No one ever drowned in Roy Moore's car

[WaitingFor2020]

Nope...and once that got found out, no one ever voted for Clinton again, did they?

LOl! He couldn't run again so how could anyone vote for him? My God you are pathetic.

No one ever voted for him again. Is there something difficult in that comment you don't get?

You have to excuse the brain-dead right; they’re searching desperately for moral equivalence.

moral equivalence

Says the guy who supports men putting their Johnson in another mans ass......

I support freedom. You? You want the government to tell consenting adults who they can or cannot have sex with?

This is where they hit the wall inside their myopic craniums.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Nope...and once that got found out, no one ever voted for Clinton again, did they?

LOl! He couldn't run again so how could anyone vote for him? My God you are pathetic.

No one ever voted for him again. Is there something difficult in that comment you don't get?

You have to excuse the brain-dead right; they’re searching desperately for moral equivalence.

moral equivalence

Says the guy who supports men putting their Johnson in another mans ass......

I support freedom. You? You want the government to tell consenting adults who they can or cannot have sex with?

In Alabama 14 year olds can marry adults that was 40 years ago and even today. Why are you so hypocritical about the law?

 

[MisterBeale]

i love the new conservative slant....what about this guy....

moore is a pervert

Perhaps, but with no proof and the accuser admitting forgery, what do you have other than what the media is feeding you?

She never admitted to forgery and even Fox News retracted that claim.

An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate​

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

You dismiss it for no reason other than you’re desperate for it not to be true. Meanwhile, the message was written in Moore’s handwriting and that can’t be easily dismissed.

No, it is simple logic. Of course it can easily be dismissed.

If she was at first trying to deceive folks on a story, and then was busted, changing the story, how do we know it wasn't a simple case of Roy Moore was a regular customer?

How do we know she didn't just have a crush on him and she asked him to sign her year book? If he thought she was nice and liked her service and tipped her well, and they were friends, why not? That DOESN'T necessarily mean that anything more ever happened, nor does it mean that he had inappropriate relations. Then again, anything is possible. I am going by the preponderance of what I know. What I know of Moore's character, and of her character. What I know of HER character is that she is willing to deceive to achieve her ends for the Democrat party establishment in the State of Alabama.

He didn't even use her name in the inscription. It doen't bode well that they were all that familiar with each other. We don't really know the truth, only what SHE is saying. You desperately only want to believe the word of an already shown to be, UNRELIABLE witness. So now, TELL ME, who is desperate?

YOU, who want to believe the narrative of someone who has been caught lying, or the denials of Moore?

I will gladly consider any incident you have that you can link to a point where it has been proven that Moore has lied. Go on, share a link.

Till then. . . It would appear YOU are the desperate one.

 

[MisterBeale]

i love the new conservative slant....what about this guy....

moore is a pervert

Perhaps, but with no proof and the accuser admitting forgery, what do you have other than what the media is feeding you?

She never admitted to forgery and even Fox News retracted that claim.

An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate​

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

Anyone half-blind from cataracts can tell that was his note and signature. Get over it.

And what if it was?

It still doesn't prove what they say it proves.

All it proves is that he used to eat in a diner, and that he had a regular waitress that had a crush on him. Someone that he barely took note of. I don't really know the story.

It appears there are two sides to this story.

Moore is minimizing his side, for political reasons, and she, would appear to be maximizing in the most horific porportions her side of the story.

If I were to guess, I would think that in all likelihood, it was SHE that took advantage of him.

Yet, this truth could never come out. It would destroy him, and make her look awful.

So that begs the question, how can she get that truth out there, w/o making herself look like the tawdry slut that she was back then?

See if we look at Moore's conservative religious background, and his social circle, the women that were in his life were all very religious, no sex before marriage types. And he was in the throughs of his sexual peak. He was probably very sexually inexperienced, and very vulnerable to advances by extremely attractive and loose women of the underclasses.

