Sure, NOT like you.
Post 1277
"Yet your party votes against prosecuting sexual predators and traffickers".
"Do some research before popping off"
WTF does THAT have to do with the protest?
DUMB ASS.
No Kings protest Oct 18th
- Thread starter TroglocratsRdumb
- Start date
Post 1277
"Yet your party votes against prosecuting sexual predators and traffickers".
"Do some research before popping off"
WTF does THAT have to do with the protest?
DUMB ASS.
The election was in November 2024. You lost.
And 75 million Americans are “cult members”? You crazy!
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 65,886
- 74,678
- 3,615
Lefty *****. Just have your protest and enjoy it. Why lie about the numbers?
Gatherings of like minded people are generally good for mental health.
The NO KINGS thing is ******* stupid, you could have just called it “a day of left wing solidarity”.
Just enjoy the day.
WHY LIE ABOUT THE NUMBERS?
You guys are pissed off that Trump did not crack skulls…..******* ADMIT IT. YOU WANTED SOME VIDEO OF FEDERAL OFFICERS BEATING UP PROTESTORS.
Gatherings of like minded people are generally good for mental health.
The NO KINGS thing is ******* stupid, you could have just called it “a day of left wing solidarity”.
Just enjoy the day.
WHY LIE ABOUT THE NUMBERS?
You guys are pissed off that Trump did not crack skulls…..******* ADMIT IT. YOU WANTED SOME VIDEO OF FEDERAL OFFICERS BEATING UP PROTESTORS.
No Bill listed in the text. I assume it is 7909 based on the vote count? Why are you such a dick?
The 158 Democrats who voted “nay” on H.R. 7909 did not oppose the idea that non-citizens convicted of serious violent crimes should be inadmissible or removable. Rather, their opposition was largely about how the bill was written, what the potential unintended consequences might be (especially for survivors of violence and vulnerable immigrants), and whether the bill added meaningful protections or just symbolic policy with risk of harm.
Looks like you are a disingenuous ****.
Why 158 Democrats voted against bill on violent immigrants
U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., reintroduced legislation Jan. 3 she said would keep dangerous immigrants out of the countr
www.politifact.com
Well you fucked up the thread, I thought you needed some more off topic posts.
I thought this thread was about some lame ass protests that were overbilled and failed to produce.
My bad
For most of American history we deported illegals. Somehow the last few years or a little more it became a major issue. We have problems in our nation. And we spend much time on this for nothing. Of course, the illegals sent here is on purpose for votes and to change the makeup somewhat as to promote a large newer nation originally called the north American Union. English and Spanish the two major languages. The NAU would be one of at least several large nations answerable to the leadership in Europe as of now. We actually see people who banty around killing the opposition party flippantly. Progressive Socialist Communist women are an engine towards this result. The death of the west.
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 65,886
- 74,678
- 3,615
Good for you lefties. You had your tantrum.
You are still not getting ice cream until you finish your broccoli.
You are still not getting ice cream until you finish your broccoli.
Better yet - “a day of left wing stupidity.”Lefty *****. Just have your protest and enjoy it. Why lie about the numbers?
Gatherings of like minded people are generally good for mental health.
The NO KINGS thing is ******* stupid, you could have just called it “a day of left wing solidarity”.
Just enjoy the day.
WHY LIE ABOUT THE NUMBERS?
You guys are pissed off that Trump did not crack skulls…..******* ADMIT IT. YOU WANTED SOME VIDEO OF FEDERAL OFFICERS BEATING UP PROTESTORS.
All these horseshit laws cited yet Biden let millions of unvetted perverts cross the border.No Bill listed in the text. I assume it is 7909 based on the vote count? Why are you such a dick?
The 158 Democrats who voted “nay” on H.R. 7909 did not oppose the idea that non-citizens convicted of serious violent crimes should be inadmissible or removable. Rather, their opposition was largely about how the bill was written, what the potential unintended consequences might be (especially for survivors of violence and vulnerable immigrants), and whether the bill added meaningful protections or just symbolic policy with risk of harm.
Looks like you are a disingenuous ****.
Why 158 Democrats voted against bill on violent immigrants
U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., reintroduced legislation Jan. 3 she said would keep dangerous immigrants out of the countr
Suck on that for a while....
EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 94,885
- 70,918
- 3,645
That's not going to help him.
His negotiating Tariffs is one, trump declared a NATIONAL EMERGENCY in order to, he needs Congress's permission within 15days of Trump's declaration before beginning his tariff negotiation. Johnson would not bring it to a vote.... Johnson did some crooked move and declared all the days working in congress until the end of the fiscal year, is just ONE WORKING DAY.
In Congress, a Day Can Last Months if Politics Demands It
House Republicans are so intent on avoiding tough votes on President Trump’s tariffs that they have rewritten the calendar.
What if you could prolong today to avoid making an uncomfortable decision tomorrow?
For most human beings, that’s not possible. But in the alternate reality that is Congress, which operates according to its own arcane rules and precedents and is exempt from the statutes that bind the rest of us, a day can be as long or short as the laws of political gravity demand.
That is how it came to pass that House Republicans in recent weeks declared the rest of the year one long day when it came to considering a challenge to President Trump’s tariffs. They would prefer to avoid votes on whether to scrap the levies, but the law says the House must consider them within a set period of time.
