to punish people more successful than all of you).

There was no capitalism in 2001 either, stupid. The "1997 Community Re-Investment Act" (which collapsed the housing market) is not capitalism. Social Security is not capitalism. Sarbanes/Oxley is not capitalism. Taxes on corporations is not capitalism. Medicare is not capitalism. Medicaid is not capitalism. Affirmative Action is not capitalism. All of those (and a lot more) are government controlled regulations interfering with what used to be the free market (until envious little scrubs like you elected power-hungry bigger scrubs to punish people more successful than all of you).

There was no capitalism in 1991 either, stupid. Jimmy Carter's "Community Re-Investment Act" is not capitalism. Social Security is not capitalism. Taxes on corporations is not capitalism. Medicare is not capitalism. Medicaid is not capitalism. Affirmative Action is not capitalism. All of those (and a lot more) are government controlled regulations interfering with what used to be the free market (until envious little scrubs like you elected power-hungry bigger scrubs to punish people more successful than all of you).

If you had an ounce of brain power you'd be horribly ashamed of your post. But we both know you won't be. That says quite a bit chief.
 
Liars.jpg
 
There was no capitalism in 2008, stupid. The "1997 Community Re-Investment Act" (which collapsed the housing market) is not capitalism. Social Security is not capitalism. Sarbanes/Oxley is not capitalism. Taxes on corporations is not capitalism. Medicare is not capitalism. Medicaid is not capitalism. Affirmative Action is not capitalism. All of those (and a lot more) are government controlled regulations interfering with what used to be the free market (until envious little scrubs like you elected power-hungry bigger scrubs to punish people more successful than all of you).

Poodle, you have a definition of capitalism that has never existed and can't exist in a real world.

Are you saying that Capitalism has failed because it hasn't actually been tried?

If you had an ounce of brain power you'd be horribly ashamed of your post. But we both know you won't be. That says quite a bit chief.

It says that you can't own up to the fact that three times, the greed of rich people have wrecked the economy.

There's a certain point where you take the keys away from the drunk.
 
There was no capitalism in 2008, stupid. The "1997 Community Re-Investment Act" (which collapsed the housing market) is not capitalism. Social Security is not capitalism. Sarbanes/Oxley is not capitalism. Taxes on corporations is not capitalism. Medicare is not capitalism. Medicaid is not capitalism. Affirmative Action is not capitalism. All of those (and a lot more) are government controlled regulations interfering with what used to be the free market (until envious little scrubs like you elected power-hungry bigger scrubs to punish people more successful than all of you).

Poodle, you have a definition of capitalism that has never existed and can't exist in a real world.

Are you saying that Capitalism has failed because it hasn't actually been tried?

If you had an ounce of brain power you'd be horribly ashamed of your post. But we both know you won't be. That says quite a bit chief.

It says that you can't own up to the fact that three times, the greed of rich people have wrecked the economy.

There's a certain point where you take the keys away from the drunk.
The greed of rich people is one thing, when coupled with their control of government it's another. That's one thing I don't get about thinking on the left, much of what is seen as the control of the rich is only possible through the hand of government. And yet the only answer is more government. ?
 
The greed of rich people is one thing, when coupled with their control of government it's another. That's one thing I don't get about thinking on the left, much of what is seen as the control of the rich is only possible through the hand of government. And yet the only answer is more government. ?

Because the rich don't have the power they have through control of government. They have it because government doesn't do what it's supposed to do when we have a collective brain fart and put Republicans in charge.

Other industrial democracies don't have these problems. The rich pay their fair share, workers are protected and empowered, consumers aren't cheated.
 
Are you saying that Capitalism has failed because it hasn't actually been tried?
If anyone ever wondered about the limited mentality of progressives - just point them to this post by Joseph. It's a very special kind of stupid that could only come from the left.

How could something "fail" if it has "never been tried"? :uhh:
 
Poodle, you have a definition of capitalism that has never existed and can't exist in a real world.
Jospeh...you are ignorant about everything. But especially history. Why do you insist on engaging me in debate when you just come out looking foolish every time?

When our nation was officially founded in 1776 there was no "Community Re-Investment Act". There were no federal taxes (none sparky). There was no Sarbanes/Oxley. There was no Medicare. There was no Medicaid. There was no Affirmative Action. So what happened? We only went from a fledgling nation to the world's most elite superpower in history.

And what happened after the rise of the cancer known as progressivism? $19 trillion in debt. Roads and bridges crumbling. Cities like Detroit declaring bankruptcy. Areas of our nation now resemble third-world countries.
 
The rich pay their fair share...
This is one thing that Joseph has gotten correct over the years. The rich don't pay their fair share in America. We would have to lower taxes on them by roughly 90% for them to be paying their "fair share". Right now they are robbed blind by greedy, entitled people like Joseph.

The top 1% earned 19% of the income pool but paid 35% of federal tax pool. If Jospeh understood basic math, he'd realize how the top 1% was getting royally screwed.
 
If anyone ever wondered about the limited mentality of progressives - just point them to this post by Joseph. It's a very special kind of stupid that could only come from the left.

How could something "fail" if it has "never been tried"?

This is the argument communists make all the time, too. "The USSR wasn't really Communist".

Look, little boy, some day you're going to have to move out of the basement and go out intot he real world and find out that it's not like an Ayn Rand Novel.

The top 1% earned 19% of the income pool but paid 35% of federal tax pool. If Jospeh understood basic math, he'd realize how the top 1% was getting royally screwed.

Wrong again. the Top 1% has 43% of the wealth, even though they didn't do 43% of the labor to create said wealth. They are not paying anywhere near their fair share.

again, other industrialized democracies don't do it this way. Americans are the retards of the Western World
 

Forum List

Back
Top