I've seen it before with these religious types.

It is a dark secret.

If there was any victimization going on, it is the reverse here. Moore's religious convictions were tested. . . and he in all likelihood, HE FAILED.

But there probably was no "sexual abuse" or "sexual predation," no, quite probably, he was the one that was pursued, and had his heart crushed. Poor virgin.

 

[Faun]

LOl! He couldn't run again so how could anyone vote for him? My God you are pathetic.

No one ever voted for him again. Is there something difficult in that comment you don't get?

You have to excuse the brain-dead right; they’re searching desperately for moral equivalence.

moral equivalence

Says the guy who supports men putting their Johnson in another mans ass......

I support freedom. You? You want the government to tell consenting adults who they can or cannot have sex with?

In Alabama 14 year olds can marry adults that was 40 years ago and even today. Why are you so hypocritical about the law?

Why did you refuse to answer my question? And to what do your delusions tell you O’m being hypocritical about?

 

[RealDave]

So you are okay with a CEO banging an intern while working at the top level, which to normal people would be an abuse of power?

Nope...and once that got found out, no one ever voted for Clinton again, did they?

LOl! He couldn't run again so how could anyone vote for him? My God you are pathetic.

No one ever voted for him again. Is there something difficult in that comment you don't get?

You have to excuse the brain-dead right; they’re searching desperately for moral equivalence.

moral equivalence

Says the guy who supports men putting their Johnson in another mans ass......

Wow, yet another bigoted hater.

 

[Faun]

i love the new conservative slant....what about this guy....

moore is a pervert

Perhaps, but with no proof and the accuser admitting forgery, what do you have other than what the media is feeding you?

She never admitted to forgery and even Fox News retracted that claim.

An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate​

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

You dismiss it for no reason other than you’re desperate for it not to be true. Meanwhile, the message was written in Moore’s handwriting and that can’t be easily dismissed.

No, it is simple logic. Of course it can easily be dismissed.

If she was at first trying to deceive folks on a story, and then was busted, changing the story, how do we know it wasn't a simple case of Roy Moore was a regular customer?

How do we know she didn't just have a crush on him and she asked him to sign her year book? If he thought she was nice and liked her service and tipped her well, and they were friends, why not? That DOESN'T necessarily mean that anything more ever happened, nor does it mean that he had inappropriate relations. Then again, anything is possible. I am going by the preponderance of what I know. What I know of Moore's character, and of her character. What I know of HER character is that she is willing to deceive to achieve her ends for the Democrat party establishment in the State of Alabama.

He didn't even use her name in the inscription. It doen't bode well that they were all that familiar with each other. We don't really know the truth, only what SHE is saying. You desperately only want to believe the word of an already shown to be, UNRELIABLE witness. So now, TELL ME, who is desperate?

YOU, who want to believe the narrative of someone who has been caught lying, or the denials of Moore?

I will gladly consider any incident you have that you can link to a point where it has been proven that Moore has lied. Go on, share a link.

Till then. . . It would appear YOU are the desperate one.

He wrote in her yearbook. That cannot be easily dismissed. He denies ever meeting her. Clearly, that’s not true.

 

[RealDave]

i love the new conservative slant....what about this guy....

moore is a pervert

Perhaps, but with no proof and the accuser admitting forgery, what do you have other than what the media is feeding you?

She never admitted to forgery and even Fox News retracted that claim.

An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate​

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

Anyone half-blind from cataracts can tell that was his note and signature. Get over it.

And what if it was?

It still doesn't prove what they say it proves.

All it proves is that he used to eat in a diner, and that he had a regular waitress that had a crush on him. Someone that he barely took note of. I don't really know the story.

It appears there are two sides to this story.

Moore is minimizing his side, for political reasons, and she, would appear to be maximizing in the most horific porportions her side of the story.

If I were to guess, I would think that in all likelihood, it was SHE that took advantage of him.

Yet, this truth could never come out. It would destroy him, and make her look awful.

