No, Donald Trump Didn't Win Post-Debate 'Polls'

[jon_berzerk]

Wow, so Hillary should see a serious spike in her polls in the battleground states.

After her impressive victory on Monday night, what percentage of a lift is she going to get in the polls, would you say?

real polls or the ones the media puts together

--LOL

 

[Iceweasel]

Hillary also was wearing an ear piece, give hand signals to Lester and had the questions and canned responses laid out in from of her.

Must be why she needed a week to train for it.

 

[toxicmedia]

Post debate comprehensive polls.

Even Republimussen Reports can't even skew a poll enough to make Trump look like He's ahead. So thy settle for 1% behind and regroup to defend that

Clinton (D)
Trump (R)

Spread
RCP Average 9/15 - 9/28 -- -- 43.9 41.0 7.2 2.3 Clinton +2.9
Rasmussen ReportsRasmussen 9/26 - 9/28 1500 LV 2.5 42 41 7 2 Clinton +1
PPP (D)PPP (D) 9/27 - 9/28 933 LV 3.2 44 40 6 1 Clinton +4
Reuters/IpsosReuters 9/22 - 9/26 1041 LV 3.5 42 38 7 2 Clinton +4

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hillary also was wearing an ear piece, give hand signals to Lester and had the questions and canned responses laid out in from of her.

Must be why she needed a week to train for it.

They needed that long to test the different drug combinations

 

[Snouter]

Who gives a fuck about polls, The Donald won that debate. Next.

 

[namvet]

Amazing that the wingers have to be told this. But given the rants from trumpsters over the past couple of days, I guess it's necessary.

On Tuesday, after a less-than-stellar debate performance, Donald Trump returned to using one of his favorite measurements to mask his missteps on Monday night — the polls.

Except that the post-debate "polls" the GOP nominee and campaign kept touting that he won on social media, at his rally in Florida and in press releases aren't polls at all. They're essentially unscientific Internet popularity contests, are not weighted as to what the electorate will actually look like, and they have no predictive value. In fact, if you're worried about voter fraud, in many of these surveys people can vote multiple times and they can easily be rigged by Internet bots.

*snip images*

Many of the results he cited came from very Trump-friendly sites, such as Breitbart News and the Drudge Report. Some of these polls were shared by Trump supporters on reddit, encouraging people to go vote. These were not selective samples with any merit, and in no way could they accurately measure whether the more than 81 million people who tuned in for the debate thought Trump did better than Hillary Clinton.

Even though Fox News repeatedly touted the same results Trump trumpeted on air and online, Business Insider reported that the network's polling director, Dana Blanton, warned that such polls "do not meet our editorial standards":

"As most of the publications themselves clearly state, the sample obviously can't be representative of the electorate because they only reflect the views of those Internet users who have chosen to participate. ... Another problem — we know some campaigns/groups of supporters encourage people to vote in online polls and flood the results."

*more at link*

No, Donald Trump Didn't Win Post-Debate 'Polls'

go fuck yourself moron

 

[jon_berzerk]

--LOL

cnn has been forced to admit they fudged that poll

--LOL

 

[namvet]

Liberals are globalist pigs