No....Greenland annexation would not be he end of NATO

[Zincwarrior]

LOL.
Please describe this "major war" breaking out within NATO if the US annexed Greenland.

Please review NATO Article 5.

 

[konradv]

Making Greenland a protectorate of the United Stated just makes sense for all involved

It’s already a protectorate of NATO. I think they’re good.

 

[citygator]

First of all NATO is nothing without the US. Not monetarily and not militarily. Greenland will absolutely not survive for another decade as an independent territory of Denmark... It will become a vassal either of Russia or China... Most probably China...."Whether they like it or not"... China is not going to ask how they are feeling about it before they do it. Denmark is not going to do shit.... Maybe Greenland will send out a few harpoon boats?

The United states has a signed contract with Denmark that allows unlimited military expansion on the island. It is still valid.

Jo

Your ignorance is endless.

NATO collectively outspends Russia on defense by more than 3:1, even excluding the U.S.

Ukraine’s defense against Russia has been sustained largely by European supplies, training, intelligence, and funding, not just U.S. troops on the ground (which are zero).

Greenland is not an unprotected free agent — it sits under constant U.S. and allied surveillance.

China does not invade Arctic NATO territory; it uses trade and investment, which Greenland has already rejected with Danish and NATO backing.

Denmark doesn’t need to “do shit” militarily because deterrence already exists and works. The U.S. already has broad, legal defense access under existing agreements — annexation adds zero security value. The “China will just take it” line ignores geography, alliances, logistics, and reality.

 

[struth]

It’s already a protectorate of NATO. I think they’re good.

It should be of the United States

Better all around for all those involved

 

[Zincwarrior]

It should be of the United States

Better all around for all those involved

While I agree and don't see why Daneland doesn't sell at an obscene price to us, thats up to them. Attacking a fellow NATO member if they refuse is the height of insanity.

Setting aside that whole major war problem, it means the end of Europe buying goods and services from the US, and opens them even more to China.

 

[struth]

While I agree and don't see why Daneland doesn't sell at an obscene price to us, thats up to them. Attacking a fellow NATO member if they refuse is the height of insanity.

Setting aside that whole major war problem, it means the end of Europe buying goods and services from the US, and opens them even more to China.

Nobody is "attacking" a NATO member

 

[marvin martian]

First of all NATO is nothing without the US. Not monetarily and not militarily. Greenland will absolutely not survive for another decade as an independent territory of Denmark... It will become a vassal either of Russia or China... Most probably China...."Whether they like it or not"... China is not going to ask how they are feeling about it before they do it. Denmark is not going to do shit.... Maybe Greenland will send out a few harpoon boats?

The United states has a signed contract with Denmark that allows unlimited military expansion on the island. It is still valid.

Jo

What's wrong with the end of NATO? It's a useless, money-sucking, outdated drag on our resources.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Nobody is "attacking" a NATO member

That is literally what Trump is threatening.

 

[struth]

That is literally what Trump is threatening.

No, no he isn't. He literally ISN"T threating going to war with anyone over Greenland.

 

[Zincwarrior]

No, no he isn't. He literally ISN"T threating going to war with anyone over Greenland.

He has several times. I am not going through that nonsense again.

 

[struth]

He has several times. I am not going through that nonsense again.

Link to any time Trump said he was going to war with anyone for Greenland....I'll wait

 

[kyzr]

Please review NATO Article 5.

So we're supposed to kick Russia's or China's ass for Denmark?

Because we know that Denmark has no real military.

I think Trump is saying that if we're supposed to defend Greenland we might as well annex it.

 

[Mr Natural]

You’d think Denmark would be thankful for Trump taking the burden ofGreenland off their hands.

 

[Zincwarrior]

So we're supposed to kick Russia's or China's ass for Denmark?

For NATO. An attack on one NATO nation is an attack on all. Plus we already have troops there so they would be attacking us directly.

 

[Zincwarrior]

You’d think Denmark would be thankful for Trump taking the burden ofGreenland off their hands.

Yes actually, especially if they get $10B in gold for it.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Link to any time Trump said he was going to war with anyone for Greenland....I'll wait

There are twenty seven threads on this. You are free to purview the internet. I suggest searching "trump threatens Greenland"

 

[struth]

There are twenty seven threads on this. You are free to purview the internet. I suggest searching "trump threatens Greenland"

and I've read them all, and nobody has yet to provide me with a single quote from Trump saying he would go to war with anyone over greendland, that's why I asked you, when you again, claimed he did.

 

[kyzr]

For NATO. An attack on one NATO nation is an attack on all. Plus we already have troops there so they would be attacking us directly.

Denmark should be happy we're taking care of the defense of Greenland for them, so we might as well annex it.

 

[struth]

Denmark should be happy we're taking care of the defense of Greenland for them, so we might as well annex it.

basically, we should be able to get all the rewards, since we are spending all the money

 

[candycorn]

Why would a NATO country do that? What if Alaska allows Russian bases?

The blob supporters have gone ‘round the bend yet again it seems. What if the bahamas builds a Chinese sub pen? We going to take it over too on specualtion that they may?