So that begs the question, how can she get that truth out there, w/o making herself look like the tawdry slut that she was back then?

See if we look at Moore's conservative religious background, and his social circle, the women that were in his life were all very religious, no sex before marriage types. And he was in the throughs of his sexual peak. He was probably very sexually inexperienced, and very vulnerable to advances by extremely attractive and loose women of the underclasses.

I've seen it before with these religious types.

It is a dark secret.

If there was any victimization going on, it is the reverse here. Moore's religious convictions were tested. . . and he in all likelihood, HE FAILED.

But there probably was no "sexual abuse" or "sexual predation," no, quite probably, he was the one that was pursued, and had his heart crushed. Poor virgin.

Well, dipshit, it proves he did know her, when he knew her & know her to the point of signing her yearbook.

How about that.

 

[MisterBeale]

Perhaps, but with no proof and the accuser admitting forgery, what do you have other than what the media is feeding you?

She never admitted to forgery and even Fox News retracted that claim.

An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate​

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

You dismiss it for no reason other than you’re desperate for it not to be true. Meanwhile, the message was written in Moore’s handwriting and that can’t be easily dismissed.

No, it is simple logic. Of course it can easily be dismissed.

If she was at first trying to deceive folks on a story, and then was busted, changing the story, how do we know it wasn't a simple case of Roy Moore was a regular customer?

How do we know she didn't just have a crush on him and she asked him to sign her year book? If he thought she was nice and liked her service and tipped her well, and they were friends, why not? That DOESN'T necessarily mean that anything more ever happened, nor does it mean that he had inappropriate relations. Then again, anything is possible. I am going by the preponderance of what I know. What I know of Moore's character, and of her character. What I know of HER character is that she is willing to deceive to achieve her ends for the Democrat party establishment in the State of Alabama.

He didn't even use her name in the inscription. It doen't bode well that they were all that familiar with each other. We don't really know the truth, only what SHE is saying. You desperately only want to believe the word of an already shown to be, UNRELIABLE witness. So now, TELL ME, who is desperate?

YOU, who want to believe the narrative of someone who has been caught lying, or the denials of Moore?

I will gladly consider any incident you have that you can link to a point where it has been proven that Moore has lied. Go on, share a link.

Till then. . . It would appear YOU are the desperate one.

He wrote in her yearbook. That cannot be easily dismissed. He denies ever meeting her. Clearly, that’s not true.

At best, we can say he has a poor memory, at worst, he is a liar.

If he were to tell the truth, that this girl seduced him, what would his supporters think?

What would the left think?

No good could come of it either way.

Folks don't want to know the truth anyway.

Moore is a hypocrite and a sinner, but I doubt he is as evil as the left makes him out to be.

 

[MisterBeale]

Perhaps, but with no proof and the accuser admitting forgery, what do you have other than what the media is feeding you?

She never admitted to forgery and even Fox News retracted that claim.

An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate​

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

Anyone half-blind from cataracts can tell that was his note and signature. Get over it.

And what if it was?

It still doesn't prove what they say it proves.

All it proves is that he used to eat in a diner, and that he had a regular waitress that had a crush on him. Someone that he barely took note of. I don't really know the story.

It appears there are two sides to this story.

Moore is minimizing his side, for political reasons, and she, would appear to be maximizing in the most horific porportions her side of the story.

If I were to guess, I would think that in all likelihood, it was SHE that took advantage of him.

Yet, this truth could never come out. It would destroy him, and make her look awful.

So that begs the question, how can she get that truth out there, w/o making herself look like the tawdry slut that she was back then?

See if we look at Moore's conservative religious background, and his social circle, the women that were in his life were all very religious, no sex before marriage types. And he was in the throughs of his sexual peak. He was probably very sexually inexperienced, and very vulnerable to advances by extremely attractive and loose women of the underclasses.

I've seen it before with these religious types.

It is a dark secret.