The obvious solution? Stop time.
It was hardly the first time congressional leaders have meddled with the laws of the universe for the sake of political expediency. By bending legislative time, House and Senate leaders have long found ways to buy themselves wiggle room for negotiation, preserve their prerogatives and shield their members from votes they would rather not have to cast.
-----------
Speaker Mike Johnson’s recent efforts to freeze time have been more conspicuous — and longer lasting. Last month, he quietly pushed through a provision that contained a calendar gimmick ensuring that no lawmaker could force a vote this year to end Mr. Trump’s tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico. He used the same trick on Wednesday to head off a vote until at least October on the global tariffs Mr. Trump announced last week and then partially paused.
The first measure stated that “each day for the remainder of the 119th Congress shall not constitute a calendar day” for the purposes of the emergency Mr. Trump declared on Feb. 1 to impose the tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico. The resolution approved on Wednesday used the same language to stop any member from forcing a vote on the rest of Mr. Trump’s tariffs through Sept. 30.
“When is a day not a day?” Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who was the only G.O.P. member to oppose both moves, wrote on social media. “Answer: when Congress circumvents the law requiring a vote on Presidential National Emergencies within 15 days.”
Meh...... Trump's tariffs moves are slated for SCOTUS review.His negotiating Tariffs is one, trump declared a NATIONAL EMERGENCY in order to, he needs Congress's permission within 15days of Trump's declaration before beginning his tariff negotiation. Johnson would not bring it to a vote.... Johnson did some crooked move and declared all the days working in congress until the end of the fiscal year, is just ONE WORKING DAY.
In Congress, a Day Can Last Months if Politics Demands It
House Republicans are so intent on avoiding tough votes on President Trump’s tariffs that they have rewritten the calendar.www.nytimes.com
What if you could prolong today to avoid making an uncomfortable decision tomorrow?
For most human beings, that’s not possible. But in the alternate reality that is Congress, which operates according to its own arcane rules and precedents and is exempt from the statutes that bind the rest of us, a day can be as long or short as the laws of political gravity demand.
That is how it came to pass that House Republicans in recent weeks declared the rest of the year one long day when it came to considering a challenge to President Trump’s tariffs. They would prefer to avoid votes on whether to scrap the levies, but the law says the House must consider them within a set period of time.
The obvious solution? Stop time.
It was hardly the first time congressional leaders have meddled with the laws of the universe for the sake of political expediency. By bending legislative time, House and Senate leaders have long found ways to buy themselves wiggle room for negotiation, preserve their prerogatives and shield their members from votes they would rather not have to cast.
-----------
Speaker Mike Johnson’s recent efforts to freeze time have been more conspicuous — and longer lasting. Last month, he quietly pushed through a provision that contained a calendar gimmick ensuring that no lawmaker could force a vote this year to end Mr. Trump’s tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico. He used the same trick on Wednesday to head off a vote until at least October on the global tariffs Mr. Trump announced last week and then partially paused.
The first measure stated that “each day for the remainder of the 119th Congress shall not constitute a calendar day” for the purposes of the emergency Mr. Trump declared on Feb. 1 to impose the tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico. The resolution approved on Wednesday used the same language to stop any member from forcing a vote on the rest of Mr. Trump’s tariffs through Sept. 30.
“When is a day not a day?” Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who was the only G.O.P. member to oppose both moves, wrote on social media. “Answer: when Congress circumvents the law requiring a vote on Presidential National Emergencies within 15 days.”
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 65,886
- 74,678
- 3,615
When did Shifty turn Asian?
I just figured you out.
You took the thread off topic to cover up the failed to perform 'No Kings' event.
Gotcha
OhPleaseJustQuit
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2021
- 73,869
- 86,967
- 3,488
.
So, Shifty thinks democracy looks like making noise and accomplishing nothing.
.
JusticeHammer
Platinum Member
- Apr 20, 2017
- 8,348
- 5,248
- 940
If that were true it would have been all over the news. Made up lists don't impress me.
Huge turnout. But I never put much into these protests other than they are a good sign that people are not happy. And we know Trump supporters aren't happy with everything Trump has done. Most of them say "I'm happy with most of or some of what he's done" They may even say they don't like how he's going about it. Like with ICE or with blowing up boats off Venezuela with zero proof or evidence those weren't just innocent people.The Democrats are going have nation wide "No Kings" protests on Oct 18th.
This will be fun to watch.
Organizers of the “No Kings” coalition announced a nationwide mobilization for October 18 that they say will be even larger than June’s historic day of action, when millions of people demonstrated across thousands of cities against President Donald Trump’s escalating authoritarian tactics. With over 2,110 protests planned across all 50 states, organizers predict the October actions will be the largest peaceful protest in modern American history.
So you may like what Trump said on the campaign trail but implementing he's not so good at. Look at the tariffs.
Republicans, everything this guy touches he ruins. What the **** is wrong with you people?
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 65,886
- 74,678
- 3,615
That brain dead mantra is so stupid.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
If we can bomb iran and remove its leader from the gene pool
- Started by Hurricanelover
- Replies: 1
-
-
Russia Remade Its Economy for War, but It’s Come at a Huge Cost - The New York Times- Started by peacefan
- Replies: 0
-