If there was any victimization going on, it is the reverse here. Moore's religious convictions were tested. . . and he in all likelihood, HE FAILED.

But there probably was no "sexual abuse" or "sexual predation," no, quite probably, he was the one that was pursued, and had his heart crushed. Poor virgin.

Well, dipshit, it proves he did know her, when he knew her & know her to the point of signing her yearbook.

How about that.

That's all I'm trying to say.

I sense lies on all sides of this story.

 

[jc456]

i love the new conservative slant....what about this guy....

moore is a pervert

And Kennedy was a killer. again, your morals are all fked up.

 

[DOTR]

Ted Kennedy had drinks while she drowned and then complained to the hotel about noise keeping him awake as she gasped her last. She may have survived some hours in an air pocket existing at the roof of the car.

 

[jc456]

She never admitted to forgery and even Fox News retracted that claim.

An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate​

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

Anyone half-blind from cataracts can tell that was his note and signature. Get over it.

And what if it was?

It still doesn't prove what they say it proves.

All it proves is that he used to eat in a diner, and that he had a regular waitress that had a crush on him. Someone that he barely took note of. I don't really know the story.

It appears there are two sides to this story.

Moore is minimizing his side, for political reasons, and she, would appear to be maximizing in the most horific porportions her side of the story.

If I were to guess, I would think that in all likelihood, it was SHE that took advantage of him.

Yet, this truth could never come out. It would destroy him, and make her look awful.

So that begs the question, how can she get that truth out there, w/o making herself look like the tawdry slut that she was back then?

See if we look at Moore's conservative religious background, and his social circle, the women that were in his life were all very religious, no sex before marriage types. And he was in the throughs of his sexual peak. He was probably very sexually inexperienced, and very vulnerable to advances by extremely attractive and loose women of the underclasses.

I've seen it before with these religious types.

It is a dark secret.

If there was any victimization going on, it is the reverse here. Moore's religious convictions were tested. . . and he in all likelihood, HE FAILED.

But there probably was no "sexual abuse" or "sexual predation," no, quite probably, he was the one that was pursued, and had his heart crushed. Poor virgin.

Well, dipshit, it proves he did know her, when he knew her & know her to the point of signing her yearbook.

How about that.

That's all I'm trying to say.

I sense lies on all sides of this story.

I don't believe liars, she is a liar. no more needed.

 

[Faun]

She never admitted to forgery and even Fox News retracted that claim.

An update to this story reflects that Beverly Young Nelson admits writing what ABC News characterized as “notes” beneath what she says is Roy Moore’s signature, and that the only notes below the signature are the date and location. Furthermore, the headline on story now specifies that Nelson admits to writing part of the inscription herself, rather than forging part of it.

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate​

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

You dismiss it for no reason other than you’re desperate for it not to be true. Meanwhile, the message was written in Moore’s handwriting and that can’t be easily dismissed.

No, it is simple logic. Of course it can easily be dismissed.

If she was at first trying to deceive folks on a story, and then was busted, changing the story, how do we know it wasn't a simple case of Roy Moore was a regular customer?

How do we know she didn't just have a crush on him and she asked him to sign her year book? If he thought she was nice and liked her service and tipped her well, and they were friends, why not? That DOESN'T necessarily mean that anything more ever happened, nor does it mean that he had inappropriate relations. Then again, anything is possible. I am going by the preponderance of what I know. What I know of Moore's character, and of her character. What I know of HER character is that she is willing to deceive to achieve her ends for the Democrat party establishment in the State of Alabama.

He didn't even use her name in the inscription. It doen't bode well that they were all that familiar with each other. We don't really know the truth, only what SHE is saying. You desperately only want to believe the word of an already shown to be, UNRELIABLE witness. So now, TELL ME, who is desperate?

YOU, who want to believe the narrative of someone who has been caught lying, or the denials of Moore?

I will gladly consider any incident you have that you can link to a point where it has been proven that Moore has lied. Go on, share a link.

Till then. . . It would appear YOU are the desperate one.

He wrote in her yearbook. That cannot be easily dismissed. He denies ever meeting her. Clearly, that’s not true.

At best, we can say he has a poor memory, at worst, he is a liar.

If he were to tell the truth, that this girl seduced him, what would his supporters think?

What would the left think?

No good could come of it either way.

Folks don't want to know the truth anyway.

Moore is a hypocrite and a sinner, but I doubt he is as evil as the left makes him out to be.

Now you’re diverting. We’re talking about the validity of the yearbook. There’s no question he wrote that creepy message in her yearbook. It’s not dismissed because she added a note at the end and was not forthcoming about adding it. The salient part is that he wrote in her yearbook.

 

[Faun]

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

Anyone half-blind from cataracts can tell that was his note and signature. Get over it.

And what if it was?

It still doesn't prove what they say it proves.

All it proves is that he used to eat in a diner, and that he had a regular waitress that had a crush on him. Someone that he barely took note of. I don't really know the story.

It appears there are two sides to this story.

Moore is minimizing his side, for political reasons, and she, would appear to be maximizing in the most horific porportions her side of the story.

If I were to guess, I would think that in all likelihood, it was SHE that took advantage of him.

Yet, this truth could never come out. It would destroy him, and make her look awful.

So that begs the question, how can she get that truth out there, w/o making herself look like the tawdry slut that she was back then?

See if we look at Moore's conservative religious background, and his social circle, the women that were in his life were all very religious, no sex before marriage types. And he was in the throughs of his sexual peak. He was probably very sexually inexperienced, and very vulnerable to advances by extremely attractive and loose women of the underclasses.

I've seen it before with these religious types.

It is a dark secret.

If there was any victimization going on, it is the reverse here. Moore's religious convictions were tested. . . and he in all likelihood, HE FAILED.

But there probably was no "sexual abuse" or "sexual predation," no, quite probably, he was the one that was pursued, and had his heart crushed. Poor virgin.

Well, dipshit, it proves he did know her, when he knew her & know her to the point of signing her yearbook.

How about that.

That's all I'm trying to say.

I sense lies on all sides of this story.

I don't believe liars, she is a liar. no more needed.

Juanita Broaddrick is a proven liar, do you so casually dismiss her claims of rape?

 

[basquebromance]

Second only to Trump’s victory last November, a Moore win on Tuesday will be the most catastrophic defeat for the Left in recent years

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

No one ever voted for him again. Is there something difficult in that comment you don't get?

You have to excuse the brain-dead right; they’re searching desperately for moral equivalence.

moral equivalence

Says the guy who supports men putting their Johnson in another mans ass......

I support freedom. You? You want the government to tell consenting adults who they can or cannot have sex with?

In Alabama 14 year olds can marry adults that was 40 years ago and even today. Why are you so hypocritical about the law?

Why did you refuse to answer my question? And to what do your delusions tell you O’m being hypocritical about?

You lied when you supported freedom. When you no longer had a CHOICE to not have health insurance when you are young, forced upon you by the government, you are a typical liar, but then you are a liberal, so to be expected..

 

[MisterBeale]

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

Anyone half-blind from cataracts can tell that was his note and signature. Get over it.

And what if it was?

It still doesn't prove what they say it proves.

All it proves is that he used to eat in a diner, and that he had a regular waitress that had a crush on him. Someone that he barely took note of. I don't really know the story.

It appears there are two sides to this story.

Moore is minimizing his side, for political reasons, and she, would appear to be maximizing in the most horific porportions her side of the story.

If I were to guess, I would think that in all likelihood, it was SHE that took advantage of him.

Yet, this truth could never come out. It would destroy him, and make her look awful.

So that begs the question, how can she get that truth out there, w/o making herself look like the tawdry slut that she was back then?

See if we look at Moore's conservative religious background, and his social circle, the women that were in his life were all very religious, no sex before marriage types. And he was in the throughs of his sexual peak. He was probably very sexually inexperienced, and very vulnerable to advances by extremely attractive and loose women of the underclasses.

I've seen it before with these religious types.

It is a dark secret.

If there was any victimization going on, it is the reverse here. Moore's religious convictions were tested. . . and he in all likelihood, HE FAILED.

But there probably was no "sexual abuse" or "sexual predation," no, quite probably, he was the one that was pursued, and had his heart crushed. Poor virgin.

Well, dipshit, it proves he did know her, when he knew her & know her to the point of signing her yearbook.

How about that.

That's all I'm trying to say.

I sense lies on all sides of this story.

I don't believe liars, she is a liar. no more needed.

I think Moore may be covering up some youthful indiscretions, which at the time they were committed, were not a big deal, but by today's standards are quite large.

If he had been lured into some relationships with young women who either did not tell him their age, or lied about their age, those relationship would not have been looked upon very well by his church or social circles. I'm pretty sure he kept those on the down low.

 

[Compost]

What Moore lacks is a medical fashion accessory!

Nothing says innocent like playing the victim.

Is that why the Gross Old Pervert party keeps doing it?

That's a picture of "Liberal Lion" Ted Kennedy. He was too creepy for the GOP! And to this day, dems laud his lewdness.

So this justifies electing Moore?
You fuckers promote yourselves as being above this, the party of family values, remember, dumb-ass?

It's a joke, dumb-ass. Lighten the fuck up. Save the pontificating for the Religion forum.

 

[MisterBeale]

The fact is, she lied about the nature of the original yearbook inscription, thus, we have no reason to believe the nature of her original accusations.

IOW, she isn't a credible witness, and nothing she says should be believed.

You dismiss it for no reason other than you’re desperate for it not to be true. Meanwhile, the message was written in Moore’s handwriting and that can’t be easily dismissed.

No, it is simple logic. Of course it can easily be dismissed.

If she was at first trying to deceive folks on a story, and then was busted, changing the story, how do we know it wasn't a simple case of Roy Moore was a regular customer?

How do we know she didn't just have a crush on him and she asked him to sign her year book? If he thought she was nice and liked her service and tipped her well, and they were friends, why not? That DOESN'T necessarily mean that anything more ever happened, nor does it mean that he had inappropriate relations. Then again, anything is possible. I am going by the preponderance of what I know. What I know of Moore's character, and of her character. What I know of HER character is that she is willing to deceive to achieve her ends for the Democrat party establishment in the State of Alabama.

He didn't even use her name in the inscription. It doen't bode well that they were all that familiar with each other. We don't really know the truth, only what SHE is saying. You desperately only want to believe the word of an already shown to be, UNRELIABLE witness. So now, TELL ME, who is desperate?

YOU, who want to believe the narrative of someone who has been caught lying, or the denials of Moore?

I will gladly consider any incident you have that you can link to a point where it has been proven that Moore has lied. Go on, share a link.

Till then. . . It would appear YOU are the desperate one.

He wrote in her yearbook. That cannot be easily dismissed. He denies ever meeting her. Clearly, that’s not true.

At best, we can say he has a poor memory, at worst, he is a liar.

If he were to tell the truth, that this girl seduced him, what would his supporters think?

What would the left think?

No good could come of it either way.

Folks don't want to know the truth anyway.

Moore is a hypocrite and a sinner, but I doubt he is as evil as the left makes him out to be.

Now you’re diverting. We’re talking about the validity of the yearbook. There’s no question he wrote that creepy message in her yearbook. It’s not dismissed because she added a note at the end and was not forthcoming about adding it. The salient part is that he wrote in her yearbook.

Not really.

The paradigm here is; If the yearbook inscription is true, then the story that goes along with the inscription is true. THAT is what the media paradigm that is being pushed is.

All I want you to do is to think for yourself.